Thanks but I wasn't referring to those links as being broken and didn't want to post thd image earlier, I often prefer sending direct links of an image rather than the image itself but this is still good.
ohh my bad then.. i thought you were referring to them, which means it was the previous link right? those weren’t broken either.. are they?
The links of the screenshotted sites were broken and so I decided to screenshot it for others to see and searching online one will still see them.
Secondly, I've seen an exchange, claiming that they have a non custodial wallet too, which will protect users from losing their assetss and guaranteed maximum security and the rest, all these offers still on the same exchange that is centralized, yet it's a pity that some will still fall under this trick and take them for a non custodial wallet just by what they say, but platform like this brought us into the light of them all by exposing their secrets.
Is it to say that their exchange security is not as strong as the non custodial wallet they are offering as higher secured option foe their users. When you approach the marketing statements of many of these exchanges and wallets with deeper reasoning you can simply separate the lies from the truth about what they are offering.
The thing is that some of these Centralize exchanges have their own non-custodial wallet but often times
if not all, it is closed source and their fee calculations can be even more expensive, this is something I have experienced. The truth might not be stated, you have to verify yourself.
