WARNING!!! "Vigilante" RC 2021 Set 1 from RarityCheck SWEPT!

[raritycheck]

the point is still valid though - coins have had their keys compromised, keys were off number (meaning one coin might look swept it was fine because the key to first bits to serial numbers are wrong.

Because of this issue, I had to peel a coin that I had that I did not want to peel.

No keys are not compromised. That’s a lie.

[MoparMiningLLC]

the point is still valid though - coins have had their keys compromised, keys were off number (meaning one coin might look swept it was fine because the key to first bits to serial numbers are wrong.

Because of this issue, I had to peel a coin that I had that I did not want to peel.

No keys are not compromised. That’s a lie.

not in the vigilante set perhaps but this error made more than a few peel.  And there were keys that were compromised in the VGYBR or how it was spelt (not misspelling intentionally) people lost their funds. IIRC you did replace/refund them.

[raritycheck]

the point is still valid though - coins have had their keys compromised, keys were off number (meaning one coin might look swept it was fine because the key to first bits to serial numbers are wrong.

Because of this issue, I had to peel a coin that I had that I did not want to peel.

No keys are not compromised. That’s a lie.

not in the vigilante set perhaps but this error made more than a few peel.  And there were keys that were compromised in the VGYBR or how it was spelt (not misspelling intentionally) people lost their funds. IIRC you did replace/refund them.

> this error made more than a few peel.
That's a lie. Who else peeled? It's only you who peeled. You peeled coin (#75) - your own decision.
No other holder has reported peeling due to this https://crypto.raritycheck.com/2021-set-1

Let's be very clear for anyone reading:

Vigilante 2021 Set 1 (this thread): Zero keys compromised. Zero funds lost. Zero sweeps.

VIBGYOR (2023): Separate series, separate issue, all affected holders were fully refunded (We paid from our pocket).

You're conflating two completely unrelated series to create fear, then admitting in the same breath that we refunded the first issue in full.


 

[Kazkaz27]

Let’s keep to the facts: no other series of coins are confirmed to be compromised, and all the coins that were compromised funds were returned to members. Rarity has done a good job keeping a clean noise despite the mistake he has made amends for, any mix up, all of the controversy, assumptions, and lies that have been spread.

He has went a step further and teamed up with ballot. So to everyone who tells this artist that he should quit or aims to blur the facts can respectfully buzz off.

[MoparMiningLLC]

the point is still valid though - coins have had their keys compromised, keys were off number (meaning one coin might look swept it was fine because the key to first bits to serial numbers are wrong.

Because of this issue, I had to peel a coin that I had that I did not want to peel.

No keys are not compromised. That’s a lie.

not in the vigilante set perhaps but this error made more than a few peel.  And there were keys that were compromised in the VGYBR or how it was spelt (not misspelling intentionally) people lost their funds. IIRC you did replace/refund them.

> this error made more than a few peel.
That's a lie. Who else peeled? It's only you who peeled. You peeled coin (#75) - your own decision.
No other holder has reported peeling due to this https://crypto.raritycheck.com/2021-set-1

Let's be very clear for anyone reading:

Vigilante 2021 Set 1 (this thread): Zero keys compromised. Zero funds lost. Zero sweeps.

VIBGYOR (2023): Separate series, separate issue, all affected holders were fully refunded (We paid from our pocket).

You're conflating two completely unrelated series to create fear, then admitting in the same breath that we refunded the first issue in full.


 

I did state it was another series - I did have the acryonym incorrect - true. and I also said you made everyone whole for that - I did not conflate the issue only stated there was an issue. Have a good New Year's.

[raritycheck]

the point is still valid though - coins have had their keys compromised, keys were off number (meaning one coin might look swept it was fine because the key to first bits to serial numbers are wrong.

Because of this issue, I had to peel a coin that I had that I did not want to peel.

No keys are not compromised. That’s a lie.

not in the vigilante set perhaps but this error made more than a few peel.  And there were keys that were compromised in the VGYBR or how it was spelt (not misspelling intentionally) people lost their funds. IIRC you did replace/refund them.

