A fixed match is very difficult to organize.

[YOSHIE]

And what do you think - how are fixed games possible in team sports if they are so difficult to organize?

Actually there are many reasons for managing one sports match difficult to hold, a match can run smoothly or not very prioritized requires a few Contacts to smooth out matches such as soccer, tennis, boxing and so on.

Related to the match settings, it can occur or not, if giving and receiving money for referees, players, team officials, and elements Other gambling dealers are not in accordance with the agreement, of course setting the match is very difficult and vice versa if all of that runs normally the match settings can run normally.

[Hewlet]

And what do you think - how are fixed games possible in team sports if they are so difficult to organize?

it is not possible that players will be carried along when attempting to influence the outcome of a game like, say, food. if you want to do that, you have to think of how to convince all the players and not all of them will think of it as something that is morally okay with them which can bring up some bad issue in the long run. players know better that they are not attached permanently to a team and will not want to get attached to something that has the tendency of ruining their Carree. the best way it can easily work is when the compromise is from the angle of the referee whereby the referee is biased with the game or say a defender or can make an avoidable error that will lead to a goal. if that happens, it will be difficult to ascertain if it is a planned error or one that is done because the game was fixed.

country football are the ones that can easily get fixed and the easiest way it can be done will be to feature a weak team maybe in a qualification series where the nation knows that they have already qualified without an added point such kind of games are the easiest to fix because you cannot even determine the squad a team should use.

[bitbollo]

For what we have seen in Italy, It's much much more easier bribe one-two players and not a full team.
First of all, better involves less people. Secondly in some sports you dont need the whole team... it's enough the goalkeeper!
Or a variant of the last years, exotic betting in red cards and so on...

[blomen]

i don't know if fixed matches really exist, but if they do (in football), perhaps the players are unaware that the matches are fixed.

imagine you are a player in a match. if only the coach on your team knew that the match was fixed before you did, the coach would probably know how to lose to the opposing team.

even a simple “bad” instruction given to you that day could cause you to lose the match, despite doing your job well.

the head coach is the highest authority in the team's management. even if only the head coaches of the two teams are aware of this situation, it is enough to fix the match.

by the way, if such a thing is happening, i'm sure they're getting paid enough that they can't snitch on each other.

[stadus]

If there’s a fixed match, only a small number of people would be involved. And if it’s the league ordering it, the best people to carry it out would be the referees. In the NBA, there was once a controversy about a referee hinting that he was instructed to fix games, like calling fouls on plays that weren’t fouls, or not calling fouls when they clearly happened.

Look up Tim Donaghy. He has some interviews on YouTube, and this guy actually served a jail sentence.
Now he’s a free man, He doesn’t reveal everything he knows, but if you read between the lines, you’ll get what he’s trying to say.

[stompix]

Sometimes you hear about fixed matches, and people allow them very easily. But in reality, a truly fixed match is very difficult to organize. All participants in a fixed match are at great risk, at least in terms of reputation, and at most in legal terms - you can get fines, disqualifications and criminal prosecution.

Lol
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calciopoli
How about when all the participants, the referees, the managers, even politicians and journalists, colluded on arranging what referee to put on what game to ensure a certain team wins and this in Serie A and with teams like Juventus and Milan involved.
You still think arranging a match in some Serie C where not you can't even get someone from the neighboring town to name a player from the other team is going to be a problem?

[robelneo]

And what do you think - how are fixed games possible in team sports if they are so difficult to organize?

In wrestling, there is a narrative and coordination, but in real game it's hard to pull one; they have to coordinate all their action so it will not become evident, because sports experts have a very keen eye for any anomaly.
Its more easier for individual sport,s but for competition without coordination, they will be caught.
People are more aware of game fixing so they can easily spot one, the people involved in game fixing are fully aware of consequences so they have to be consitent.

[Zackz5000]

But in this case, the result is not guaranteed.
And what do you think - how are fixed games possible in team sports if they are so difficult to organize?

You don't need the whole team to be involved and convinced to achieve a fixed match; if the plan for the game is to allow one side to win over the other and not by the number of goals, that's very simple to do without it being much noticed or convincing the entire team.

In such a case, only two or three people from the team can do it, or, in the worst-case scenario, the officiating referee of the match will also be part of the plan. The target for such is the goalkeeper; if the goalkeeper can be bribed and convinced, then it's easier for the success of the fixed match to come to pass.

The best defender covering a good position is also another target, as he can perform less that very day, and the next target is also the best goal scorer of a team. If these three can be had on a raider, then it's very easy for the fixed match to come to light. But the risk of sanction is what will not allow some to get involved in it, which is why it can only be very possible in small teams in which the players are not much more afraid, or they believe no one pays attention to them.

