Innovative Bitget Shilling [Compliation]

[Cryptoababe]

~snip~
But it's hard to consider this spam as the content does not revolve around the mentioned product but around the storyline.

Obviously, some people don't mind spam and shills, the only thing that matters is that the daily quota of posts can be fulfilled - even if that means that you participate in a topic with made-up stories that aim to promote some shady company. If you were a moderator on this forum, shills would enjoy it because you wouldn't delete their posts - as long as the storyline is imaginative enough.

Who is this? Someone has already added a neutral tag on you, stating that you are making false claims about something they never said. You claimed I shill different companies without evidence.
I agreed with people who said I mention Bitget too much, and I've reduced that. But why are you adding a false tag on me as if you're the perfect one? Do you mean I shouldn't talk about any platform here? Bro, chill. You aren't going to gain anything from adding false tags on people. Lucius, you should stop it. Lying against people isn't a good way to have a good reputation anywhere. You could also mind your own business and help others while you have a good reputation. Please remove your neutral tag on me. It's false.

[logfiles]

Who is this? Someone has already added a neutral tag on you, stating that you are making false claims about something they never said. You claimed I shill different companies without evidence.

What more evidence do you need?
It's there in the reference links

Look at another post of yours two days later, what the hell does it even mean 

Alticoins might pump fastet than Bitcoin earlier. But when Bitcoin drops, altcoins drops more than 10x of Bitget drop. So, if you are able to make profit in any altcoins, the best decision is to swap to Bitcoin back so that you can still keep on with the game.

I agreed with people who said I mention Bitget too much, and I've reduced that.

You clearly haven't done so, even after getting called out by nutildah. I don't think you will change.

I might add my tag too.

[Cryptoababe]

Who is this? Someone has already added a neutral tag on you, stating that you are making false claims about something they never said. You claimed I shill different companies without evidence.

What more evidence do you need?
It's there in the reference links

Look at another post of yours two days later, what the hell does it even mean 

Alticoins might pump fastet than Bitcoin earlier. But when Bitcoin drops, altcoins drops more than 10x of Bitget drop. So, if you are able to make profit in any altcoins, the best decision is to swap to Bitcoin back so that you can still keep on with the game.

I agreed with people who said I mention Bitget too much, and I've reduced that.

You clearly haven't done so, even after getting called out by nutildah. I don't think you will change.

I might add my tag too.

Add whatever you wanna add. Its your problem. You can add as many tags as you want. Doesn't "Bitget drop" sound like a typo error and a mistake to you? It's obviously a typo error and a mistake. But you are just eager to make show off
Also, he said I shill for different companies. Don't you understand simple English? Show the different company proofs. Well, I can understand you and your friend.
I'm adding a tag for you too. I'll wait for his response and see if he deserves one as well.

[nutildah]

Add whatever you wanna add. Its your problem. You can add as many tags as you want. Doesn't "Bitget drop" sound like a typo error and a mistake to you? It's obviously a typo error and a mistake. But you are just eager to make show off
Also, he said I shill for different companies. Don't you understand simple English? Show the different company proofs. Well, I can understand you and your friend.
I'm adding a tag for you too. I'll wait for his response and see if he deserves one as well.

Its pretty obvious you're part of the Bitget spam campaign. You've been called out on it at least a few times in the past.

I've seen different kinds of tags on me about this. I had to ignore them cos thats the only exchange I use. And I research, read news and try to know more about them everyday than other exchanges. So, I mostly prefer to include what I know in my posts or conversation just like anyone would love to do.

Yes, but the word Bitget is present on every page of your posts, which is not normal.
I searched for it here

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?Aaction=profile;u=2809031;Sa=showposts;Start=120
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?Aaction=profile;u=2809031;Sa=showposts;Start=100
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?ective=profile;u=2809031;Sa=showposts;Start=80
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?Aaction=profile;u=2809031;Sa=showposts;Start=60
https://bitcontalk.org/index.php?ective=profile;u=2809031;Sa=showposts;Start=40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?ective=profile;u=2809031;Sa=showposts;Start=20

this is not a normal behavior for an account that wants to discuss, not promotion

I don't understand what you're complaining about -- that the wording of your second neutral isn't 100% accurate? The point is this: you're shilling a questionable exchange by spamming the forum with useless posts. Neutral tag is pretty fair for a relentless spammer of your nature.

