Does your Sig-Camp Manager counts gambling posts that moved to off topic

[The Cryptovator]

By default, any company won't count the posts whose signatures aren't displayed. So the manager won't count your post there because they aren't actually paying for your post; they are paying for the visibility of their signature ads. So every manager adds these points to their rules, though each manager has different rules and terms. When I was managing the signature campaign, I wasn't accepting posts where the signature wasn't visible. So before joining the campaign, you must read the rules. If, during the post count, the thread where you replied moved to the off-topic section, then it will be considered an off-topic post. It doesn't matter where you made the post. 

[1715539955]

1715539955

[1715539955]

1715539955

[1715539955]

1715539955

[1715539955]

1715539955

[Darker45]

By default, any company won't count the posts whose signatures aren't displayed. So the manager won't count your post there because they aren't actually paying for your post; they are paying for the visibility of their signature ads. So every manager adds these points to their rules, though each manager has different rules and terms. When I was managing the signature campaign, I wasn't accepting posts where the signature wasn't visible. So before joining the campaign, you must read the rules. If, during the post count, the thread where you replied moved to the off-topic section, then it will be considered an off-topic post. It doesn't matter where you made the post. 

Signatures are actually visible in the Off-topic section. So the reason why posts made in the Off-topic section won't be counted is not that signatures aren't visible there. It's more likely because the Off-topic section is probably one of the least visited sections. It might also be one of the sections with low activity. Also, since the section isn't really focused on a certain topic or field, not even directly related to Bitcoin or crypto, there probably aren't loyal posters.

[coin-investor]

I've been through a lot of signature campaigns and the majority of campaign managers, discourage people from creating topics or posting on threads that will likely land off-topic, it's not good for the product or services they are promoting as off-topic sections do not generate views and traffic.

The Majority of my posts landed on off-topic sections so some of my posts are not counted, I understand this and I cannot argue on this issue, because that's the rule of the campaign and there's no exception as long as you are part of the campaign.

We have no control over this and we just have to continue posting naturally and pick the topics that are relevant to the category where the posts are counted.

[dothebeats]

Most of the signature campaign managers that I've worked with do not count these posts as valid. If within the week, your posts are still in the gambling section and was moved to off-topic at the start of the next week, those posts are still paid and will not affect your post count on the next week. It makes their work a lot easier, plus, if it's something that isn't considered a gambling thread, why would they even pay for it anyway? It's not helpful for the service to pay for posts that are considered off-topic and may even be bad for their promotion overall.

Just think lf this, why would a company pay for a product that doesn't meet their requirement and criteria? They'd be losing money if they do that since anyone can introduce their product and the company will just pay for it anyway.

[Beparanf]

I've been through a lot of signature campaigns and the majority of campaign managers, discourage people from creating topics or posting on threads that will likely land off-topic, it's not good for the product or services they are promoting as off-topic sections do not generate views and traffic.

This is always a tricky part on the recent mass moving of gambling related post in off topic because technically speaking those topic is indeed gambling topics. The reason why it moves to off topic is probably due to recycled content that is more worthy to be locked or move to thrash can rather than put on off topic since it’s really not an off topic on gambling board.

I don’t have much post on this moved topic since it’s noticeable what kind of topic which the mods don’t like.

@OP probably you are looking on previous week campaign spreadsheet and check someone post history that has an off topic to it that will not meet the quota for that time. The answer is already mention by some user, those post was on gambling board the time manager counts it. It probably just moved after the post count for that week.

[EarnOnVictor]

By default, any company won't count the posts whose signatures aren't displayed. So the manager won't count your post there because they aren't actually paying for your post; they are paying for the visibility of their signature ads. So every manager adds these points to their rules, though each manager has different rules and terms. When I was managing the signature campaign, I wasn't accepting posts where the signature wasn't visible. So before joining the campaign, you must read the rules. If, during the post count, the thread where you replied moved to the off-topic section, then it will be considered an off-topic post. It doesn't matter where you made the post. 

Signatures are actually visible in the Off-topic section. So the reason why posts made in the Off-topic section won't be counted is not that signatures aren't visible there. It's more likely because the Off-topic section is probably one of the least visited sections. It might also be one of the sections with low activity. Also, since the section isn't really focused on a certain topic or field, not even directly related to Bitcoin or crypto, there probably aren't loyal posters.

That's a very good point, despite the visibility of the campaign signature there, most campaign managers (if not all) clearly state that they will not count the posts in that section which I do not think is cool. The main reason why this persisted is that there are so few activities in this section of the forum, but this must have been aggravated further the reason the section is less attractive due to the lack of appreciation there by the CMs.

Think of it, if campaign managers start making the posts in the section count today, you can imagine the increased traffic the section will garner within a short period. The fact that it's a section with many discussions is a good reason why people may visit it and locate what they feel to reply to therein.

[KingsDen]

I know some of you noticed that some of the threads or topics from the gambling discussion section were moved to the off-topic section. Well, I haven't experienced having any of my posts moved to the off-topic section. I just want to ask, if this has already happened to you, does your signature campaign manager still count or pay for posts that have been moved to the off-topic section?

