Now that the IRS has deemed bitcoin to be "property" and not "currency" surely that means that charlie shrem's & Ross Ulbricht's money laundering allegations are no longer valid?
IRS rules that it is "property" for tax purposes. It's very narrow in scope. If it had ruled it currency, it wouldn't have been eligible for special lower tax rates on long term capital gains. For the most part, this is a positive news for taxpayers, not so positive news for miners that didn't realize they were speculating in bitcoin after mining and holding and had losses.
A federal judge in Texas ruled it "currency" in respect to AML/money transmitter laws. The law is still semi-fluid on this point, until set in stone by the Supreme Court. Probably a good thing, considering the next point:
The big point that must be decided in the law is whether bitcoin is property or currency when it comes to
Nemo dat quod non habet, where stolen bitcoin could be reclaimed by the original owner even though it has gone through several
bona fide owners, if it is considered property.