[Lucius]

Obviously, some people don't mind spam and shills, the only thing that matters is that the daily quota of posts can be fulfilled - even if that means that you participate in a topic with made-up stories that aim to promote some shady company. If you were a moderator on this forum, shills would enjoy it because you wouldn't delete their posts - as long as the storyline is imaginative enough.

Who is this? Someone has already added a neutral tag on you, stating that you are making false claims about something they never said. You claimed I shill different companies without evidence.
~snip~

Anyone can write whatever they want in someone's trust feedback, but it is important that there are facts behind it, and not vengeful feedback that has no basis in fact. My feedback to you is the result of your activity that was detected even before, and the only reason why I didn't write the name of the company you shill is that I don't want to mention that name at all. In addition, all of you who shill one company will sooner or later shill another, so sooner or later that feedback will probably be completely accurate.

[Coyster]

I'm adding a tag for you too. I'll wait for his response and see if he deserves one as well.

Retaliatory feedbacks is very wrong, you don't leave a feedback because you were left one. The exchange you are accused of shilling appears in almost all of your post, isn't that suspicious? Of course you can talk about what interests you in this forum, but when yourself and a lot of other users just show up and start mentioning the name of one company in all posts that you all make, then that is shilling.

[Cryptoababe]

Obviously, some people don't mind spam and shills, the only thing that matters is that the daily quota of posts can be fulfilled - even if that means that you participate in a topic with made-up stories that aim to promote some shady company. If you were a moderator on this forum, shills would enjoy it because you wouldn't delete their posts - as long as the storyline is imaginative enough.

Who is this? Someone has already added a neutral tag on you, stating that you are making false claims about something they never said. You claimed I shill different companies without evidence.
~snip~

Anyone can write whatever they want in someone's trust feedback, but it is important that there are facts behind it, and not vengeful feedback that has no basis in fact. My feedback to you is the result of your activity that was detected even before, and the only reason why I didn't write the name of the company you shill is that I don't want to mention that name at all. In addition, all of you who shill one company will sooner or later shill another, so sooner or later that feedback will probably be completely accurate.

So, you are aware that your feedback is not accurate and you still go ahead and drop it? Well, I'm not surprised. As the feedback on your profile states that you lie against people.
Also, you are free to mention the name of the company and let us know. So far your job here is to monitor people's profile and give unnecessary feedbacks.

[logfiles]

So, you are aware that your feedback is not accurate and you still go ahead and drop it? Well, I'm not surprised. As the feedback on your profile states that you lie against people.
Also, you are free to mention the name of the company and let us know. So far your job here is to monitor people's profile and give unnecessary feedbacks.

The feedback is accurate. I don't even know what you are trying to prove here. You have been called out a number of times, and you refused to change, so the feedback is well deserved.

You think your dry threats work here? The best thing you should have done was to acknowledge your mistake and try to change, but instead you are just trying to dig a deeper hole for yourself.
Speaking of digging a deeper hole. There might be a case of bounty cheating and linked accounts as well, It might be worth looking it to for better understanding.

[Cryptoababe]

So, you are aware that your feedback is not accurate and you still go ahead and drop it? Well, I'm not surprised. As the feedback on your profile states that you lie against people.
Also, you are free to mention the name of the company and let us know. So far your job here is to monitor people's profile and give unnecessary feedbacks.

The feedback is accurate. I don't even know what you are trying to prove here. You have been called out a number of times, and you refused to change, so the feedback is well deserved.

You think your dry threats work here? The best thing you should have done was to acknowledge your mistake and try to change, but instead you are just trying to dig a deeper hole for yourself.
Speaking of digging a deeper hole. There might be a case of bounty cheating and linked accounts as well, It might be worth looking it to for better understanding.

You are trying to prove nonsense. Someone once accused me of this bounty stuff, and I posted several screenshots to prove them wrong. Imagine digging holes that I don't even know about. I think you guys are either retired old people or young guys who have no job.

