Bitcoin Forum
April 14, 2026, 03:19:12 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 30.2 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Core and spam debate - easy explanation  (Read 1910 times)
PepeLapiu (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 373
Merit: 91


View Profile
Today at 03:31:41 AM
 #161

ocean has no ability to pay people on different chains, and so you cannot freely choose bip110 coin vs bitcoin there, and they've said they currently have no plans to develop that functionality.  So when it comes to chain choice, ocean doesn't provide it.  If you're on a different fork from them they won't pay you.  All you can do there with respect to 110 is false signal (or false not signal, depending on what chain ocean will ultimately adopt, which they haven't said yet).  They do allow for *transaction* selection, so you can pool with ocean and mine all the spam you want, sure.  That functionality would probably be more widely available but Luke-jr spent years sabotaging mining in Bitcoin Core by blockading changes to GBT such as being able to specify coinbase sizes for block construction (a feature he quickly merged in knots once it was needed for datum users) or skipping tx data that slows down GBT 10 fold and makes it unsuitable as a remote mining protocol.

Essentially Luke-jr spent years gumming up mining in Bitcoin core and toxifying the area so others wouldn't work on it, and now earns 3/4 of a million dollars a year running a business selling a solution to problems he kept others from fixing.  And even today he continues to toxify the ecosystem by harassing Bitcoin devs, and now he has a budget of investor money to pay PR mouthpieces and expand his abuse to operate at an industrial scale.  This is a business primarily promoted now on the basis of a "spam" problem that substantially only exists in the words of paid ocean marketing staff and the gullible people they've conned.


If personal attacks were removed, your post would be completely empty. Pretty fucking sad.

Bitcoin is not a dickbutt jpeg repository.
Join the fight against turning bitcoin into spamware.
BitcoinKnotsForum.com
waldox
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 252


View Profile WWW
Today at 05:06:40 AM
 #162

i side with knots and bip 110, we dont need extraneous data in the blockchain. making the blockchain as light as we can is good for the health of bitcoin. the core attack vector manipulating bitcoin is a good thing, it stresses the bitcoin system and will ultimately help it defend against future main developer hijacking attacks.

PepeLapiu (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 373
Merit: 91


View Profile
Today at 06:02:22 AM
 #163

i side with knots and bip 110, we dont need extraneous data in the blockchain. making the blockchain as light as we can is good for the health of bitcoin. the core attack vector manipulating bitcoin is a good thing, it stresses the bitcoin system and will ultimately help it defend against future main developer hijacking attacks.

Keep an eye on your own posts.

A thread I started here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5579484.0
Was locked, I opened a second one, it was locked again, and all the posts siding with me were deleted.
I also saw many of my posts deleted, or moved to a less visible section.

Bitcoin is not a dickbutt jpeg repository.
Join the fight against turning bitcoin into spamware.
BitcoinKnotsForum.com
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!