> this error made more than a few peel.
That's a lie. Who else peeled? It's only you who peeled. You peeled coin (#75) - your own decision.
No other holder has reported peeling due to this https://crypto.raritycheck.com/2021-set-1

Let's be very clear for anyone reading:

Vigilante 2021 Set 1 (this thread): Zero keys compromised. Zero funds lost. Zero sweeps.

VIBGYOR (2023): Separate series, separate issue, all affected holders were fully refunded (We paid from our pocket).

You're conflating two completely unrelated series to create fear, then admitting in the same breath that we refunded the first issue in full.


 

I did state it was another series - I did have the acryonym incorrect - true. and I also said you made everyone whole for that - I did not conflate the issue only stated there was an issue. Have a good New Year's.

Appreciated.

For the record:
You also stated: "this error made more than a few peel"
According to our tracking, only ONE coin from this 75-coin series was peeled due to the address list error - yours (#75). No other holder has peeled.

Summary for anyone reading:

Vigilante 2021 Set 1: All 75 coins loaded and secure - verified here
No private keys compromised - zero evidence of any sweep
Address list error starting at coin #46 has been corrected on our website

VIBGYOR (2023) was a completely separate series.

Happy New Year to you as well!

[MoparMiningLLC]

then I do stand corrected - I thought OP peeled before I did - and I had 2 others that told me via DM that they did or were going to - but maybe they saw your answer here first. I did not know their coin number so I did not verify their claim. However, you say only one coin was redeemed - OP is stating the address for their coin shows it was redeemed - and if I peeled one - that would make at least 2 that were redeemed - correct?

The coin I had peeled was originally someone else's which sold at auction and then I had to buy the coin back (reason unrelated to this thread - the coin had scratches all over the back side around the holo and the auction winner did not want the coin after seeing that) - and then later, I peeled due to the OP's post.


I am not hostile here RC - and I may make mistakes too - but if I do, I will say I am wrong. Everyone makes mistakes. No one here remembers every thing said on these forums nor can we always necessarily trust everything we get in DM's apparently either.

[raritycheck]

then I do stand corrected - I thought OP peeled before I did - and I had 2 others that told me via DM that they did or were going to - but maybe they saw your answer here first. I did not know their coin number so I did not verify their claim. However, you say only one coin was redeemed - OP is stating the address for their coin shows it was redeemed - and if I peeled one - that would make at least 2 that were redeemed - correct?

The coin I had peeled was originally someone else's which sold at auction and then I had to buy the coin back (reason unrelated to this thread - the coin had scratches all over the back side around the holo and the auction winner did not want the coin after seeing that) - and then later, I peeled due to the OP's post.


I am not hostile here RC - and I may make mistakes too - but if I do, I will say I am wrong. Everyone makes mistakes. No one here remembers every thing said on these forums nor can we always necessarily trust everything we get in DM's apparently either.

You're still misunderstanding the situation.

Someone else peeled a coin from this series off-forum (normal redemption, unrelated to this post). That triggered a notification which OP saw, prompting them to check their own coin (because of mismatch).

You were the ONLY person who peeled specifically due to this thread.

Yes, likely people who saw our clarification and didn't peel after all.
 

[transvestite lamb]

For the Record:  Rarity Check should immediately stop generating private keys for others and never do it again.  There are too many examples now of sloppy work to be taking on such responsibility. 

[raritycheck]

For the Record:  Rarity Check should immediately stop generating private keys for others and never do it again.  There are too many examples now of sloppy work to be taking on such responsibility. 

For the record: yours is a shill account.
Clearly we can see trust left on your main account tells a story.
Too many examples.

[transvestite lamb]

For the Record:  Rarity Check should immediately stop generating private keys for others and never do it again.  There are too many examples now of sloppy work to be taking on such responsibility. 

For the record: yours is a shill account.
Clearly we can see trust left on your main account tells a story.
Too many examples.

It is my mobile account.  My Lesbian Cow account is too valuable to log into from unknown WiFi. 

Mike made more than 10,000 private keys under holograms and has zero of the errors you have shown in a few 100 coins.  It is time for you to stop, you don’t have the skills necessary to be trusted generating private keys for others.

[raritycheck]

For the Record:  Rarity Check should immediately stop generating private keys for others and never do it again.  There are too many examples now of sloppy work to be taking on such responsibility.  