I believe before any fixed game the referee to officiate the game will be first contacted without the involvement of the referee i think it will be difficult for this to be accomplished, the goalkeeper will also be a party to this plan and some key important position just as you have mentioned. 4 to 5 players including the referee can comfortablely fixed a match without the notice of the fans, game fixing is mostly common in local league football.

[rdluffy]

...In football, this is extremely unlikely. Unless it is a targeted conspiracy that the rest of the team does not know about. But in this case, the result is not guaranteed.
And what do you think - how are fixed games possible in team sports if they are so difficult to organize?

In most cases where this type of problem occurred in soccer, the agreement was for the player in question to commit a foul that would result in a yellow or red card and be sent off the field
That way, they would only need one player

A very famous case was that of Brazilian Lucas Paqueta of West Ham, in which the player allegedly forced four yellow cards
However, I recently saw the news that the player was acquitted of the charges

[Fortify]

Sometimes you hear about fixed matches, and people allow them very easily. But in reality, a truly fixed match is very difficult to organize. All participants in a fixed match are at great risk, at least in terms of reputation, and at most in legal terms - you can get fines, disqualifications and criminal prosecution.
The initial criminal intent is very difficult to coordinate, because you will have to agree with many participants in the games. In team sports, it is very difficult to keep the criminal intent a secret. I am not even writing about the possible mutual distrust of the collusion participants. In fact, fixed matches are easiest to organize in games like tennis. In football, this is extremely unlikely. Unless it is a targeted conspiracy that the rest of the team does not know about. But in this case, the result is not guaranteed.
And what do you think - how are fixed games possible in team sports if they are so difficult to organize?

The majority of athletes get into their favourite sport because they love to play it and want to compete at the highest level. However it's often mistakes that they make out of the game, like getting into debt or wasting money, that cause them to look at match fixing as an option. They also end up with all the risk and receive a sizable payoff but it's often a very small percentage of the fixers profits. It's extremely rare to try and involve multiple people in a team as part of a fix, because any of them could become a whistleblower to save themselves. What you will find it match fixing is less common in the richer leagues and more common in poorer countries - so be more wary against placing bets there.

[uneng]

And what do you think - how are fixed games possible in team sports if they are so difficult to organize?

It's not hard to scheme a fixed match and I believe it happens more often than people think. In order to manipulate a match, it's not necessary to have all the players on the field participating it. It's just necessary to bribe two or three players from a determined team to decrease its performance in a way the team won't have potential chances of winning the match. Moreover, a match can be fixed by bribing the referee too, what would theoretically involve only one element or individual on the field...

[Maslate]

Lol
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calciopoli
How about when all the participants, the referees, the managers, even politicians and journalists, colluded on arranging what referee to put on what game to ensure a certain team wins and this in Serie A and with teams like Juventus and Milan involved.
You still think arranging a match in some Serie C where not you can't even get someone from the neighboring town to name a player from the other team is going to be a problem?

This isn’t a fixed match anymore because everyone already knows about it. In a real fixed match, only a small number of people are involved to avoid exposure. And while in big leagues it hasn’t been proven, since only the players get investigated and league officials stay safe, there are still rumors that it happens behind the scenes, they’re just good at keeping their dirty work hidden.

As a bettor, I always consider the possibility of a fix. One thing I’ve noticed is that when a line or odds look too good to be true, most likely that game is fixed to favor the side where the public isn’t betting.

[sunsilk]

I have watched matches before, and I don't think there's anything wrong. But with some Reddit posts and analysis, it turned out that those esports matches that I've seen were rigged and fixed.

So, there's half truth if it's about team sports that they're hard to manage and turn it into a fixed match.

IMHO, as long as the match fixers, players and organizers, are determined to rig the game and fool the bettors, there's always a way for all of them.

[AVE5]

Sometimes you hear about fixed matches, and people allow them very easily. But in reality, a truly fixed match is very difficult to organize.

I have never believed on fixed matches or something like correct scores, because in gambling we don't know what would happened in the next minute but are just giving our guesses to whatever that we feels would happened but without knowing that would not happen but since we believe that anything is possible in match fixing you see people queuing for it.
About team deciding to fixed a match, this could be very hard to implement without at least someone among them revealing the whole thing and there are serious penalties for that as well.

Whether you believe it or not, fixed matches are real but are rare due to threats and difficulties surrounding it when it's made a move.
Though it has nothing to do with us as gamblers afterall we only plays and tries our lucks. So even if the matches are rigged from the real-life event's or not, we're still not going to make better difference. Although, fixed matches can kick ones winning games off the victory because as most of us may adapt to different strategies on the prediction games, some effortlessly analyze the games following the studies of the teams potentials to determine the outcome of the game. On the go when a bettor can be so lucky to figure the right outcome where the game has been manipulated in the reality, then there'll be nothing else than loosing it.
I think this is were fixed matches can affect gamblers and therefore, we just have to act like there's no such in gambling so that we can keep the fun going without ruin it by blaming the fix match.

