That's actually not how US politics work. See, there's another Democratic candidate, Kamala Harris, who is polling better against Trump and Biden was--and Biden was in a dead heat with Trump before he dropped out. Trump is more likely to lose now.
Bitcoin went up 500% under president Biden.
You don't need Trump or anybody else to make Bitcoin go up.
You said Trump is more likely to lose? I don't think so, [...]
I only go by the scientific polls. They aren't perfect, but they sure beat "feelings".
If it were up to "feelings", then RFK Jr. would probably be winning
.
I think it’s probably good news because the Biden administration has been hostile towards Bitcoin. Trump has so far in this election run up talked kindly about Bitcoin so a Republican administration should he good. I also think Harris has no chance against Trump so it should be good for us.
There is no evidence "the Biden administration has been hostile towards Bitcoin":
1.
Bitcoin went up 500% under president Biden.2. The ETFs were approved under president Biden.
Meanwhile, Harris is polling better against Trump than Biden was, and she is turning the entire campaign around. Biden was 50/50 in the polls, so I suspect Harris will greatly increase the odds.
This will be a very close election.
And for those of you that don't live in the USA, the odds of Trump actually getting more votes than Harris is...
close to zero. The only reason Trump can win is because our system makes it so you can win the race with a minority of voters.