is food always worth it?

[9ja Amaka]

The thing is when trying to cut costs, food shouldn’t be the thing you reduce. Your body needs good and nutritious meals to stay healthy. Eating cheap or low quality foods just because you wanna save your money won’t give you some vitamins your body needs to function properly.
Know that good food strengthens your immune system , that’s why it’s important to cook healthy meals , even if you take supplements they can never replace proper food.
So even if you’re cutting costs on other things , don’t joke with the quality of food you eat.

[₿itcoin]

when asked, what is something you can't give up even when cutting costs?, people often say food that they always want delicious food but is food always worth it? my answer is NO. it is not worth eating out all the time. do not use the justification that since it is a basic necessity you have to buy expensive food all the time. you can still eat delicious food even if we are cutting costs

In here a home cooked meal could cost between four to six dollar per person which is much lower than the fifteen to twenty or more that a restaurant meal can cost. One important thing is that cooking at home could reduce your health risks because you have full control over the ingredient or salt & quantity. For this reason it is crutial not only from a financial point of view regarding quallity but also from a healthy lifestyle standpoint. I actually can not deny that eating at home can be a bit expensive yeah depending on the method of preparation. Often if you try to make delicious food or the food goes to waste, the situation can get complicated

[MFahad]

If you deny your body the necessary food it demands you wont live long enough to tell the story. All our body need to run, function, think and plan for a better life is food, rest and water.

Food is important, no matter what you do, don't stop eating good food. Because if you do, you will eat bad food that will cause danger to your health. Remember health is wealth.

Yes i agree that food play's the important role in human survival. if a person pays attention to his food, drink and rest, he will live a healthy life. we need energy to work and good food gives us strength with which we carry out our daily tasks. Although someone eats negative, unhealthy food they suffers from many diseases. No one wants to be confined bed when they are sick. Even its important for us to take care of a balanced diet. Eat and drink water on time increases a person's life span. we schedule our meals and rest on time, our body will not feel weak. Too much food is also harmful to humans. Eating too much makes a person lazy.

[leonair]

when asked, what is something you can't give up even when cutting costs?, people often say food that they always want delicious food but is food always worth it? my answer is NO. it is not worth eating out all the time. do not use the justification that since it is a basic necessity you have to buy expensive food all the time. you can still eat delicious food even if we are cutting costs

Food is our basic need and the only reason we chase money is because we have to eat. You can stop everything else but you can't stop eating. Our taste also changes with our position. When you start spending more money on your food. Then you will confine yourself to the taste of extravagant food and from then on you will not be able to eat less tasty food. Because you are used to another taste. So I don't think there should be any compromise in the matter of food.

[ejikeme24]

The thing is when trying to cut costs, food shouldn’t be the thing you reduce. Your body needs good and nutritious meals to stay healthy. Eating cheap or low quality foods just because you wanna save your money won’t give you some vitamins your body needs to function properly.
Know that good food strengthens your immune system , that’s why it’s important to cook healthy meals , even if you take supplements they can never replace proper food.
So even if you’re cutting costs on other things , don’t joke with the quality of food you eat.

Op seems to be one among those that prioritize other things instead of eating good food to be healthy, food is what make us look good and vigorous you're actually correct when you Said that while cutting cost that food shouldn't be reduced which is correct because I'm still wondering how one is going to reduce food? Op seems to have forgotten that food is life, me that can't stay for 4 hours without eating because my work is very hard which is why I easily feel hungry, me personally do not economize food in my house there are some things that need to be economize but not food.

[batang_bitcoin]

The thing is when trying to cut costs, food shouldn’t be the thing you reduce. Your body needs good and nutritious meals to stay healthy. Eating cheap or low quality foods just because you wanna save your money won’t give you some vitamins your body needs to function properly.
Know that good food strengthens your immune system , that’s why it’s important to cook healthy meals , even if you take supplements they can never replace proper food.
So even if you’re cutting costs on other things , don’t joke with the quality of food you eat.

