Royse [BitLucy Scammer] [Spiroll Contest Rigger] [Account Buyer] - TBU

[worldofcoins]

To be updated @Royse  


@Royse, my tag won't be neutral, because I got scammed in your Spiroll Campaign, reviewing -> When you were telling the admin -> Why did the Spiroll admin posted in the thread after making that mistake.

Just one example:

They also updated the rules of contest after i made the post of me not being able to withdraw my 12$.
Anyway it’s an open and shut case, i don’t think they can justify.

From the screenshot shared above, seems you guys are already in discussion with Royse777,  that's a good one and I am looking forward to seeing this casino spread out all through the forum in a signature Ad, this would bring alot of awareness to it.

By the way, is there any type of deposit bonus for new registrants on the casino? I see no information about this and I honestly think this is a good way to attract new customers the Casino.

Regarding Spiroll Admin/Dev's response to scamming the players and using the term "BUG" to dissuade queries, Royse helped them with it, just like she/he was a part of BitLucky self Proclaimed CEO, later abandoned that role when the company exited scammed.

Hello everyone! I was really upset when I saw this thread. It is very offensive that you slander without knowing why the topic was deleted. Yes, I deleted the topic. Our developer team found a big bug and I had to delete the thread hastily. After that i stopped the website. You are right in some of the comments. Big win was so high and we decreased it to $20.000. But we didn't scammed anyone! Playing or not is up to you. But before you slander, you have to ask the reasons. Website is working as well. You can check https://spiroll.app Thanks to everyone. You can see my messages with @Royse777



Worldofcoin's Updated image 1/20/2025: https://talkimg.com/images/2025/01/20/W6FXZ.jpeg (You never know if i.bb.vo image goes down)

In the screenshot above, it's clear: Royse tried to guide the scammer Spiroll but failed in that too.



I will delete irrelevant replies.

Local Rules:
1. Don't post in this thread if you're a paid shill of Royse's campaign.
2. Off-topic Posts will be deleted.
3. Posts like - Royse's the best campaign manager; she/he hasn't done anything wrong from an alt, or Royse themselves justifying their ill-intentions. (All these posts will be deleted) - Royse locks their topic, so they have no right to post on mine. (Until I allow it)

[worldofcoins]

Royse's defenders:

[1] - The person defending Royse's stance in the quote below is a part of their campaign, so it'd make sense.

- They saw my Local rules of the thread, and most likely the scams Royse's pulled, but continued to defend them in their thread with quote "My evidence of Royse awarding the prize to the alt of scammer." The tags of on the account are there for anyone to see, I don't know if they fail to see/think straight or are pretending not to.

Cut the b.s

You can't make a moderated thread attacking someone, say nobody is allowed to defend that person, and then expect to be taken seriously. Plus the evidence you provided only addresses one of the three topics you mention in your subject line. Objectively speaking, that evidence doesn't necessarily suggest any wrong-doing.

Something about throwing stones and glass houses comes to mind.

Ok, Can you tell me where I am wrong to mention that in the contest "Royse hosted for scam casino spiroll", she/he didn't award the user who won the contest,

But the alt account of the scam casino, which itself was participating in the contest?, You cannot even call that a mistake, can you?, I'd be interested to see how you defend royse here.

Anyway, I don't care, royse's a deceiver and will deceive arguing with this person is pointless, like I've mentioned before, Royse will find ways to get out of situations, I wonder why I am not on Royse's ignore list like she mentioned before, did royse got butt-hurt that ico-press accepted me in their campaign? (The way they made their dedicated thread on me, seems to be pointed towards that way)

Btw: I was a participant of the contest, where winner didn't receive their prize money. (Hosted by Royse) | (Prize Royze awarded to the Spiroll's alt account), and yes that Alt didn't win the contest, but Royse awarded them the prize money.
The same alt in next contest, to win had to edit their post, but got caught and tagged.

[worldofcoins]

Reserved #2

[worldofcoins]

Response 1:

@Royse, my tag won't be neutral, because I got scammed in your Spiroll Campaign

You are mistaken or making yourself a joker?

