Would you rather….

[yhiaali3]

As long as they'll let me pass the KYC, and they'll allow me withdraw my winnings without any troubles, I don't mind using the casino even if they have strict KYC.

Herein lies the real problem. Most casinos that require KYC will allow you to withdraw if you win a small amount, but when your winnings increase, the problems begin. They may ask for additional proof, such as verifying the source of the funds, etc.

Check the "Scam Accusations" section in the forum and you'll see dozens of complaints about casinos that have banned users and refused to allow them to withdraw their funds.

[Y3shot]

Would you rather play in a casino where you win a lot and big ones too but has strict KYC implementation and is a headache to actually cash out from or play in a casino with no KYC, totally private and secure but doesn’t let you win a lot?

I know that in casinos, there’s not much difference between rates of winning because it’s random but hypothetically which one is more important for you? Profit or Privacy?

For me, if gambling is legal in my country, I see nothing wrong with Gambia having a casino with KYC, as long as I'm not breaking the rules. Gambling is also about winning; nobody feels happy when they lose in gambling. Since the KYC casino is where money can be easily won, I will choose it. However, if I'm in a country that doesn't fully accept gambling, a country that is not gambling-friendly, i won't allow casinos where gambling is won easily to push me into trouble someday that I will regret.

[nullama]

Would you rather play in a casino where you win a lot and big ones too but has strict KYC implementation and is a headache to actually cash out from or play in a casino with no KYC, totally private and secure but doesn’t let you win a lot?

I know that in casinos, there’s not much difference between rates of winning because it’s random but hypothetically which one is more important for you? Profit or Privacy?

I would rather just get the big payout.

In the end the tax man is always looking anyway, so might as well just pay it and be done with it.

The difference between the casinos could just be the tax payment for example, so, in a way, you could get the same money in the end, but with the KYC one, there's nothing to worry about in the future. The tax man got their share, so they won't be bothering you anymore.

[Justbillywitt]

I have nothing to hide and I know so far that I have not involved myself in any shitty dealings that I will be scared of doing kyc with a casino that will allow me win big amount of money. I don't see any difference between the kyc that I will do with a casino and the ones I do with commercial banks, exchanges and other government establishments. Or will the kyc of the casino be different from the ones I mentioned, were my government issued documents will be required? Or are there other special demands that the casino will ask from me?

[LogitechMouse]

Would you rather play in a casino where you win a lot and big ones too but has strict KYC implementation and is a headache to actually cash out from or play in a casino with no KYC, totally private and secure but doesn’t let you win a lot?

I know that in casinos, there’s not much difference between rates of winning because it’s random but hypothetically which one is more important for you? Profit or Privacy?

Privacy that's for sure.

You said already that the win rate of a gambler doesn't matter at all. If you're lucky, you're lucky. Even you submitted your personal information to them, that doesn't mean that it will increase your chances of winning. I'd rather be private myself at least I'm still winning some money on it. I don't believe in "quick profits" because it will take time, energy and money before somebody makes profit whether it's on gambling or whatever it is. Realistically speaking though, most of the gambling casinos out there requires KYC if you're cashing out significant amounts of money and worse, there are some where their accounts are being froze for various reasons.

If there's a way for us to be private especially in these gambling casinos then at least do it. Quite surprising that many chooses profit rather than privacy. Well, we have our own opinion about the matter.

[junder]

Would you rather play in a casino where you win a lot and big ones too but has strict KYC implementation and is a headache to actually cash out from or play in a casino with no KYC, totally private and secure but doesn’t let you win a lot?

I know that in casinos, there’s not much difference between rates of winning because it’s random but hypothetically which one is more important for you? Profit or Privacy?

During my time gambling, I've mostly found casinos that aren't strict with KYC, and the winnings are pretty standard, as they depend on luck, so sometimes I lose and sometimes I win. Gambling with casinos that aren't particularly strict with KYC is easier, but I've experienced instances where they didn't pay out my winnings when I made a withdrawal. Perhaps this is why it's important to find a reputable casino, even if it's strict with KYC.

[maydna]

I select a casino with no KYC but safe and private and don't mind if they don't allow me to win a lot. That makes me safe because I don't have to do KYC and playing gambling anonymously. But I can do KYC in a casino but not with the strict one.

I can find some casinos that aren't strict with their rules. I can handle myself if I am difficult to win a lot like others, in certain casinos, because I don't chase the win. I only want to have fun in gambling but I don't spend too much money.

[Mahanton]

Would you rather play in a casino where you win a lot and big ones too but has strict KYC implementation and is a headache to actually cash out from or play in a casino with no KYC, totally private and secure but doesn’t let you win a lot?

