Charlie Kirk shot dead

[_Miracle]

Hostility in our political environment is ramping up.
This also happened yesterday...

https://www.denverpost.com/?G2I_ActionId=135041&returnUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.denverpost.com%2F2025%2F09%2F11%2Fevergreen-high-school-shooting-colorado-updates%2F%3FclearUserState%3Dtrue

Yea, the world has lost it's mind. That story wasn't all over CNN and it should have been at least some. If we keep going like we are it's going to be anarchy quick, the Purge is real apparently.

Should have never taken corporal punishment away and parents should be spanking their kids asses and teach them actions have consequences.

I don't believe corporal punishment in school is the answer. Accountability for those in power when they stoke political division would be a great start  <--- this should be considered a crime against "we the people".

Discourse is necessary for democracy and it is a shame that everyday people who vote are not skilled enough to participate in it but we have lost our government when we allow those who represent us to divide which is how tyranny concurs.



Mellissa Hortman (Democrat) was assassinated on June 14th Her name wasn't included on Trumps lips as a tragedy.

Luigi is tried as a "domestic terrorist" in the united health trial?

Profit over people is the thing tearing the world apart right now; division is its tool.
Avarice is the sin.
Colonization takes by force and everyday people should know by now that our minds are the next frontier.
Stand up for sovereignty and basic human dignity before there is nothing left.

[Hewlet]

The act of killing is condemnable in the whole world. I don't know what gives some people the mindset that killing other people makes them a better person, as per those who have achieved their target of killing a soul that doesn't align with their ideologies.

Every time we see cases of killing of this sort, it brings a reminder to how nothingness life can be and how that in just a short space of time, things can just change and you become history just like that. Charlie kirk lived a short life but no doubt, he lived a fulfilled life. the people that are behind his death might think that they have succeeded in putting him to silence but the fact is that within the short period of time he lived, he has fulfilled the purposed of his existence far more than those that killed him can come close to even if they lived more than hundred years.

Earth lost but heaven rejoice 

[OgNasty]

Such a weird society we live in. Today you expect to see everyone saying nice things about Charlie but my social feeds are full of people celebrating his death or hunting down those that are to try and ruin their lives. I couldn’t imagine spending my day celebrating a death or trying to get as many people fired for expressing their opinion as possible. I’m all for hating liberals, but I think if they want to express hate, they should be free to do so without having their lives ruined. I’d rather know who is evil than have them be scared to show it.

[tvbcof]

How many souls have died in Gaza since Kirk was (supposedly) killed a day ago?  Probably orders of magnitude.  And the Gazan's were killed by operations such as baiting starving people with food then shooting them en-mass via scammy 'aid' NGO's schemed up by Zionists of both the Christian and Jewish variety.  Kirk made millions excusing and justifying the Zionist's activities.

Ya know what?  Fuck Charlie Kirk.  I feel bad mainly for his family, but the whole Gazan population who are being genocided have family who feel just as bad too, and they don't have multi-million dollar estates trusts and insurance policies to fall back on.  If I had to choose between one random kid in Gaza or Charlie Kirk getting 86'd, it would have to be Kirk.  No-brainer.

* Actually, I never even knew what Charlie Kirk looked like until the dust-up with Fuentes a week or two ago.  Never listened to him except for some random clips here and there.  He was just another dude in the massive pool of right-wingers who were fairly obviously from the stable of the Zionists and their well-funded influence campaigns, and not worth my time since you get the same talking points from the lot of them.  However, since his supposed demise, I did see a clip where he questioned the veracity of the obviously fake 'Hamas hang-glider attack' which Netanyahu used to kick off the "Final Solution" [note the double quotes] for Gaza which the Zionists have talking about for at least 15 years.  So maybe Kirk had an honest side...though if so he buried it pretty quickly and clearly maintained his place on the pay-roll.

[yahoo62278]

How many souls have died in Gaza since Kirk was (supposedly) killed a day ago?  Probably orders of magnitude.  And the Gazan's were killed by operations such as baiting starving people with food then shooting them en-mass via scammy 'aid' NGO's schemed up by Zionists of both the Christian and Jewish variety.  Kirk made millions excusing and justifying the Zionist's activities.

