Is my profile eligible for signature campaigns ?

[Free Market Capitalist]

Neutral tags do not matter for campaigns.

False. Here is an example:

[2]: Your application was rejected for one of the possible reasons:... if you have a neutral feedback left by actmyname, or if you have neutral feedback from another DT member who flagged you as a sig spammer,

[krishnaverma]

I personally don't think you are from the Indian subcontinent as you  are trying to make a joke about yourself. If you were from the Indian subcontinent then you would have been active on multiple board related to the subcontinent.

Edit: why I am certain this guy is trying to act like a clown as he is using a username which is known in the Indian subcontinent.

You seem more interested in my nationality on a thread I created related to doubt regarding trust system on bitcointalk. Speaks clearly who is the real clown here.

[Alone055]

Am I eligible for signature campaigns now or I cannot participate ?

I'm going to be brutally honest with you. Even though your trust score, having neutral tags, might not make you ineligible for participating in some signature campaigns where the managers don't reject users for having neutral tags for certain reasons, your post quality isn't impressive enough to convince a campaign manager to accept you in their campaigns and pay you for the posts you are making. Most of your posts are general responses to topics, and you can probably find a bunch of similar replies if you look through all the pages.

What I said above is also the reason why you have been around for so many years, have made more than 1900 posts, but still couldn't manage to get a considerable amount of merits even though you have been active since 2021 based on your merit history. And, let me tell you that most campaign managers also require participants to have earned at least a minimum of 5 merits in the last 120 days to qualify, so you fail in that area as well.

So overall, despite the trust score on your profile, you have a lot of work to do on building your presence in the forum. Signature campaigns are for people who are actively contributing in the forum in one way or another, with that kind of stats, you don't really deserve a spot in one. So you better make yourself worthy of getting a spot first.

No offense.

[EarnOnVictor]

My trust shows
Trust:   +0 / =2 / -0

I am not very much sure how the trust is calculated. The reason is mentioned though on trust page. Am I eligible for signature campaigns now or I cannot participate ?

By having 100 merits and enough activities as a Full Member, you are qualified for the Full Member campaign cadre but equally note that the 2 tags you have are a concern. But the good thing is that they are both neutral tags, nonetheless the first is more concerning as it's related to plagiarism, however, the second one is "nothing to write home about," it's not a direct offence, so the campaign manager may not take it as a serious offence. Above all, I advise you to work on the quality of your posting going forward, that is what matters to show a change in attitude and attract the attention of CMs. Good luck!

[KingsDen]

I remember you applied to EVO campaign that I am managing and I passed on you for a couple reasons. You have made less than 20 posts in the last 2 months being 1 of the top reasons. Looking at your profile again, I see that you are also burstposting which IMO is a big no no unless the quality is exceptional.

Are you eligible? Yes, but likely need many improvements to be given a chance.

I am happy that at least you remember me applying there. So my profile was rejected by you not for these trust ratings ? But because of inactivity and burp posting ?

I will try to improve as per your suggestions.

The feedback although neutral by Don I wouldn't pay attention to. Merit is able to be used pretty much in any way a user sees fit, minus selling it. The feedback by LoyceV you might be hindered by and are lucky it's not a red tag and you banned. I suppose you were just copying 1 of his terms for making a deal on your sig space, but you should probably come up wit your own terms or ask permission to use someone else's. I would have to look deeper into it if I ever did consider you for a campaign, but usually neutrals are not an issue.

Thanks yahoo62278 for coming in here. Op, a manager who recently hired has given you a desirable answer. You can now work on your posting habit.

I also think that Don's feedback doesn't actually hold water and shouldn't be in the first place. I have seen people reward users with BTC just for guessing BTC price. So, I don't find it out of place to reward anyone who guesses correctly BTC price with merits. We could call it guessing, who knows if the person actually used some TA skills to arrive at the price. That's obviously not an abuse of merit.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

I also think that Don's feedback doesn't actually hold water and shouldn't be in the first place.

Before you start giving lessons the first thing you could do is to lead by example, you've been on the forum for 3 and a half years and you haven't written any neutral feedback or any negative feedback either. So you don't seem to be the best example to establish what can and can't be written in neutral feedback.

Rewarding people with your bitcoin for whatever you want is not the same as rewarding them with merit for something that has no merit at all.

