@dkbit98I wouldn't recommend creating new account that acts like a ''friend'' because ban evasion is not allowed by forum rules. I am not Filippo Spina. He is sitting next to me, though.
@Lafu:As dkbit98 has already written looks like after the OP got banned this is a new Account from the same person maybe.
I am not Filippo Spina. He is sitting next to me, though.
@robelneo:
I'm sure he will learn from this and will do better in his future endeavors, as a developer myself I also learn from my mistakes but if he still reads this thread I urge him to keep up and continue to do what he does best I'm sure he will find a breakthrough project of his own, we are sometimes become impulsive due to our excitement in promoting our project. Your kind words mean the world to us. Thank you.
We did have a peek at the features but a roadmap on where the platform is heading is important, well from here the platform started on the wrong foot, OP should be Bitcointalk friendly because he is trying to get members, OP on his post has a plan to beat Bitcointalk whom he describes as a platform with artificially generated posts. This project is in its infancy, treat it like it's a newborn child that can be molded into anything. Currently, there is no cost to signup and make an elon.report account. Currently, there is no cost to be invited to or join Redivivus. Currently, there are no single satoshi mechanics because of how early in the project it is.
@coin-investor:So OP is inviting people here on Bitcointalk to his platform to try to overthrow Bitcointalk Fil wants to ask you if you're trolling or not.
Our goal is to aggregate a userbase willing to test out a newfound utilization of bitcoin. Our goal is to be bitcointalk.org friendly. Our goals do
not include overthrowing the bitcointalk.org forum. That seems to be a recurring theme when it comes to some people's reaction to this project. This is
not bitcointalk.org 2.0 or anything of that nature. Fil has described it as a place to play-test a newfound utilization of bitcoin that we think will do the community some good. That's what we are sticking with.
@SFR10: Fil wants to tell you that he is seriously happy you showed up like you said. "What a guy!", he said.
Anyway,
I don't think it's a good idea to start with the pay-as-you-go route from the beginning... If I were you, I'd give my users some leeway to test my platform and see if it's worth their time, then ask for the above thing after a certain period of time.
- BTW, how is Redivivus planning to protect those staked funds (I do know individually it's not going to be a lot, but collectively, it could grow fast)? Wow okay that's actually solid advice. Mabey when we get some users going we can implement a fake satoshi public action balance display. Giving users the leeway they want to play-test is a fundamental aspect of videogame development, and I think the same applies here for this play-test.
As for the protection of funds, that would be left to the developers of elon.report.
To answer your question about determining who is real and who is fake, we would have to leave it to elon.report developers.
PS: Fil says Vod is
really good at what he does.
Hey, now that we have you here on this thread, would you like to join? You would be the first non-staff member to be a part of the club. To make the offer more enticing, Fil says he has plans to accumulate BTC and distribute it among early users of Redivivus to playtest single satoshi mechanics of facilitating the organic generation of public content. I'll be contributing to that bankroll as well, so everyone that joins will be able to practice with real satoshis and not feel pressured they are spending their own hard earned satoshis.
