acquiring many properties in the name of owning an asset

[Jatiluhung]

My question is that is it advisable to own too many properties that are unproductive with the expectations that they would stand as aids to us in the future or should we just own few assets and make sure they are of the best standards and are generating money for us regularly?

Actually, it doesn't matter if you own a lot of property that isn't productive at all. As long as the value of the property continues to increase even without us having to maintain it at all. In this case, land is usually the type of property that is purchased and then left untouched. Even the original owner may not manage it for decades. Then, after a long time, they come back just to sell it because by then the price has increased many times over compared to the original price.

In my country, the price of land can increase by more than 30% in just one year. So imagine that in a few years or decades, we could sell it for a value that is even higher than expected.

But personally, I also like to buy land and the like, which will continue to increase in value even without being maintained. And if we manage and maintain it, it can even generate passive income for us, such as planting trees that we only plant once but can bear fruit every season and can be sold for profit.

[Pi-network314159]

My question is that is it advisable to own too many properties that are unproductive with the expectations that they would stand as aids to us in the future or should we just own few assets and make sure they are of the best standards and are generating money for us regularly?

Well it depends on individual difference, what I like will definitely deffer from what you would like. Although your point is directing towards Bitcoin investment instead of buying too many physical asset that one will forget the location later. But as the case may beost people love to buy and stack Bitcoin and also buy physical properties like landed property as an alternative to Bitcoin, not only focusing on Bitcoin. Remember the risk of losing Bitcoin in your wallet is worst than losing a single property among all your property. For example, if a person has $10m in Bitcoin and $10m in physical asset, and he somehow lose access to his Bitcoin holding, which aperently mean that he has lost $10m of Bitcoin. He will still be left with $10m of physical asset. But a person who invested $20m into Bitcoin for the sake of not knowing or being able to manage all his property might lose all his holding due to wallet compromisation and that is all. So such person will go bankrupt because he didn't diversify. Now you wouldn't blame anyone that diversify into physical asset.

Please don't get me wrong, what I am trying to say is that even as we are investing in Bitcoin as a major investment, we should also not take physical investment for granted sothat if nemesis caught up with us, we will not regret much. Atleast we would still have alternative.

[gibrab16]

So yeah, SmartLinks are basically one link that does all the work for you. You drop the link, and the network auto-redirects users to whatever offer fits them best (country, device, OS, etc). Two people click the same link, they see different stuff.

Why people use it? Simple.
No offer hunting, works with global traffic, easy for beginners, and decent for testing.

Downside? Less control and payouts can be meh if traffic is trash.

Still worth it in 2025?
Yeah, if your traffic isn’t garbage and you know what you’re doing. Not magic money, though 😅

[lornadane]

Owning many unproductive properties often looks impressive on paper, but in reality it creates more problems than value. Dilapidated buildings, unmanaged land, forgotten documents, and dishonest intermediaries all turn “assets” into liabilities. If a property does not generate income, appreciate reasonably, or serve a clear purpose, it quietly drains money through maintenance, taxes, legal risks, and opportunity cost.

[aysha9853]

Owning many properties only makes sense if they are managed well and actually produce cash flow otherwise it becomes a liability, not an asset taxes, maintenance and legal risks add up fast.

[9ja Amaka]

Please don't get me wrong, what I am trying to say is that even as we are investing in Bitcoin as a major investment, we should also not take physical investment for granted sothat if nemesis caught up with us, we will not regret much. Atleast we would still have alternative.

The instance OP gave was a genuine attack on persons who buy landed properties later forget about it, while some get into dispute for years. The truth is, you can as well forget you own a property or an investment somewhere, when you have so much at hand. Not minding if they lose one of the properties, it means nothing to them since they have more.

Landed properties are not to be joked with. The massive return from owning land should not be overlooked. It is never a wrong investment, maybe a dispute comes out in the future, it can be settled, but it is important before purchasing a landed property torough research and enquiries should be made regarding that land.

[Ab de villiers]

The instance OP gave was a genuine attack on persons who buy landed properties later forget about it, while some get into dispute for years. The truth is, you can as well forget you own a property or an investment somewhere, when you have so much at hand. Not minding if they lose one of the properties, it means nothing to them since they have more.