Also, I saw your feedback, and I think you are satisfied now. You can add as much as you like. I've seen lots of higher-ranked members with lots of feedback like these, and I know people like you with fake trust scores gave it to them. I know your type of people. Lol

[Lucius]

~snip~
Speaking of digging a deeper hole. There might be a case of bounty cheating and linked accounts as well, It might be worth looking it to for better understanding.

I personally offer a reward for whoever manages to prove that it is ban evasion. There is an old saying that says "he who lies, steals.". I just wonder if these shills realize how much damage they are causing to the company they are promoting in this way?

[nutildah]

I know your type of people. Lol

You don't know shit. You've been here for over 6 years and haven't learned a damn thing, except how to cheat better. The persistent focus on "easy money" has retarded your growth, which is why after 6 years on the forum you are still chasing pennies.

We know you are Cryptolanad; aside from using the same address, you've admitted it in the past. There are several instances of akjuve (banned) depositing ETH to the same address Cryptolanad deposited ETH to.

In addition, such transactions like these could only be made if the same user was controlling all the addresses:

https://etherscan.io/txs?a=0x467c1dce11aa733fdac5cada42207f5c0a1dfc4c&p=2


Why do I know this? Because that's 3 transactions done in 4 minutes. It would require extremely skillful coordination if the parties were different people.

I personally offer a reward for whoever manages to prove that it is ban evasion. There is an old saying that says "he who lies, steals.". I just wonder if these shills realize how much damage they are causing to the company they are promoting in this way?

I spent about half an hour looking into it and there's a huge tangle of alt accounts; its likely possible to connect them in a firmer manner but I don't have time for it at the moment.

[Cryptoababe]

I know your type of people. Lol

You don't know shit. You've been here for over 6 years and haven't learned a damn thing, except how to cheat better. The persistent focus on "easy money" has retarded your growth, which is why after 6 years on the forum you are still chasing pennies.

We know you are Cryptolanad; aside from using the same address, you've admitted it in the past. There are several instances of akjuve (banned) depositing ETH to the same address Cryptolanad deposited ETH to.

In addition, such transactions like these could only be made if the same user was controlling all the addresses:

https://etherscan.io/txs?a=0x467c1dce11aa733fdac5cada42207f5c0a1dfc4c&p=2


Why do I know this? Because that's 3 transactions done in 4 minutes. It would require extremely skillful coordination if the parties were different people.

I personally offer a reward for whoever manages to prove that it is ban evasion. There is an old saying that says "he who lies, steals.". I just wonder if these shills realize how much damage they are causing to the company they are promoting in this way?

I spent about half an hour looking into it and there's a huge tangle of alt accounts; its likely possible to connect them in a firmer manner but I don't have time for it at the moment.

These three different chats should answer your query.




Some guys are just trying to find a safe way to back up their keys then, and Ethereum gas fees weren't affordable for everyone, even BNB and Tron. The world is a big one, and there are different kinds of people from various backgrounds, etc., in case you didn't know that

Also, feel free to spend more hours to look for more information. I would appreciate that

[nutildah]

I don't see what any of this has to do with what I posted. You've been full of shit since your very first post. Lucky for you, there's some campaigns here that are still happy to have you, so long as you churn out spam at a consistent rate. Also, yes, its true, I have better things to do with my time.

[Cryptoababe]

I don't see what any of this has to do with what I posted. You've been full of shit since your very first post. Lucky for you, there's some campaigns here that are still happy to have you, so long as you churn out spam at a consistent rate. Also, yes, its true, I have better things to do with my time.

Do you know I don't really give a shit about what you think?
I never expect any of you to believe me. And I feel honored with all of you becoming some sort of monitoring spirits. Also, as someone is willing to pay because of me, which reminds me of some movies. Anyway, it would be better if you do something tangible with your time. But honestly, I wish you would go deeper into someone else's matters . It's also a job since they are willing to pay you.

[Lucius]

Two more BG shill accounts detected :

Ticdeneb - post history
Phoenixtrader - post history

Topic -> Link (archived)

[aioc]

I had an account here because our country banned Binance, and this is a good option. However, I have not used their platform because of what I see on how they run their shilling marketing now; it was mentioned that they run a signature campaign here, so they should stick to this method. Still, instead, they prefer a resort to this kind of marketing that could result to a word filter.
I have a bad feeling about this exchange, even though I checked on Coingecko, and they had a good trust rating.