Supplements are from the word itself, it's just there to supply the additional nutrients but it's not the main thing that our body needs. If someone who's trying to save and are cutting their meals, the healthy ones that you're preparing. You need to think of it, it's more costly when you go to the hospital and it's not only money that you'll spend but as well as the emotion that it will create within you. And the worry that you'll be making for your family, so it's not worth it to cheap your foods out just because you have to save. But there are cheap foods that are healthy like the vegetables but you have to cook them.

[DaNNy001]

You can cut budgets on any other thing but food is very important, this shouldn't be up for debate...if you value and cherish your body then you are not going to starve yourself or eat things that have no nutritional value just because you are trying to save money...there's no point in having money if you use it get good delicacies...one thing you can do to slightly reduce cost is always prepare or learn to cook

[Asuspawer09]

I mean for sure food was always worth it and it is a need not a want so it is normal to not cut the cost especially on food it is just wasnt worth it, also who doesnt want to eat delicious food, its necesarry for survival, it makes us healthy, so its never a bad thing to have a great food on the table. I mean, you weren't really working 8hours a day just to eat some kind of canned food, right? You want to eat at least a decent meal every day it doesnt need to be a gourmet meal, something like that, but at least something that is decent that you are going to be satisfy atleast when your eating or something that you can just eat every day.

Diet is important in our health, so it is non-negotiable when it comes to money, I guess what most people forget is just how eating right, in the past 6 months I started dieting and working out, that is where I learn a lot when it comes to budgeting and eating right, you dont need to restrict yourself form eating you just need to eat the right food. Most of the time we just choose to eat what's delicious without even thinking of its effect is it health. That is where we hit the budget thing, since we are buying things that are not really good for our health, but something that is convenient or delicious just to make us satisfied. Everything should be balanced, eat healthy budget your food, and once in a while you could eat a delicous meal that you wanted.

[philipma1957]

when asked, what is something you can't give up even when cutting costs?, people often say food that they always want delicious food but is food always worth it? my answer is NO. it is not worth eating out all the time. do not use the justification that since it is a basic necessity you have to buy expensive food all the time. you can still eat delicious food even if we are cutting costs

In here a home cooked meal could cost between four to six dollar per person which is much lower than the fifteen to twenty or more that a restaurant meal can cost. One important thing is that cooking at home could reduce your health risks because you have full control over the ingredient or salt & quantity. For this reason it is crutial not only from a financial point of view regarding quallity but also from a healthy lifestyle standpoint. I actually can not deny that eating at home can be a bit expensive yeah depending on the method of preparation. Often if you try to make delicious food or the food goes to waste, the situation can get complicated

Yeah here in USA if I serve chicken thighs or drumsticks I can make a healthy meal at six bucks a person.

If I serve steak it is more expensive.

If I serve veal it is also expensive.

[Hanadawa]

The taste is quite good, and the difference in taste isn't much compared to that of a skilled chef at a restaurant. If we convert the price to the same menu at a place that serves special prices, like you mentioned, we can save over 50%, and it's not just the two of us who enjoy it, but the kids too.
Saving is necessary, but it's not mandatory or forced. It's important to remember that there are still needs and unexpected expenses that will arise later. We can save on one budget item. Imagine if other budget items could be rationalized further, that would be even better because we know that money, when we have a family, is always enough, but it's never enough every month.

That's what I'm saying. The food industry sells the price of ingredients and the services required to make them. And that's what allows the food industry to make profits of up to 50%. Yes, of course, I think that's a reasonable profit because the food industry is a red ocean with many competitors and food that's at risk of expiring. And it will significantly save your monthly budget if we cook for ourselves. It's okay to enjoy a fancy meal in a restaurant every now and then. But cooking for yourself is far more worthwhile when it comes to savings. And it can help you increase your emergency fund or divert it to other investments. You could even divert the money you've saved each month to a fine dining date.

