Otherworld.xyz | World's First Fantasy Real-Estate Crypto Casino 🏙️

[Kavelj22]

Even though there are casinos that are friendly to VPNs, and someone uses VPN to play at the casino, they are actually still vulnerable where the casino will have a problem with it later.

I've never come across a casino that accepts the use of a VPN. Even those who claim to be friendly simply fail to mention it in their TOS as a mechanism to attract maximum traffic. However, the use of any type of anonymity quickly becomes a violation of the terms of service without the need to explicitly state this in the TOS.

Logically, no casino would accept this, as it encourages multiple accounts and system manipulation, and it also doesn't meet the requirements for obtaining a license from any authority.

[Potato Chips]

As much as I believe what they said that a user or potential user should make sure to read the terms and conditions and also ensure to read the list of restricted countries to be sure their country isn't on the list before signing up and making any deposit on the casinos, explicitly stating that defaulter's fund will be confiscated I think is too harsh a punishment, why not the casino simply stop any one from restricted country from signing up and depositing to the casino by simply implementing a feature that blocks potential users from restricted countries access to the casino?

If the user go ahead to make use of VPN after knowing his or her country is restricted, then the user is clearly looking for trouble and whatever he or she sees, he/she takes.

And speaking of VPN, I do not think this casino will support the use of VPN, most casinos with long lists of restricted countries usually don't like VPN, because users from this restricted places are going to be using it to bypass their restriction.

They could have easily done that, but for some strange reasons they don't.

I thought they had this feature already? as mentioned by @Awaklara as well:

Actually, no need to search, when you try to open their casino and you are from a prohibited country, their system automatically gives information that they are not available in our region.

So for some reason, your country which was restricted did not show any kind of restricted notice? that's indeed odd. Which country is this if you don't mind me asking?

Other than the relaunch of the signature campaign, there don't seem to be any other updates. Even regarding the license, I'm still seeing the same initial message. I am still banned although i can access all other major platforms. This is the message

"Due to licensing restrictions, we cannot accept players from your country. If you’re using a VPN, please disable it and try again."

Maybe they are targeting specific audience or have inclusive product.

Perhaps they could consider switching to Anjouan Gaming as well. From what I heard, they are less strict, probably why I've seen some casinos who switched, and it is rising in popularity.

[pusaka]

Even though there are casinos that are friendly to VPNs, and someone uses VPN to play at the casino, they are actually still vulnerable where the casino will have a problem with it later.

I've never come across a casino that accepts the use of a VPN. Even those who claim to be friendly simply fail to mention it in their TOS as a mechanism to attract maximum traffic. However, the use of any type of anonymity quickly becomes a violation of the terms of service without the need to explicitly state this in the TOS.

Logically, no casino would accept this, as it encourages multiple accounts and system manipulation, and it also doesn't meet the requirements for obtaining a license from any authority.

If we already know that by only using a VPN we can access the casino, then we should be ready for the consequences in the future that we will experience. So go ahead if you want to force yourself to use a VPN, as long as we are ready for the risks.

The problem is that some people are not ready for the risks, for example they use a VPN to be able to access, but when there is a problem later they will blame the casino and even bring a narrative that discredits the casino. They act as if they did nothing wrong, when in fact from the start they themselves forced themselves.

[DYING_S0UL]

I thought they had this feature already? as mentioned by @Awaklara as well:

Actually, no need to search, when you try to open their casino and you are from a prohibited country, their system automatically gives information that they are not available in our region.

Sorry for the confusion mate! You misunderstood my statement or I misunderstood the other persons statement. I didn't mean otherworld explicitly, it was a universal statement. What I meant was, that I have seen casinos that do not show warnings despite being in restricted. I didn't meant otherworld didn't do that! Anyway, since they gave users the warning, they can't complain later, why was I banned, why did they confiscate my funds and so on! Better that way!

[Kavelj22]

Even though there are casinos that are friendly to VPNs, and someone uses VPN to play at the casino, they are actually still vulnerable where the casino will have a problem with it later.

I've never come across a casino that accepts the use of a VPN. Even those who claim to be friendly simply fail to mention it in their TOS as a mechanism to attract maximum traffic. However, the use of any type of anonymity quickly becomes a violation of the terms of service without the need to explicitly state this in the TOS.

