Umm... unfortunately I can't.

Stake is [currently] the only casino that refuse my help to get the situation against them understood and clarified. I am asking as above in hope to understand a better context of it, so I can help the player plan their next move to get it resolved [and a sliver of hope that Symphonized read this recent fact and update the compliance team about it so the case can be internally re-reviewed].

My initial thought was similar as yours, that if the total fund is from winning, then money laundering is somewhat... improbable. But AHOY's insight is worth mulling. If the initial deposit [though I somewhat doubt someone tries to launder 1,500 USD] is not clean, casinos have right to forfeit every bets where the fund is involved.

A step further though, another thing worth to be thoroughy thought about is the fact that OP passed SoW level KYC. Their team should be able to figure whether OP is involved with a mafia or something else darker from his cash flow. I mean... that's basically the purpose of SoW, no? So why still insist on ML? Did OP's SoW shows that he's a one-night billionaire? It has tons of questionable transactions?

I doubted that, because if [suppose] OP is a launderer, he'll certainly won't be that stupid to upload the account used to launder money. Thus, safe to say that the document used to pass SoW is clean. And thus, what gives?

Those said, OP, what Mahdirakib suggested seems to be the best way for now. Go to an ADR. I think CG is good, since your gameplay are casino-related and not sports. Hopefully they can mediate this and get it retried with fair ruling after they verify every documents they deemed necessary.

Ahh umm... actually... there were four, not three [Antillephone, GC, CIL, and CeG] and they've been made obsolete. Gone is the era of four master license holder. I think that was around mid-2024.

Casinos who are still operating in Curacao will now be directly under Curacao Govt., under CGA [Curacao Gaming Authority], of which a transition body named GCB [Curacao Gaming --Control-- Board] is in charge until CGA kicks in and take full control.

Did I mention anything about player's protection as curacao's best interest? I simply explained to alani123 of how Curacao license operates these days and the days that'll follow. And, on what part do I try to convince people that the new regulatory name changes how they [whoever they are being referred here] operates? It's literally not in my post.

Oh wait... right.

That's your MO: fabricate statements.

Hi! Thank you for keeping the discussion going in this post, you are helping me and the people who could potentially be scammed a lot

I would like to clarify with holydarkness, what does the abbreviation CG mean? Do you, as a more experienced and mature player and person, have any specific advice on where to get justice?
I found out that the abbreviation ADR means Alternative dispute resolution. But I am completely illiterate in jurisprudence and have no idea where I can go to get justice

That means Stake is lying!


1) Stake isn't licensed by gaming authorities in Curacao.

2) Stake isn't providing a safe and secure betting platform.

3) Stake claims that the Curaçao Gaming Control Board (GCB) is authorised and regulated by the Government of Curaçao.

But that is useless for players if the GCB doesn't regulate Stake!

4) Stake isn't verfied by the Crypto Gambling Foundation.


Here is what the GCB wrote to me:


Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack is a violation of the applicable regulations and they even don't investigate this!

The GCB are nothing but liars and partner in crime!

No, the "Certificate of Operation" isn't a license.

Yes, they want as much money as possible, but nevertheless they didn't give a license to the website stake.com within 5 months!