Jollygood is a person who feels great, even though he is just a narcissistic

[PytagoraZ]

Jollygood, accused someone and deliberately locked the thread so that he could influence other people and did not want to be debated on his statement.

Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5493610.0

So, he is nothing but a loser who only dares to express an opinion, but does not dare to argue, reason logically, and debate.

Jollygood is nothing more than a narcissist who feels he is the truest, most valuable, and most trusted member. Even though it's easy to see other people's mistakes by looking at Ninjastic, he doesn't have any good posts so that's all he can do.

Jolly, im back  , lets fight 

[1714800788]

1714800788

[1714800788]

1714800788

[1714800788]

1714800788

[_act_]

On the signature campaign that I am presently, someone came to accuse BitcoinGirl.Club and making reference to the locked topic. If the thread was not locked, it is possible that the discussion may or may not favour Jollygood. If it does not favour Jollygood, that person will not come to troll on the campaign thread. It would have been better for Jollygood to leave the thread unlocked. I do not expect a reputable member to do what he did.

[PytagoraZ]

On the signature campaign that I am presently, someone came to accuse BitcoinGirl.Club and making reference to the locked topic. If the thread was not locked, it is possible that the discussion may or may not favour Jollygood. If it does not favour Jollygood, that person will not come to troll on the campaign thread. It would have been better for Jollygood to leave the thread unlocked. I do not expect a reputable member to do what he did.

Jollygood gave an example, the way to accuse someone is to create an accusation thread and lock it. Someone can copy what it does and then use it as a reference to provide negative tags

[Don Pedro Dinero]

It would have been better for Jollygood to leave the thread unlocked. I do not expect a reputable member to do what he did.

I agree with this. I didn't quite understand why he created that thread and locked it. I think it would have been better to leave it open for discussion, although nothing prevents someone from creating a parallel thread in this section to discuss the topic (it won't be me, to avoid dramas).

[examplens]

It would have been better for Jollygood to leave the thread unlocked. I do not expect a reputable member to do what he did.

I agree with this. I didn't quite understand why he created that thread and locked it. I think it would have been better to leave it open for discussion, although nothing prevents someone from creating a parallel thread in this section to discuss the topic (it won't be me, to avoid dramas).

The topic is quite pointless and I understand why it was locked immediately.
I didn't see any accusations there, but only a statement that BitcoinGirl.Club was put on distrust by several members.

although nothing prevents someone from creating a parallel thread in this section to discuss the topic (it won't be me, to avoid dramas).

@PytagoraZ did it 

[PytagoraZ]

It would have been better for Jollygood to leave the thread unlocked. I do not expect a reputable member to do what he did.

I agree with this. I didn't quite understand why he created that thread and locked it. I think it would have been better to leave it open for discussion, although nothing prevents someone from creating a parallel thread in this section to discuss the topic (it won't be me, to avoid dramas).

This is clearly a bad action by Jolly. I honestly wasn't surprised by his actions because I never thought he was a qualified and reputable member.

Let's wait what reason he has for locking the thread, because he has locked it for 2 days. But I'm not sure he'll give a good reason, or even comment here because he usually only comments on threads where many members support him.

As far as I know, only icopress really likes him and always gives him campaigns.

It would have been better for Jollygood to leave the thread unlocked. I do not expect a reputable member to do what he did.

I agree with this. I didn't quite understand why he created that thread and locked it. I think it would have been better to leave it open for discussion, although nothing prevents someone from creating a parallel thread in this section to discuss the topic (it won't be me, to avoid dramas).

The topic is quite pointless and I understand why it was locked immediately.
I didn't see any accusations there, but only a statement that BitcoinGirl.Club was put on distrust by several members.

It was a post created to direct the masses not to trust bitcoingirls. If the topic is useless then the op can delete it, but jolly deliberately left it alone and deliberately locked it because it aims to damage bitcoingirls' reputation, this is a reputation board so whatever is here is related to that. Do you understand?

[lovesmayfamilis]

Yes, most likely he had exactly this goal: to convey to the community an incident that happened in the company’s signature. I first learned about this from his thread. But yes, I probably should have left the topic open, for the usual throwing of insults, as is usually the case, and for buying popcorn for the observers. 

PytagoraZ, it would be too dubious for you to call him a failure. Do you have a mirror? By the way, in your new account, don’t be so noticeable so as not to arouse Jolly’s suspicion, as happened with this account.
Although I'm sorry about what happened to you.

[LoyceV]

This is clearly a bad action by Jolly.

I agree it would have been better to keep the thread open. But it looks like you're just throwing dirt because JollyGood was the first one to call you out on your Trust Summary page. If you cared about BitcoinGirl.Club's case, you would have picked a different title.

[PytagoraZ]

PytagoraZ, it would be too dubious for you to call him a failure. Do you have a mirror? By the way, in your new account, don’t be so noticeable so as not to arouse Jolly’s suspicion, as happened with this account.
Although I'm sorry about what happened to you.