Just one example:

They also updated the rules of contest after i made the post of me not being able to withdraw my 12$.
Anyway it’s an open and shut case, i don’t think they can justify.

It does not look like my campaign. This was my campaign which launched two weeks before the OP Spiroll decided to launch his own campaign.

Does this again prove that the tag I left is justified?

worldofcoins is a signature spammer and a burst poster. This user also spreads propaganda and supports propaganda ~

It does. Thanks for proving my point.

The member who won your competition Heibo
Was a team member of Scam team "Spiroll", The team member of scam website won the contest you were hosting!, What JOKER, and Scammer ROYSE you are.
Trust for Heibo: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2985729


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5424047.msg61375556#msg61375556


The user "Heibo" edited their post, and you declared them winner for the competition?, This proves you knew quite well, you're Deceving everyone (You should be tagged for it too)

[worldofcoins]

By the way, look at you! You must take credit that a person like me gave you so much attention for the last two to three hours. I feel shamed for wasting my valuable time to someone like you. Back to my regular work. Good luck.

[1] You created a dedicated thread on me sure took your more than 30 minutes (So i don't think you're wasting time trying to tarnish my reputation)

238 is winner. but felt strange, I didn't see have got paid for those winner game head or tails.

No provably fair?

youare  right, my bad to not checking carefully.

My bad, the person you declared the TEAM Member of Scam Casino "Heibo", who later edited their post in another contest that you weren't managing; it was a safety measure.

You deceived in your competition, everyone including me, I participated in that competition, but it got rigged. Even if I or any would've  won it you would've still rewarded "Heibo" (The team member of the contest's company), I bet you were a part of Spiroll too, just like BitLucky, just accept it, it's obvious at this point.

Recep:
1. You managed Spiroll's first contest, in which you gave prize money to them, even though the winner was someone else.

238 is winner. but felt strange, I didn't see have got paid for those winner game head or tails.

No provably fair?

youare  right, my bad to not checking carefully.

Spiroll.app V2 is coming with provably fair soon. New user interface, new games, new reward system and more. Stay soon.

I promise you when V2 is active i will send you $10 bonus.

2. Then in second contest you didn't manage their contest, they themselves hosted it, and Edited the post from their own account, the same account you awarded the money too in previous one (That's another thing the user didn't win, but you awarded them prize money), What could've been the reason Royse, stop deceiving us on our face.
Proof: https://postlmg.cc/WtWCxCqS

[JollyGood]

I have tried to recollect anything related to Spiroll but it does not ring any bells. For one reason or another, I was probably never aware of it and missed the threads. Having said that, the Spiroll account received multiple negative tags therefore are you saying Royse777 should have been tagged too?

Regarding Spiroll Admin/Dev's response to scamming the players and using the term "BUG" to dissuade queries, Royse helped them with it, just like she/he was a part of BitLucky self Proclaimed CEO, later abandoned that role when the company exited scammed.

[Tiger Fist]

Hehe. The troll talking to himself 😂😂😂

[worldofcoins]

I have tried to recollect anything related to Spiroll but it does not ring any bells. For one reason or another, I was probably never aware of it and missed the threads. Having said that, the Spiroll account received multiple negative tags therefore are you saying Royse777 should have been tagged too?

Regarding Spiroll Admin/Dev's response to scamming the players and using the term "BUG" to dissuade queries, Royse helped them with it, just like she/he was a part of BitLucky self Proclaimed CEO, later abandoned that role when the company exited scammed.

What Spiroll did was:

- They hired Royse/ or Royse was their part like BitLucy.
- Royse Managed their contest, of which I was also a part of (There was a condition to deposit some amount before you can participate, if I'm not forgetting)
- Spiroll's Alt (Yes their own account), participated in their own contest, that Royse was managing at the time.
- When it came to awarding the winner, Spiroll's alt account was given the prize, real winner from the contest didn't get the prize amount, considering Spiroll was new, so everything was Royse's responsibility.
- Some user mentioned, the winner is not correct, but Spiroll's official account promised 10$ in next contest.
- The winner declared in their 1st contest (I believe), was their alt.

