Comparing two best wagering strategies so far.

[swogerino]

You can conclude to this because Plinko can give a chance to win different multiplier based on your luck compared to dice game that only 1 multiplier and the other is loss. But if you will use same house edge Plinko and dice game then you will still have close result in the end.

Plinko can give you chance of winning but that doesn’t mean you will keep experiencing that pace compared to dice game that you will just lose fewer times on 100 tries.

I think they are the same when it comes to accumulating wager safely. I think the chance of winning higher multiplier is what gives you an illusion that Plinko is better since it’s hard to be on green side with dice game farming.

You have gotten it all wrong. I can understand that you can assume that they are nearly equal the same yet I never have been able to make 20 dollars translated in a wagered amount of near 13.000 dollars which yesterday with Plinko I did and I was fascinated by that which is the main reason of this post. Most people think that dice is the fastest way and it is but the cost of dice is with 20 dollars you can wager max 2500-3000 dollars because the multiplier is always 1.01 with 98% chance while in Plinko 16 rows low risk it is just one tab of 0.5x and all others are 1x or more, that is where the catch is and it is not an illusion. Of course in the end both these are wagering strategies meaning you will lose your money in the end but the best is the one who can increase your VIP levels faster.

[mammusu]

In fact, it doesn't matter what your probability of winning is if the odds of your winning are so small that they can't compensate for your losses. And you will have to compensate not only for all your losses with your winnings, but also compensate for the bookmaker's commission, and you will also have to make some profit on top. This is incredibly difficult and is in fact no different in result from a 50% probability of winning in sports betting with odds of 2. In simple terms, the higher the probability of your winning, the proportionally smaller the result and in the end, over the long term, you will still lose money, because 1 big loss, although rare, can destroy about a hundred of your small winnings.

Yes I agree with you, people say they have won a large amount of winnings, but the question is can they count the amount of losses they have experienced while playing? of course not, and even I personally think that their winnings are not enough to return the amount of losses they experienced.
But of course we don't have a problem with losses if we do gamble using money that we can afford to lose, yes although I do not deny that when we accumulate it all then it can be very large. Therefore some people never remember how much they have spent on gambling.

Gambling actually has two very different sides, on the one hand, we will feel the tremendous thrill and excitement of a victory even with the numbered winning a small amount, but as you say, on the other hand there are often losses we often ignore even though the amount is very large.

For me personally, gambling is nothing more than fun and entertainment so I will set a limit for the finances that I spend in gambling, Because after all it is very important that we always have full awareness of the risks when engaging in gambling, so that at least gambling will not affect to other aspects from our lives, such as our personal finances, family or social relationships later.

[pawanjain]

We all know that the best strategies regarding increasing your rank is to play dice 98% win with odds 1.01 and that in theory only 2 rolls out of 100 should be lost bets yet the reality in every single f*cking casino is the same, we see much more than 2 lost bets during 100 rolls, don't even start telling me that it evens out during our game play as I have had enough of idiots telling me that while I have tested millions of rolls in this strategy, anyway that is not the point, the point is that to wager from 0.50 dollars to 60-65 dollars is a nice achievement although with dice it needs like 1 - 1.30 dollars to go there and I have found out that with Plinko 16 rows low risk is much better. It takes like 0.50 or even less to reach it and the reason is because at Plinko 16 rows low risk you only have one 0.5x where you lose money while all other bets are money back or wins, the percentage of 0.5x is 19.89% which in theory it is 1 out of 5 balls to be a lost one, even here these is not reality and does not even out through millions of balls, however this is the best strategy ever to maximize your rank, I have used IDR to tell you that with almost 0.50 dollars spent you can have it wagered at least 60 dollars which is 120x your initial amount and not a bad strategy at all.

I have made this thread because many people are struggling even to reach the first level of VIP ranks, with this Plinko strategy they can do it in no time, they just have to be patient if they want to use IDR or if they use dollars they can reach it much faster. I use 0.05% of my total bankroll as a bet, you can use whatever your like.
snip

As far as I know, the algorithm takes individual bets into count and assigns them a 98% chance to win.
So if you have played 100 bets, it doesn't mean that there will be only be 2 lost bets because all bets are individual.
The first bet will have  a 98% chance to win, the second will again have 98% chance to win and so on.
This is why there is no assurity of how many losses you will have because your bet can occur in the 2% loss more than 2 times as well.
This was my understanding though, not saying that what you are saying is wrong or something.

[MArsland]

I have made this thread because many people are struggling even to reach the first level of VIP ranks, with this Plinko strategy they can do it in no time, they just have to be patient if they want to use IDR or if they use dollars they can reach it much faster. I use 0.05% of my total bankroll as a bet, you can use whatever your like.

I don't know I'm not actively playing at Plingko, I've tried all the lines but the return is not worth it, losing 50% of what I throw. Limbo and Crash are favorites even in Crash I was lucky enough to play the smallest capital. You share a good way to play at Plingko, I really like it but maybe it takes momentum to try it again. You must know when a gambler who is disappointed from 1 game doesn't make him come back for a long time. Besides, I'm not chasing VIP Level, so a little freedom without having a target.

[bering]

I know the strategy is to increase your level at the casino but not targetting the profit but i think OP strategy cannot be used for every people because the results is depend on people luck theirself and previously i have tried similar strategy which OP said that i was playing plinko with using automatic bets and low risk option and from 100 automatic bets total i was reach to 0.5x streak quite often so this makes my balance dried quickly before i can reach my wagering target

For me if i want to increase my level at the casinos i think dice is the right game and recently i have make an experiment to increase my level at the casino and at that time i was set the payout to 98% and initial bet to $0.1 and to reach $250 total wager it took only spend approximately $0.8 so in my opinion this strategy is more successfull for me than playing plinko

[danherbias07]

I will try this later. Thank you for sharing it.

I have been playing casino games and Dice has always been the most suggested when it comes to increasing the wagering requirement I also have doubted that because I tried the 98 percent too and all I can say is I lost more money in the process.
This Plinko strategy though might work because I have played the risk style of Plinko in the past and I can say it just gives the money back and forth for a long time but at those moments I was looking for profits so I hated the slow movement. I will give it a try now.

[gunhell16]

I remember those dice games when I was new to the crypto gambling business. At that time I read something that said if you lose on a dice roll, just make the bet amount you lost x3 until you win, then go back to x1 again.

I made this strategy; in the early days I was still winning, and I was happy with the results I was making. And when I saw that my balance was increasing because of the dice games, I felt disgusted with playing. Until the few days that I only won, in the end I still lost because at that time I was still overcome by greed. So I stopped it at that time because I saw that self-discipline or control over ourselves is still needed.

[Solosanz]

Thanks for sharing @OP.

Although I can't verify the legitimacy of your strategy by playing low risk plinko, but I do agree if playing dice with 1.01x is sucks, the risk is quite high even though the chance to lose is just 2%.

I think playing dice would be worth it if we play with 1.10x - 1.25x odds, the return and risk is quite fair.

[swogerino]

I am glad many people got what I am meaning here so I am locking this thread now, I know many people may want to try and for those suggesting that dice is better trust me it is not, it can increase your level faster but at a brutal cost of low return for wager as I said. My strategy needs at least 50 dollars in the balance and a minimum bet of 0.02 dollars to a maximum of 0.10 dollars depending on how fast you want to grind, trust me it will make wagering much more efficient than that wagering dice strategy everyone is using so far. Of course I repeat once again, never play money you cannot afford to lose in such type of strategies as with these strategies money it will be lost in the end yet you should look at how much you have wagered for this 50 dollars which should be a good amount I assume.