Well, I saw your website and I confess that you could have explored it more, for example in the part where you talk about "Fake Casino Reviews" it seems to me that you mixed topics which in my opinion you shouldn't have done. for example, you said that the stake on May 17th posted on X a person who managed to bet $0.1 and got the multiplier of x1,000,000 right and that person ended up with $100,000. but I ask you:
Are you accusing stake of making fake reviews on their X account?
because stake wouldn't do these types of things, they are an established casino for years, they have a good reputation and I personally use stake and trust stake. so when you post this in the fake reviews section, you are accusing the stake without proof. and there are more articles about staking on your website and in this fake review section, which in my opinion makes it seem like you have a problem with staking and don't want to be direct in talking about it. If you don't have proof that it's fake reviews, then you could post it in another section, something like the news section and then at the end you could say something like: "I let each person draw their own conclusions" but without accusing the stake, because you have no proof
and about AskGamblers, they post everything that anyone posts, it is up to each person to then read the reviews and investigate further, but from what I have been able to conclude in over 5 years of following these review sites: we have to pay more attention to negative comments and it is always done by people who have already made many comments on other sites, because they tend to be true comments, few people remember to post positive comments when using a casino, but most people remember to posting negative comments when they are not paid or have closed accounts or have funds withheld
His subject title is =
Fake Casino Reviews, Crazy Rare Wins and More! So at first glance, you will think that it will be under the
fake casino review, but check it again and the header is under -
Big Wins Rush which is for sure can be under
Crazy Rare Wins, with the topic "
Players Started a Rush to Hit the Max Win in Limbo on Stake". So he is not accusing stake of making fake reviews here. He also has another article discussing stake under the "
Gambling Time Machine" header =
Let’s Look at Stake.com Through the Years.
Maybe, the author can separate the topic of fake casino reviews -because for sure there are a lot of these articles. So people won't have the impression that they are writing the fake reviews in one article. It may mislead some readers who are not carefully checking all the details of the subject matter.