Alt account? Good advice, I don't have any at the moment. but maybe one day I will have it. lol

This is clearly a bad action by Jolly.

I agree it would have been better to keep the thread open. But it looks like you're just throwing dirt because JollyGood was the first one to call you out on your Trust Summary page. If you cared about BitcoinGirl.Club's case, you would have picked a different title.

I don't care about reputation anymore, but what Jolly did was a bad act that influenced mass opinion with the aim of damaging Bitcoingirl's reputation. From what I learned about trust systems in your thread, trust systems are used to prevent someone from cheating other members of their money. I've never cheated anyone of money so I don't think I have anything to fear.

With the neg trust that I have, I'm just here to discuss without any monetary reward behind it. I always like people who like to discuss even if they have different opinions, but Jolly is not the type of person who likes to discuss, maybe because his intellect is below average. 

[JackpotRacer]

IMO @JollyGood instead of making a post and locking it, he could make a self moderated thread. It is clearly a very bad example he has set.

Anyone could take his example now (yes, even me) and open such a thread. what then? Yes, many accusations and no one can defend himself except to do the same. LOL

[PytagoraZ]

IMO @JollyGood instead of making a post and locking it, he could make a self moderated thread. It is clearly a very bad example he has set.

Anyone could take his example now (yes, even me) and open such a thread. what then? Yes, many accusations and no one can defend himself except to do the same. LOL

That's an example of a DT who people say has a good reputation and can be trusted, but who commits stupid and anti-critical actions. So, is there still trust in people like that? I know not all DTs are like that, but Jolly has abused a lot of trust system

[JackpotRacer]

IMO @JollyGood instead of making a post and locking it, he could make a self moderated thread. It is clearly a very bad example he has set.

Anyone could take his example now (yes, even me) and open such a thread. what then? Yes, many accusations and no one can defend himself except to do the same. LOL

That's an example of a DT who people say has a good reputation and can be trusted, but who commits stupid and anti-critical actions. So, is there still trust in people like that? I know not all DTs are like that, but Jolly has abused a lot of trust system

You are absolutely right and narcissist is IMO a compliment because what @JollyGood is doing is much worse. He is actually afraid of members who criticize him and shuts them out by locking the thread immediately after one post.

[nutildah]

By the way, in your new account, don’t be so noticeable so as not to arouse Jolly’s suspicion, as happened with this account.
Although I'm sorry about what happened to you.

Alt account? Good advice, I don't have any at the moment. but maybe one day I will have it. lol

C'mon man, give it up. Its so completely obvious what happened with your komisariatku account. You (he) posted as komisariatku not just once but twice on accident, and you even told shasan that the accounts didn't know each other. LOL. I do not think you're in any type of position to call anyone a narcissist given how brazen (and annoying) you were as a "newbie," and as you refuse to admit you got caught slippin. That's a classic sign of a narcissist: the inability to admit when one was wrong.

Next time (and I have no doubt you've started a new account already), try to be more humble, and don't interject yourself in reputational matters that don't concern you... That's a dead giveaway that a newbie is an alt... Among other things, which I won't disclose as they are "proprietary trade secrets."

[PytagoraZ]

By the way, in your new account, don’t be so noticeable so as not to arouse Jolly’s suspicion, as happened with this account.
Although I'm sorry about what happened to you.

Alt account? Good advice, I don't have any at the moment. but maybe one day I will have it. lol

C'mon man, give it up. Its so completely obvious what happened with your komisariatku account. You (he) posted as komisariatku not just once but twice on accident, and you even told shasan that the accounts didn't know each other. LOL. I do not think you're in any type of position to call anyone a narcissist given how brazen (and annoying) you were as a "newbie," and as you refuse to admit you got caught slippin. That's a classic sign of a narcissist: the inability to admit when one was wrong.

Next time (and I have no doubt you've started a new account already), try to be more humble, and don't interject yourself in reputational matters that don't concern you... That's a dead giveaway that a newbie is an alt... Among other things, which I won't disclose as they are "proprietary trade secrets."

Of course there is no prohibition for me having an opinion in this forum, and do you think Jolly's actions are correct and should be used as an example by other members?

I don't think there is anything that needs to be explained further because there is already an explanation in your thread about what actually happened between me and komisariatku. Our relationship has also improved and I have compensated for the losses caused by my mistakes.

I don't hate you and you are still on my trust list even though you don't trust me. I don't care about other people's views because I have my own views. But for jolly? even he didn't dare to come here and comment because he knew his actions were something inappropriate

[nutildah]

do you think Jolly's actions are correct and should be used as an example by other members?