- Then, moving forward to another contest:
- Spiroll's alt again participated in the next contest.
- I believe "Fat Fork" caught Spirol's alt, just like he caught "Small Rabbit's fake screenshots" after he scammed 25,000$ bounty.
- The alt was caught and tagged.

-> https://postlmg.cc/WtWCxCqS
-> https://postlmg.cc/0MZFkHWk

Moving forward, the Spiroll used "BUG" to confuse everyone when everything was clear, and it's shown they're scammers.


Anyway, to me, it was all a setup. Royse knew full well that Spiroll's account was participating in the contest he was managing, and he awarded the prize to that "Alt account", even though it "Did not win it."

If the Spiroll couldn't even pay a 50$ Prize for a mere contest but use alt to win a competition by editing their own posts.

[JollyGood]

All of this is new to me. Somehow this whole episode passed me by and I knew nothing about it. Time permitting I will take a look at what Spiroll is/was and how Royse777 fitted in to the equation but if there was something untoward going on at the time why was not picked up by others?

If (and it is an "if") Royse777 was participating in scam conduct by colluding with a business to fool forum members, then that is unacceptable conduct. The fact is employing (a chief manipulator and industrial scale account farmer) naim027 as his sidekick does not show good judgement either.

Anyway, to me, it was all a setup. Royse knew full well that Spiroll's account was participating in the contest he was managing, and he awarded the prize to that "Alt account", even though it "Did not win it."

If the Spiroll couldn't even pay a 50$ Prize for a mere contest but use alt to win a competition by editing their own posts.

[worldofcoins]

All of this is new to me. Somehow this whole episode passed me by and I knew nothing about it. Time permitting I will take a look at what Spiroll is/was and how Royse777 fitted in to the equation but if there was something untoward going on at the time why was not picked up by others?

Yes, it's only once that Royse was given the pass/overlooked by most trusted members, and for some reason, I can't fathom it.

These factors woul've been more enough to not trust this person, but they still are by many.

-> Naim
-> Bitlucy
-> Spiroll - Royse awarded the scam casino's alt account, which participated but didn't win, even though someone mentioned they're not the winner, but Royse proceeded.
-> Pretending to give "Small Rabbit" advice to reform. | - Getting the address of Mammal username "Small Rabbit" or pretending to, Just like Learn Bitcoin got the address of "Little Mouse"

-> Royse successfully managed to fool users like "DireWolfM14" and "examples" by getting them to change their negative feedback to neutral under the guide of pretend to "Do the right thing, good morals, we know."
-> Engagement in account sales | Royse's original owner was from Russia. The current owner bought the account. Even though account trading is negatively looked upon here on the forum, they're still clean as far as this matter goes (Also)

Royse knows russian language very well. So good, that during all 2016 and early 2017 he speaks only in russian (I remember him due to Wings altcoin topic and Analytics).

I didn't know Royse was from Russia? He seems very interested in Cricket, i have to admit that's kinda odd combination; Russian + Cricket? 

No comments in the Russian local boards since '17 too. Hmm

Royse's interest in cricket is mainly from being from an Asian country. | Bangladesh, I believe.
Learn Bitcoin & Little Mouse are also from that country.
It's may look another co-incident, but to me, it's not:

considering you got a PM, from a fan Like you got "Small Rabbit's" Address | And Learn Bitcoin got "Little Mouse's" address | Both Mammal(s) you've interacted with seems to have a lose touch on their addresses.

Honestly, I've never seen any user on the forum pull off these many scams and tricks, but they still operate freely. If it were some other user then I believe, they wouldn't have lasted after pulling any of the points above, I wrote.

