Gambling Competition: Player with the smallest bonus donates all to Charity

[Su-asa]

Donating to the charity is something that needs to be done without directing it towards game winning. though it is another form or way of helping the charity. Another thing is that the game was not Fair in my own opinion because it would have been better if the highest winner with enough bonus will donate to the charity instead of the one with smaller bonus donating to the charity. but as the case may be it is now vise versa, but anyway it's still a good things that people would use such medium of gambling to help people. to me it's a welcome development to give game/gambling a good name and not always a bad name as they usually said.

From the OP I noticed that it's only for the fun, and my instincts tells me that the father and the son are not doing it out of greed, they are doing it for fun because donating money for Charity's is a normal thing that one can do even without including bet on it. That's why I had to say they are doing it f is r only fun purpose. Why the losers have to donate his money is just to make the game more interesting for others around to observe.

[Frankolala]

If I don't have the money to donate to charity and I partake in such competition I will do it. Bit if I have the money to donate to charity, I don't need to gamble for that. It is good to give out to the needy but one thing that I am still thinking is that giving our gambling wins to charity is not a guarantee that we will win more.

Also if you are gambling in a particular casino and that casino donates money to charity does not mean that you are the one that donated because it is the casino funds and not yours. Anyone money that you lose is no longer yours so let's not think that if casino donates money it is part of our money. It is when you donate from your pocket that it is your money.

[_act_]

If I don't have the money to donate to charity and I partake in such competition I will do it. Bit if I have the money to donate to charity, I don't need to gamble for that. It is good to give out to the needy but one thing that I am still thinking is that giving our gambling wins to charity is not a guarantee that we will win more.

Can someone think that if he donates to charity that he would be winning more while gambling? That is very bad kind of mindset and only the people that are addicted can think like this. As most gamblers are losing, they will not think like this. Even some people can have plans to donate, gamble but losing and making them not to donate. Gambling should be for entertainments. If I also want to donate, I do not have to gamble with the money first but donate the money directly for charity.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

Well, in such a bet, it's not as if the gambler has the option to refuse the obligation to donate their winnings to charity. The only choice they have is either to join the competition or refuse. I think most of the time we also have to do something for charitable purposes, but not all the time. So, if I accept to join such a competition, I don't mind giving off my little or huge winnings. Although it would not be all the time. I mean, sometimes, I will also have to join competitions where I can have my winning to my self.

[Agbe]

Why the smallest. The one with the biggest amount should do that. And I will not involved in such because I like to do charity giving with my open heart and not in condition. And from my understanding of your post, the two of them were ready to do the charity work but the idea came for them to do some gambling fun before going out. And from my view point it was not a gamble but a game for fun.

[acroman08]

Do you think this is the kind of competition you will like to get involved in knowing that even your smallest bonus wins will all be given to charity and you'll have nothing left?

if it is a one time thing or once in a while competition, yeah why not. it's a good way to have fun and help others in the process. that being said, wouldn't it be better to have a fixed amount that will be donated to the charity and then just adding the "smallest bonus win" to it because there is a chance that the smallest bonus wins are the one that will be donated is very small.

[Adbitco]

Do you think this is the kind of competition you will like to get involved in knowing that even your smallest bonus wins will all be given to charity and you'll have nothing left?

If this is the only option left for gamblers then people don't mind focusing on making one of the charity houses as well it could be orphanage home or anything that has to do with charity so people gambling could always come to donate in their center, you would see this may become more of business and won't benefit the gambling companies that much because much attention has been moved away because no one would want a situation were he sent all their winning to the charity and go home with nothing, to me it makes gambling not interesting anymore.

I think this type of competitions should be ones a year and not something continually otherwise people interest towards their involvement could be drastically drift from gambling to something else, knowing too well that there is nothing in return after having giving their winning to the charity, thu it's a nice idea.

[el kaka22]

This type of thing should be promoted and spread a lot more. We are seeing people who keep on gambling for just personal reasons, and people who earn just for personal reasons, basically we all live for just ourselves.