I know that in casinos, there’s not much difference between rates of winning because it’s random but hypothetically which one is more important for you? Profit or Privacy?

Privacy that's for sure.

You said already that the win rate of a gambler doesn't matter at all. If you're lucky, you're lucky. Even you submitted your personal information to them, that doesn't mean that it will increase your chances of winning. I'd rather be private myself at least I'm still winning some money on it. I don't believe in "quick profits" because it will take time, energy and money before somebody makes profit whether it's on gambling or whatever it is. Realistically speaking though, most of the gambling casinos out there requires KYC if you're cashing out significant amounts of money and worse, there are some where their accounts are being froze for various reasons.

If there's a way for us to be private especially in these gambling casinos then at least do it. Quite surprising that many chooses profit rather than privacy. Well, we have our own opinion about the matter.

Profit has always been the main attraction when it comes to gambling but if you really think long term privacy is the real treasure because profit can be temporary and unreliable one day you might win big the next you might lose it all but the personal information you hand over to a kyc heavy casino can follow you around for life if that data leaks or gets sold you can’t take it back no matter how much money you win later on that’s why the choice between profit and privacy is more than just about gambling it’s about protecting yourself and your future.

KYC casinos often dress it up as security and compliance but in reality they gain more power over players they can demand documents at any time keep your funds stuck for weeks or even refuse your withdrawals under vague excuses like “further verification needed” in that moment it doesn’t matter if you’ve won thousands because you don’t actually control your money until they say so and that feels like a huge risk compared to the promise of higher payouts on the other hand a no kyc platform might limit your win sizes or set caps but at least you know that whatever you earn is yours to take out right away without answering to anyone.Another factor to think about is peace of mind gambling itself is already stressful enough with its ups and downs adding the worry of your personal identity floating around in multiple databases makes it worse it’s not just about hackers either it’s about tracking your activities linking your gambling habits to your finances and maybe even creating problems in other areas of life for me having privacy means you play on your own terms free from the fear of being monitored or restricted by third parties even if the profits are smaller they are pure profits with no hidden strings attached.

[AbuBhakar]

Would you rather play in a casino where you win a lot and big ones too but has strict KYC implementation and is a headache to actually cash out from or play in a casino with no KYC, totally private and secure but doesn’t let you win a lot?

I will choose profit over privacy in terms of gambling sake since we are all gambling to earn money regardless if we will submit KYC if we don’t have a choice.

A legit centralized casino will release the winning once the KYC completed and you will rarely encounter problem on withdrawal if you play normal bets.

Privacy is now being ignored since casino is now required to follow AML protocol with their customers so KYC is inevitable in reality.

[MystPhysX]

Honestly my only problem with KYC is if the process is handed out to some third party I've never heard of before. Seeing these companies that exist just to process my information does not inspire any confidence. Granted I have not fallen victim to identity theft or anything yet so I if it seems as though I can trust the KYC process I would vastly prefer the casino where I win a lot.

[Accardo]

I select a casino with no KYC but safe and private and don't mind if they don't allow me to win a lot. That makes me safe because I don't have to do KYC and playing gambling anonymously. But I can do KYC in a casino but not with the strict one.

KYC is a hell of a lot of headache to go through when required after a huge win. The gamer looks through frustrated at every hour the support team snubs his complaints with zero reply. IF both were to be the only option in the gaming niche, I'd prefer playing the non-kyced casino with lower chances of winning than to face the rigorous ill treatment of the support team.

[salad daging]

Honestly my only problem with KYC is if the process is handed out to some third party I've never heard of before. Seeing these companies that exist just to process my information does not inspire any confidence. Granted I have not fallen victim to identity theft or anything yet so I if it seems as though I can trust the KYC process I would vastly prefer the casino where I win a lot.

There are casinos that process KYC on their end—there are also casinos that store it in their database, so user identities will remain secure as long as the casino has a good reputation and is well-known.

Everyone will choose a casino that often wins, even if they don't care about KYC. Nowadays, even a $5 KYC in an airdrop is common, let alone a big casino win. I think people will chase it anywhere to get that win.

[bhadz]

Would you rather play in a casino where you win a lot and big ones too but has strict KYC implementation and is a headache to actually cash out from or play in a casino with no KYC, totally private and secure but doesn’t let you win a lot?

I know that in casinos, there’s not much difference between rates of winning because it’s random but hypothetically which one is more important for you? Profit or Privacy?