Well I have taken some time to follow for myself the transactions on blockchain.com, and I see that what there are in all likelihood are auto-transfers (as they transfer the full amount) from the two addresses, both worldofcoins and SmokerFace to the address 3CX2reYLXJh1hACiA1i6qq9WFCSEUc7Ax5. Which seems pretty stupid, first for reusing the address and second because in other transactions they use coinjoin, so it seems like a beginner's mistake.

But what's more, when I put that address into ninjastic.space, I find this:

And how do you think someone without a warrant can trace you that you've to use a mixer.

I don't need a warrant to see that you and worldofcoins sweep your campaign earnings to the same address at the same time.

Do you mean I sent to address "bc1q5x7zssejfd5nl74gtgd3f92u2wc4pjtues8yng" and whatever company or whoever owns that address sent it to "3CX2reYLXJh1hACiA1i6qq9WFCSEUc7Ax5" where Worldofcoins sent their bitcoins in past Thus i own the address "3CX2reYLXJh1hACiA1i6qq9WFCSEUc7Ax5".

I'm glad this time I'm not the one making stories up
Clap #1

at the same time.

Clap #2

Granted this might fall under "scummed" coins, what with you making money from a scam casino.

If whoever owns that address sends those Bitcoins to Binance, Poloniex, Kraken, Bitfinex, then every Bitcoin those Exchanges have will come under "scummed" coins?
Clap #3

In that thread SmokerFace in the face of evidence claimed that they had both deposited at the same company address but in this thread worldofcoins admits to having 'traded' with SmokerFace (when he already had a few red tags).

Wow, you will threaten someone with whom they should trade and interact? The privilege of being a DT to support Royse is being utilized well.
Linking two users based on a blockchain transaction, you can say all the scammers who defaulted on loans are lenders' alts, including off-forum trades.

- It's a pretty innovative way to use negative feedback now.

There is not much more to explain. It is the same person behind both accounts or at the very least worldofcoins had no qualms about trading with someone who had many red tags from the community at the end of 2021.

Can you also mention the post about actually trading with Smokerface on the forum and not on Telegram or an exchange? If this is to be the case, then you can be traders who are alt of each other, and they will be tagged if someone they traded with screws up on the forum, the good example you're setting up. @Don

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

[Don Pedro Dinero]

<...>

Whatever.

If it looks like a duck, ........, you know.

I don't say this to you, I say it to any DT: I don't have many inclusions, if you think my red tag is wrong, feel free to distrust me. I think it would be even better to avoid these dramas. It's too obvious that you are the same person managing both accounts, and I don't care who you work for. If I find out that someone in my campaign is an alt of someone who has 10 red tags I will red tag him too.

[worldofcoins]

<...>

Whatever.

If it looks like a duck, ........, you know.

There could be two ducks, too, you... know?

If I find out that someone in my campaign is an alt of someone who has 10 red tags I will red tag him too.

Are you managing one?

[yahoo62278]

if you think my red tag is wrong, feel free to distrust me.

As you wish.

I'm not a fan of blockchain transactions being used as a connection as there are too many unknowns. It's just not 100% proof to tag someone IMO. Maybe a neutral until you have conclusive evidence, but not a red tag at this time.

I have been reading the drama and trying to stay out of it as no conclusive evidence has been given for either side. I see a bunch of stuff being thrown on the wall at royse and feels like a let's see what sticks case. Then I see some arguing back n forth and very little conclusive evidence from either. Both could be right, both could be wrong, 1 could be right, blah blah blah. We need more proof in any case.

I am not on anyone's side or anything. I have no problem tagging either of you as far as worldofcoins or royse goes, but I would need conclusive evidence in order to do so and that's how all DT should be looking at cases.


worldofcoins, feel free to delete this post if need be. If you decide to, please quote it before doing so.

[worldofcoins]

worldofcoins, feel free to delete this post if need be. If you decide to, please quote it before doing so.

This post doesn't violate any official or local rules, so I can't and won't.

I will use SmokerFace aka worldofcoins style to do it.

[1]. https://www.tokopedia.com/hangermedal/kantong-anti-air-waterproof-outdoor-trail-plastik-zip-like-loksak-large-f67e7

Apparently, everyone using [] is an alt of Chikito, too? Out of uncountable other examples.