Landed properties are not to be joked with. The massive return from owning land should not be overlooked. It is never a wrong investment, maybe a dispute comes out in the future, it can be settled, but it is important before purchasing a landed property torough research and enquiries should be made regarding that land.

Acquiring so many properties is not bad because it has no disadvantage. Almost every assets Sooner or later give higher return. It is not wastage of money, it is something to generate more. passivel income is a tool to strength your financial position. But in my locality many people have the habit to do the investment in land property. After one buying they used to start think about another purchasing. I feel not good for them because of this habit. They can't enjoy the beauty of life , they just focus on making or acquiring the next assets. I think life is not about collecting the assets , one has to must enjoy the life through travelling parties or sometimes spending time with the friends and doing things that make us happy.

[viljy]

It depends on how cost-effective it is to maintain this property. Since real estate always requires expenses for its maintenance (even if it's just an empty barn without heating, you need to pay at least a tax). Inefficient real estate can turn into a loss-making, low-liquid asset that requires too much utility and other payments. Commercial real estate for retail space is especially dangerous for this. Now, in the era of online trading of absolutely any goods, retail areas are often empty for years due to the lack of tenants.

[Mate2237]

I don't see anything wrong any individual owing many properties, if you have the financial leverage then it's at your discretion to acquire much property or not , it's all depends on the individual involved. Acquiring more properties means you are investing which will lead to an increase in cash flow because when ever an investment is done you are sure of return on investment.



Were this is wrong is politicians who who public funds in acquiring properties and is using their close allies and proxies in doing this for them, off course because there is already an act of illegality involved there is definitely going to be lose of properties to these people because the process is already corrupted.

[Donk1]

Well that's the difference between a wealthy person and an average person, as it's easy to say wealthy people do not keep note of how many assets they have and sure most of them often leave it for their agents while for an average person, indeed you can tell that they are very aware of their assets because they only spend on things that are valuable to them and their future. That's said having different asset is very good, but what is bad is when you cannot manage them.

​Moreover the answer to your question varies alot because I like to believe that everyone has their perspective and points of views. So to me it's advisable to own too many properties but not the once that are unproductive. Why Because if you as and individual keeps wasting money on assets that doesn't have value basically you could get bankrupt and unfortunately you will end up selling all of them. That's why it's easy to say own properties that can generate wealth, so that they will create further wealth for you, Unfortunately when the future comes you will have the money to buy the aids you want. That's just it bro.....

[Roseline492]

The instance OP gave was a genuine attack on persons who buy landed properties later forget about it, while some get into dispute for years. The truth is, you can as well forget you own a property or an investment somewhere, when you have so much at hand. Not minding if they lose one of the properties, it means nothing to them since they have more.

Landed properties are not to be joked with. The massive return from owning land should not be overlooked.

If a persons only business is landed properties, they can't forget any of the properties they will acquire no matter if they have hundreds of it, but when someone is buying so many with no goal of business for it or even developing it for occupants to stay either for free, sheltering or for means of getting income could actually forget some of it or in future loss some of them in problems, urban areas are not good for buying and leaving it unattended because people who are in habits of using power to inherent someone's properties could cause problem for the person. Landed properties needs thorough investigation and also going more to see if the name on the house documents is the same with one they register in government.

[Yeesha]

Owning many properties only makes sense if they are managed well and actually produce cash flow otherwise it becomes a liability, not an asset taxes, maintenance and legal risks add up fast.

This is actually a wise and a wonderful thought, Acquiring many properties just to claim the owner, or ownership of the properties or assets isn't what truly matters. What matters most is whether those properties are actually growing or if it is productive, by generating income, adding value or supporting you financially in order to achieve your goals.

Sincerely speaking, An asset that drains your resources without offering returns isn't an asset at all, it is nothing but a liability in disguise. True wealth is not measured by how you have or own, but by how well your assets is, productive. Well from my perspective, a single and well managed income generating asset is much more better and valuable than several idle ones that cause you more than they bring in.