HAMSTER! success and failure.

[fikrett]

Many people drop them since instead that they get a lot of praised when finally they launch their token and it even listed on big exchange people didn't like what they get despite of the efforts they give for the project.

Right now I don't think its good to invest with this project since its like people who bought HMSTR will get fooled again. They are always the winner and true losers are those people who believe that there token will bring good success for people who invest with it.

I see this project as pump and dump token so people must be aware of that.

Many T2E projects are like that, they are a shitcoin basically with some tricks done beside it to get people rolled up and hyped about it to buy it / acquire it.
That doesn't mean that they can't be worked on, especially with farms ready for that type of activity, however, usually, they don't deliver to the expectations put on them.

[Mr. Magkaisa]

I call this abuse. The people behind Hamster are banking on the success of Notcoin they saw the opportunity to monetize their platform because of the eagerness of the people to join, thinking that they are going to make money out of the success of Notcoin, it's both a success and a failure.
Success for the developers of Hamster but failure for their users, now people are looking for warning for the next Hamster.
 

            -      It is your opinion to call it abuse, but the  marketing they did is really brilliant. Abuse because of what people get? people on their telegram airdrop  did not earned a lot because of them also.  Most of them look for bigger referral on their profile in hamster which results the same on their lower bracket.

You know the law of airdrop, the fewer the participants the bigger you get. I am one of the participants. I am not happy on what i got but this is the only project
I witnessed, earning huge amount on their airdrop.

[fikrett]

I call this abuse. The people behind Hamster are banking on the success of Notcoin they saw the opportunity to monetize their platform because of the eagerness of the people to join, thinking that they are going to make money out of the success of Notcoin, it's both a success and a failure.
Success for the developers of Hamster but failure for their users, now people are looking for warning for the next Hamster.
 

It is your opinion to call it abuse, but the  marketing they did is really brilliant.
Abuse because of what people get? people on their telegram airdrop  did not earned alot because of them also.
Most of them lok for bigger referal on their profile in hamster which results the same on their lower bracket.
You know the law of airdrop, the fewer the participants the bigger you get. I am one of the participants. I am not happy on what i got but this is the only project
I witnessed, earning huge amount on their airdrop.

HK just got too bloated due to their marketing and hype around them, it's was inevitable that people wouldn't receive the news about a small drop for everybody warmly - even though they should of, because HK was the biggest of them after NOT in terms of communities, in my opinion.

[milewilda]

I call this abuse. The people behind Hamster are banking on the success of Notcoin they saw the opportunity to monetize their platform because of the eagerness of the people to join, thinking that they are going to make money out of the success of Notcoin, it's both a success and a failure.
Success for the developers of Hamster but failure for their users, now people are looking for warning for the next Hamster.
 

It is your opinion to call it abuse, but the  marketing they did is really brilliant.
Abuse because of what people get? people on their telegram airdrop  did not earned alot because of them also.
Most of them lok for bigger referal on their profile in hamster which results the same on their lower bracket.
You know the law of airdrop, the fewer the participants the bigger you get. I am one of the participants. I am not happy on what i got but this is the only project
I witnessed, earning huge amount on their airdrop.

HK just got too bloated due to their marketing and hype around them, it's was inevitable that people wouldn't receive the news about a small drop for everybody warmly - even though they should of, because HK was the biggest of them after NOT in terms of communities, in my opinion.

But the bad thing that they have done is that they are really that giving out that small accumulation specially into those who had grind or simply with the community involvement. We do know that once that the community will really be ending up on having that kind of disappointment because of the allocation then no matter how big the community is, it will really be ending up on a failure. If we do really tend to look on what happened on $NOT then its not something the same way on how they do handle up the community. Also, nothing beats out if you are the one or the first of something and its expected for copy cats will really be that unlikely for it to follow in terms of success to those projects that have tending to copy it out. I do remember about on that MSN and now that HMSTER and other any projects on which it do ends up on failing
because once it do have that bad impressions on a project because of the shit decisions they had made then it will really be bringing out into their demise. Its a complete failure of a project and its not shocking anymore. It is really just that people cant be able to accept that they had recieve peanuts after all the months that they had grinded the tap games and ending up on getting that isnt worth of their time and effort.