Quote everything here, whatever sf wrote, including where they sent traded goods and what they did with them. Don't, I don't want this to be dedicated to the person this thread isn't dedicated to.

Even though SmokerFace said he used exchange wallets, none of the wallets received any funds since 2021. As we know, exchanges hot wallets are widely active and receive millions of dollars every day. But these wallets belong to a person who barely made two or three transactions a week. Lie Proved!

Example of one exchange, out of countless others: Source (Idiot like you @Tiger fist, isn't even capable of basic search like this)

We automatically generate a new address for you after every transaction you make or when funds are moved between your wallet and our storage system. This is done to protect your privacy, so a third-party cannot view all other transactions associated with your account simply by using a blockchain explorer.

All addresses that have been generated for your account will remain associated with your account forever. They are safe to re-use to receive future payments, but for the prior stated reasons, we recommend using a unique address for all transactions. You can view your complete list of crypto addresses at any time here.

Needless to say nobody should trust you with any amount of money going forward from hereon out. See ya later.

Based on what? Never have I faced anyone whose money I've scammed in [any Trade, Deals, or Loans] since I joined this forum, and who are you to make that decision?

The campaign manager you're part of rigged a contest, Spiroll, opened a scam casino, BitLucy, and hired scammer Naim.
Yet, you trust them to pay you a couple of bucks weekly, compared to what they always have in their pocket, 50k USD?

Do you have a reference to any contract deal I've broken, even a single one?

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

[worldofcoins]

[moderator's note: This post was deleted but its contents weren't. Due to a violation of either rule 21 or 32 (see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0) this post's contents were merged into the first post in a row you've made. If you're sure you didn't violate rule 21 or 32, then someone could've deleted their post(s) in between yours, making yours consecutive. If that's the case, while the posts were merged, you don't have to worry about doing anything differently]

I will use SmokerFace aka worldofcoins style to do it.

[1]. https://www.tokopedia.com/hangermedal/kantong-anti-air-waterproof-outdoor-trail-plastik-zip-like-loksak-large-f67e7

Apparently, everyone using [] is an alt of Chikito, too? Out of uncountable other examples.

Quote everything here, whatever sf wrote, including where they sent traded goods and what they did with them. Don't, I don't want this to be dedicated to the person this thread isn't dedicated to.

Even though SmokerFace said he used exchange wallets, none of the wallets received any funds since 2021. As we know, exchanges hot wallets are widely active and receive millions of dollars every day. But these wallets belong to a person who barely made two or three transactions a week. Lie Proved!

Example of one exchange, out of countless others: Source (Idiot like you @Tiger fist, isn't even capable of basic search like this)

We automatically generate a new address for you after every transaction you make or when funds are moved between your wallet and our storage system. This is done to protect your privacy, so a third-party cannot view all other transactions associated with your account simply by using a blockchain explorer.

All addresses that have been generated for your account will remain associated with your account forever. They are safe to re-use to receive future payments, but for the prior stated reasons, we recommend using a unique address for all transactions. You can view your complete list of crypto addresses at any time here.

[worldofcoins]

[moderator's note: This post was deleted but its contents weren't. Due to a violation of either rule 21 or 32 (see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0) this post's contents were merged into the first post in a row you've made. If you're sure you didn't violate rule 21 or 32, then someone could've deleted their post(s) in between yours, making yours consecutive. If that's the case, while the posts were merged, you don't have to worry about doing anything differently]

Needless to say nobody should trust you with any amount of money going forward from hereon out. See ya later.

Based on what? Never have I faced anyone whose money I've scammed in [any Trade, Deals, or Loans] since I joined this forum, and who are you to make that decision?

The campaign manager you're part of rigged a contest, Spiroll, opened a scam casino, BitLucy, and hired scammer Naim.
Yet, you trust them to pay you a couple of bucks weekly, compared to what they always have in their pocket, 50k USD?