Ya know what?  Fuck Charlie Kirk.  I feel bad mainly for his family, but the whole Gazan population who are being genocided have family who feel just as bad too, and they don't have multi-million dollar estates trusts and insurance policies to fall back on.  If I had to choose between one random kid in Gaza or Charlie Kirk getting 86'd, it would have to be Kirk.  No-brainer.

* Actually, I never even knew what Charlie Kirk looked like until the dust-up with Fuentes a week or two ago.  Never listened to him except for some random clips here and there.  He was just another dude in the massive pool of right-wingers who were fairly obviously from the stable of the Zionists and their well-funded influence campaigns, and not worth my time since you get the same talking points from the lot of them.  However, since his supposed demise, I did see a clip where he questioned the veracity of the obviously fake 'Hamas hang-glider attack' which Netanyahu used to kick off the "Final Solution" [note the double quotes] for Gaza which the Zionists have talking about for at least 15 years.  So maybe Kirk had an honest side...though if so he buried it pretty quickly and clearly maintained his place on the pay-roll.

Knew there'd be someone to come in the thread and have a very radical opinion of the situation. Look, you are entitled to your opinion. I can't fault you for that, nor will I try. As I stated in the OP I don't agree with all of his ideas, but I don't think the answer is kill someone either.

It doesn't matter if it's the never-ending war for the Gaza strip, the War in Ukraine, School shootings anywhere, or any other insane act none of it should be happening. The answer isn't violence. Some get rich from war and would have a different opinion, I don't get it. Noone should be forcing their opinion or views on others.

[OgNasty]

This is my favorite clip of Charlie Kirk.

https://x.com/whatever/status/1965995740901056840

I urge people to take a look at it to help realize that he was first and foremost a Father who cared deeply for his family. A shining example of who we should all strive to be. The loss his daughters are faced with is greater than any of us can comprehend. Such a tragedy.

[tvbcof]

How many souls have died in Gaza since Kirk was (supposedly) killed a day ago?  Probably orders of magnitude.  And the Gazan's were killed by operations such as baiting starving people with food then shooting them en-mass via scammy 'aid' NGO's schemed up by Zionists of both the Christian and Jewish variety.  Kirk made millions excusing and justifying the Zionist's activities.

Ya know what?  Fuck Charlie Kirk.  I feel bad mainly for his family, but the whole Gazan population who are being genocided have family who feel just as bad too, and they don't have multi-million dollar estates trusts and insurance policies to fall back on.  If I had to choose between one random kid in Gaza or Charlie Kirk getting 86'd, it would have to be Kirk.  No-brainer.

...

Knew there'd be someone to come in the thread and have a very radical opinion of the situation. Look, you are entitled to your opinion. I can't fault you for that, nor will I try. As I stated in the OP I don't agree with all of his ideas, but I don't think the answer is kill someone either.

Nothing in my statement spoke to the right/wrong of killing anyone over ideas or anything else.  I was simply musing about why Kirk's putative death matters any more than the tens of thousands of people being killed by the Israelis?  Most of these people didn't even seek to get involved but were simply born in the wrong place at the wrong time.  The same cannot be said for Kirk, and indeed, one could argue that his actions simply added lubrication to keep the killing going.

What should make Kirk more deserving of my empathy than the run-of-the-mill soul in Gaza?  Fair question I think.  Wanna take a stab at it?

It doesn't matter if it's the never-ending war for the Gaza strip, the War in Ukraine, School shootings anywhere, or any other insane act none of it should be happening. The answer isn't violence. Some get rich from war and would have a different opinion, I don't get it. Noone should be forcing their opinion or views on others.

It's starting to look to me as if there is a clear distinction in some groups mind about the applicability of killing based on those who signed something like the 'Jerusalem Covenant'.  The bar justifying 'extreme prejudice' seems to be much higher for those who have not signed the contract.

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DijQPr487Nc

I dunno what Kirk did or did not agree to or sign, but given the huge number of people who have been 'invited' on Israel junkets, it seems more likely than not that he made some commitments of various types.  This pic is not super easy to find on-line any more for some reason:

[o48o]

And he hated the very idea of empathy.

That sounds like a huge pile of BS to me. Can you back that up with links?

