 |
January 04, 2025, 02:59:48 PM |
|
THE BENEFITS OF IMBALANCE
Almost all commentators on "cultural imperialism" treat a recipient culture as if it is static, all absorbing and all passive. Western media and influences are seen as the cultural invading forces, like an army moving into an open city, while the indigenous cultures are helplessly being homogenized. However, every culture, regardless of how primitive it is, is a dynamic, viable entity, sufficiently flexible and dexterous in coping with exogenous influences. Of all these charges the only one that can be readily substantiated is the quantitative imbalance.
The disparity in communication resources and lopsided command of both technological and professional leads are the basis of cultural imperialism. Based on Rada's (1980) distinction of three disparities - disparity in the information infrastructure, disparity in the distribution of scientific and technological capability, and disparity related to industrial capability - the cards are, indeed stacked against the Third World nations. The sentiments in developing nations against North American or European dominance are understandable.
Imbalance can facilitate cultural exchange and diversity as people from different regions or backgrounds interact and share experiences. This cultural exchange enriches societies, fostering understanding, tolerance, and creativity.
Imbalance in resources or capabilities can create opportunities for trade and cooperation between regions or entities with complementary strengths and weaknesses. Through trade, entities can access resources and goods that they lack domestically, leading to mutual benefit and economic growth.
|