[Hispo]

Sometimes you hear about fixed matches, and people allow them very easily. But in reality, a truly fixed match is very difficult to organize. All participants in a fixed match are at great risk, at least in terms of reputation, and at most in legal terms - you can get fines, disqualifications and criminal prosecution.
The initial criminal intent is very difficult to coordinate, because you will have to agree with many participants in the games. In team sports, it is very difficult to keep the criminal intent a secret. I am not even writing about the possible mutual distrust of the collusion participants. In fact, fixed matches are easiest to organize in games like tennis. In football, this is extremely unlikely. Unless it is a targeted conspiracy that the rest of the team does not know about. But in this case, the result is not guaranteed.
And what do you think - how are fixed games possible in team sports if they are so difficult to organize?

I don't think it is so difficult as you make it sound, to be honest. Criminal syndicates which are the ones who usually organize fixed matches only need to give money and corrupt a certain number of people of one single team, in order for those members to purposely under-perform and give the victory to the opposite team. That is how usually works in team sports like football and soccer.

Obviously, in tennis and boxing will be always easier to corrupt (because it only takes one single person to be convinced). That is because I try to avoid those markets and seek for matches which are very difficult to fix by criminal organizations.

[Accardo]

I don't think it is so difficult as you make it sound, to be honest. Criminal syndicates which are the ones who usually organize fixed matches only need to give money and corrupt a certain number of people of one single team, in order for those members to purposely under-perform and give the victory to the opposite team. That is how usually works in team sports like football and soccer.

It can be difficult based on the repercussions or the penalties that awaits players who work closely with the criminal syndicates. Since it demeans the results and credibility of the team and aswell place fans in a bad condition, financially and emotionally.

[Nwada001]

As a bettor, I always consider the possibility of a fix. One thing I’ve noticed is that when a line or odds look too good to be true, most likely that game is fixed to favor the side where the public isn’t betting.

That's why it's dangerous to make your prediction only based on how the odds are presented, but come to think of it, who benefits the most when it comes to game fixing? Is it just a few parties who will get involved, or are the bookies the major role players here since they will end up sending the attention of bettors to the wrong side, thereby getting more money from lost bets?

[₿itcoin]

Sometimes you hear about fixed matches, and people allow them very easily. But in reality, a truly fixed match is very difficult to organize. All participants in a fixed match are at great risk, at least in terms of reputation, and at most in legal terms - you can get fines, disqualifications and criminal prosecution.
The initial criminal intent is very difficult to coordinate, because you will have to agree with many participants in the games. In team sports, it is very difficult to keep the criminal intent a secret. I am not even writing about the possible mutual distrust of the collusion participants. In fact, fixed matches are easiest to organize in games like tennis. In football, this is extremely unlikely. Unless it is a targeted conspiracy that the rest of the team does not know about. But in this case, the result is not guaranteed.
And what do you think - how are fixed games possible in team sports if they are so difficult to organize?

Yes fixing the result of a football match is hard, but it's not impossible. it actually occurs particularly with high level corruption and wager frauds working in the shadows. the organizers usually go after low-level games or even arbiter decisions, influencing a small part of the games rather than organising the full result 'because it limits the chance of them being noticed by other people. Sport betting analysts such as sportrader have identified thousands of dubious matches ,they even flagged a world cup qualification games and Albanian club games got caught. So yes group sport rigging does not happen occasionally but i can assure you it's real.

[mid9tclaw02]

Sometimes you hear about fixed matches, and people allow them very easily. But in reality, a truly fixed match is very difficult to organize. All participants in a fixed match are at great risk, at least in terms of reputation, and at most in legal terms - you can get fines, disqualifications and criminal prosecution.
The initial criminal intent is very difficult to coordinate, because you will have to agree with many participants in the games. In team sports, it is very difficult to keep the criminal intent a secret. I am not even writing about the possible mutual distrust of the collusion participants. In fact, fixed matches are easiest to organize in games like tennis. In football, this is extremely unlikely. Unless it is a targeted conspiracy that the rest of the team does not know about. But in this case, the result is not guaranteed.
And what do you think - how are fixed games possible in team sports if they are so difficult to organize?

actually you dont need the whole team to fixed a match is just some few players and the organisers then you are good to go

[Moreno233]

There is an unconfirmed rumor that the bookmakers do have information of some fixed matches and that it shows in the odd of the match. If you noticed some matches, before kickoff you will see sharp changes in the odds which may signal leaks of the information about that match. There are times I avoid any match I noticed such significant change in the odds just before kickoff and I have always been right to avoid such matches because the match end up appearing manipulated. Like I said before, these are rumors and my personal observation, I have no data to back that up.