For sure, but that makes me think you haven't you heard what he has said before this. So where are you getting your information from him from? Are you basing a lot of your views on how they sound?

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/A54Hkn0vcBY

Here's a short clip. I am sure you are able to google the whole interview and his other views relating to that, but i am not giving any additional clicks to him.

And if this is news to you, i feel like there's more surprises for you when you google it and dig in deeper.

[Marykeller]

i know some lobbyists are probably going to want to turn all universities into prison walled institutions, all bags checked all identities shown and camera's on every foot of the campus, trying to push for security overreach, and reduce peoples freedoms of movements (probably snipers ulterior motives)
..
the university does have multiple camera's and the sniper wasnt using a handgun, so shouldnt be hard to review security camera's to see whom was carrying a large object into the building the sniper used. and then trace from camera to camera the path taken back to some vehicle or location to identify the culprit, it just will take time to investigate/review

this was not some situation of 1960's grassy knoll. it was ontop a building in the middle of campus with lots of angles of cameras

The FBI has reported that the shooter was wearing an all dark outfit. I think the camera has spotted him running on top of the building after the shooting.
It wont be hard to identify the shooter, if they review the video of people fleeing the scene after hearing the gunshot. Of course the shooter isn't some teleporter. He would come down the building mix in the crowd and flee.

Well, I dont know if the shooter fled without the gun or perhaps he took the gun and fled. Anyway, just like you said, the cameras of course would have captured every person coming into the premises and would easily identify someone carrying a big object into the building. Another thing to consider is, what if the shooter has been in the building even before the conference started. Everything was well planned.
...

More digging will be done..

update: person of interest wearing blue denim jeans, black hoody with chest image* and black hat and shades

the FBI have followed a figure of such description from the building to a wooded area off campus.. where he dumped his weapon. so they have reviewed and traced his exit off campus. they are now viewing other footage before the assassination to trace that path backwards and then they will be be looking at further ways to trace him off campus after the assassination. they have a picture of "a person of interest" but not identified the name yet. they have the gun, a footprint and a palm print and are forensically looking into those

*eagle infront flag "land of the free home of the brave"

opinion:
its beleived from the images prior to assassination, the suspect did not arrive carrying the weapon in the photos, so suggestion is that it was well planned prior to the incident, by hiding the weapon on campus way before incident. the picture also shows the suspect clasping his hands in clenched fists to avoid touching the hand rail of stairs, etc, using only the sleeve of black hoody to press covered wrist against hand rail to stable himself as he walked up stairs, again shows intent to avoid leaving behind dna trace forensics, which shows more intent to want to follow through with act without getting caught.

From your explanation you gave about the person of interest, the picture above explains it, of the guy the FBI is accusing of being the main killer of Charlie.  There are pictures of him, pointing to him as the "person of interest'' who took the shot on Charlie. However, the identity of the shooter is unknown. Let's see what the FBI can make out of the unknown sniper with his identity revealed.

Edited
The one responsible, 22 years old Tyler Robinson

[Agbamoni]

~snip

~snip
More digging will be done..

update: person of interest wearing blue denim jeans, black hoody with chest image* and black hat and shades

the FBI have followed a figure of such description from the building to a wooded area off campus.. where he dumped his weapon. so they have reviewed and traced his exit off campus. they are now viewing other footage before the assassination to trace that path backwards and then they will be be looking at further ways to trace him off campus after the assassination. they have a picture of "a person of interest" but not identified the name yet. they have the gun, a footprint and a palm print and are forensically looking into those

*eagle infront flag "land of the free home of the brave"

opinion:
its beleived from the images prior to assassination, the suspect did not arrive carrying the weapon in the photos, so suggestion is that it was well planned prior to the incident, by hiding the weapon on campus way before incident. the picture also shows the suspect clasping his hands in clenched fists to avoid touching the hand rail of stairs, etc, using only the sleeve of black hoody to press covered wrist against hand rail to stable himself as he walked up stairs, again shows intent to avoid leaving behind dna trace forensics, which shows more intent to want to follow through with act without getting caught.

Franky1, I also saw the update and yes, everything you described was exactly what the BBC news said about the shooter. I also watched footage from the ministry of security. The footage shows the shooter leaving the scene from the top of the roof just after the gun was shot. He jumped down and walked across the road like he never did anything.