Not always, no. But he was spot on when it came to his neutral feedback on you, the 1st left by anybody:

JollyGood

2023-07-05

Reference

This "PytagoraZ" account was created less than a month ago but seems to know a lot about the forum and members. I suspect a farm/alt-account trying to increase rank as fast as possible probably for signature campaign enrolment. This feedback will be edited after his motivations become known.

I don't think there is anything that needs to be explained further because there is already an explanation in your thread about what actually happened between me and komisariatku.

An explanation that nobody believes.

Our relationship has also improved and I have compensated for the losses caused by my mistakes.

Congratulations

I don't hate you and you are still on my trust list even though you don't trust me.

Good. I don't hate you either; I don't hate anyone on this forum - there's nothing here that's worth getting that upset over - but anyone who lands on my distrust list does so for a reason.

[PytagoraZ]

do you think Jolly's actions are correct and should be used as an example by other members?

Not always, no. But he was spot on when it came to his neutral feedback on you, the 1st left by anybody:

JollyGood

2023-07-05

Reference

This "PytagoraZ" account was created less than a month ago but seems to know a lot about the forum and members. I suspect a farm/alt-account trying to increase rank as fast as possible probably for signature campaign enrolment. This feedback will be edited after his motivations become known.

I don't think there is anything that needs to be explained further because there is already an explanation in your thread about what actually happened between me and komisariatku.

An explanation that nobody believes.

Our relationship has also improved and I have compensated for the losses caused by my mistakes.

Congratulations

I don't hate you and you are still on my trust list even though you don't trust me.

Good. I don't hate you either; I don't hate anyone on this forum - there's nothing here that's worth getting that upset over - but anyone who lands on my distrust list does so for a reason.

Thank you for not hating me. I don't like Jolly because of the abuse he does, and the worst thing is when he creates threads to ruin someone's reputation and locks the thread. His bad actions were even imitated by other members, very bad

If I hated JG because of the tag he gave me, then you should be the first person I hated, but I didn't.

I guess you also don't agree with what JG did, but you chose to play it safe. So I'm here to speak out about his terrible actions

Regarding the true story that happened to me, komisariatku has explained many things. Believe it or not, it's your right. Moreover, negative tags don't limit me in discussing, because I like discussing so it is not a serious problem.

[JackpotRacer]

I don't hate you and you are still on my trust list even though you don't trust me.

Good. I don't hate you either; I don't hate anyone on this forum - there's nothing here that's worth getting that upset over - but anyone who lands on my distrust list does so for a reason.

Why so many colors? Hmm, I remember that many people did not like colored text and attacked me when I used it. So colored text looks very useful to me.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5489235.0

[nutildah]

Regarding the true story that happened to me, komisariatku has explained many things. Believe it or not, it's your right. Moreover, negative tags don't limit me in discussing, because I like discussing so it is not a serious problem.

He is a controversial figure indeed but at this point in time I feel the positive contributions he added to the forum via his feedbacks outweigh the negatives, so he will remain in my trust list. Yes, you're still free to discuss what you want, nobody is going to argue with you about that.

Why so many colors? Hmm, I remember that many people did not like colored text and attacked me when I used it. So colored text looks very useful to me.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5489235.0

You really think I'm the one that choses "so many colors" for LoyceV's forum tool?

Or you're just complaining about the use of non-black text? You should clone Loyce's site and change the text to black or some shade of gray, surely that would solve this very important problem.

[JackpotRacer]

Regarding the true story that happened to me, komisariatku has explained many things. Believe it or not, it's your right. Moreover, negative tags don't limit me in discussing, because I like discussing so it is not a serious problem.

He is a controversial figure indeed but at this point in time I feel the positive contributions he added to the forum via his feedbacks outweigh the negatives, so he will remain in my trust list. Yes, you're still free to discuss what you want, nobody is going to argue with you about that.

Why so many colors? Hmm, I remember that many people did not like colored text and attacked me when I used it. So colored text looks very useful to me.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5489235.0

You really think I'm the one that choses "so many colors" for LoyceV's forum tool?

Or you're just complaining about the use of non-black text? You should clone Loyce's site and change the text to black or some shade of gray, surely that would solve this very important problem.

Do you really get paid even 1 Satoshi for this post of yours in the reputation thread?/b]
 
if yes it would be a Shame

at least I get paid for my Signature wherever I post

[PytagoraZ]

Regarding the true story that happened to me, komisariatku has explained many things. Believe it or not, it's your right. Moreover, negative tags don't limit me in discussing, because I like discussing so it is not a serious problem.

He is a controversial figure indeed but at this point in time I feel the positive contributions he added to the forum via his feedbacks outweigh the negatives, so he will remain in my trust list. Yes, you're still free to discuss what you want, nobody is going to argue with you about that.

Yes, it's your choice to trust him or not, but I'm sure it's only a matter of time until people's realize the mistake that Jolly made.

I acknowledge your abilities, lovesmyfamilies and several other members who have good abilities and views and are worthy of being DT. But for me it's still not for Jolly