[Dareo]

Food is our basic need and the only reason we chase money is because we have to eat. You can stop everything else but you can't stop eating. Our taste also changes with our position. When you start spending more money on your food. Then you will confine yourself to the taste of extravagant food and from then on you will not be able to eat less tasty food. Because you are used to another taste. So I don't think there should be any compromise in the matter of food.

I think that the issue of food actually depends more on our habits and mentality. Many people think that even if we reduce our expenses the food has to be as expensive and fancy as before but to be honest delicious food does not mean expensive food, Sometimes you can cook something at home that is even better than eating out. However I agree that it is not right to compromise completely on food, because we eat not only to fill our stomachs, but also for a little pleasure. So reducing expenses does not mean that we have to eat all the bad quality or boring food. On the contrary, if you are a little smart, the cost will also be reduced and the fun of eating will not be reduced.

[ZeroVinsonN]

when asked, what is something you can't give up even when cutting costs?, people often say food that they always want delicious food but is food always worth it? my answer is NO. it is not worth eating out all the time. do not use the justification that since it is a basic necessity you have to buy expensive food all the time. you can still eat delicious food even if we are cutting costs

In here a home cooked meal could cost between four to six dollar per person which is much lower than the fifteen to twenty or more that a restaurant meal can cost. One important thing is that cooking at home could reduce your health risks because you have full control over the ingredient or salt & quantity. For this reason it is crutial not only from a financial point of view regarding quallity but also from a healthy lifestyle standpoint. I actually can not deny that eating at home can be a bit expensive yeah depending on the method of preparation. Often if you try to make delicious food or the food goes to waste, the situation can get complicated

Yeah here in USA if I serve chicken thighs or drumsticks I can make a healthy meal at six bucks a person.

If I serve steak it is more expensive.

If I serve veal it is also expensive.

Different food with different price range will at the end of the day serve the same purpose and provide with roughly the same amount of nutrients, and sure from time to time you might want to treat yourself to something expensive which isn't wrong on it own but this should be done within your limits too, you can't realistically be craving expensive food all through the week, if you treat yourself one day out of seven or even two days out of seven you will still be able to save alot from the remaining 5 to 6 days left, expensive food doesn't necessarily mean good and nutritious food.

[bakasabo]

I think it is impossible to cut or save a lot on food. You can trick your body and taste. If you eat less for few days to save money on food expenses, in next days you will compensate lack of food by eating more. If you eat less tasty food to cut on expenses, in some time you will still buy something extra tasty to treat yourself. I suppose it is possible to readjust expenses, spend less now to spend more later, but it wont be possible to cut on food and do that regularly to make it worth doing like that. If your body is used to get 10000 callories per day (just a random amount), you cant give it 9000 callories of food you dont love.

[LucyFurr]

Every food will taste delicious when you are starving.

So the plan should be starve between each meals so you can save money?

That's beyond stupidity. We are working to make our lives better and saving is important but having the full meals everyday is very important as well. And so that you know Health is wealth.

[uneng]

Food has become a luxurious asset nowadays. If you want to eat tasteful and real food, you have to pay expensive prices. For me it sounds ridiculous and shameful, but that is the current low level of degeneration this world has reached.

Someone living on minimum wage won't be able to afford quality food, so they have to ask themselves, what should be the decision, then? To spend the low wage they earn on tasteful, but expensive food (which won't be enough for the whole month), or to cut food expenses, while trying to save money for something else, like investment for an example?

Personally, I prefer to cut food expenses, so I can, at least, dream about a more comfortable life condition in the future, which can be achieved through investments and entrepreneurship. But I don't blame those who want to have access to their favorite food on the present time too. After all, our goal is the same, we just diverge on the most appropriate moment of life for that.

[passwordnow]

Every food will taste delicious when you are starving.

So the plan should be starve between each meals so you can save money?

That's beyond stupidity. We are working to make our lives better and saving is important but having the full meals everyday is very important as well. And so that you know Health is wealth.

