Harmful effect of robot to the world.

[justdimin]

Nowadays countries are improving with technology robots have both good and bad aspects. Instead of depending on it you have to improve yourself and use these robots. But in fact these devices are becoming so efficient at doing their jobs that we may end up extinct just by accidentally or unintentionally misusing them. Many believe that this technology may one day go beyond human control manifest itself as an entity.

I do agree that instead of fearing what AI or robotic world could turn us into and what kind of dangers that could hold, we should consider that we are not going to end up with a much better situation if we just learn to use it. Imagine a future where AI and robots are quite common, they are the workers basically, do you think that people who fear them would be doing better than people who know how to make money?

I think it should be considered that people who know how to use them would be able to make money, they will be getting everything as much as possible and we are going to end up making as much profit as we possibly could if we could just learn to use them and we should definitely consider that as an option. It is just much better situation to get better in the end.

[1715257119]

1715257119

[1715257119]

1715257119

[1715257119]

1715257119

[1715257119]

1715257119

[1715257119]

1715257119

[Queentoshi]

In the next 10 years there will be high rate of unemployment in the world because job's that should be done by humans are now given to robots and by so doing it will also affect the economy of the world.

Because of this early realization, I believe that every employee in any field and company where their jobs can quickly be replaced by robots should quickly begin to find out ways to improve on their skill level that they become almost indispensable to the company. Even when the robots take over, they cannot run continuously without maintenance, and humans will be required to run this maintenance.
If you upgrade your skills to the relevant ones for the future, you will have better job security.

[mamesso]

The use of robot in the world is really affecting the economy and also causing unemployment.

Who can guarantee that robots can continue to be productive in doing work that is usually done by humans for 10 years without any disappointment for their owners. It cannot be denied that technological developments such as the presence of robots have had a significant impact on various aspects of human life, but not all work carried out by humans can be replaced by robots. Humans as social creatures have the ability to interact and use complex skills such as emotions, creativity in solving problems because they are equipped with thinking powers that robots do not have. In general, humans have an important role in society and the world of work.

Robots are not competitors for human survival, I see them more in a positive direction, like partners for humans. Jobs that are difficult for humans to do, such as those that have a high level of risk or jobs that can threaten human safety, can be replaced by robots, so the presence of robots cannot be completely considered a threat because their presence can increase human safety.

Even though the presence of robots can pose a risk of increasing unemployment for humans, humans remain the main choice and play an important role in the employment sector. The role of humans in terms of creativity, using the mind to solve problems, emotions and caution cannot be replaced.

[Darker45]

I equate robots with machines. And I assume the advent of machines in human society has created more jobs rather than lessen it. The growth of society, modernization itself, is mainly driven by the rise of complicated machines. Ironically, these machines meant jobs. Factories have spread all over the world because of machines. Mass production is made possible to a great extent by machines. And they created jobs. Computers are machines and rather than taking away jobs, they made so many of them.

[Miles2006]

The use of robot in the world is really affecting the economy and also causing unemployment.
If you build a company and you are making 1 million dollars as profit every month and then spends 6000 thousand dollars to pay your works and then you are given the opportunity to buy robots for 1 million dollars that will do the jobs your works are doing without it having faults for 10 years won't you go for it there by sacking your workers.
In the next 10 years there will be high rate of unemployment in the world because job's that should be done by humans are now given to robots and by so doing it will also affect the economy of the world.

The use of robot in an organization or company varies like in most countries I don't see this happening sooner or later mostly in an underdevelop country cause not all companies can make such huge amount 1 million dollars as profit except op is referring to classic organizations but still I can't trust robots to carry out my task, despite the world development and new inventions the use of robot will be the least thing if I own any company. Services rendered by robots can never be in a cooperative way so why should I trust a robot, secondly humans will always fear and lament about the use of robot and this is just the honest truth about a digital era when humans service will no longer be valid

[stompix]

So you feel my topic is stupid

It's not just me and it's not just this topic of yours, all are stupid and everyone thinks so, that's reality!
You need to go out of your house, you need to study real economy not tiktok education and you have to look at history!
All your ideas look like some 6yo finally got access to the internet!

Judging from your same example, paying $6000 every month to workers is cheaper than acquiring a robot that will work for you for 10 years without fault. At the price of $1,000,000, your monthly worker's salary will be $720,000 in 10 years, which means you still have about $280,000 in wasted resources that could have been put to good use.
 