Logically, no casino would accept this, as it encourages multiple accounts and system manipulation, and it also doesn't meet the requirements for obtaining a license from any authority.

If we already know that by only using a VPN we can access the casino, then we should be ready for the consequences in the future that we will experience. So go ahead if you want to force yourself to use a VPN, as long as we are ready for the risks.

The problem is that some people are not ready for the risks, for example they use a VPN to be able to access, but when there is a problem later they will blame the casino and even bring a narrative that discredits the casino. They act as if they did nothing wrong, when in fact from the start they themselves forced themselves.

I was surprised by the opinion in the quote, as it indicated that a VPN could be used with casino approval, which I found somewhat odd. I know that no means of online anonymity can be used, and all service platforms have the ability to detect such practices, as experience has shown on numerous platforms.

[_BlackStar]

-snip-

I was surprised by the opinion in the quote, as it indicated that a VPN could be used with casino approval, which I found somewhat odd. I know that no means of online anonymity can be used, and all service platforms have the ability to detect such practices, as experience has shown on numerous platforms.

In most cases - VPN usage is strictly prohibited in most casinos. Even if a customer gets away with it and doesn't face any issues with using a VPN - it doesn't guarantee that they will remain safe and undetected. The terms and conditions of service should be the official reference in deciding who is at fault and who is not - usually customers who use VPNs to gamble will face problems when they hit a big win.

There are many gambling customers who complain that they have not violated anything and the casino limited their withdrawals to the point of blocking the account - but upon further investigation, the customer violated the terms and conditions either due to VPN use or something else prohibited by the casino.

[boyptc]

If we already know that by only using a VPN we can access the casino, then we should be ready for the consequences in the future that we will experience. So go ahead if you want to force yourself to use a VPN, as long as we are ready for the risks.

The problem is that some people are not ready for the risks, for example they use a VPN to be able to access, but when there is a problem later they will blame the casino and even bring a narrative that discredits the casino. They act as if they did nothing wrong, when in fact from the start they themselves forced themselves.

That is right.

When these gamblers are aware that the casinos like otherworld is unavailable in their region, what they do is still try to access it for some reasons. If there are some bonuses that they're trying to get and that's why they still pursue despite the ruling.

In the end, when they've been caught that they're from restricted countries, they'll complain and they blame the casino. Where in fact, from the first place they are aware of it and shouldn't pushed for that.

With VPN, they think that they already were allowed to proceed but that's another violation for most casinos if they have seen and proved a user uses it.

[Potato Chips]

I was surprised by the opinion in the quote, as it indicated that a VPN could be used with casino approval, which I found somewhat odd. I know that no means of online anonymity can be used, and all service platforms have the ability to detect such practices, as experience has shown on numerous platforms.

There are still some casinos which allows VPN usage. For instance, jacksclub—they mention this in their terms of service last time I checked. Another one would be betpanda—they have a dedicated page that it's okay.

Just a matter of looking around in each casino's fine prints or asking. But typically, VPN or anything that would mask a user location is prohibited by most platforms. This is also the case with Otherworld.xyz, VPN is not allowed.

[Zoomic]

Welcome to the forum Otherworld.xyz
Any latest update for us?
And if I may ask, is anything done about the long list of restricted countries. I am glad my country isn't restricted.
Is the reason for the restrictions because the countries policies conflict with the Estate based casino idea?

There doesn't seem to be any updates on restricted countries as previously the casino representative said they would update here if there was any news, but it seems that news has not come yet and until now I can't access it because the country is on the restricted list.

For all we know, the casino representative haven’t been active for a while, although they have a running signature campaign running which is a good one, one that shows commitment to the project and it would have been a lot better to have an active representative here to monitor this thread closely.
I guess they have other engagements to have warrant the casino representative to have not been active in weeks but even then, an active representative brings a lot to the project on the forum as well.

From my observation, most of the casino owners or representatives aren't so used to communicating in forums. They depend more on their socials and others. So, it is always difficult for them to sign-up here, remain active to interest with people here. This is where I give it to the campaign managers, they do alot to consume some of these projects to advertise here. But since the campaign is up and running again, we should anticipate to have a steady rep in this thread.