[Coin_trader]

Aside from their social media earnings, their main source of profit are from VC investors that provide initial liquidity for the exchange listing of this shit token. They later take profit once retail investors enter due to the hype.

Airdrop users was use to create hype and marketing for the project while the team and VC slowly drain the liquidity on exchange using retail money that newly bought the token. It’s a success because there’s still a lot of naive traders that still buying this token despite there’s no long term benefits on holding this token.

[fikrett]

Aside from their social media earnings, their main source of profit are from VC investors that provide initial liquidity for the exchange listing of this shit token. They later take profit once retail investors enter due to the hype.

Airdrop users was use to create hype and marketing for the project while the team and VC slowly drain the liquidity on exchange using retail money that newly bought the token. It’s a success because there’s still a lot of naive traders that still buying this token despite there’s no long term benefits on holding this token.

For them - totally successful and 2 Season would be the second, maybe a smaller success, but nevertheless, for people - a failure like no other (especially for those who got into crypto because of HK in the first place ).

[sale1143]

All those tokens have no success in the future because they don't have any valuable project, those tokens have a value a few hours after the listing and then the value drops, the only profit is the founders because of advertisements and views on social networks, out of all of them I would perhaps single out bloom, it seems to me somehow with potential in the future!

[Lida93]

I Believe that the group of people behind this project is very bright specially hteir marketing officers.

They weren’t brilliant; they just got lucky because too many naive people rushed into joining every Telegram app, thinking each one would be the next Notcoin

The catalyst to all of these damn success to hamster Kombat so-called achievement was due to the  success of Notcoin and Dogs projects where participants received some mouthwatering reward's. And then, hamster Kombat was in the pipeline and that attracted a lot of newcomers to hamster Kombat especially with how promising too the future of the  project was presented to users.  Giving the circumstance, HMSTR is one telegram project this year I think whose team made a bulk-buster profit three times  than what they gave as reward.

[el kaka22]

The success of hamster was from the amount of people it got hyped, and not a lot of projects can do this, the price isn't doing well right now and expected to do much better, but too many people participated which means there were too many people selling the moment airdrop was distributed.

What could the project creators do in such a situation? We are talking about people who could not control the price, they can't just use all their money to buy their tokens back and burn them, they would have no money left for anything else, and even if they did, it would be a temporary increase and then people would continue to sell, so nothing would have been solved. The solution was people not selling all together, but they unfortunately did.

[SamReomo]

They weren’t brilliant; they just got lucky because too many naive people rushed into joining every Telegram app, thinking each one would be the next Notcoin

That's true, they took advantage of new comers who were excited because of Notcoin success and they thought that they'll get some good amount of tokens by participating in it. Not just Notcoin but Dogs also made them more sure that they'll get good amount of airdrop for their effort, but in real the users got nothing but hope, and most of them left Hamster Kombat.

[Baki202]

The success of hamster was from the amount of people it got hyped, and not a lot of projects can do this, the price isn't doing well right now and expected to do much better, but too many people participated which means there were too many people selling the moment airdrop was distributed.

People that were tapping hamster was to much And I don't see why people are blaming the community their is nothing wrong with what hamster do every one is just doing everything possible so that they don't go beyond their own budget. And the project was actually over hyped because the moment everyone heard that hamster is listing the whole table changed and people were excited about what they will get from it but at the end of the day they got, the price is not looking well and the project is looking as if it as failed already since from day one that it was listed.

What could the project creators do in such a situation? We are talking about people who could not control the price, they can't just use all their money to buy their tokens back and burn them, they would have no money left for anything else, and even if they did, it would be a temporary increase and then people would continue to sell, so nothing would have been solved. The solution was people not selling all together, but they unfortunately did.