Like I said before now. The plan was orchestrated. He knew the exact spot Charlie Kirk would seat and he planted his gear right before time. He was see coming in without any weapon, he brought his head down, covered his eyes with dark shade knowing fully well his face will be exposed to the camera.

The shooter may be difficult to be identified facially but I think since they got his handprint and footprint something can achieved today. I also heard they have taking the prints to highly classified facilities for more advanced scanning. Surely I expect good news today.

I know the shooter will be sweating in his pants, now that he has been identified.

[9ja Amaka]

How many souls have died in Gaza since Kirk was (supposedly) killed a day ago?  Probably orders of magnitude.  And the Gazan's were killed by operations such as baiting starving people with food then shooting them en-mass via scammy 'aid' NGO's schemed up by Zionists of both the Christian and Jewish variety.  Kirk made millions excusing and justifying the Zionist's activities.

Ya know what?  Fuck Charlie Kirk.  I feel bad mainly for his family, but the whole Gazan population who are being genocided have family who feel just as bad too, and they don't have multi-million dollar estates trusts and insurance policies to fall back on.  If I had to choose between one random kid in Gaza or Charlie Kirk getting 86'd, it would have to be Kirk.  No-brainer.

* Actually, I never even knew what Charlie Kirk looked like until the dust-up with Fuentes a week or two ago.  Never listened to him except for some random clips here and there.  He was just another dude in the massive pool of right-wingers who were fairly obviously from the stable of the Zionists and their well-funded influence campaigns, and not worth my time since you get the same talking points from the lot of them.  However, since his supposed demise, I did see a clip where he questioned the veracity of the obviously fake 'Hamas hang-glider attack' which Netanyahu used to kick off the "Final Solution" [note the double quotes] for Gaza which the Zionists have talking about for at least 15 years.  So maybe Kirk had an honest side...though if so he buried it pretty quickly and clearly maintained his place on the pay-roll.

Knew there'd be someone to come in the thread and have a very radical opinion of the situation. Look, you are entitled to your opinion. I can't fault you for that, nor will I try. As I stated in the OP I don't agree with all of his ideas, but I don't think the answer is kill someone either.

It doesn't matter if it's the never-ending war for the Gaza strip, the War in Ukraine, School shootings anywhere, or any other insane act none of it should be happening. The answer isn't violence. Some get rich from war and would have a different opinion, I don't get it. Noone should be forcing their opinion or views on others.

Obviously there are individuals who are happy for the death of Charlie Kirk. Everyone has the right to air their opinion but the idea of killing someone because of transgender, gay and lesbianism is crazy.

No one should die for having debates. Charlie Kirk only had a debate he never insulted anyone.

[Agbamoni]

Update: Trump says "WITH A HIGH DEGREE OF CERTAINTITY, CHARLIE KIRK SHOOTER IS IN CUSTODY"

Hopefully, we will hear official confirmation on how he was caught. There has been no conference  yet for the FBI or Trump to speak on when and where the shooter was caught. We should be expecting em in the late hour of the day. There is a rumor that someone who knows him, turned him in after seeing the video and photos.

Sorry 9:AM: Washington DC time zone: FBI to give update on Charlie Kirk killer.

[hilariousandco]

Update: Trump says "WITH A HIGH DEGREE OF CERTAINTITY, CHARLIE KIRK SHOOTER IS IN CUSTODY"

Hopefully, we will hear official confirmation on how he was caught. There has been no conference  yet for the FBI or Trump to speak on when and where the shooter was caught. We should be expecting em in the late hour of the day. There is a rumor that someone who knows him, turned him in after seeing the video and photos.

Sorry 9:AM: Washington DC time zone: FBI to give update on Charlie Kirk killer.

Apparently his name is Tyler Robinson: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/live-blog/charlie-kirk-shooter-manhunt-live-updates-rcna230762

Looks like his family turned him in. I wonder if they'll get the 100k reward?