Do you have a reference to any contract deal I've broken, even a single one?

[Shishir99]

Example of one exchange, out of countless others: Source (Idiot like you @Tiger fist, isn't even capable of basic search like this)

We automatically generate a new address for you after every transaction you make or when funds are moved between your wallet and our storage system. This is done to protect your privacy, so a third-party cannot view all other transactions associated with your account simply by using a blockchain explorer.

All addresses that have been generated for your account will remain associated with your account forever. They are safe to re-use to receive future payments, but for the prior stated reasons, we recommend using a unique address for all transactions. You can view your complete list of crypto addresses at any time here.

You are confusing yourself, buddy. Didn't you say that you traded with SmokerFace? So, why are you even looking at the exchanges and what they do? Yes, we do know that exchanges create unique addresses for each user. But how did you and SmokerFace end up sending money to the same wallet? Also, once an exchange receives deposits from users, they later send it to their hot wallet which receives hundreds of Bitcoins every day, as Tiger Fist pointed out, none of those wallets received more than two or three transactions in a week. So, how are you trying to convince the community that it is not your address but an exchange on that? Does not make sense at all.

By replying in your self-moderated thread, you are inviting people to engage in this thread so you can delete it if you do not like the reply. Good move.

[worldofcoins]

By replying in your self-moderated thread, you are inviting people to engage in this thread so you can delete it if you do not like the reply. Good move.

There are users for whom I've not deleted the posts. You're free not to engage if you don't want to.

[Shishir99]

By replying in your self-moderated thread, you are inviting people to engage in this thread so you can delete it if you do not like the reply. Good move.

There are users for whom I've not deleted the posts. You're free not to engage if you don't want to.

Can I expect you to reply to my entire post instead of picking the last line? I have pointed out something which you should clear if you want to prove yourself innocent. But if you do not show any interest in answering these questions, then it won't look good. You said you traded with SmokerFace, and yet again, you are pointing out what exchanges do with their wallet addresses. What is the reason? You sare upposed not to talk about it because you traded with SmokerFace, you didn't send your Bitcoin to exchange. So, it does not matter what exchanges do. Moreover, how do you guys ended up sending Bitcoin to the same wallet?

[worldofcoins]

By replying in your self-moderated thread, you are inviting people to engage in this thread so you can delete it if you do not like the reply. Good move.

There are users for whom I've not deleted the posts. You're free not to engage if you don't want to.

Can I expect you to reply to my entire post instead of picking the last line? I have pointed out something which you should clear if you want to prove yourself innocent. But if you do not show any interest in answering these questions, then it won't look good. You said you traded with SmokerFace, and yet again, you are pointing out what exchanges do with their wallet addresses. What is the reason? You sare upposed not to talk about it because you traded with SmokerFace, you didn't send your Bitcoin to exchange. So, it does not matter what exchanges do. Moreover, how do you guys ended up sending Bitcoin to the same wallet?

I've exchanged multiple times and gambled money in different casinos depending on the speed of the network (Now I mostly prefer BNB trades and loans, and yes, I take loans off-forum, even now).
So yes, there is quick transaction time between trades when trades occur through DM, within seconds to minutes.
People are active; you don't have to wait hours like on the forum for someone to read your post, look at your profile, and then provide a loan or trade; it's very quick. BTC isn't the only currency I trade with, and SF isn't the only person I've traded with.

There are people, a lot, who trust me. They will disregard Natildah and Don's feedback to trading with me, so you can rest assured I'm not losing much against this beef Royse began.

His servants/campaign participants tell me to keep my head down because they fear what will happen once my feedback is shown as trusted on their campaign manager profile. They will have trouble finding clients (This is the possible outcome I can think of), so yes, they will try everything to take me down.

Natildah called me a cheater smoker face's alt, but they have no problem working for emotionally immature who pulled scams, rigged contest, and hired scammer, bought account. (Yes this user has a problem with me, but not the manager they're working for)

But, why would you get the picture here? You're in the campaign of his friend "LM".