They did not plan everything well and that is why the project is going down and if you don't take time binance will end up removing it, their people that actually bought and keep so if they should in anyway hear that there is an increase they will definitely sell they didn't give a good listing price so people were disappointed and made a lot of people lose intrest, I did not even bother because it was seriously trending on twitter the expectation of people was just to high.

[lixer]

The success of hamster was from the amount of people it got hyped, and not a lot of projects can do this, the price isn't doing well right now and expected to do much better, but too many people participated which means there were too many people selling the moment airdrop was distributed.

People that were tapping hamster was to much And I don't see why people are blaming the community their is nothing wrong with what hamster do every one is just doing everything possible so that they don't go beyond their own budget. And the project was actually over hyped because the moment everyone heard that hamster is listing the whole table changed and people were excited about what they will get from it but at the end of the day they got, the price is not looking well and the project is looking as if it as failed already since from day one that it was listed.

Community had a little bit of wrong though, we can't just blame the market or the project creators or anything like that all the time and get away with it. We should see what went wrong with the community as well. Notcoin had very few people, not as much as hamster kombat, and they distributed thousands of dollars to each person.

When this happened, tens of millions of people started to look for projects in telegram app world, and TON provided a lot of options, it still does, there are still people trusting dogs or whatever they can find. So what was the end result? Tens of millions of people wanted thousands just like notcoin airdrop, how could that happen? Even a thousand dollars per person would mean 10 million people would be paid ten billion dollars, does that make any sense to you?

[shinratensei_]

The success of hamster was from the amount of people it got hyped, and not a lot of projects can do this, the price isn't doing well right now and expected to do much better, but too many people participated which means there were too many people selling the moment airdrop was distributed.

What could the project creators do in such a situation? We are talking about people who could not control the price, they can't just use all their money to buy their tokens back and burn them, they would have no money left for anything else, and even if they did, it would be a temporary increase and then people would continue to sell, so nothing would have been solved. The solution was people not selling all together, but they unfortunately did.

yeah they definitely can't control the price, but honestly even at curent price it's already overrated and overvalued, what project that don't have utility at all getting valued around $300m if not for these tap-tap project, I just don't understand.

so I think the low reward is to be expected from the fact that there are simply too much participant while reward is not increasing which equal to high dilution.
moreover, people having too high of an expectation doesn't help either, some think they can buy house by participating to hamster kombat, guess what , if they can buy house from just participating with minimal effort, that means other 1.3 million users also can, doesn't make sense.

[Single Jump]

https://t.me/hamster_kombat
58.2 million

They certainly got off to a great start, and they helped increase my interest in learning more about crypto. Their graphics are detailed and funny, but can they grow beyond tap-to-earn and turn into something much better? How?

[itorai]

The success of hamster was from the amount of people it got hyped, and not a lot of projects can do this, the price isn't doing well right now and expected to do much better, but too many people participated which means there were too many people selling the moment airdrop was distributed.

What could the project creators do in such a situation? We are talking about people who could not control the price, they can't just use all their money to buy their tokens back and burn them, they would have no money left for anything else, and even if they did, it would be a temporary increase and then people would continue to sell, so nothing would have been solved. The solution was people not selling all together, but they unfortunately did.

by assessing the views of the project community, I am optimistic that what has been achieved they cannot control the price because the price of hamster combat, by facing fluctuations, with many investors selling when the launch occurs, with this happening it is very difficult to maintain the price increase.

[Dzwaafu11]

I Believe that the group of people behind this project is very bright specially hteir marketing officers.

They weren’t brilliant; they just got lucky because too many naive people rushed into joining every Telegram app, thinking each one would be the next Notcoin

Exactly. They are not brilliant; it was luck, and it was because of the way NOTCOIN paid people. Everybody thinks Hamster Komabt will do the same thing. That was why they got many people to join their Telegram channel and other channels, and it later turned to dust. Although many people are blaming the community for the return of the project, I did not blame the developers/community people that played Hamster Kombat. It was too much; everybody thought it would cook; it was expectation that too much; if not, I did not see anything wrong with the community. 