Do you think he actually checked the numbers?

He just threw some around thinking he knew what he was talking about when in reality it's so complicated 100 lines would barely scratch the tip of it.
What kind of business, how many workers are required, what do you pay in extra taxes, what would be the maintenance for the robot, how much would that robot cover at a high demand hour, how many extra workers do you till need in peak season, but most important than everything, how would this math look when you have the robot for 5 years and meanwhile the wages have doubled...

It's such a complex subject you can't just throw a phrase and think you know it all!

[CageMabok]

The use of robot in the world is really affecting the economy and also causing unemployment.
If you build a company and you are making 1 million dollars as profit every month and then spends 6000 thousand dollars to pay your works and then you are given the opportunity to buy robots for 1 million dollars that will do the jobs your works are doing without it having faults for 10 years won't you go for it there by sacking your workers.
In the next 10 years there will be high rate of unemployment in the world because job's that should be done by humans are now given to robots and by so doing it will also affect the economy of the world.

I also thought that robots would replace humans in some jobs that previously relied on human expertise to get good results. So at this time I am also quite sure that several large companies in the world are definitely conducting research and experiments on this matter in order to see how much profit the company can get when they use robots by hiring some of their own workers. Because this really needs to be tested very well in order to find out more profitable conditions when companies no longer rely on human expertise as their workers.

Apart from that, the company also needs to know the cost of maintaining the robot and the lifespan of the robot itself in terms of completing work and how long a job can be completed properly by the robot. If the company finds that the costs for maintaining the robot are cheaper, the service life tends to be longer and the job completion rate can be faster. I think it would not be wrong for companies to replace human workers with robot workers because this would also be more profitable for them as company owners.

And regarding the problem of increasing unemployment due to the implementation of this, I think most humans will also continue to improve their knowledge and skills which cannot be done by robots so that they can still have a more decent job with income that continues to flow into their lives. Because unemployment will only be more visible when many people don't want to work and don't know what to do, but as long as every human being is still willing to work and create their own business, I don't think there will be a greater level of unemployment in the future.

[lovesmayfamilis]

That is why it is now necessary to have a high level of education to control these robots or obtain a profession in which robots cannot replace humans. But the prospect of being pushed aside by a robot has existed for a very long time. Take, for example, Amazon, which robotized its services and fired several thousand people. However, obtaining higher qualifications is necessary to still be in demand as more than a robot.

[Beparanf]

The use of robot in the world is really affecting the economy and also causing unemployment.
If you build a company and you are making 1 million dollars as profit every month and then spends 6000 thousand dollars to pay your works and then you are given the opportunity to buy robots for 1 million dollars that will do the jobs your works are doing without it having faults for 10 years won't you go for it there by sacking your workers.
In the next 10 years there will be high rate of unemployment in the world because job's that should be done by humans are now given to robots and by so doing it will also affect the economy of the world.

It only means that humans need to focus on different aspect to find a job since something more efficient is being use for their job. Having a robot on company means more productivity for the business that generates profit while this profits usually invests on different project that will create again another job opportunity for workers.

Agriculture for example is the sector which frequently being ignored by worker while its product is a necessity. Maybe people that lose their jobs will focus on this sector to help the country demand meets without the need to import. Robot is not harmful, people just don’t want to venture out on different jobs since they want a work that is very simple even though they are replaceable since they are just repeating what they are doing.

[Hamphser]

The use of robot in the world is really affecting the economy and also causing unemployment.
If you build a company and you are making 1 million dollars as profit every month and then spends 6000 thousand dollars to pay your works and then you are given the opportunity to buy robots for 1 million dollars that will do the jobs your works are doing without it having faults for 10 years won't you go for it there by sacking your workers.
In the next 10 years there will be high rate of unemployment in the world because job's that should be done by humans are now given to robots and by so doing it will also affect the economy of the world.

AI,robot and another technological advancement would really be having its risks or cons which it would really be affecting that employment on which its true that it could increase out that rate
but this is something inevitable because companies or employers would really be definitely be choosing on which one is really that cost efficient or something that they could be able to save up
on which they would really be normally be having that kind of option on which there's nothing we can do as employees if the company would really be having that kind of switch up.
This is why it really be best that we should really be finding up another source of income because there's no such thing about guarantees that it would last forever.
Always having that back up plans will be best.

