Removing OP_return limits seems like a huge mistake

[She shining]

For all they have been waiting for the single video, here it is:



Mixed feelings about the debate, a lot of fanboys in the audience on both sides, cheering and booing at every statement, but maybe this was meant to be.

The truth remains that no side can convince the other. When there comes a time on exploit on OP_RETURN. I won't be surprised if it's done by knot lover to try and prove their point that they are right because so far, they haven't.

[nutildah]

Mixed feelings about the debate, a lot of fanboys in the audience on both sides, cheering and booing at every statement, but maybe this was meant to be.

Hey thanks for sharing this, I'm listening to it now. Its good to get perspectives straight from the horses' mouths, that way you know exactly what they stand for, not just hearing it second hand.

It was telling when Lopp talked about how nobody has been sued for downloading data they didn't want to download, and that it happens all the time via things like website cookies... the downloader has never been subject to prosecution, and there's no reason why Bitcoin node runners would be as well. Plus of course you have to decode media data, which is a next step that nobody has to take.

And then Luke responded to Lopp by saying storage of illicit data is "immoral and illegal." Like he didn't hear what Lopp had said at all. He did repeatedly call Lopp a "bad actor." He can't really be reasoned with.

[Satofan44]

The truth remains that no side can convince the other. When there comes a time on exploit on OP_RETURN. I won't be surprised if it's done by knot lover to try and prove their point that they are right because so far, they haven't.

The ones that scream the loudest about something like CSAM are usually the ones that are basement case examples of people holding CSAM.

And then Luke responded to Lopp by saying storage of illicit data is "immoral and illegal." Like he didn't hear what Lopp had said at all. He did repeatedly call Lopp a "bad actor." He can't really be reasoned with.

He's clearly arguing in bad faith, it is a waste of time to address him. There are much more productive uses of time available, like sitting down and not doing anything. Even that is more productive than talking to CSAM-jr.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