[EFS]

Perhaps the allowed signature styling should change with activity score / membergroup. Like:
- Newbie: No styling (including links) allowed. Max 40 characters.
- Jr. Member: Links allowed. Max 100 characters.
- Member: Unlimited length.
- Full: Color allowed.
- Sr. Member: Size allowed
- Hero: Background color allowed

Then newbies will be less effective advertisers, which would hopefully significantly reduce the incentive for low-content posts. And when people become capable of effectively advertising through their signatures, they'll have invested a lot of time into their accounts, and they won't risk being banned by spamming.

You are a Full Member and that's enough to put some colorful ads with links in the signature area. Your trust score doesn't make you ineligible, accounts that have neutral and negative trust can also get ads in their signature. It depends on the campaign manager, they all have different criteria. The more quality posts you make, the better your chances of being selected.

[lovesmayfamilis]

I also think that Don's feedback doesn't actually hold water and shouldn't be in the first place.

Before you start giving lessons the first thing you could do is to lead by example, you've been on the forum for 3 and a half years and you haven't written any neutral feedback or any negative feedback either. So you don't seem to be the best example to establish what can and can't be written in neutral feedback.

Rewarding people with your bitcoin for whatever you want is not the same as rewarding them with merit for something that has no merit at all.

I support you. Your tag can also very well characterize the OP. Those who did not follow the link you left may not know all the reasons.
But I participated in this topic and saw the OP's attitude toward the "fun" he created. Apart from the pursuit of merit and his failure to fulfill his obligations, this topic held no significance. It is strange that Jolly did not leave him his tag. I can say that the OP likes to create the simplest questions in his started topics and almost never returns to them.
In addition, he has been on the forum long enough not to know what worries him here today. Based on this, could such a person be interested in promoting signature companies?

[Majestic-milf]

 Some campaign managers could overlook the neutral tag pasted on your account and try to give you a shot but if you don't improve, may not last long in the campaign. My advice? Focus on your weak points and better them first before seeking to apply in a campaign. At least you know where you are falling short so this gives you enough advantage over someone who doesn't.

[examplens]

This was escalating quickly.

I can go on with other comments you made in last post  but I do not care much especially seeing the tone of your last post.

Speaks clearly who is the real clown here.

You came here to ask for advice, and as far as I can see you got enough concrete answers. Why don't you just accept it and move on, instead you are entering into a further discussion in this way.
That certainly does not help you qualify for the signature campaign.

[Lucius]

Registered 7 years ago, still doesn't know forum rules and opens a topic like this in Meta - definitely not someone I would personally accept in a sig campaign. However, considering the fact that there are fewer and fewer quality members, in recent years even the biggest spammers are getting a chance.

[TheUltraElite]

You seem more interested in my nationality on a thread I created related to doubt regarding trust system on bitcointalk. Speaks clearly who is the real clown here.

Dont take it personally. The people from India who are active in the Indian local board have been trying for the last few years to encourage our people to visit and post in the local board. We have a hope to get that section up and running for any upcoming bull run in which India might (with a lot of hope) becomes the next big leader in crypto.

Speaking of campaigns, plagiarism is a big no no from my side, that is if I was managing a campaign, which will never happen. Even without a campaign you still have the ability to post and eventually earn merits over the upcoming years. So why not look forward to that?

[aioc]

I remember you applied to EVO campaign that I am managing and I passed on you for a couple reasons. You have made less than 20 posts in the last 2 months being 1 of the top reasons. Looking at your profile again, I see that you are also burstposting which IMO is a big no no unless the quality is exceptional.

Are you eligible? Yes, but likely need many improvements to be given a chance.

I am happy that at least you remember me applying there. So my profile was rejected by you not for these trust ratings ? But because of inactivity and burp posting ?

I will try to improve as per your suggestions.

Not only Yahoo. but all campaign managers wants their signature participants to be responsible on how they post, You are promoting a brand so its important to be active most of of the days in a week, and all your posts have interval to get the brand you're promoting maximum visibility.
I'm sure once you improved you can get hired on any signature campaign, the key is consistency and being a responsible poster, and keep your reputation clean by not involving into shady deals or promoting scam platforms.

[acroman08]

if you meet their initial requirement(like rank, merit, etc...) then it entirely depends on the signature campaign manager whether they'll accept you into their signature campaign or not. There are members who have negative feedback and are currently in the signature campaign.

[Aanuoluwatofunmi]

My trust shows
Trust:   +0 / =2 / -0

I am not very much sure how the trust is calculated. The reason is mentioned though on trust page. Am I eligible for signature campaigns now or I cannot participate ?

What a pity, you're now having an additional negative trust to the neutral tag left on your profile, maybe you need to take time in reviewing yourself and know the wrongs in which you have been doing and still continue doing, all the three tags on you are not speaking well at all, those two neutral tags were as equal as a negative one because you have been misbehaving right from time in things you do and maybe you never thought of how obvious those things have been to others, no campaign manager will see those reviews and want to hire you.