It's sad to read that there are people that are willing to cut their budget for food just to save. Even if I haven't earned that much before, I didn't cut my budget for food. Getting a full meal is one of the few joys that we can provide for ourselves and if we're going to cut it and deprive ourselves with spoiling no longer with food. That's going to impact on how you perceive things. Because if you can't even reward yourself with a good food, what else you want it to be in a simpler appreciation of yourself and how you take care of it?

[Oluwa-btc]

when asked, what is something you can't give up even when cutting costs?, people often say food that they always want delicious food but is food always worth it? my answer is NO. it is not worth eating out all the time. do not use the justification that since it is a basic necessity you have to buy expensive food all the time. you can still eat delicious food even if we are cutting costs

Food is essential,it fuels your body, keeps you healthy, and affects mood, energy, and longevity.You can cut costs on your food, but on no account should you compromise on the quality of your diet and health.Even if,you can still get the satisfaction you need even on a budget,but food is absolutely worth it and spending wisely is key.You can cut costs without sacrificing quality.

[HONDACD125]

Every food will taste delicious when you are starving.

So the plan should be starve between each meals so you can save money?

That's beyond stupidity. We are working to make our lives better and saving is important but having the full meals everyday is very important as well. And so that you know Health is wealth.

Eating full meals is another thing, and eating expensive things is another. No one should starve themselves to death only because they want to save money, but it's possible for a person to compromise a little on what they eat every day. You can have simple food that doesn't cost a lot of money every day, but you should only feast at least once a week or so, instead of eating expensive food that you love every day and saying that you will starve if you don't eat, because you don't need to eat expensive in order to stay alive.

So, the discussion is about whether we should be eating fancy every day or eat food that we can either buy or cook ourselves with a lower cost in general. A lot of people spend a lot of money on food every day, and that's not because if they don't do it, they will stave to death, but it's because they like doing it, and they have made a habit out of it, and now if they don't do it, they will feel something is missing in their life. However, one can even have normal meals and still have the same results, it's just that you won't be eating your favorite stuff every time.

[wiss19]

Supplements are from the word itself, it's just there to supply the additional nutrients but it's not the main thing that our body needs. If someone who's trying to save and are cutting their meals, the healthy ones that you're preparing. You need to think of it, it's more costly when you go to the hospital and it's not only money that you'll spend but as well as the emotion that it will create within you. And the worry that you'll be making for your family, so it's not worth it to cheap your foods out just because you have to save. But there are cheap foods that are healthy like the vegetables but you have to cook them.

Supplements is always an option but we should not really consider taking those supplements. They are not only expensive but also have adverse effects on our health. As long as we eat healthy, there is not need for us to take the supplements because we already intake enough nutrients from the food we consume.

The choice of food here should be healthy. We can't eat fries everyday thinking they have enough carbs to provide energy throughout the day. We need to combine carbs with minerals and vitamins to provide a stable meal. I would prefer spending some extra amount on food to get quality food because I know if I cut short on the food, I might have to spend equal or more amount in hospital bills. So here, even if I spend more on food I am still saving my future expenses.

[ancafe]

Food is essential,it fuels your body, keeps you healthy, and affects mood, energy, and longevity.You can cut costs on your food, but on no account should you compromise on the quality of your diet and health.Even if,you can still get the satisfaction you need even on a budget,but food is absolutely worth it and spending wisely is key.You can cut costs without sacrificing quality.

Without food our bodies won't function optimally. They may need protein, carbohydrates, and other nutrients, which we generally get from food sources. I agree with you because people can save money on food, but they shouldn't compromise on quality, even if they are on a diet. Health is far more important than money, and saving on bodily needs is not something worth doing, because when someone gets sick, money is no longer valuable.

The method can be adjusted because even if we save, we can still meet the body's nutritional needs as long as we are more wise in spending our money on those needs. The most important thing is not to reduce nutritional quality because there are still many cheap foods that provide sufficient nutrition, and perhaps that can be implemented.