[Kelward]

If you don't move with the time, it'll move without you, if robots were to take over most of the workforce from humans, it'll be difficult in the beginning, but with time humans will adapt and upgrade in ways to earn income. From the 1900 to present day, machines have been taking over parts of the human workforce, but still humans have found ways to still work alongside any new technological advancements. Ove twenty years ago people were still writing letters and sending through postal services, but today the internet has made communication very easy and convenient, and more people are earning incomes through internet now, so if robots were to take over our workforce, I'm sure that, it's maintenance will create more jobs for them.

[Juse14]

Without innovation, the economy will die. Behind the negative impacts conveyed by the OP, the presence of robots has the potential to make a significant contribution to economic growth and technological progress in the long term. because it will produce higher product quality, and can increase operational efficiency in various fields.

There will probably be some jobs replaced, and there will be millions of people out of work. However, the presence of robots is not something to blame, because we cannot stop all technological progress and innovation. Soon our jobs may be replaced, so prepare ourselves for that. Improve the knowledge, abilities and skills you have, become someone who cannot be replaced by anyone, including the presence of robots.

Continue to hone your skills and knowledge, the presence of robots has a significant impact on the world economy, be someone who takes advantage of the presence of robots and turns them into value. Not the other way around, being someone who constantly talks and raves about the bad impacts of the presence of robots... because of the possibility that jobs will be replaced. And if we behave like that, then it will only show how stupid we are, because we are unable to compete and don't want to improve our knowledge and skills.

[macson]

The use of robot in the world is really affecting the economy and also causing unemployment.
If you build a company and you are making 1 million dollars as profit every month and then spends 6000 thousand dollars to pay your works and then you are given the opportunity to buy robots for 1 million dollars that will do the jobs your works are doing without it having faults for 10 years won't you go for it there by sacking your workers.
In the next 10 years there will be high rate of unemployment in the world because job's that should be done by humans are now given to robots and by so doing it will also affect the economy of the world.

discussing unemployment in this modern era, in fact we cannot blame the cause on technology, a developing world requires technology that continues to develop consistently, in the future, not only robots will be a threat to humans but also the development of AI must be of great concern because now AI has really shifted skills that can only be done by humans.  Artificial intelligence is now even able to become an assistant for internet business people who really take advantage of it, as humans we cannot reject it, all we can do is adopt it ^{(robot and AI)} as early as possible so as not to be left behind.

[oktana]

Talk about other risks but not the risks of job. Say you’re a farmer and you have lived really long on earth, you were there when people had to go through the fields to water the plants, and hire people for the watering, harvesting, and even planting. And then you’ve lived to this point where you can rather use a drone to water the plants without stressing a muscle or pay anyone to do it, you can plant everything by yourself by sitting and driving the machine around. And harvesting is no big deal because there’s a machine for that as well. Or you could still have employees but reduce them to just a few. Will you rather complain that technology took people’s jobs or that technological advancement has relived the processes?

Robots can’t do everything, and if they are created to help and they really can help with a low error rate, let them help. There will always be new jobs because someone has to service the robots, someone has to drive the planting truck. So we should learn the skills as they shift.

[topbitcoin]

Company owners will never pay attention to the fate of their employees, what they think about is profit... and if using robotic technology and artificial intelligence (AI) can increase the efficiency and quality of the products produced, and can reduce production costs, then the owners Companies will never be reluctant if they have to fire their employees and replace them with technology.

And in this case, it is not the company owners who are cruel, but we are the stupid ones... we are too relaxed in responding to every progress that occurs and we are too indifferent to ourselves, so we don't prepare everything properly. So it's not that the development of the times is too fast, but that we ourselves are too relaxed.

In a modern era like this, so that we can continue to have an income, it is necessary to continue to innovate and improve our skills... because the only person who cares about us is ourselves. And behind the negative impacts caused by the presence of robotic technology and artificial intelligence, there are many positive impacts and benefits provided. So be someone who is able to take advantage of the presence of this technology... not the other way around.

[Taskford]

If you build a company and you are making 1 million dollars as profit every month and then spends 6000 thousand dollars to pay your works and then you are given the opportunity to buy robots for 1 million dollars that will do the jobs your works are doing without it having faults for 10 years won't you go for it there by sacking your workers.

No, if I ever build a company and if I make 1 Million dollars profits per month, then spending $6k to $60k per month of workers won't be an issue for me.

