Trump And his executive's orders a threat to world peace

[Argoo]

Look what's happening in Ukraine, Millions of young people have died over a bad deal from the previous administration, Trump is working to ceasefire and Puttin said he wants peace, not a temporary one, but permanent. And from the information he dropped he mentioned Putin never wanted peace with Biden. And when that is settled his next move would be to denuclearize the world - investing the billions of dollars used to build nuclear weapons on other things.

Tens and hundreds of thousands of people are dying in Ukraine not because of Biden's position, but because of the imperial aspirations of Putin and his entourage. It was Russia that attacked Ukraine back in 2014 and has been attacking it with all possible military means, except for nuclear, for the last three years.

It's funny to me to read that someone still pays attention to the words of Putin, who lies almost every day, and even more so to his words that Putin wants peace in Ukraine. Putin wants to seize Ukraine with its fertile lands, rich minerals and hard-working people. Putin could and can stop the war and bloodshed in Ukraine any day if he withdraws his troops from Ukraine. But every day he sends his soldiers to kill Ukrainians and die themselves. The number of dead and wounded on both sides has already reached about one and a half million people.

Ukraine has no other choice than to defend its freedom and independence and it will never agree to give up its territory to foreign invaders.

[EarnOnVictor]

With barely a week in Trump's second term in office he has made some significant changes in some of the laws that the previous president had but the one that concerns me the most is Trump authorizing the release of bombs to Israel in their war on Palestine infact these said bombs are so powerful that it calls for concern about human rights violations

Honestly, I thought you had a better thing to say when I saw your title but it happens not to be so. Is sending bombs to Israel your headache? Have the US and other allies not been sending bombs to Israel and sharing formulas to produce them? Aren't their deadly airforce and marine units with heavy destroyers etc not on nearby waters? Nothing will change.

There is a war already in that area, so I see nothing different. The main concern is how Trump is causing uncertainty in the world, his wrong perception against friends and foes in terms of tariffs and aid and how he's undermining the efforts of world bodies e.g. WHO to the world and making the EU rethink about the US militarily. These may have long-lasting consequences.

[Fortify]

With barely a week in Trump's second term in office he has made some significant changes in some of the laws that the previous president had but the one that concerns me the most is Trump authorizing the release of bombs to Israel in their war on Palestine infact these said bombs are so powerful that it calls for concern about human rights violations

The bomb known as MK_84 also known as bunkers is so powerful that it penetrate some meters deep into the ground before detonating and with Trump sending this kind of powerful weapons to Israel what does this mean on world peace can trump truly end the war going on the the middle east or he is coming to fuel it

Here's the link https://news-af.feednews.com/news/detail/26fc1bb65d5dc064dba9c1248af17369?client=news

Unfortunately successive presidents have decided that using executive orders is acceptable instead of putting stuff past Congress and the House which requires more negotiating. The strangest thing is, you could understand it somewhat with a lame duck president like Biden, who only had control of one house instead of both, but Trump does not have this excuse. The majority of law changes should go through the normal vetting process because the politicians in his party would be able to get them through the most legitimate way. Instead we have descended to full on dictator level law making from a single person with the other elected politicians hardly having any input to the process at all. It's making a complete mockery of democracy and is a great injustice towards dismantling the way America has functioned for centuries.

[pooya87]

Ukraine has no other choice than to defend its freedom and independence and it will never agree to give up its territory to foreign invaders.

I'm sorry to say this but Ukrainians lost the privilege of freedom of choice a long time ago when they themselves allowed Russia and US to carry out coups and install their desired government, last one being a Zionist installed by the US regime.

This is why today US and Russia meet with each other to decide the fate of Ukraine without even having a single Ukrainian present in their meeting or even anyone from Europe; while they literally split the resources between themselves!
So no matter how much the European leaders cry like Heusgen did in Munich, nothing will change in that regard. Not just Ukraine but at this point the entire Europe is US regime's proxy and its cash cow...

[el kaka22]

While everyone could have their own political opinion on the subject, we are forgetting what the people themselves are doing. Sure Americans could have their view on the subject, sitting comfortable on their PC, promoting their president who they love so much (well half of them do, the other half hates him). But meanwhile, they are forgetting that Ukrainians are the ones who are picking up the guns to protect their land, and their freedom to choose and rule their own nation and make their own decisions.

You can put the blame on their president as much as you want, and you can claim Trump wants peace as much as you want, and you can dream Putin wanting a peace, which he does not obviously, he was the one who first attacked, but in the end, Trump will just come up with a plan of "give up these two land to Russia and the war will be over, such a good peace deal isn't it" and you will suggest he actually made a good deal, without asking if Ukrainians are ok with giving up land. It's like saying "sure Mexico will give up sending their cartels to you, only if you give Texas", would you agree? I am sure you won't.

