Gambling on events, where do you draw the line?

[LUCKMCFLY]

I don't think because they don't like it but political bets are not yet crowded after some time ago such as the US selection and many who chose Trump and from there also a lot of profits will be more crowded in the politics betting. And if the prize is very tempting in a short time it will become crowded back in the future.

The bad thing about political bets is that without knowing you can make enemies just because you do not agree with what they say, for me it is stupid that someone fights for politics, sometimes you can go against a candidate and respect their followers , in politics Perons are very susceptible, just in the betting threads with the Trump and Kamala thing you realize it, and even if the opponents win they do not respect it and do not accept it, they Continue believing that it is as they say, but it can only be more interesting over time, because a lot of controversy and fighting are Created , and that attracts.

[aoluain]

I never bet or support bets about wars, especially on something that predicts a potential war; its unethical, and you are like wishing the war to happen. A platform like Polymarket should not let such a topic be created, or they will incur people who see this as distasteful.
There should be limits to what these platforms can accommodate. We are gamblers, but we are humans too.

Like many other users opinions here its correct that it is unethical and actually
not needed in terms of providing odds for war, destruction and the loss of life.

Its not actually required, we have live and future sports, virtual sports to fill in
between times where there is no sports, online slot, card and dice games along
with physical casinos and amusements to provide for our betting needs, do we
really need to bet on chances of war? I say no.

[EarnOnVictor]

I don't think because they don't like it but political bets are not yet crowded after some time ago such as the US selection and many who chose Trump and from there also a lot of profits will be more crowded in the politics betting. And if the prize is very tempting in a short time it will become crowded back in the future.

The bad thing about political bets is that without knowing you can make enemies just because you do not agree with what they say, for me it is stupid that someone fights for politics, sometimes you can go against a candidate and respect their followers , in politics Perons are very susceptible, just in the betting threads with the Trump and Kamala thing you realize it, and even if the opponents win they do not respect it and do not accept it, they Continue believing that it is as they say, but it can only be more interesting over time, because a lot of controversy and fighting are Created , and that attracts.

Your mindset about political engagement is the best and this is in relation to the events' betting, everyone has to be mature. But at the same time, what provoked some people is not their fault, it might be the approach of the other person, some people will take it so personally to the point that they might be insulting you directly, which is an affront, so it sometimes degenerates from the politics itself but to the defence of one's person.

As calm and collected as I am, I often let go of many provoking issues, but I've been provoked before about politics in my country, so I know how it could be even if you are trying to be nice and calm.

[khiholangkang]

I don't think because they don't like it but political bets are not yet crowded after some time ago such as the US selection and many who chose Trump and from there also a lot of profits will be more crowded in the politics betting. And if the prize is very tempting in a short time it will become crowded back in the future.

The bad thing about political bets is that without knowing you can make enemies just because you do not agree with what they say, for me it is stupid that someone fights for politics, sometimes you can go against a candidate and respect their followers , in politics Perons are very susceptible, just in the betting threads with the Trump and Kamala thing you realize it, and even if the opponents win they do not respect it and do not accept it, they Continue believing that it is as they say, but it can only be more interesting over time, because a lot of controversy and fighting are Created , and that attracts.

It is a risk of political argument at the casino, there will be a lot of contact even a lot of controversial things in the implementation both before and after the election is done, the losers will shout and the winner will laugh, as usual in political contestation, and usually will be There is a target that is blamed by the wrong party, they will seek uprootes and the possibility of fraud to be shrunk and problematic, hahaha, the old political game will have an impact on the casino, this has been a long time, and it will be the risk of a casino that holds it .

[Mate2237]

Frankly speaking this is not a gambling thread therefore it does not belong to this place. And from look of things, every event in the world is gambling. Conflict between two countries now has turn to gambling in which people are creating thread for. In political events mostly election can be used as gambling and people can bet on them but not wars. I will not bet on killing on humans. We don't have to gamble with human life. Politics is a game but not life.

How do we bet such gamble. Is Israel winning Syria war? or what?