However, the more we promote charities and do more for them, I think we are going to get better results in life. Remember, just you being rich or just you living a good life will never be good for you, that would mean like being the guy with a billion dollars in mars, what can you do if there is nowhere to spend it. If you however make your community better, then even if you are just an average person, it would be like living in Asgard. This is why trying to make sure that everyone is better is the way to go.

Gambling could be used for this, I mean we are talking about something that will take a while but can happen, anything could be used to promote charities, and I am all for gambling being part of it. This could be something that will not be all that easy, we need to make sure that they know which charities how much and so forth. In this case it was father and son, so it is not a big deal, but a tournament like this would be a lot harder to convince people to join all together.

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

Do you think this is the kind of competition you will like to get involved in knowing that even your smallest bonus wins will all be given to charity and you'll have nothing left?

This is exactly what we meant about people gambling for fun, because judging from the scenerio which surrounds this event, it clearly shows it was a Father's Day celebration between Son and Dad, who just went to a casino to just have fun together. Because if they literally were there for the money, they definitely would have cash out the $1300 they won at the beginning of the video, but rather they continue and kept gambling more. And also nice the money was donated to charity, because I didn't actually watch the entire video, I stopped half way

[retreat]

I'm not the type of gambler who wants to participate in things like that, I just gamble and enjoy it, whether I lose or win, it doesn't matter to me. I wouldn't want to donate my betting money to other people, not because I'm greedy or don't have a heart, but I think that if I want to donate I would prefer to donate the money I earn from my job, not the money from gambling, because in my opinion it's just It's just unethical, yeah other people might think that I'm a hypocrite but I still stand by that position.

[lovesmayfamilis]

I would slightly change the idea of charity. There is a certain number of games played, after which a person remains in the black. It would be a good, noble act to give some of the money you win to charity. In the same way, if you are unlucky in the game for a very long time, donate some amount, because anyway, this money goes down the drain, and Lady Luck will probably not leave this good action unnoticed.

[fullhdpixel]

I watched a YouTube video where the father and son had a slot betting competition. The rule was simple- the individual with the biggest bonus wins while the individual with the smallest bonus will have to donate all of it to their favorite charity which the family has been involved in. I liked the idea gambling and donating to charity for a good cause. I have hardly heard of gamblers doing something exactly like this. Do you think this is the kind of competition you will like to get involved in knowing that even your smallest bonus wins will all be given to charity and you'll have nothing left?

I wouldn't mind at all if I knew that the amount I'm using for it is something that I can easily afford to lose, so even if I lose all the money without getting any bonus or if I win a bonus that goes to a charity, I am completely okay with it. Even if it's the other way around where the person with the highest bonus will donate their winnings to the charity, I would still not mind doing it if I'm getting the highest bonus because it's for a good cause and I believe the money that is spent for good causes isn't lost, it's money well spent.

These sort of competitions will only be conducted among people who are already fond of doing such deeds. If a person already does charity all the time, they would surely think of doing things that can increase their chances of giving more money to the charity, and this is one of those ways for them.

[lienfaye]

Do you think this is the kind of competition you will like to get involved in knowing that even your smallest bonus wins will all be given to charity and you'll have nothing left?

Well, I like the idea since it's a competition for a good cause, the challenge and excitement are real. However, for me, if you want to donate then do it because it's your own free will and not because you lose in the challenge. This might be unusual since there's a charity involve and it's a father and son competition (or bonding). However, maybe this is their way to make it more exciting knowing that there's a consequence for the one who lose the competition.

[Findingnemo]

I am not that rich enough but I do encourage if they are capable of doing it, basically I am not having high hopes on charity instead I would do anything on my own or to near charity house where I can get the satisfaction of the money spent for the actual cause while internet there are lot of scammers out there in the name of charity.

I don't connect with the idea either, if you want to donate money then just go ahead and do it instead of trying your luck by betting it and give them later if it's small from other one.

