The identity of the bitcoin founder.

[Husires]

While still deliberating on the issue i told them that i have already invested in bitcoin and some other Altcoins, i also made it very clearer to them that cryptocurrency is the only way out for financial freedom considering the lingering economic crisis.

Bitcoin is one of the tools for financial freedom, and it is the tool that helps you have wealth that helps you provide the basics without the need to work, but it is not the only tool.
Satoshi's identity is unknown, but the identity of many founders is known, and the identity of many developers of altcoin such as Ethereum and Litecoin is known. What difference would it make if Satoshi's identity was unknown, especially since if he returned, his decisions would not change much in Bitcoin.

[famososMuertos]

...//:::He came up with this question 'why is the identity of the bitcoin founder (Satoshi Nakamoto) remained unknown'?,  i will be very glad if any of the high ranked members can provide us with the answer so we can add it to our knowledge too. thanks.

That answer can be given by anyone users, it is not necessary to put "merits" to that user, everyone interprets it as they want, if you look in the mirror and pronounce bitcoin, there you have the answer of who SN is.

On the other hand, you are asking why, the reality is that the anonymity of SN is an intrinsic value to bitcoin. It is the letter of guarantee to that premise of anonymity, now, the small print is that this does not necessarily apply to all users of bitcoin.

#TBT Topic

[lionheart78]

He came up with this question 'why is the identity of the bitcoin founder (Satoshi Nakamoto) remained unknown'?,  i will be very glad if any of the high ranked members can provide us with the answer so we can add it to our knowledge too. thanks.

I believe no one knows the real reason why the founder of Bitcoin hid himself.  If there is someone who tells you the reason, it is more likely to be his own speculation or somehow he reads other people's articles trying to speculate the absence of Satoshi Nakamoto.

[Churchillvv]

I believe this question could be answered by Google but you decided to ask it here to get wide deliberation on why Satoshi decided to stay anonymous hence you have a lot answers that could really matter. But I will have to contribute my little idea of why he remains anonymous til date and perhaps all the answers here are mere speculations on what could be the reason since non of us here is Satoshi we can not get the exact reason why he did so except Satoshi himself will be the only one to have correct answer to that.

But from my own understanding, Satoshi is a big fan of freedom and for him to practice true freedom he must first remain anonymous to everyone. He would have also love to claim or revile his identity but the world is a wicked and dangerous place that one can be jailed for helping the world come out of the control system of governments, so he decided that instead of him to get into trouble for helping humanity he will rather stay unknown which he did.

To you OP A simple answer that you could have given to your friend is, Satoshi remain anonymous because he wants to be safe. Alot of agencies that work for the government would really want to detain him for sometime but he was smart enough to do his will without those stresses of questioning.