Bitcoin lover, will you vote for Trump?

[Marvell1]

Those words Trump made are political words which are not reliable until they begin to do what they promised during the rally to their people. I don't think Trump will do all those things he has promised the people of U.S because there are some people who are against BTC and crypto which they will not allow Trump to make BTC and crypto legal tender.

It is very difficult for a president to fulfill all his promises to the voters because they are not the ones who can decide everything. They need to get approval from both the Senate, House and Congress so don't blame them if they can't deliver on all their promises. I think that's not what we should care about, what we should care about is if Trump actually supports Bitcoin and crypto then that's already a win for us. As long as we have a president who supports bitcoin and will fight with us to promote its development, that's enough for us. We should not be too greedy in forcing them to fulfill every promise they have made to us. Because it's not that they don't want to do it, but sometimes it's beyond their ability.

[BADecker]

Those words Trump made are political words which are not reliable until they begin to do what they promised during the rally to their people. I don't think Trump will do all those things he has promised the people of U.S because there are some people who are against BTC and crypto which they will not allow Trump to make BTC and crypto legal tender.

It is very difficult for a president to fulfill all his promises to the voters because they are not the ones who can decide everything. They need to get approval from both the Senate, House and Congress so don't blame them if they can't deliver on all their promises. I think that's not what we should care about, what we should care about is if Trump actually supports Bitcoin and crypto then that's already a win for us. As long as we have a president who supports bitcoin and will fight with us to promote its development, that's enough for us. We should not be too greedy in forcing them to fulfill every promise they have made to us. Because it's not that they don't want to do it, but sometimes it's beyond their ability.

That's why the 'Executive Orders' rule is so powerful. Until Congress or SCOTUS overturns this rule, the President can act almost like a king.

[Akbarkoe]

Those words Trump made are political words which are not reliable until they begin to do what they promised during the rally to their people. I don't think Trump will do all those things he has promised the people of U.S because there are some people who are against BTC and crypto which they will not allow Trump to make BTC and crypto legal tender.

It is very difficult for a president to fulfill all his promises to the voters because they are not the ones who can decide everything. They need to get approval from both the Senate, House and Congress so don't blame them if they can't deliver on all their promises. I think that's not what we should care about, what we should care about is if Trump actually supports Bitcoin and crypto then that's already a win for us. As long as we have a president who supports bitcoin and will fight with us to promote its development, that's enough for us. We should not be too greedy in forcing them to fulfill every promise they have made to us. Because it's not that they don't want to do it, but sometimes it's beyond their ability.

Promises in politics are only campaign merchandise, whether or not they are implemented is how the discussion forum with his team works in his term of office, often promises are just a hoax to attract their supporters, but regarding bitcoin and Trump I'm afraid he did something like that to bitcoin which he ended up being skeptical again like when he was leading, but besides Trump Harris also seems to be open to the development of the bitcoin industry in the US, it's just that he must be stricter in regulating how the future is like what happened in Biden's hour, they are quite harsh but if according to their regulations it goes well.

[Marvell1]

... but besides Trump Harris also seems to be open to the development of the bitcoin industry in the US, it's just that he must be stricter in regulating how the future is like what happened in Biden's hour, they are quite harsh but if according to their regulations it goes well.

Are there any signs that she is as open to the crypto industry as Trump? From what I have seen since the campaign began, candidate Trump is the one who has publicly expressed his support for bitcoin. Meanwhile, Harris barely mentioned bitcoin once and even ignored it.


Bitcoin grew during Biden's term despite his unfriendly attitude towards it and it would be fine if Harris was elected and still maintained an unfriendly attitude towards it. But it's not just fine, it has a chance to grow even more if Trump is elected and delivers on some of his promises. Bitcoin would clearly have more opportunity and growth potential if Trump were elected than if Harris were elected.
Trump supports bitcoin or not, we will have to wait and see after the election is over, it is still an unanswered question. But with Harris, she almost said no because she has never cared about it. Why should we vote for a candidate who says "no" to us?

[Akbarkoe]

... but besides Trump Harris also seems to be open to the development of the bitcoin industry in the US, it's just that he must be stricter in regulating how the future is like what happened in Biden's hour, they are quite harsh but if according to their regulations it goes well.

Are there any signs that she is as open to the crypto industry as Trump? From what I have seen since the campaign began, candidate Trump is the one who has publicly expressed his support for bitcoin. Meanwhile, Harris barely mentioned bitcoin once and even ignored it.


Bitcoin grew during Biden's term despite his unfriendly attitude towards it and it would be fine if Harris was elected and still maintained an unfriendly attitude towards it. But it's not just fine, it has a chance to grow even more if Trump is elected and delivers on some of his promises. Bitcoin would clearly have more opportunity and growth potential if Trump were elected than if Harris were elected.
Trump supports bitcoin or not, we will have to wait and see after the election is over, it is still an unanswered question. But with Harris, she almost said no because she has never cared about it. Why should we vote for a candidate who says "no" to us?

