[ANN] CHAMBY: serious memcoin on TON

[Julien_Olynpic]

We were thinking about holding another (eighth) airdrop for Chamby diamond holders, meaning those with a public TON address linked to a Bitcointalk account. This requires that the holder personally purchase tokens using this address and never sell them. But I was told that only a couple of activists have public diamond addresses. Is this true?

[BitBakerr1]

We were thinking about holding another (eighth) airdrop for Chamby diamond holders, meaning those with a public TON address linked to a Bitcointalk account. This requires that the holder personally purchase tokens using this address and never sell them. But I was told that only a couple of activists have public diamond addresses. Is this true?

I really don’t know how true that is, but if it’s true then something is wrong, I have been thinking about something why not we have many addresses and making it this community address and then sending huge amount of Chamby token over there and never sell it, I believe this will be good and everyone can have access to check the token, I really don’t trust some people they may hold the token for a very long period of time and when the token starts growing they sell all the token they are holding but if it’s a community address it will be more safe and no one will ever have access to sell it.

[Qhunman]

We were thinking about holding another (eighth) airdrop for Chamby diamond holders, meaning those with a public TON address linked to a Bitcointalk account. This requires that the holder personally purchase tokens using this address and never sell them. But I was told that only a couple of activists have public diamond addresses. Is this true?

That's a great idea about holding another airdrop but I would advise it should be done outside forum since it is against forum rules and to avoid participants accounts getting banned. how can we certain that participants who will purchased token would likely not sell it when the price began going up? We can't trust people that they won't sell them especially since we don't know their intentions and their targets. Since chamby token is decentralized, it would be difficult to stop people from selling the token at their own will.

if it’s a community address it will be more safe and no one will ever have access to sell it.

I agree because we can be sure that people won't sell them for short term gains

[Nightwatchmare]

We were thinking about holding another (eighth) airdrop for Chamby diamond holders, meaning those with a public TON address linked to a Bitcointalk account. This requires that the holder personally purchase tokens using this address and never sell them. But I was told that only a couple of activists have public diamond addresses. Is this true?

That's a great idea about holding another airdrop but I would advise it should be done outside forum since it is against forum rules and to avoid participants accounts getting banned. how can we certain that participants who will purchased token would likely not sell it when the price began going up? We can't trust people that they won't sell them especially since we don't know their intentions and their targets. Since chamby token is decentralized, it would be difficult to stop people from selling the token at their own will.

Julien_Olynpic knows that giveaway is not allowed in the forum and anyone who breaks the rule will be ban for a certain period of time, and he will not allow anyone who is helping Chamby token to go viral to be ban in the forum because of Chamby token giveaway/airdrop, and because of that he created discord group for Chamby token so that Chamby token giveaway/airdrop would be carried out outside the forum in order for people not to get ban. We can't stop anyone from selling Chamby token when the price starts going up, but i think Julien_Olynpic should giveaway/airdrop dust so that it will enable people not to sell their Chamby token immediately they receive it, and if they hold their Chamby token and it worth something in the future, i have no problem if they want to sell it because they have been able to hold it for a very long time before it worth something for them.

[Agbam]

AVATAR

I have a simple suggestion for this logos and avatar. As a growing token we have to start standardising our designs. The Logo on the Avatar has different color palette for the H at least the C has same color palette. To have a more professional look we should just have a standard color code just like Bitcoin Color Code is always Gold except in some cases where maybe the background will cause it to have a different variation.

We have already talked about this a long time ago, we were using just one single Avatar and some people wanted us to have more than one Avatar and we decided to vote on that and then conclude on having more Avatar for the Chamby token signature campaign and so far it has been great.
I see nothing wrong in having more than one Avatar, we are a community and different people with want they want and we can’t stop anyone from using the kind of Avatar he or she wants. The bitcoin you are talking about if a free signature campaign is created for bitcoin in this forum believe me it will have different Avatar just like they have different coin designs on social media.
Pick one Chamby token signature Avatar and put on I believe it will look good in your profile.

No I’m not talking about the avatar, I’m talking about the logo on the avatars, they have different shades of colors.
Logo should be branded so that no matter what designs you are using it’ll still remain the same…… I don’t know if there’s any brand manager or designer here, they’ll really get what I’m saying.

We can have as many avatars as we want but let the Logo be same anywhere and everywhere.

Just saw the recent post by Superbitman on our X, he’s doing a good job there. Let’s always support him.