[Voting 2024] Bitcoin Pizza Day on Bitcointalk 🍕

[examplens]

I vote for: #2, #22, #45, #111, #88

 

[fillippone]

Not in particular order: (...)

FYI: With the vote-counting method that icopress has opted for (IRV), the order of your choices is important.

Mhh, I haven’t seen anything about it in the rules.
If the order of voting is important, this schould be clearly stated by @icopress. Not much harm doing so before ending of the voting, so that everyone get time to edit accordingly.

Since we are here,  it would be nice to have some tie-braking criteria (what if two pizza end up with the same number of votes? Given the prize structure, avoiding doubts on the ranking system would be nice.

[kawetsriyanto]

Finally we come to the end, the vote will decide everything. You have created a democratic and fair system, @icopress. Thank you  

I vote for: #42, #22, #17, #19, #53

[Rikafip]

Since we are here,  it would be nice to have some tie-braking criteria (what if two pizza end up with the same number of votes? Given the prize structure, avoiding doubts on the ranking system would be nice.

Since Instant-runoff voting system is used, I don't think that its possible to have a tie as the order of votes actually count so the one with highest number of first choices wins. 

[fillippone]

Since we are here,  it would be nice to have some tie-braking criteria (what if two pizza end up with the same number of votes? Given the prize structure, avoiding doubts on the ranking system would be nice.

Since Instant-runoff voting system is used, I don't think that its possible to have a tie as the order of votes actually count so the one with highest number of first choices wins.  

I totally missed the point where icopress said the voting system is based on the IRV.
Using this system is totally fine, yet it should be clear to everyone, and based on an “official” statement by contest organiser(s), rather than speculation.

[cryptofrka]

Code:

I vote for: #42, #53, #99, #19, #22.

I'm really sorry that I wasn't able to include #97, it required huge effort and was my favorite for a while. #15 was really close as well.

[Rikafip]

I totally missed the point where icopress said the voting system is based on the IRV.
Using this system is totally fine, yet it should be clear to everyone, and based on an “official” statement by contest organiser(s), rather than speculation.

Hover over "voting" and you will see instant-runoff being mentioned. But yeah, maybe it could have been actually mentioned and not kinda hidden as there might be more like you that missed it.

For the voting system to work, any nominated pizza must have the support of at least three users.

[fillippone]

I totally missed the point where icopress said the voting system is based on the IRV.
Using this system is totally fine, yet it should be clear to everyone, and based on an “official” statement by contest organiser(s), rather than speculation.

Hover over "voting" and you will see instant-runoff being mentioned. But yeah, maybe it could have been actually mentioned and not kinda hidden as there might be more like you that missed it.

For the voting system to work, any nominated pizza must have the support of at least three users.

The fun part is that I even quoted the OP looking for this kind of stuff, but I missed that “hidden” code.
Yes, I think you are right. This should be amended asap and made clear to everyone.

[GrosWesh]

Wow ! So much pizzas 

Some are beautifull ! (some less...  )

I vote for: #53, #37, #87

[Ale88]

I totally missed the point where icopress said the voting system is based on the IRV.
Using this system is totally fine, yet it should be clear to everyone, and based on an “official” statement by contest organiser(s), rather than speculation.

Hover over "voting" and you will see instant-runoff being mentioned. But yeah, maybe it could have been actually mentioned and not kinda hidden as there might be more like you that missed it.

For the voting system to work, any nominated pizza must have the support of at least three users.

I'll be honest, I completely missed it as well, I had no idea the voting order was important. I see that many users wrote their preferences in a perfect numeric order, I guess they missed this part as well otherwise it would be quite a coincidence.

[fillippone]

I'll be honest, I completely missed it as well, I had no idea the voting order was important. I see that many users wrote their preferences in a perfect numeric order, I guess they missed this part as well otherwise it would be quite a coincidence.

Bear in mind that not every browser correctly renders that code.
I am currently browsing via my iPhone, and of course I cannot see it, and I am almost sure the same is from Safari on MacOS.

If this piece of information is so crucial, why not report it clearly?

Anyway, as I said, not much damage was done, as there is plenty of time to put everyone on the same page.


EDIT: It works on Safari in Mac OS, but the popup appears after a second or so.

[BlackHatCoiner]

Code:

I vote for: #42, #92, #101, #15, #100

We can't vote our own, right?

[Ale88]

We can't vote our own, right?

From the original thread:

So, are we voting for our own pizza?

This is allowed, but if I were you I wouldn't do it. 

[paid2]

Code:

I vote for: #87 and #92

[shahzadafzal]

I totally missed the point where icopress said the voting system is based on the IRV.
Using this system is totally fine, yet it should be clear to everyone, and based on an “official” statement by contest organiser(s), rather than speculation.

Hover over "voting" and you will see instant-runoff being mentioned. But yeah, maybe it could have been actually mentioned and not kinda hidden as there might be more like you that missed it.

For the voting system to work, any nominated pizza must have the support of at least three users.

The fun part is that I even quoted the OP looking for this kind of stuff, but I missed that “hidden” code.
Yes, I think you are right. This should be amended asap and made clear to everyone.

Based on how people are voting and how the pizzas are presented (in sequential order from 1, 2, 3…), someone can easily miss this point. Voting in order matters, and when scrolling from 1 to 112, you will automatically choose 5 pizzas in ascending order.

I agree that this needs to be highlighted more prominently, or something like this might help.

1st:__, 2nd:__, 3rd:__, 4th:__, 5th:__
Or
First:__, Second:__, Third:__, Forth:__, Fifth:__
Or
First Place:__, Second Place:__, Third Place:__, Forth Place:__, Fifth Place:__

[JusticeSolus]

Code: (example)

I vote for: #15, #7, #17, #77, #107

   Cool event @icopress

[Xal0lex]

I vote for: #39, #50, #57, #73, #87

Thank you to all the participants.

[icopress]

The numbering is not important. Simply select 5 pizzas of your choice (or less).

[Mate2237]

Wow!!! There are yummy yummy Pizzas in this year contest though in my closely looking at it some of them are needles pizza though the designs are nice and I vote for the following Pizzas. Number: #2, #22, #45, #111, #88
 And those are the ones that if I eat, it will full my stomach. And I congratulate all the participants and their pizzas I would have voted more than this but the voting slots are limited.

[famososMuertos]

Code:

 I vote for: #39, #42, #58, #64, #74