I've heard at a fundraiser in September if I don't forget he said that he supports AI technology and digital assets, although not specific in saying it and not the same as what Trump said but that comment shows that he is also not too skeptical about it.

Did you hear that Harris said he does not support bitcoin? for me people who do not speak do not mean that they reject or do not support, governance is dynamic and also how economic opportunities go along with the development of technology, so Trump even though he does support openly but governance is a government where it must be firm on something that even has to swallow its own saliva during the campaign, I mean something on what is marketed on political campaigns usually does not match what they promise.
BTW I am not a fanatic of either of them, because bitcoin will continue to advance according to its wishes even if it is bridled like before.

[terrific]

What season are we and candidates like Trump saying that he's supporting crypto? Don't be too naive and gullible people.
Politicians will tell that they support you even you aren't doing anything to get your vote.

[GigaBit]

Usually, political figures make various promises before coming to power, especially before elections, but it is now clear that Trump has given special support to crypto at this time. If he comes to power, surely crypto lovers will be supported by the American government. In addition, they will move away from the government's negative stance towards Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies and put their faith in Bitcoin. This would be a good initiative for all bitcoiners. That's why these people love Bitcoin and will try to elect Trump.

Trump also shared his own opinion in an interview with X, saying his country wants to get the first position in crypto. He would not like any other country to rule over it. That is why it will have direct support on Bitcoin.



https://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-going-for-crypto-bro-vote-world-liberty-financial-2024-9

[BADecker]

Usually, political figures make various promises before coming to power, especially before elections, but it is now clear that Trump has given special support to crypto at this time. If he comes to power, surely crypto lovers will be supported by the American government. In addition, they will move away from the government's negative stance towards Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies and put their faith in Bitcoin. This would be a good initiative for all bitcoiners. That's why these people love Bitcoin and will try to elect Trump.

Trump also shared his own opinion in an interview with X, saying his country wants to get the first position in crypto. He would not like any other country to rule over it. That is why it will have direct support on Bitcoin.



https://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-going-for-crypto-bro-vote-world-liberty-financial-2024-9

Crypto is supported by the government, and has been for the whole life of crypto being around. What do I mean? Crypto transactions are private, except when they are made public like through some of the exchanges. But if an exchange became a private organization - a Private Membership Association (PMA) - with members having to join through an appropriate PMA signup process, even exchanges could be private.

The US is a private property country. Bitcoin transactions are private, even if the amounts of the transaction are public in the blockchain. Government gets control when people don't remain private, voluntarily.

Scared of government? Why? Because of the threats or actions of government people? File a claim with the courts against the man or woman (government official) who threatens or damages you. They are simply people like anyone else. Make them pay in Bitcoin.

[harapan]

In fact I will vote for the president who will work well for the development of Bitcoin. Between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, if Kamala Harris did more to develop Bitcoin than Donald Trump, I would definitely vote for her. Moreover, what if the development of Bitcoin is forgotten after voting?

Inasmuch as you're not aware of his or her capacity or capability to handle matters of Bitcoin,then it's needless to invoke your decision depending on that factor.Because political representatives are different,with different aims and intentions initially.
Politicians in the same vain are very tactical and extremely calculative even ahead of their actions.
In between, don't get too comfortable with their unforseen supports and promises.

[Wakate]

In fact I will vote for the president who will work well for the development of Bitcoin. Between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, if Kamala Harris did more to develop Bitcoin than Donald Trump, I would definitely vote for her. Moreover, what if the development of Bitcoin is forgotten after voting?

Inasmuch as you're not aware of his or her capacity or capability to handle matters of Bitcoin,then it's needless to invoke your decision depending on that factor.Because political representatives are different,with different aims and intentions initially.
Politicians in the same vain are very tactical and extremely calculative even ahead of their actions.
In between, don't get too comfortable with their unforseen supports and promises.

Most time I don't like arguing about politicians and what they intend doing for the people. Trump is a good business that has entered politics and we have seen that the United States was doing very fine when he was the president then before now that Biden seems to have scattered the entire economy making things not to work as usual. Every individual voters know what they want and who they want to vote for but we should not be influenced by celebrities to vote for someone that we think will not meant well for the United States people and someone that is not experienced at all.

[BADecker]

There are loads of people in the US who are better than Trump. But Trump is the only one popular enough to beat the Deep State Dem Regime that would do away with much private property if it were allowed to remain in power.

Trump is in favor of Constitutionality... even if he has to play the non-constitution-game somewhat to destroy the destroyers of freedom. Freedom in America is based on private property. And it is private property that Trump would uphold in America.

What does this have to do with Bitcoin? Your bitcoins are your private property, as long as you don't reveal your private key to anyone else. Anybody who would take down the Bitcoin blockchain is destroying private property. This is something that Cabala would do, even if she doesn't speak to Bitcoin directly... not a thing that Trump would do.

The Bitcoin choice is clear. The Trump choice is the only strength for Bitcoin.