[bitbollo]

donate even small amounts to charity is always something important to do and must be always supported.
Each year I made donation of a small amount to some charity, of course these are not money come in from gambling but why not...
Well, pretty obviously that any player with gambling issue must avoid at all any similar initiative... but generally could be a nice way for doing a good action (even if this is not related to gambling).

[Wapfika]

Do you think this is the kind of competition you will like to get involved in knowing that even your smallest bonus wins will all be given to charity and you'll have nothing left?

Well, I like the idea since it's a competition for a good cause, the challenge and excitement are real. However, for me, if you want to donate then do it because it's your own free will and not because you lose in the challenge. This might be unusual since there's a charity involve and it's a father and son competition (or bonding). However, maybe this is their way to make it more exciting knowing that there's a consequence for the one who lose the competition.

They are doing a content at the same time so they are in a win win scenario since they won the game and at the same time gain impression to their channel that possibly monetize due to the ads when I watch it.

This kind of competition is for rich since there’s no guarantee that they can both win on their turn. They are sharing a bankroll which makes this competition very risky. They are very lucky to hit a massive bonus win on their own turn because it’s very to do that with the limited spin they got due to the amount of bet they are using.

[Free Market Capitalist]

I find this nonsense, tbh.

donate even small amounts to charity is always something important to do and must be always supported.
Each year I made donation of a small amount to some charity, of course these are not money come in from gambling but why not...
Well, pretty obviously that any player with gambling issue must avoid at all any similar initiative... but generally could be a nice way for doing a good action (even if this is not related to gambling).

I also donate to a charity every month, but it is independent of this nonsense. Even in my case or in the case of winning skill games it would make sense to donate a % of your net profits to the charity but in games like slots? People don't know anymore what to invent to get views on Youtube.

[Porfirii]

-snip-

What if both participants (father and son) are losers? It may be easier to directly donate this money to charity.

It seems to me that everything that is done on YouTube is done to increase views, and a plausible pretext under the guise of charity is carried out for the sake of monetization.

I believe that such YouTube channels should not be idealized as something disinterested and truly associated with charity.

That's what I thought when I first read the OP. Most probably (depending on the games they play, of course) one would win and the other lose. Chances of both winning are low and even in that case they would lose the smallest win. I agree with you that most content not only in Youtube but in other Social Media and the Internet in general is created with the only aim of increasing views, so chances are that their plan was profitable since the beginning no matter of the results of their bets.

-snip-

For now I will not do it, but if I'm rich and there's nothing I want to achieve again in my life, I will do it.

This is so generous

[Hewlet]

I watched a YouTube video where the father and son had a slot betting competition. The rule was simple- the individual with the biggest bonus wins while the individual with the smallest bonus will have to donate all of it to their favorite charity which the family has been involved in. I liked the idea gambling and donating to charity for a good cause. I have hardly heard of gamblers doing something exactly like this. Do you think this is the kind of competition you will like to get involved in knowing that even your smallest bonus wins will all be given to charity and you'll have nothing left?

this is the little way of spicing up things for a good cause most expecially when relating with someone that might not want to give things out willingly without attaching a clause. We've done something like that where we just bet on a novelty match in our old boys gathering and whatever comes out of it is gathered and if it's not much an additional contribution added to it and used to assist out alma mater in a project that's lacking in the school. It's a smart way to get people to do things and they will easily oblige to play the game. If they win, itw to thier favour while if they lose, they wouldn't be sad after all because the proceed of the bet actually went into a meaningful thing that has left the life of the beneficiaries better that it was before.

[danherbias07]

It's like you said, not too many gamblers will do such a thing. Maybe the rich one. Most gamblers are gambling trying to make a fortune out of those bonuses and I don't think they will just give it out. Honestly, it might become the other way around, where they will gamble more to make more fortune.

I salute those two for doing such a thing but let's face it, not everyone will do it. They might even say it's a waste of money because they don't know if it will really be spent on charity. I won't wash my hands and say I'd do such a thing too because I won't. I am not in a position where I could just give out money while my family is hungry. As I said, this could be done by the rich people who have nothing else to do with their money.