[Argoo]

Ukraine has no other choice than to defend its freedom and independence and it will never agree to give up its territory to foreign invaders.

I'm sorry to say this but Ukrainians lost the privilege of freedom of choice a long time ago when they themselves allowed Russia and US to carry out coups and install their desired government, last one being a Zionist installed by the US regime.

This is why today US and Russia meet with each other to decide the fate of Ukraine without even having a single Ukrainian present in their meeting or even anyone from Europe; while they literally split the resources between themselves!
So no matter how much the European leaders cry like Heusgen did in Munich, nothing will change in that regard. Not just Ukraine but at this point the entire Europe is US regime's proxy and its cash cow...

Facts are stubborn things. Namely, they have recently refuted your words that Ukraine and its President Zelensky do everything under the control of the United States. The proof of this is that Zelensky refused to sign the terms of the deal imposed by Trump on Ukraine's rare earth resources, which was not beneficial to Ukraine. Zelensky also said that Ukraine will never recognize the occupation of its territory by Russia and will not agree to a truce without proper security conditions. Trump did not like this at all and he began to insult Zelensky with Russian accusations that he heard from Lavrov.

Trump and Putin can negotiate as much as they want about the division of Ukraine, but this will not have any meaning for Ukraine. The Armed Forces of Ukraine and Zelensky as the President of Ukraine will decide on what conditions and when to end the war with Russia.

[Free Market Capitalist]

Are we back to this again? During Trump's first term, they also tried to scare us by saying that Trump would start World War III, and it wasn't with him that we were on the brink—it was with Biden.

[DeathAngel]

I don’t think so, Trump unlike many other leaders actually wants peace & will ensure wars end. He is not a warmonger like many other leaders. I am willing to state now that I think there will be less war & hostility worldwide with Trump in charge of the US than when Biden was.

[WillyAp]

America 1st is like America alone (in the world.)
Global powers carve up the world and let it fall into blocks, increasingly hostile to each other.
One forecaster was Lenin. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperialism%2C_the_Highest_Stage_of_Capitalism

As it goes we see Ukraine thrown to Russia, If Elon withdraws Star-link it'll be tough.
The US, plus the EU mostly gave elderly weapons, and with limitation. Those with knowledge of ammunition know that 20 to 30 years old ammo has to be in proper storage.

https://www.survivalworld.com/preparedness/preppers-dont-let-your-ammo-go-to-waste-7-must-know-tips-for-long-term-storage/

Who knows Russia might in for a surprise. From the Woke EU.  

[philipma1957]

America 1st is like America alone (in the world.
Global powers carve up the world and let it fall into blocks, increasingly hostile to each other.
One forecaster was Lenin. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperialism%2C_the_Highest_Stage_of_Capitalism

As it goes we see Ukraine thrown to Russia, If Elon withdraws Star-link it'll be tough.
The US, plus the EU mostly gave elderly weapons, and with limitation. Those with knowledge of ammunition know that 20 to 30 years old ammo has to be in proper storage.

https://www.survivalworld.com/preparedness/preppers-dont-let-your-ammo-go-to-waste-7-must-know-tips-for-long-term-storage/

Who knows Russia might in for a surprise. From the Woke EU. 

I was thinking what if the UK arms Canada, Greenland, and the Ukraine with a few dozen nukes each.

Not to be left out France gives Canada< Greenland and the Ukraine a few dozen nukes each.

[WillyAp]

I was thinking what if the UK arms Canada, Greenland, and the Ukraine with a few dozen nukes each.

Not to be left out France gives Canada< Greenland and the Ukraine a few dozen nukes each.

It would certainly have a positive effect on the North American/Russian rhetoric.  

[pooya87]

Trump and Putin can negotiate as much as they want about the division of Ukraine, but this will not have any meaning for Ukraine. The Armed Forces of Ukraine and Zelensky as the President of Ukraine will decide on what conditions and when to end the war with Russia.

Time will tell...

Are we back to this again? During Trump's first term, they also tried to scare us by saying that Trump would start World War III, and it wasn't with him that we were on the brink—it was with Biden.

Although there really is no difference between Trump and Biden but you are forgotting that on January 2020 he ordered a terrorist attack that killed an Iranian general (with his Iraqi counterpart) on an official mission to Iraq to discuss the operations to eliminate the remainder of US backed ISIS terrorists inside Iraq.

Iran started a series of retaliations as the response to that act of terror that included elimination of various US military officers that were involved in that terrorist attack. But the main one that could be called "being at the brink" was to carry out what Pentagon calls the largest ballistic missile attack to that date; it was on 2 US military bases with over a hundred US servicemembers eliminated and nearly a thousand incapacitated in a blinking of an eye.