We all gamble not only to have fun and have some headaches but also for the profits. So, obviously if the choice is the first one that will give us significant profits and the other one isn't going to allow us to win. Why gamble on the latter choice if it won't give you any win? I'm willing to go through headaches as long as there is a chance that I can get my money and they're allowing me to win. Compared to the other option, you won't even experience a headache there but your headache is more of losing and thinking of how to recover.

[KiaKia]

People have been exaggerating this KYC thing for years now, I will like to know or ask how many times you have seen your friends or family get in trouble because they pass KYC on a platform? Really I need just one.

None I believe, this is how useless KYC information can be if someone goal is to steal the identity and use it fir something else, it doesn't matter because there is no proof, and technology is getting advanced every time, if the criminal try to use your ID on any bad platforms they need to prove it that it's really them, this is where stolen IDs become useless.

I have nothing to hide, I will always be fine with passing KYC checks online and this one comes to extra goodies so yes I will do it straight away and make some money in return.

[Satofan44]

Privacy always, everything else is a mistake that is fueled by greed and a lack of education as you can see from the many responses in this thread.

People have been exaggerating this KYC thing for years now, I will like to know or ask how many times you have seen your friends or family get in trouble because they pass KYC on a platform? Really I need just one.

Exaggerated? How stupid are you? Have you even finished elementary school or is your school just some rural shithole that doesn't even teach history?   Privacy is the foundation of freedom and normal living. Without privacy there is nothing except a totalitarian nightmare. KYC is a big stepping stone towards abolishing all privacy, and the second step is complete control. What you can write, what you can say, what you can do, who you can interact with and so on. If we reach step two, it is already over.

You have been warned by many great minds and whisteblowers, but if you are too stupid to understand something don't confuse it with a lack of importance of the message.

I have nothing to hide

You have nothing smart to say either, so shut up then. Jeets like you would sell their own mother for $50 because she is no longer useful.

[Royal Cap]

Well, although gambling is not directly banned in our country, it is somewhat banned. If I am asked, I will definitely select non-kyc. The first reason is that I do not gamble regularly. Another reason is that I do not gamble with large amounts.
Moreover, privacy is very important to me. But another thing I want to add here is that whoever wants to keep their account safe, then I would definitely say to stick to a reliable platform.

[YOSHIE]

I know that in casinos, there’s not much difference between rates of winning because it’s random but hypothetically which one is more important for you? Profit or Privacy?

Gambling, a large advantage is a great risk of accessing personal information and privacy to maintain the confidentiality of personal information and limits, these are two different things, but the same goal is gambling.

Indeed, every individual has a different way of thinking in understanding risk gambling and safe, to be honest for my personality, of course I will use online casinos that maintain privacy, For what we see delicious food but can't be eaten, let me choose just ordinary food but I enjoy it, win small but I have a risk.

Of course all of us and anywhere, the purpose of gambling for profit and winning, if the victory becomes a disaster for us is not a solution.

[Muba20]

Generally, everyone tries to win in gambling and will try to gamble where the chances of winning big are high. Though there is no gambling platform where there is high provability of winning big, but there is anxiety among gamblers about doing KYC. Generally, most gamblers prefer casinos where gamblers can gamble quickly without any interruptions. If KYC is complicated, then many gamblers will not want to do it because privacy is an important issue for them. Personally, I want to avoid the hassles related to KYC.

[Z-tight]

Profit or Privacy?

You may play in a casino that does not request kyc from the outset, but later on, probably after a big win, they could request that, so when playing in any crypto casino, you should expect that kyc could come up at anytime. Even if one is unwilling to submit kyc, if they win a big amount of money and it is requested, 99.9% of people will provide it, so that answers your question.

[BITCOIN4X]

Generally, everyone tries to win in gambling and will try to gamble where the chances of winning big are high. Though there is no gambling platform where there is high provability of winning big, but there is anxiety among gamblers about doing KYC. Generally, most gamblers prefer casinos where gamblers can gamble quickly without any interruptions. If KYC is complicated, then many gamblers will not want to do it because privacy is an important issue for them. Personally, I want to avoid the hassles related to KYC.

In my opinion, many people will still prioritize privacy, because logically no casino will guarantee a high winning percentage after a gambler completes KYC. To me, that's a bit of an exaggeration. Basically, casinos operate to make a profit. They don't really care whether a gambler does KYC or not, they only care about their bottom line.

However, sometimes casinos have to abide by local regulations so they don't break the law, which is why they require KYC as a primary condition. I think if a gambler manages to win a large amount, they'll willingly complete KYC for the disbursement process. But the fact is, only a few gamblers ever get lucky, so it makes perfect sense that many people will still choose to maintain their privacy.