Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 03:56:00 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: bitcoind mining  (Read 1978 times)
100%digital (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 100
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 19, 2011, 10:37:16 PM
 #1

Hello All,

I post this same question like once a week in hopes someone (perhaps Dekbit) will reply Sad

does anybody have any experience with mining via RPC to the bitcoind service? i'm used both poclbm/poclbm-mod/phoenix all report differently regarding "shares" accpeted and calculated hash returned... I'm examined raw data flow between miners and mining server (bitcoind) and can attest that all are solving hashs, but somthing seems to be up... if you've worked with the bitcoind service please reply to this thread Sad

...i hate the fact that (while clearly not a noobe) i cant post to correct section of forum, i have valuable insight to contribute as well -should any mods come across this post, i would much appreciate you removing my inabilities to post in all forum sections.

regards,

J
1714060560
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714060560

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714060560
Reply with quote  #2

1714060560
Report to moderator
1714060560
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714060560

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714060560
Reply with quote  #2

1714060560
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, but full nodes are more resource-heavy, and they must do a lengthy initial syncing process. As a result, lightweight clients with somewhat less security are commonly used.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714060560
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714060560

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714060560
Reply with quote  #2

1714060560
Report to moderator
1714060560
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714060560

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714060560
Reply with quote  #2

1714060560
Report to moderator
1714060560
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714060560

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714060560
Reply with quote  #2

1714060560
Report to moderator
grue
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1431



View Profile
December 21, 2011, 12:46:47 AM
 #2

you're talking about solo mining, right? because they're no shares in solo mining.

It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.

Adblock for annoying signature ads | Enhanced Merit UI
100%digital (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 100
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 23, 2011, 06:35:28 PM
 #3

i am talking about solo mining, as my post details... bitcoind is the native clients used for checking/solving hashs created by the various mining clients. while the term "share" may not be 100% accurate, a "getwork" is much the same...

thanks for your insightful reply...
grue
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1431



View Profile
December 30, 2011, 04:39:08 PM
 #4

i am talking about solo mining, as my post details... bitcoind is the native clients used for checking/solving hashs created by the various mining clients. while the term "share" may not be 100% accurate, a "getwork" is much the same...
bitcoind gives the miner a merkle root to work with, along with a target, and the miner checks through all the nonces, if none of the nonces result in a hash lower than the target, it asks for more. if it finds a nonce that is lower than the target, it submits the nonce to bitcoind, and it's broadcasted to the network.

in solo mining, as i said, there are no "shares". you either get a block or not. but some miners count imaginary "shares" when solo mining. where a imaginary share is a nonce that meets difficulty of 1.

It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.

Adblock for annoying signature ads | Enhanced Merit UI
Epoch
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 922
Merit: 1003



View Profile
December 31, 2011, 08:26:48 AM
 #5


when it comes to bitcoin anything,  i am still a noobe
Not too many noobes have a 32GHash/s setup ...  Wink
jjiimm_64
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000


View Profile
January 01, 2012, 12:25:01 AM
 #6


when it comes to bitcoin anything,  i am still a noobe
Not too many noobes have a 32GHash/s setup ...  Wink

LOL,  I didn't know anyone would notice anymore since my signature is 'image removed'.



1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
Epoch
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 922
Merit: 1003



View Profile
January 01, 2012, 12:47:44 AM
 #7


when it comes to bitcoin anything,  i am still a noobe
Not too many noobes have a 32GHash/s setup ...  Wink

LOL,  I didn't know anyone would notice anymore since my signature is 'image removed'.


I think you mentioned it somewhere ...  Wink
100%digital (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 100
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 03, 2012, 03:53:29 PM
 #8

Thank you for your reply Grue. I'm thinking the mining software i'm using (phoenix) does not use "imaginary" shares, while poclbm/poclbm-mod does... thus giving me different feedback via the console.

Is there any additional reporting capabilities to bitcoind besides the "getinfo" switch?

...bitcoind getinfo also reports "hashspersec" = 0, which i can attest via rawcaptures and the f'd up reporting behavior of poclbm is not true Smiley


again, thanks for your replies,

J
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!