When I read the title, I thought you were going to ask someone different from what you have asked. For your question, it is obvious that campaign managers don't count off topic posts. But, I have heard some users complain to me how some managers deny them payment maybe because one out of their 25 posts for the week was moved to off topic. You know the campaigns that doesn't pay per post, they only pay when you meet a certain post requirement. My only advice to them is they should make posts above the requirements incase of off topics and deletion. But I don't think it's so nice that someone is denied payment just because of 1 off topic post.

[Poker Player]

A post that has been moved to off topic is as if it was written there. I don't think my manager when he counts posts stops to think if the ones in off topic have been moved there or were originally written there. So no, I don't think he pays for posts moved to off topic.

[Eternad]

My only advice to them is they should make posts above the requirements incase of off topics and deletion. But I don't think it's so nice that someone is denied payment just because of 1 off topic post.

Some campaign manager is very strict when it comes to post quota. Missing 1 post will cause you to missed pay day for that week especially during the time when the moderator on gambling board do a massive thread move to off-topic board.

Luckily, My manager is one of the best manager that consider effort of post when this kind of shit happened. You’re that 1 missed post is worthy for a consideration to receive partial payment due to the effort done.

[Pmalek]

That's a very good point, despite the visibility of the campaign signature there, most campaign managers (if not all) clearly state that they will not count the posts in that section which I do not think is cool.

I think that it's completely understandable that posts in off-topic don't count. The name of the sub-forum tells you why. It's for discussions unrelated to Bitcoin or crypto in general. The purpose of your signature is for it to be visible in sections where there is valuable traffic and users talk about Bitcoin-related topics. Despite the signatures being shown in off-topic, it's of no interest to anyone.

Imagine placing a big billboard with your ad in the sewers. No one is going to see that except a few sewage workers. On the other hand, placing it on the side of the highway generates much more interest.

[TheUltraElite]

Luckily, My manager is one of the best manager that consider effort of post when this kind of shit happened. You’re that 1 missed post is worthy for a consideration to receive partial payment due to the effort done.

I still dont see the reason not to do some extra posts in sections that you normally visit. A number of surplus posts are only helping the site that you are promoting and in case a bunch of your posts get moved you have some buffer to save yourself from missing out a week's payment. Managers may be generous in this regard but participants should not take their generosity for granted.

I usually keep a count of my posts every few days and before the week ends so I am making extra posts beyond my weekly quota.

[jrrsparkles]

If they mentioned posts in off-topic will not be counted then which is clear any posts that's in your history at the payday will not be counted for paid posts and no need to get confused with that. So anyone who is concerned about their posts being moved to off-topic can take their time before jumping into posting on every thread that has been created in the gambling discussion.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

My only advice to them is they should make posts above the requirements incase of off topics and deletion. But I don't think it's so nice that someone is denied payment just because of 1 off topic post.

That's the only solution to this, ideally we shouldn't be making an exact number of post that is being asked by us from our managers because we're posting on a thread that anything can happen to the thread without we having a say. The OP can decide to move his thread to any board that he feel, fits more for the discussion or the moderators can do that too. Beside when someone always makes an exact number of post needed by the campaign week in and out (to me it simply sends the message that this user is posting just to get paid). The rules says make this quantity of post to receive this quantity of reward so if you didn't meet up the cut off post, you aren't entitled to receive payment and the manager is on his every right to denied you payment. It must not always have to be nice but that's the rules and to avoid that, make more posts.

Some campaign manager is very strict when it comes to post quota. Missing 1 post will cause you to missed pay day for that week especially during the time when the moderator on gambling board do a massive thread move to off-topic board.

It's your duty as an employee of your campaign to post in the threads that'll be of value to the campaign, you don't have to comment on every thread that you come across as some of them are worthless, read through the threads before replying and you'll know if the threads fits right in the gambling board or not. If you do this, you can be the one to report the thread to moderator for it to get move to the right board. Campaigns are spending money on advertisement so we should give them good value for their money.

[SatoPrincess]

The companies who come to advertise here want to see the results of the money they spend on signature campaigns. It’s unfair to expect that you should be paid for posts that are moved to off-topic, knowing that the off-topic section does not have much relevance and most likely the target audience of your campaign are not visiting that part of the forum. It’s not difficult to tell what topic is low quality and should be moved to trash or off-topic, I think members have gotten used to the fact that the gambling board is a spam site and are complaining now that mods are cleaning the board.

 I think signature participants should show more interest in promoting the campaigns they are in, by this I mean posting more than the required weekly quota and participating in discussions that are interesting to read, not mega threads because this does not give the campaign much exposure.

[Z-tight]

But I don't think it's so nice that someone is denied payment just because of 1 off topic post.

What we think is nice or not does not matter in this case, most campaign managers reserve the right to deny any participant payment and even remove them without notice, it is their rules and if we don't like it we should not join the campaign. Off-topic posts are not counted and that is that, and if there is a minimum post requirement and you do not reach it, then the manager would not be doing anything bad if they deny you payment, it is up to them.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

Do we really need a mega thread about this? I'm not saying it's a mega thread now but the answer is already clear: no, managers don't count those posts, and apart from a few comments and nuances I don't think there is anything to add. I think it would be better if the OP locked the thread.