As per restricted countries, there isn’t much about that, it’s a jurisdiction thing.

Yes, there's nothing much about it, but when the restricted regions are way higher, it begins to give some concern.

[gunhell16]

Even though there are casinos that are friendly to VPNs, and someone uses VPN to play at the casino, they are actually still vulnerable where the casino will have a problem with it later.

I've never come across a casino that accepts the use of a VPN. Even those who claim to be friendly simply fail to mention it in their TOS as a mechanism to attract maximum traffic. However, the use of any type of anonymity quickly becomes a violation of the terms of service without the need to explicitly state this in the TOS.

Logically, no casino would accept this, as it encourages multiple accounts and system manipulation, and it also doesn't meet the requirements for obtaining a license from any authority.

I get what you're trying to point out about this dude, and it's true that most casinos prohibit the use of VPNs because they want to avoid having problems in these situations. But what if, for example, the country in the casino is restricted and there are other gamblers who want to use VPNs because this is the only way for them to play, is there a chance that the casino management will allow them even though the region country is restricted on their platform?

And if they ever allow it, it seems like the ones who will end up losing or being cheated are the players or gamblers who use VPNs because the casino management can say that VPNs are prohibited for them especially if they know that the gambler will spend a large amount of money from his winnings.

[salad daging]

But what if, for example, the country in the casino is restricted and there are other gamblers who want to use VPNs because this is the only way for them to play, is there a chance that the casino management will allow them even though the region country is restricted on their platform?

If your region is restricted by a casino, then there is no need to play there because it is useless, you will definitely get into trouble later for trying to break the restrictions.
unless using a VPN to bypass the provider's game restrictions you probably won't have any problems.

And if they ever allow it, it seems like the ones who will end up losing or being cheated are the players or gamblers who use VPNs because the casino management can say that VPNs are prohibited for them especially if they know that the gambler will spend a large amount of money from his winnings.

Usually the problem will be more complicated - but make sure to avoid this kind of thing because you know you will get into trouble later.
I would not try to penetrate a restricted country because that is against the law.

[pusaka]

If we already know that by only using a VPN we can access the casino, then we should be ready for the consequences in the future that we will experience. So go ahead if you want to force yourself to use a VPN, as long as we are ready for the risks.

The problem is that some people are not ready for the risks, for example they use a VPN to be able to access, but when there is a problem later they will blame the casino and even bring a narrative that discredits the casino. They act as if they did nothing wrong, when in fact from the start they themselves forced themselves.

That is right.

When these gamblers are aware that the casinos like otherworld is unavailable in their region, what they do is still try to access it for some reasons. If there are some bonuses that they're trying to get and that's why they still pursue despite the ruling.

In the end, when they've been caught that they're from restricted countries, they'll complain and they blame the casino. Where in fact, from the first place they are aware of it and shouldn't pushed for that.

With VPN, they think that they already were allowed to proceed but that's another violation for most casinos if they have seen and proved a user uses it.

That's when irresponsible people do something, and even when there are other violations that they consciously do, still when there is a problem they blame the casino for the problems that occur next.

There are people who say they did it unintentionally, but I doubt that, because how could something they know be unintentional. I can only say they are just lazy to read the TOS of a casino which ends up harming themselves.

In fact, we may have seen many people on this forum with their new accounts protesting in the casino's thread and saying that the casino is a scammer.

[virasog]

There are people who say they did it unintentionally, but I doubt that, because how could something they know be unintentional. I can only say they are just lazy to read the TOS of a casino which ends up harming themselves.

Rules are rules and you cannot claim to be innocent if you say that you unintentionally violate the terms and service. VPN usage is one common thing that most gamblers violate, and they do not know that they are doing it wrong.

For example, one may accidentally connect to a VPN that connects to a country prohibited or banned by a particular gambling site. This may result in the ban of your account if the site has strong security measures in place that detect where you are logging in. This may seems a small mistake but if you have big money in your account and your account is declared suspicious, it can be a big problem for the gambler.

[Potato Chips]

But what if, for example, the country in the casino is restricted and there are other gamblers who want to use VPNs because this is the only way for them to play, is there a chance that the casino management will allow them even though the region country is restricted on their platform?