[Alone055]

I was also approached privately by advertiser and paid for renting my signature.

Seriously? I wouldn't believe that until I see some proof. Why would someone hire a user who doesn't even post much or has enough good-quality posts? As an advertiser, it wouldn't make sense for anyone to hire someone who posts generic posts around the forum that most people would probably ignore because that wouldn't bring enough visibility to what they're trying to promote through that user's signature. Why do you think signature campaigns only accept users with good post quality? It is because they tend to get more attention, their posts are read by more users around the forum, and that brings more visibility to the brand being advertised.

If someone can hire you, I'm pretty sure every single average poster in this forum can get offers for their signature and avatar spaces if they create their threads in the Services section but I'm pretty sure that wouldn't work because you at least need some reputation to attract advertisers, even if you don't have a very good reputation yet, you should at least be a good poster.


I know this is off-topic, but I'm curious to know why you abandoned this thread of yours and never made an announcement about the winner of the contest? You created the thread, made people participate in it, and then abandoned it. Why?
You also received one of the neutral tags you have because of that contest.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

I am not very much sure how the trust is calculated. The reason is mentioned though on trust page. Am I eligible for signature campaigns now or I cannot participate ?

All accounts on the forum are eligible for a signature campaign provided you're not ban but accepting you in the campaign is the choice of the manager and not that of any other person on the forum.

Don't want to repeat what others have said but next time when you make a mistake, instead of acting ignorant, take corrections immediately and you might get forgiven. Your tags could've been forgotten if you followed up the matter and apologize and also made yourself useful to the forum. Two neutral aren't that bad, if you could build up your positive feedback in a legitimate way, as it could help you when your profile is being looked through by managers. Also be more active on the forums and contributing to quality discussions and it might help your case when next you apply for a campaign.

[KingsDen]

I also think that Don's feedback doesn't actually hold water and shouldn't be in the first place.

Before you start giving lessons the first thing you could do is to lead by example, you've been on the forum for 3 and a half years and you haven't written any neutral feedback or any negative feedback either. So you don't seem to be the best example to establish what can and can't be written in neutral feedback.

Rewarding people with your bitcoin for whatever you want is not the same as rewarding them with merit for something that has no merit at all.

I support you. Your tag can also very well characterize the OP. Those who did not follow the link you left may not know all the reasons.
But I participated in this topic and saw the OP's attitude toward the "fun" he created. Apart from the pursuit of merit and his failure to fulfill his obligations, this topic held no significance. It is strange that Jolly did not leave him his tag. I can say that the OP likes to create the simplest questions in his started topics and almost never returns to them.
In addition, he has been on the forum long enough not to know what worries him here today. Based on this, could such a person be interested in promoting signature companies?

I have noticed Op to be some kind of controversial user. Especially when he created thread in the service board to be hired for signature campaign simply because he saw some reputable members do that, LOL. I think it was at the course of doing that he plagiarised LoyceV.
According to Lovesmayfamilis, his attitude towards the fun he created could warrant Don's neutral feedback. Maybe Don didn't use the best lines of expression in the feedback.
For not leaving red tags or neutral is normal. The community should have people interested in giving red tags and people interested in only positive, that way there will be a balance in the ecosystem.

[Alone055]

The community should have people interested in giving red tags and people interested in only positive, that way there will be a balance in the ecosystem.

Giving feedback or tags based on interests would be abusing the trust system. There is absolutely no need for a balance in this. The trust system is created to make the forum a safer place for everyone and make shady people exposed to the general public. So the tags given should solely be for the welfare of the community instead of being for personal interests, conflicts, or to create a balance in the system.

[Cryptohygenic]

 You got your first neutral tag by Don Pedro Dinero reason being stated by him as follows that "He misuses the merit system by proposing to give merit to whoever guesses the price of bitcoin on a date instead of giving merit for quality"
Second tag was by LoyceV reason being stated by him as follows that "This user plagiarized my post, while trying to rent out his avatar. I wouldn't hire him".
"(this feedback replaces LoyceMobile's feedback)"

I personal dropped this notice to you if in case you don't know how come about your 2 tags on your profile.
I also hope you adjust so that you don't get more or worse than the neutral tags.
However, it depends on quality posts and repetitions of a profile that campaign managers considers when hiring participants on their Campaigns. Perhaps you can be hired by some managers with your current tag so also, so managers would not hire you.