For the record: yours is a shill account.
Clearly we can see trust left on your main account tells a story.
Too many examples.

It is my mobile account.  My Lesbian Cow account is too valuable to log into from unknown WiFi.  

Mike made more than 10,000 private keys under holograms and has zero of the errors you have shown in a few 100 coins.  It is time for you to stop, you don’t have the skills necessary to be trusted generating private keys for others.

Lies. You keep lying as is evident from your feedback in the other profile. it is against the forum rules to use alt accounts.  That account:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=206143
Because of your misinformation the whole Titan BTC scam happened. You should really stop making these sloppy mistakes and stop.
Your signature for your alt account at the moment is “Get paid, Get laid”. You are a very bad person and not a decent human.

people can decide the value of the account. You have a pattern of spreading misinformation where it isn’t needed.
You don’t know what issue with the VIBGYOR series was. Get educated first and then come and tell us what to do and what not to do. Mainly you do this because you don’t know how to comprehend. You actually are also confused from the ratings left on your main account.

For the VIBGYOR series the keys were not leaked but we used a bad website (walletgenerator.net) that was the issue. But still we took it on us and refunded every buyer and even generated new holos and keys and made them whole. we are committed to always do it.

Unlike you. Learn to be nice!

[owlcatz]

Lies. You keep lying as is evident from your feedback in the other profile. it is against the forum rules to use alt accounts.  That account:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=206143
Because of your misinformation the whole Titan BTC scam happened. You should really stop making these sloppy mistakes and stop.
Your signature for your alt account at the moment is “Get paid, Get laid”. You are a very bad person and not a decent human.

people can decide the value of the account. You have a pattern of spreading misinformation where it isn’t needed.
You don’t know what issue with the VIBGYOR series was. Get educated first and then come and tell us what to do and what not to do. Mainly you do this because you don’t know how to comprehend. You actually are also confused from the ratings left on your main account.

For the VIBGYOR series the keys were not leaked but we used a bad website (walletgenerator.net) that was the issue. But still we took it on us and refunded every buyer and even generated new holos and keys and made them whole. we are committed to always do it.

Unlike you. Learn to be nice!

Wrong - alt accounts are allowed here

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.msg32348337;topicseen#msg32348337

You are talking to users who have also been here a very long time. Your mistakes are discouraging to people like us, sorry.

Why do you suggest he was involved in the titan scam? That was all Tim. You are wrong again. Thanks.

[raritycheck]

Lies! You are liar who lies through their teeth and came back to change topic now.
You are discouraging people in general.. it literally says on your trust feedback https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=313016.
You are wrong every single time. Be  nice. Thanks

[owlcatz]

Lies! You are liar who lies through their teeth and came back to change topic now.
You are discouraging people in general.. it literally says on your trust feedback https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=313016.
You are wrong every single time. Be  nice. Thanks

Not at all, you changed the topic.

BTW you should note my Trusted feedback is what counts. You are seeing an altered view of reality -

Try this link for the real default trust view, so your own trust(s) stops showing you the lies.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=313016;dt

[Kazkaz27]

The reality is that there is a group of DT members here that consider themselves to be elitists. They lie, spread false narratives, harass, derail posts, and social engineer the system here. The facade created by these members is cracking and people are feed up with the abuse. I suggest that you stay professional and cordial. Stick to the facts and lay off on spreading hate and insinuations. Your status won't shield you any longer. Your cult is being tagged and your tactics exposed.

Read any replies by these people. Go to any reply. They are hostile, mocking, and confrontational. Here's the breakdown of characteristics how they reply:

1. Sarcastic derision - Uses rhetorical questions to mock.

2. Open mockery -  Contempt rather than substantive criticism.

3. Personal attacks - Directly attacks both the credibility of  creators and their customers.

4. False objectivity - Claiming neutrality then launching emotional attacks.

5. Escalatory - Continuation of bashing and hostility towards the maker and those who support his work. Ongoing dispute where members deliberately try to provoke and undermine other’s reputation.

Overall: They use classic internet forum attack disguised with a thin veneer of objectivity. The tone is meant to damage reputation and credibility rather than engage in good-faith discussion.