If your region is restricted by a casino, then there is no need to play there because it is useless, you will definitely get into trouble later for trying to break the restrictions.
unless using a VPN to bypass the provider's game restrictions you probably won't have any problems.

That's true. anyone part of prohibited jurisdiction shouldn't play because it would be a breach of Terms of Service.

Unfortunately, I don't think any purpose for VPN usage like bypassing region locked games from providers would be tolerated when they have this clause:

The attempt to manipulate your real location through the use of a VPN, proxy, or similar service or through the provision of incorrect or misleading information about your place of residence, with the intent to circumvent geo-blocking or jurisdiction restrictions, constitutes a breach of this Terms of Service.

And if they ever allow it, it seems like the ones who will end up losing or being cheated are the players or gamblers who use VPNs because the casino management can say that VPNs are prohibited for them especially if they know that the gambler will spend a large amount of money from his winnings.

That would be scammy. Though I don't think they would allow it in that way—if I understand correctly.

[Dicbac]

Even though there are casinos that are friendly to VPNs, and someone uses VPN to play at the casino, they are actually still vulnerable where the casino will have a problem with it later.

I've never come across a casino that accepts the use of a VPN. Even those who claim to be friendly simply fail to mention it in their TOS as a mechanism to attract maximum traffic. However, the use of any type of anonymity quickly becomes a violation of the terms of service without the need to explicitly state this in the TOS.

Logically, no casino would accept this, as it encourages multiple accounts and system manipulation, and it also doesn't meet the requirements for obtaining a license from any authority.

"I've never come across a casino that accepts the use of a VPN."

🧨 False.

Many crypto-first casinos (e.g., Stake, BC.Game, Roobet, Rollbit) do not ban VPN use outright — they often only restrict VPN usage to avoid geo-blocked jurisdictions (like the U.S.).

Some platforms even recommend using VPNs in their support forums or guides (usually in the gray market scene).

Live chat support from crypto casinos often unofficially confirms VPN usage is tolerated as long as it's not used to violate location restrictions.

"Even those who claim to be friendly simply fail to mention it in their TOS..."

🧨 Misleading.

Not mentioning something is not the same as banning it. Casinos routinely leave VPN use unaddressed in the TOS to keep plausible deniability.

This is intentional ambiguity, not hidden prohibition. Some even phrase it like: “Players must not mask their location to access restricted regions,” which is not a blanket VPN ban.

"The use of any type of anonymity quickly becomes a violation..."

🧨 Overgeneralization.

The whole crypto casino ecosystem thrives on partial anonymity.

Wallet-based signups

No KYC until withdrawal threshold

No email verification on many platforms

Plenty of licensed Curacao casinos operate without KYC unless triggered, and never flag VPN use unless linked to fraud/multi-accounting.

"Logically, no casino would accept this..."

🧨 Contradicted by reality.

Many do. They simply don’t advertise it loudly to avoid regulator scrutiny.

It’s common for players in restricted countries to use VPNs and still get paid, provided they don’t abuse bonuses or create duplicate accounts.

High-roller crypto players frequently use VPNs and mixers as standard OPSEC.

"Doesn't meet the requirements for obtaining a license from any authority."

🧨 Technically correct only for tier-1 licenses, but irrelevant for most crypto casinos.

Curacao eGaming and other permissive licenses do not strictly enforce VPN bans. Enforcement is mostly light-touch unless flagged by serious abuse.

Casinos can and do maintain licenses while tolerating VPN usage as long as they appear compliant on the surface.

[Kavelj22]

Even though there are casinos that are friendly to VPNs, and someone uses VPN to play at the casino, they are actually still vulnerable where the casino will have a problem with it later.

I've never come across a casino that accepts the use of a VPN. Even those who claim to be friendly simply fail to mention it in their TOS as a mechanism to attract maximum traffic. However, the use of any type of anonymity quickly becomes a violation of the terms of service without the need to explicitly state this in the TOS.

Logically, no casino would accept this, as it encourages multiple accounts and system manipulation, and it also doesn't meet the requirements for obtaining a license from any authority.