[TastyChillySauce00]

I Believe that the group of people behind this project is very bright specially hteir marketing officers.

They weren’t brilliant; they just got lucky because too many naive people rushed into joining every Telegram app, thinking each one would be the next Notcoin

Exactly. They are not brilliant; it was luck, and it was because of the way NOTCOIN paid people. Everybody thinks Hamster Komabt will do the same thing. That was why they got many people to join their Telegram channel and other channels, and it later turned to dust. Although many people are blaming the community for the return of the project, I did not blame the developers/community people that played Hamster Kombat. It was too much; everybody thought it would cook; it was expectation that too much; if not, I did not see anything wrong with the community.

yeah, people seem to also ignore the fact that different developer, different reward mechanism, we all know there are some good developer like the one who developed not coin and dogs where they just impose minimum qualification to be eligible, and then there are some developers that are low key community milkers, trying to milk their community as much as they can and then give pennies.

blind FOMO is always not good, even from day 1 we can already understand that the hamster kombat reward will be overly diluted but it seems people who get fomo'd just ignore the notion anyway and instead just trying to believe on their dreamy expectation.
I don't think the airdrop is disappointing and below expectation, I think people's expectation are simply too high.

[CK485]

I Believe that the group of people behind this project is very bright specially hteir marketing officers.

They weren’t brilliant; they just got lucky because too many naive people rushed into joining every Telegram app, thinking each one would be the next Notcoin

Exactly. They are not brilliant; it was luck, and it was because of the way NOTCOIN paid people. Everybody thinks Hamster Komabt will do the same thing. That was why they got many people to join their Telegram channel and other channels, and it later turned to dust. Although many people are blaming the community for the return of the project, I did not blame the developers/community people that played Hamster Kombat. It was too much; everybody thought it would cook; it was expectation that too much; if not, I did not see anything wrong with the community. 

it is a real thing for the future, that not all projects provide a guarantee to always succeed, even though hamsters at the beginning seem good because many people follow and are supported by a large community, it is a process that looks very good so people are interested in trying it.

[ultrloa]

I Believe that the group of people behind this project is very bright specially hteir marketing officers.

They weren’t brilliant; they just got lucky because too many naive people rushed into joining every Telegram app, thinking each one would be the next Notcoin

Exactly. They are not brilliant; it was luck, and it was because of the way NOTCOIN paid people. Everybody thinks Hamster Komabt will do the same thing. That was why they got many people to join their Telegram channel and other channels, and it later turned to dust. Although many people are blaming the community for the return of the project, I did not blame the developers/community people that played Hamster Kombat. It was too much; everybody thought it would cook; it was expectation that too much; if not, I did not see anything wrong with the community. 

They just take advantage on the hype what tap games bring and they are just lucky that many people share their project and succeed like this. If people didn't just share this and work solely to qualify on airdrops then provably that hamster combat will not succeed just like this. But many airdrop hunter help this kind of devs to gather fast engagement that's why this project soar up high and now they are the one benefiting for its success. I don't know why we can't blame their community for their outrageous growth since they are main reason why they succeed like this and confident to give few bucks to their airdrop hunters since they already know that there's nothing to chase since they are successful anyways towards what shitty project they do.

[South Park]

it is a real thing for the future, that not all projects provide a guarantee to always succeed, even though hamsters at the beginning seem good because many people follow and are supported by a large community, it is a process that looks very good so people are interested in trying it.

No project can guarantee success and if there is one that does then you know it is a scam, besides getting the support of a large amount of people is not really indicative of the quality of the project itself, as we have seen many projects that had a lot of support and they still failed, since the project did not really had anything that could make it a long term success, and as soon as the investors realized this, they got rid of their coins and left the project to never return.