What can be done to maintain the balance of the Bitcoin market?

[Saint-loup]

Looking at the Bitcoin market's movements, we see that its speed is obstructing due to various problems. If a favorable environment can be created to overcome all these adversities, we can enjoy a transparent bitcoin. From various government laws to the banking sector, market activity monitoring,regulations We can create a suitable environment if we can make and make decisions on many more issuesNo government law has been enacted so far in Bitcoin transactions, so that people are recklessly accepting it and cannot control market instability.

If Bitcoin is governed by government law, the market instability will greatly reduce the instability which is from various transaction regulations to tax policiesControl the transparency of the market If Bitcoin is covered by a banking immigration system, it will be much more suitable for customers' debt. In addition to making regulation policies to enhance Bitcoin's acceptance, it is more prevalent in the country to ensure suitable customer service within the countryIt will increase.

Bitcoin investment will have to be issued to prevent the people's opaque market in the public and improve the economic infrastructure within the country, then we will be able to conduct a riskless Bitcoin investment.

That's very surprising to read such message from someone adversiting services for Monero. Bitcoin has been designed to be decentralized and to be a usable alternative to fiat money issued by central banks and managed by commercial banks. Why do you want and how above all, to transform Bitcoin into a centralized currency regulated by governments(which ones precisely) and managed by banks. IMO you understand even less Bitcoin than I am able to understand your point.

[retreat]

Volatility is a part of bitcoin, you just can't eliminate it by heavily regulating bitcoin. In some ways government regulation of bitcoin is to prevent money laundering, protect consumers, and tax, and in effect it could create an umbrella that protects investors and could increase the potential for bitcoin adoption. But heavy regulation of bitcoin could be an attack on the decentralization of bitcoin itself and eliminate the financial freedom and resistance to centralized control that bitcoin has. And I think that people who love bitcoin would strongly disagree with that.

[Ishicryptic]

Volatility is a part of bitcoin, you just can't eliminate it by heavily regulating bitcoin. In some ways government regulation of bitcoin is to prevent money laundering, protect consumers, and tax, and in effect it could create an umbrella that protects investors and could increase the potential for bitcoin adoption. But heavy regulation of bitcoin could be an attack on the decentralization of bitcoin itself and eliminate the financial freedom and resistance to centralized control that bitcoin has. And I think that people who love bitcoin would strongly disagree with that.

Bitcoin is a decentralized digital currency, that was the purpose of it's creation, it is not supposed to be in total control of anybody, institutions or governments, remember that it's creator Satoshi, is anonymous. Bitcoin is not supposed to be controlled by any government, the least they can do is to regulate it for tax purposes in exchanges and to curb it's use for money laundering, aside from these it should only be in the custody of it's holders, they have the freedom and privacy to control the amount that they have. Volatility is a part of Bitcoin and supply and demand determines its price, there is no need for any centralized interferance.

[Marvelockg]

If Bitcoin is governed by government law, the market instability will greatly reduce the instability which is from various transaction regulations to tax policiesControl the transparency of the market If Bitcoin is covered by a banking immigration system, it will be much more suitable for customers' debt.

What makes Bitcoin stand out is that it is decentralized. If Bitcoin is governed by the government or allowed to be regulated by the government, its transparency will become questionable, and it will only take a matter of time before Bitcoin loses its credibility. The effect of government investors is already causing a lot of harm to Bitcoin, let alone allowing them to govern Bitcoin.

In addition to making regulation policies to enhance Bitcoin's acceptance, it is more prevalent in the country to ensure suitable customer service within the countryIt will increase.

This description suits what fiat is being used for. The government has the power to regulate the fiat, and when you talk about customer service, it means we no longer have control over our Bitcoin if we are going to rely on customer service in the context of the safety of our Bitcoin. The fact that Bitcoin decentralization is a core aspect of Bitcoin makes your angle of looking for a balance unnecessary.

[Peanutswar]

To make a changes with the bitcoin market you must need to have increase the total marketcap of it so tons of people make trades of the bitcoin and buy opportunity even before bitcoin doing its best to be dependent but recently people see a potential of the bitcoin not just an investment but also a reserve, transactions to buy services and goods and more so people getting more hype of the bitcoin this needs to help the market but again not all the time this happens people getting tired holding their coins reason why there's a pull and push of the market which is a normal cycle t here's a trend or demand with the bitcoin if people keep holding their asset and there's no activity there's no price action might happens.

[Gozie51]

If Bitcoin is governed by government law, the market instability will greatly reduce the instability which is from various transaction regulations to tax policiesControl the transparency of the market If Bitcoin is covered by a banking immigration system, it will be much more suitable for customers' debt. In addition to making regulation policies to enhance Bitcoin's acceptance, it is more prevalent in the country to ensure suitable customer service within the countryIt will increase.

Government is not making policy for the acceptance of bitcoin just because they want it but it is because they no longer have a choice. If you understand bitcoin then you will know that it is community base and decentralized. Government won't be able to control what the community do with their bitcoin, they can't deduct any fraction of it just like they are doing with your fiat bank balance. Therefore, being a decentralized option to payment/fiat and already in the public space through your wallet by P2P transaction, so the government has no choice than trying to come closer by working out modalities for its use but not control, they can only direct or regulate platforms that hodl it like exchanges. Now US working through it with their strategy reserve, that is part of coming close to it and not preaching hate about it.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

Looking at the Bitcoin market's movements, we see that its speed is obstructing due to various problems. If a favorable environment can be created to overcome all these adversities, we can enjoy a transparent bitcoin.

We won't be enjoying the market when everything is running smoothly and there aren't opportunity for buying when the market is having a correction. The way the market is, is what's best for it because for every dip in price, that's an opportunity right there for you invest and stand the chance to change your financial status.

What can be done is for you to keep accumulating and not being bothered about anything else. The market is decentralized for a reason and trying to control it won't be successful so no need trying.

The dips aren't as bad as we make it look or are we just after the price of Bitcoin going up everyday. If that's the case, it's also going to become a problem because there's also some people that don't like any direction that the market is going. People will still say the market is being manipulated when the projection is always upwards.