I would never even think about purchasing robots even if I get one for $100k because they're nothing as compared to humans.

I would never choose a machine over a living human who can use his own mind and has emotions which a robot lacks.

A robot is always going to be a machine, and a machine is created to reduce the work of humans not to take their place.

Maybe on some other task that needs human attention yes we can't replace this service to any automated robots since we cannot get the best result for that since robot don't have emotions. But for manufacturing or producing of products for sure a lot of companies will think about having those robots since they are fast and can able to produce a lot of products which this is the huge risk that can eliminate a lot of human work force in future.

But hopefully government should do something to regulate the usage of robots since if they let the companies to buy whatever they want for sure there would be less work left for a lot of people and this could provably give a lot of problem to humans.

Robot should be use as that where it can help humans so hopefully there's no greedy employers want to minimize their operational cost will abuse this technology.

[Ludmilla_rose1995]

~
Robots can’t do everything, and if they are created to help and they really can help with a low error rate, let them help. There will always be new jobs because someone has to service the robots, someone has to drive the planting truck. So we should learn the skills as they shift.

your view about this robot is very good, I also think so, currently many human jobs are made easier by robots, well on average robots are deliberately created to make human work easier

robot can do jobs that humans cannot do at all and also dangerous jobs such as in mining and so on, robots also don't need a salary so the use of robot in the future will definitely be massive and humans must be able to compete hard with robot

[Ndabagi01]

The use of robot in the world is really affecting the economy and also causing unemployment.
If you build a company and you are making 1 million dollars as profit every month and then spends 6000 thousand dollars to pay your works and then you are given the opportunity to buy robots for 1 million dollars that will do the jobs your works are doing without it having faults for 10 years won't you go for it there by sacking your workers.
In the next 10 years there will be high rate of unemployment in the world because job's that should be done by humans are now given to robots and by so doing it will also affect the economy of the world.

Robots are designed to make your work efficient and that’s the purpose it has come to life. But for every advantage, there’s also a disadvantage attached to it. The imagination of how it replaces humans and take their place is so scary. I saw an old image on the internet where a photographer was in an helicopter and taking coverage on the earth. It was written in that picture that in 10 years, both the photographer and pilot lost their jobs because of the inventions of drones, that’s just the reality and we just have to live by it.

A robot is always going to be a machine, and a machine is created to reduce the work of humans not to take their place.

You’re right but humans are already employing machines is some part of their works and reducing their number of staffs because of the work the machine can do under few minutes with just one human operator attached to the machine. It is just sad that machines are replacing humans and the number of workers are being reduced, that’s just the reality now.

[boty]

I equate robots with machines. And I assume the advent of machines in human society has created more jobs rather than lessen it. The growth of society, modernization itself, is mainly driven by the rise of complicated machines. Ironically, these machines meant jobs. Factories have spread all over the world because of machines. Mass production is made possible to a great extent by machines. And they created jobs. Computers are machines and rather than taking away jobs, they made so many of them.

It is true that with the development of technology that can create various types of machines that can help human work, but for those who cannot adapt to this situation, of course they will lose their jobs and be replaced by these machines and for those who can take advantage of this, of course it will be very makes it easier for them to complete their work and I really agree with what you say, with these machines it will be easy to produce on a large scale and this is very difficult to be done by humans but with machines it can be easily done.

That is why it is now necessary to have a high level of education to control these robots or obtain a profession in which robots cannot replace humans. But the prospect of being pushed aside by a robot has existed for a very long time. Take, for example, Amazon, which robotized its services and fired several thousand people. However, obtaining higher qualifications is necessary to still be in demand as more than a robot.

To be able to control machines or robots of course requires high education because it is very unlikely that new technology can be easily learned by someone who does not have high education and in fields that cannot be replaced by robots of course they still use humans until they can create a robot that can replace it, from the example you said of course this requires those of us who work in fields that have the possibility of being replaced by robots to be able to have skills that can provide us with income so that when the time comes we will have the skills that can give us income.

[dothebeats]

This is why a lot of people are urging everyone to at least learn how to code. These robots are not self-maintaining, they still need humans in order to make themselves available and ready to serve their purpose. A little bit of coding knowledge can get you so far in this economy, and in a world faced with automation, I don't see why someone with coding knowledge can't get a job anywhere.

Of course, it's easier said than done, but it still can be done if one is really dedicated to learn at all.