If you were a campaign manager would you select these members for campaigns?

[komisariatku]

Some names to consider:

==========
Campaign: bc.game
Member: JollyGood
Trust:    # +18 / =3 / -1
Reason: Has no semantic value
==========

[1714670540]

1714670540

[1714670540]

1714670540

[stompix]

The reality is that 2nd page up to the 20th page isn't always read by organic visitors from the internet.
I think campaign managers should consider users who always post on the first page because they are the first to be noticed.

This thing will destroy the forum!

Since most are interested in just getting paid to post no matter what they will simply start a hundred topics a day to have for themselves, their "family", and their friends an opportunity to post in the first two pages, then completely abandon the topic and opening a new one each day. It will end with some accounts posting the same thing in 30 topic a week, the only difference being a paraphrased title for those topics.

Who bothers to read these posts except for other Gambling board spammers?

I doubt even that happens!
I am rather curious on what would be the percentage of active posters in that section that actually gamble! I would say it would be an easy bet on 20% not knowing what an over/under or a double chance is.

[Rikafip]

Ever since M!xers were expelled, some good and average posters are still looking for the campaign to join, while some have but want to switch for the better.

You want to say that there are good posters who were unable to join any signature campaign since the beginning of the year, despite them being active and constantly applying? Yeah right.

I am rather curious on what would be the percentage of active posters in that section that actually gamble! I would say it would be an easy bet on 20% not knowing what an over/under or a double chance is.

Not that they don't gamble, but majority don't even watch the sports they are commenting. 

[JackpotRacer]

It's a shame. There are already too many spammers/shitposters in some sections like the Gambling one but not only, posting random off-topic, nonsense, low value or irrelevant content, or just repeating what they've read in the previous pages of the thread from other posters. So the forum doesn't need users posting AI generated posts on top of that. In my opinion, campaigns enrolling or maintaining such spammers should be banned or restricted to a very limited number of participants. Otherwise campaign managers accepting this shouldn't be allowed to manage a campaign here anymore, at least.

Finally someone states it and is not afraid to shout it from the rooftops. It has been an old problem for many years and nothing has been done about it until today. Sad but true

Chapeau @Saint-loup

[EarnOnVictor]

Ever since M!xers were expelled, some good and average posters are still looking for the campaign to join, while some have but want to switch for the better.

You want to say that there are good posters who were unable to join any signature campaign since the beginning of the year, despite them being active and constantly applying? Yeah right.

Not at all, you got the whole of it wrong perhaps since you brought this out of an excerpt. I was just explaining what happened at times when a running campaign that was formerly CFNP becomes OPEN again where the campaign manager might need one or two participants to fill some space up. In this campaign having opened it again, I do see enough good-quality posters applying but since there was a limited space to fill up, the CM would have to choose the needed few. This is even as shitposters could be many in that campaign, and fine, good posters will surely get another campaign sooner or later after then.

However, the gist is that if the CM is fully aware of the shitposters with their plainly annoying posts, just because more quality posters applied upon the reopening of the campaign, he would have had the chance to replace them easily. This is just to clarify that it is not always about the scarcity of quality posters at times but the overwhelmingness of the CMs just as I indicated in my first post.

[Rikafip]

I was just explaining what happened at times when a running campaign that was formerly CFNP becomes OPEN again where the campaign manager might need one or two participants to fill some space up. In this campaign having opened it again, I do see enough good-quality posters applying but since there was a limited space to fill up, the CM would have to choose the needed few.

Just because every once in a while good poster is out of the campaign for a short period of time, it doesn't mean that there's not enough spots for good posters.

This is just to clarify that it is not always about the scarcity of quality posters at times but the overwhelmingness of the CMs just as I indicated in my first post.

True, its not always about scarcitty, sometimes its about laziness to weed out shitposters from their own campaign (perfect example of that being the campaign you are part of).

[Sandra_hakeem]

I could list dozens, probably a hundred examples for the community to analyze--but why bother?  The only opinion that matters as far as whether any shitposting moron gets into a campaign is the manager, not the rest of us who don't manage campaigns. 

Definitely not for us -- but TP, don't you think it'd go a long way if we took it upon ourselves to reveal the ones we've known? ^{[if y'all could be less sentimental and more realistic]}, y'all would realize that most of these accounts are managed by the companies themselves..Yikes! Nobody wants to be termed a "rebel" for not soothing up their secrets with some infinitesimal delusions ^{[especially since most of them are active users]}

Give 'em hell, JollyGood!

he's been so relentless... A couple of elite don't even reckon him - tell me the forum is selectively imbalanced without telling me?

[SatoPrincess]

if y'all could be less sentimental and more realistic, y'all would realize that most of these accounts are managed by the companies themselves.

Are you saying the companies are behind the alt accounts in their campaign? I doubt that’s likely because of the merit system. They would have to spend a significant amount of time and effort into building those accounts. That would mean the company would have to start building accounts 3-6months before launching a campaign. That is too much work just to cut campaign costs. I don’t think any reputable company will have any problem splashing some money on advertising.

[JollyGood]

It is good to read the activity in the thread but unfortunately no names have been added to the mix. Hopefully members will add a name or two and allows to read what they are doing and if it even warrants the amount of pay they are receiving from campaigns as they spam their way to meeting their signature quota.

Hopefully some names might be added to further the discussion.

[JollyGood]

The post below was deleted but archived in the #2 post in this thread.

~

[JackpotRacer]

The post below was deleted but archived in the #2 post in this thread.

~

Please explain what was wrong with my question? Did I offend anyone? Why deleting it without any answer?
are those postings acceptable for a Signature campaign?