If Trump hadn't been scared shitless of Iran's military power back in 2020 and had tried showing any kind of aggression, a World War would have started...

[WillyAp]

Although there really is no difference between Trump and Biden but you are forgotting that on January 2020 he ordered a terrorist attack that killed an Iranian general (with his Iraqi counterpart) on an official mission to Iraq to discuss the operations to eliminate the remainder of US backed ISIS terrorists inside Iraq.

Iran started a series of retaliations as the response to that act of terror that included elimination of various US military officers that were involved in that terrorist attack. But the main one that could be called "being at the brink" was to carry out what Pentagon calls the largest ballistic missile attack to that date; it was on 2 US military bases with over a hundred US servicemembers eliminated and nearly a thousand incapacitated in a blinking of an eye.

If Trump hadn't been scared shitless of Iran's military power back in 2020 and had tried showing any kind of aggression, a World War would have started...

No differences?

Please give us a source for report on the death of servicemembers

Washington and Tehran both confirmed that Iran was the source of the missiles. The extent the damage was unclear.

Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said the strikes were a "slap in the face" to the U.S. and not sufficient retaliation for the killing of Soleimani, a top general, last week.

In a White House address, President Donald Trump said: "No Americans were harmed in last night's attack by the Iranian regime. We suffered no casualties. Our great American forces are prepared for anything. Iran appears to be standing down."

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/u-s-base-iraq-comes-under-attack-missiles-iran-claims-n1112171

[pooya87]

Please give us a source for report on the death of servicemembers

That's irrelevant to the discussion. The point is it makes no difference who is in the Oval Office when it comes to aggression against the rest of the world and taking things too far to the point of starting a global armed conflict.

If you are looking for source for something like this, you won't find any in the next 30 to 50 years until they declassify it. The US regime had to issue a "choke act" at the time and increase the classified level of the casualty report to highest level.

If they hadn't classified the hell out of it, the first thing that would have happened was those against the party in office would have used it as a weakness to attack the incumbent administration to the point that Trump would have had no choice but to show some response. That would have meant only one thing: escalation. Because next time instead of hitting 2 military bases with a dozen missiles Iran would have instantly launched 3000+ missiles hitting every US military base across the region and most probably the US navy as well. They would have never been capable of covering up that kind of casualties then.

That's an escalation ladder US regime neither wants to nor is capable of climbing.

Not to mention that the first consequence of that would have been global economic collapse as a big chunk of energy market would have evaporated in a blinking of an eye. Not only that would have evaporated Trump's hope for re-election back in 2020 but he would have gotten impeached and kicked out of office for breaking the constitution and declaring war without congress's permission and getting most of US central command wiped out in a matter of days.

Of course there are evidence as open source intelligence we can find that proves there were casualties, eg. eye witness reports of medivacs to hospitals in occupied Palestine and elsewhere or the interviews in US media with US servicemembers who deny the casualties but sometimes tell us the targets that were hit like the drone cockpit in al-Assad airbase (with the pilots inside) that turned into a gaping hole after it was hit with a BM with pinpoint precision or the fist target that was hit which was the command and control tower of the base which is where the commanding officer, dozens of communication officers and ranks are located and were evaporated!

[freedomgo]

It’s okay for major countries to mediate in conflicts between two nations, but not in a way that makes things worse. War should never be the solution to war.

Trump’s aggressive stance could escalate tensions, not just between the two countries involved, but also among their allies, which would be bad for the world. I’m not sure how this will all play out, but I really hope I’m wrong because another global war is something we definitely can’t afford.

[asriloni]

As far as i know Biden has been sending this bomb since last year, and what's the difference? Israeli is just requesting the same bomb like what they did when Biden was there.

I don't even think this decision is threatening world's peace. In fact, nothing happens to the world. The war keep continue, and that's it.

As long as it was only at the middle east, and i see nothing to feel worry about that.

[pooya87]

The proof of this is that Zelensky refused to sign the terms of the deal imposed by Trump on Ukraine's rare earth resources, which was not beneficial to Ukraine.

As I said earlier: time will tell and now its the time.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has agreed to a draft of a minerals deal with the White House, President Donald Trump said on Tuesday.

The bitter facts are that Ukraine has turned into a proxy of US regime and Zelensky has always been a Zionist they installed to obey their orders. By definition, he is not even allowed to disobey the orders he is given even though the may go (as they call it) rogue for a while and pretend to disagree.