I get what you're trying to point out about this dude, and it's true that most casinos prohibit the use of VPNs because they want to avoid having problems in these situations. But what if, for example, the country in the casino is restricted and there are other gamblers who want to use VPNs because this is the only way for them to play, is there a chance that the casino management will allow them even though the region country is restricted on their platform?

And if they ever allow it, it seems like the ones who will end up losing or being cheated are the players or gamblers who use VPNs because the casino management can say that VPNs are prohibited for them especially if they know that the gambler will spend a large amount of money from his winnings.

The most important point is how VPN users will be able to complete the KYC verification process. This means that anyone using a VPN because their region is restricted should be prepared to use forged documents or a fake identity, which is a significant risk when making deposits.

I'm not saying that a VPN cannot be used, and perhaps there are casinos that are able to accommodate VPN users, but this does not mean the overall experience is safe. I believe that the clause, which affirms the platform's right to subject any user to identity verification procedures, is what makes these methods a major risk, and can often be considered a trap to get more victims from users.

[khaled0111]

And if they ever allow it, it seems like the ones who will end up losing or being cheated are the players or gamblers who use VPNs because the casino management can say that VPNs are prohibited for them especially if they know that the gambler will spend a large amount of money from his winnings.

That would be scammy. Though I don't think they would allow it in that way—if I understand correctly.

Unfortunately, there are many official casino representatives on this forum who have encouraged users from restricted countries to use VPNs to bypass their own geo-restrictions.

Whenever I see one of them making that sggestion, I immediately warn users about the risks of following it.
I completely agree with you, if you don’t have a problem with users from restricted countries accessing your website and using your services, then why have these restrictions in first place?

[_BlackStar]

-snip-

Unfortunately, there are many official casino representatives on this forum who have encouraged users from restricted countries to use VPNs to bypass their own geo-restrictions.

Whenever I see one of them making that sggestion, I immediately warn users about the risks of following it.
I completely agree with you, if you don’t have a problem with users from restricted countries accessing your website and using your services, then why have these restrictions in first place?

Instead of keeping the terms and conditions of service from being violated - they try to encourage users to violate those terms and conditions, which to me is a trap. So far I haven't encountered such cases - I mean, casino representatives encourage users to use VPN to access their casinos, but this is a suggestion that puts customers at risk.

Casino representatives can change at any time when the person who is doing the job is replaced for some reason. Such a policy seems unreasonable if it were done by a casino - but it may be a personal policy of the representative or the person who is in charge of serving the community.

[Zoomic]

And if they ever allow it, it seems like the ones who will end up losing or being cheated are the players or gamblers who use VPNs because the casino management can say that VPNs are prohibited for them especially if they know that the gambler will spend a large amount of money from his winnings.

That would be scammy. Though I don't think they would allow it in that way—if I understand correctly.

Unfortunately, there are many official casino representatives on this forum who have encouraged users from restricted countries to use VPNs to bypass their own geo-restrictions.

Whenever I see one of them making that sggestion, I immediately warn users about the risks of following it.
I completely agree with you, if you don’t have a problem with users from restricted countries accessing your website and using your services, then why have these restrictions in first place?

From experience, some support staff do not have in-depth knowledge about the project they represent. That is when such wrong advice could be given. If a casino is not accessible in a particular region, it shows that the casino isn't in agreement with the government and policies of that country. So, if the customer wants to bypass the restrictions, it should be according to their own discretion and they should take responsibility of that also.

A support staff or casino representative advice you to bypass with VPN even when the use of VPN is prohibited in their ToS is a setup.

[traderethereum]

From experience, some support staff do not have in-depth knowledge about the project they represent. That is when such wrong advice could be given. If a casino is not accessible in a particular region, it shows that the casino isn't in agreement with the government and policies of that country. So, if the customer wants to bypass the restrictions, it should be according to their own discretion and they should take responsibility of that also.

A support staff or casino representative advice you to bypass with VPN even when the use of VPN is prohibited in their ToS is a setup.

Sometime, from support staff and other staff from other department have miscommunication which make user confuse which is right or wrong. If use follow one staff but that is wrong in other staff, that can affect for the user side. User don't know much about the rules even if it is written in their TOS.

All staff in this matter must know the TOS and don't have different perception so they can explain their user with right.