[Merits] pgp hands-on training.

[xmrhopium]

Anyone else?

Code:

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Comment: User ID:	satscraper_new <satscraper_new@mail>
Comment: Valid from:	12/02/2025 9:17 AM
Comment: Valid until:	13/02/2028 3:43 AM
Comment: Type:	255-bit EdDSA
Comment: Usage:	Signing, Encryption, Certifying User IDs
Comment: Fingerprint:	44FAEB560F2C683E21631FFC60DF0B0D30CAC9F1

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=iww/
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Welcome to pgp training!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQRE+utWDyxoPiFjH/xg3wsNMMrJ8QUCZ68T3gAKCRBg3wsNMMrJ
8Tb0AQDnwSEqbWKL0QZvP/BNuGK5Y4u0xG5ARfoW5cAWwYqh4wEAoO9eoOI4TQs6
DhZMMai/RpNzpfOfX2few2Mgba/WEwM=
=ByCi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----

Tried a little bit.

This earlier signed signature is not valid.

Code:

gpg: Signature made Tue 25 Feb 2025 10:39:18 PM UTC
gpg:                using RSA key 60DF 0B0D 30CA C9F1
gpg: BAD signature from "satscraper_new <satscraper_new@mail>"

Code:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Welcome to pgp training!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQRE+utWDyxoPiFjH/xg3wsNMMrJ8QUCZ731ugAKCRBg3wsNMMrJ
8SJ9AP9XUry7LA1VXI1xsiPHaJDPrRukjFBUQ6sax+hWlbTATgD/RYwl3aYkIu90
YCT6jsgWGmG8mv0lGEHChmauByygjAA=
=t/TS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

This signed signature is valid.

Code:

gpg: Signature made Tue 25 Feb 2025 10:39:18 PM UTC
gpg:                using RSA key 60DF 0B0D 30CA C9F1
gpg: Good signature from "satscraper_new <satscraper_new@mail>" [full]
gpg: Signature is valid, key is trusted

Thank You.

[Gost ms]

Fringerprit:


Invalid signature


Valid Signature

[satscraper]

Valid Signature

 

In what way it could be valid if the the image element says "the data could not be verified' ?

If you could use Kleopatra and tried with the help of this app to verify the content of clipboard the correct response wold be following

  

But instead of using this app ^{or  gpg line commands} you choose to copy-paste the wrong  picture published by Creeper0 :

Here is your valid signature.

That user corrected Kleopatra  wrong response by the correct pgp one and I gave him the merit but you didn't understand this and tried to cheat me.


I have decided to close this training due to an attempt of cheating, and I am unsure how to effectively prevent such behavior in the future.