[Agbamoni]

Update: Trump says "WITH A HIGH DEGREE OF CERTAINTITY, CHARLIE KIRK SHOOTER IS IN CUSTODY"

Hopefully, we will hear official confirmation on how he was caught. There has been no conference  yet for the FBI or Trump to speak on when and where the shooter was caught. We should be expecting em in the late hour of the day. There is a rumor that someone who knows him, turned him in after seeing the video and photos.

Sorry 9:AM: Washington DC time zone: FBI to give update on Charlie Kirk killer.

Apparently his name is Tyler Robinson: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/live-blog/charlie-kirk-shooter-manhunt-live-updates-rcna230762

Looks like his family turned him in. I wonder if they'll get the 100k reward?

Newyorktime first release this information. And from closed source they say his is Tyler Robinson.

But Trump and the FBI ae yet to assure us, he is the real shooter. For now Ill keep my hands crossed while watching the press conference.

[caroasi]

But the crazy is If Charlie Kirk was killed by a Black, it would’ve been all Black people are violent thugs, but since it’s a white person, it’s “the left” hahahahha

I notice that page one doesn't have anyone who claims to be from the left wing saying they are disappointed about the murder. But there have been many leftists known to publicly celebrate the murder.

Of course the reason it was believed to be someone on the left is because a large fraction of the leftist base is often saying how much they want to kill people who disagree with them, like Trump for example. That, and the pro-trans movement messaging found on the shell casings. The transsexual political movement is also known to be much further left than any other direction.

So while you're complaining about people who complain about violence, you're not complaining about violence at all. However, Charlie Kirk was complaining about violence during the moment he was murdered.

[caroasi]

Sadly, Charlie Kirk was among the first people killed in the USA in the left's war against free speech, which some of them choose to fight with bullets. A majority of Democrats are against free speech. Only a slim majority of people believe in the freedom of speech even in the USA overall.

Hate speech is hateful speech. Hate is an emotion. Expressing emotions including hatred is an essential right that should be done with words rather than bullets.

[hilariousandco]

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15086467/amp/Tyler-Robinson-Charlie-Kirk-killer-identified-Utah-Trump.html

There's some pictures of him on there.

FBI press conference has just got started now: https://www.youtube.com/live/Y4j6OCuCfoc?si=MUmhjmKfRuDDe5I4

[montaga]

Time and Time again people fall for the same crap, red flags left, right center.
At this very moment AI junk can still found somethimes, in some weeks/months time, no chance.
World news for some generated thing.
No, sign every post to weed out the criminals

[Agbamoni]

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15086467/amp/Tyler-Robinson-Charlie-Kirk-killer-identified-Utah-Trump.html

There's some pictures of him on there.

FBI press conference has just got started now: https://www.youtube.com/live/Y4j6OCuCfoc?si=MUmhjmKfRuDDe5I4

This is Tyler Robinson. The 22 year old who shot and killed, Charlie Kirk.

Below are the writings found on the rifle he used.

Fired casing: “Notices bulges OwO what’s this?”.
Unfired casing: “Hey fascist, catch!” (reported with arrow symbols in some briefings).
Unfired casing: “Oh Bella Ciao, Bella Ciao, Bella Ciao, ciao, ciao” (a reference to the anti-fascist song).
Unfired casing: “If you read this, you are gay, LMAO”

Chatgpt was able to explain this chant, as i made my research.

“Bella Ciao” is a famous Italian folk song that became an anthem of resistance during World War II. It was sung by the Italian partisans who fought against fascist and Nazi forces. The lyrics are about sacrifice and the struggle for freedom, with the refrain “Bella ciao” (“Goodbye beautiful”) symbolizing a farewell to loved ones while going off to fight.


The reason why Tyler surrendered is because, he knows he might get caught, and would face huge penalty after on. He said goodbye to his family in the chant while going off to kill Charlie Kirk in the name of fighting against Fascism.

[DiMarxist]

Like this is actually the main reason why so many people don't want to involve themselves into politics,because politics is really a dirty game and so many politicians believe the best way to silent those who are note I'm same like with them is by killing. Those politicians no longer see opponent with different views as citizens and human being but they see them as threats to their success in politics that's which is very annoying, I just pray God help us because the world today most especially in politics is not given at all, a citizen who doesn't have the mindset of violence can't participate in politics because that's the way politics has being played for the begining.