Stumbled upon this thread when I raked through Ninjastic the second time to find an active representative of the casino. I am in agreement with what
Igebotz said above, that, to a length of a degree, there shouldn't be anything their CM [any casino and the CM they hired to manage their campaign here] should do about this, but... as I hit a dead-end with my own pursuit of a contact of Roobet...
OP, have you send
Hhampuz a PM? I don't want to trouble him and "spam" his inbox with redundancies inquiring the same info, given my opinion about CM and cases, if you've already asked him.
[...] How can the person prove beyond every reasonable doubt that it is the casinos accusation is false. It is literally their the casino's word against theirs or however they say it.
This is why a situation on the scam accusations board require evidence, to validate the statement and the basis of the accusation [the "against theirs" part]. And actually [at least this is how I approach situations provided on that board] we approach cases on that board with a grain of scepticism, the whole basket of "questions everything", a pinch of "every party hides something", and a splash of whodunnit spirit, which applied to both sides simultaneously, both parties need to "actively prove" that other side is the one wronged them.