It brings me no joy to say these things specially because I somewhat see our own history before 1979. The next thing that will come to Ukraine is US military (as Trump said: "We'll be looking... general security for Ukraine later on") and before you know it they bring you capitulation.
Unfortunately most people won't realize they are under US soft-occupation until an a*hole US soldier pulls their car over in their own city, beats them up, maybe steals something of theirs or sexually assaults a family member and they can't even shout at that soldier because if they do, their own law enforcement will arrest them as criminals not the soldier that is occupying their homeland!

Zelensky also said that Ukraine will never recognize the occupation of its territory by Russia and will not agree to a truce without proper security conditions. Trump did not like this at all and he began to insult Zelensky with Russian accusations that he heard from Lavrov.

Trump and Putin can negotiate as much as they want about the division of Ukraine, but this will not have any meaning for Ukraine. The Armed Forces of Ukraine and Zelensky as the President of Ukraine will decide on what conditions and when to end the war with Russia.

How long before time tells us how correct or wrong these statements are?

[serveria.com]

Ukraine has no other choice than to defend its freedom and independence and it will never agree to give up its territory to foreign invaders.

I'm sorry to say this but Ukrainians lost the privilege of freedom of choice a long time ago when they themselves allowed Russia and US to carry out coups and install their desired government, last one being a Zionist installed by the US regime.

This is why today US and Russia meet with each other to decide the fate of Ukraine without even having a single Ukrainian present in their meeting or even anyone from Europe; while they literally split the resources between themselves!
So no matter how much the European leaders cry like Heusgen did in Munich, nothing will change in that regard. Not just Ukraine but at this point the entire Europe is US regime's proxy and its cash cow...

Facts are stubborn things. Namely, they have recently refuted your words that Ukraine and its President Zelensky do everything under the control of the United States. The proof of this is that Zelensky refused to sign the terms of the deal imposed by Trump on Ukraine's rare earth resources, which was not beneficial to Ukraine. Zelensky also said that Ukraine will never recognize the occupation of its territory by Russia and will not agree to a truce without proper security conditions. Trump did not like this at all and he began to insult Zelensky with Russian accusations that he heard from Lavrov.

Trump and Putin can negotiate as much as they want about the division of Ukraine, but this will not have any meaning for Ukraine. The Armed Forces of Ukraine and Zelensky as the President of Ukraine will decide on what conditions and when to end the war with Russia.

Muahaha, this didn't age well! He did sign the agreement eventually!  Besides, your propaganda-damaged, room temperature IQ brain fails to understand that US and Trump are two different things. Zelensky was elected by the Deep State and he is still serving his masters. Trump is not one of them.

[Berryfolia]

Middle East countries have history that are not good together that is full of grudges. I do not think anyone can be able to end the war that is going on in Middle East. So any little thing that might have not caused issue may trigger another war. I think it gets to religion also but which I am not sure about. War has always been in the Middle East during BC.

what Trump is doing right away is revenge nothing much,he feels most of the black Americans and other neighboring countries were not in support of his second coming as a US president,and that resultant effect give birth to his failure on the last elections,where he stood election with President Joe Biden.It is was quite unfortunate that the will of the US citizens prevailed but he tends to see it as betrayal of trust.
I see this executivw order that Trump is signing as a revenge,since he has finally finds his way to the White House so now see it as an opportunity to hits them back.This is truly misplacement of priorities.

[DrBeer]

Trump needs to be careful on how he take authoritative decisions especially those related to war. Rather than supporting Israel with weapons to fight the Palestine, he should have called for a ceasefire. The unarmed and the innocent people suffers most during war, if not for anything they should consider the poor children that are going through severe conditions as a result of the effects of the war. Supplying weapons to Israel will further cause the war to continue instead of ways to end it. In this case, i can say that Trump is fueling the war and it may not end well.

It is very easy for those who have not lived in a country that has suffered terrorist attacks to play the “humanity” game.
I live in a country where for 11 years, a neighboring country has been trying to destroy us. This is the behavior of a cancerous tumor - to destroy everything foreign, healthy, from which you can get resources or benefits. That is why there should be only one solution - the destruction of the cancerous tumor and its carriers.
Or let me ask a very simple question, but I apologize in advance for its content ! It's just that when you apply the question to yourself the rhetoric changes. So the question: if you doctors offered you not to treat oncology and “leave it as it is, will not prescribe you drugs to fight oncology, it must stop” - how would you feel about such a proposal ?  It will be very interesting to hear your answer !

PS Today in Kiev a Russian UAV hit an apartment building at night when everyone was asleep. Aimed precisely at the apartment building. People died including children, housing was destroyed, dozens lost everything they had....  This happens every day in Odessa, Kharkiv, Dnipro, Zaporozhye, Krivoy Rog, and many other cities of Ukraine. Surely we should stop defending ourselves?