4 Hero Members and 1 Sr. Member are connected and 2 of them are in Epicbet

[AakZaki]

I mentioned before that lovesmayfamilis was being too nice by giving neutral tags to some people suspected of using multiple accounts.
As a result, two of these five alternate accounts managed to get into a campaign and another one even tried to apply fortunately, it wasn’t accepted.
I think if we just ignore this issue, there’s a chance that in the future all of them could slip into signature campaigns, maybe even into the same one.

Here is the proof:

• JatiKriting – Hero Member – accepted in the Epicbet– since November 2025 03, 03:55:17
• PokerBetting – Hero Member – accepted in the Epicbet Bounty – since November 16, 2025, 11:01:35
• xeqoRameshAxueamExaqana – Hero Member – attempted to apply at Epicbet, not accepted since November 17, 2025, 14:02:45
• cengsuwuei – Hero Member – inactive since October 31, 2025, 11:09:39
• nimethasa – Sr Member – inactive since October 31, 2025, 11:01:38

JatiKriting and cengsuwuei have been tagged Neutral because they are alts  here
PokerBetting and nimethasa have been tagged Neutral because they are alts here
xeqoRameshAxueamExaqana has no tags yet.

Wallet Proof:

Bech32 BTC address: bc1q0ylpkmymwrng44xmg43g7rayzd4tdne5s0eyvl

--------------------------------------------------------

Rank- Hero Member
Segwit BTC address-  bc1qss9uckdydfwrxdzapcryd58fz7e5rth8zejxc6

BTC Address: bc1quz9q9mu59e9d2a2wnpyamc87mjqzh6zu8tggs2

Bech32 BTC address: bc1qv29lw8llhfs7te5w2twyfjs8yxxdctzed77gr7

Bech32 address : bc1q0tn7nmnjmhes0689m3vj5z7v65d8afqg49ghuz

Code:

It seems this is from an Electrum Wallet:
bc1qss9uckdydfwrxdzapcryd58fz7e5rth8zejxc6
bc1quz9q9mu59e9d2a2wnpyamc87mjqzh6zu8tggs2
bc1qv29lw8llhfs7te5w2twyfjs8yxxdctzed77gr7
bc1q0tn7nmnjmhes0689m3vj5z7v65d8afqg49ghuz

Sent BTC to Hot Wallet:=> bc1qjy3d70grhawxrng20zy0fdhpnx9zu2sf86x37x

The four wallets above have sent BTC to a Market Hot Wallet (Possibly Belonging to Binance) and were then sent to a Cold Wallet (Possibly Also Belonging to Binance). As follows:
To Hot Wallet: bc1qjy3d70grhawxrng20zy0fdhpnx9zu2sf86x37x ⇒ to Cold Wallet: bc1qgzrva028eym96uax90j28qj3aqhh3dy8gk6qvp <= This Cold Wallet is not unfamiliar.

Here is TXhash:

• https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/bf39570557f83b84e7222e105f663e636a490f4501bf4f2008b2504872d18c55
  
• https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/a3e4126def099f02073acd9882d4704fbc0068758cecfa01496151591e87b6da
  

Even I find this account memequiserle strange after woke up from a long period of inactivity, it sent 5 Merit to a completely useless post. It’s also possible that this is part of their group. I haven’t checked further yet. here

The thread was edited due to new findings by Pandu Geddon regarding the account above, which was also involved in the VAVE campaign with multiple accounts.

You can check the participation of those accounts in the VAVE campaign.


I have already discussed this in the findings of lovesmayfamilis. There is evidence of transactions connecting many accounts that woke up around the same time and engaged in Merit abuse. You can check the transactions here, there might be a few more accounts joining your campaign.

[Xiaomie A1]

They've all been sharing merits in an unreasonable way locally, and I've exposed this issue since early last year (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5253221.msg63622765#msg63622765). And if you're willing to examine how they're getting merits from one account to another, you might find more anomalies than just the connection between their transactions. One account that's been making me suspicious about merits is FunshareNesialMLMPenipu. If you have the time to investigate, there might be better results for all of them.

[hosemary]

The evidence is strong enough and I guess there are more accounts involved.
I checked their post history. They are all active in Indonesian local board and also have the same posting style.

I posted negative feedback against all of them.

[God Of Thunder]

Alt accounts are proven.
If merit abuse occurs in the scenario, it deserves neutral feedback.
I didn't check if they have cheated in campaigns; if they did, they should be tagged. hosemary, could you please provide some evidence that they participated with their alt accounts in the same signature campaign and cheated them? That will actually validate your negative feedback. I have already removed two accounts from my two campaigns due to your feedback; however, I think the community will expect more evidence to support your negative feedback.

[Pandu Geddon]

I have already removed two accounts from my two campaigns due to your feedback; however, I think the community will expect more evidence to support your negative feedback.

You can check the participation of those accounts in the VAVE campaign.


I have already discussed this in the findings of lovesmayfamilis. There is evidence of transactions connecting many accounts that woke up around the same time and engaged in Merit abuse. You can check the transactions here, there might be a few more accounts joining your campaign.

[God Of Thunder]

I have already removed two accounts from my two campaigns due to your feedback; however, I think the community will expect more evidence to support your negative feedback.

You can check the participation of those accounts in the VAVE campaign.

In such a case, linking to this post as a reference would be more suitable. Or OP could include this information in the OP. So whenever someone sees the opening post, they will immediately know that, not only are they alts, but they are actually cheaters who abused campaigns with multiple accounts.  I was thinking of paying them and then removing them from the campaign. In fact, I already paid one of them for the bounty campaign. Now I will have to think about it and consider kicking them out without paying. Let me check with other managers to see what is the standard and what they do in such case.

[hosemary]

Thank you Pandu Geddon.

Honestly, I gave them that negative feedback because JatiKriting and PokerBetting were wearing the same signature and I thought they were in the same campaign.
After I read God Of Thunder's post, I checked that again and I noticed that he is running two different campaigns for Epicbet. So, they are not participating in the same signature campaign now, but according to your finding, my negative feedback is still valid.


AakZaki, I agree with God Of Thunder. Please add the information about cheating VAVE campaign to OP.

[God Of Thunder]

Thank you Pandu Geddon.

Honestly, I gave them that negative feedback because JatiKriting and PokerBetting were wearing the same signature and I thought they were in the same campaign.
After I read God Of Thunder's post, I checked that again and I noticed that he is running two different campaigns for Epicbet. So, they are not participating in the same signature campaign now, but according to your finding, my negative feedback is still valid.

Yeah, your feedback is still valid. However, I would recommend that the OP update the opening post with more information, such as instances of cheating on campaigns. Alternatively, you could change the reference link so that anyone who checks it understands that they are not only alts but also cheaters. I already paid for one account for the last week, but I changed my mind about the other. I think I agree with other managers; if they receive negative feedback for cheating, they should not be paid.

[AakZaki]

They've all been sharing merits in an unreasonable way locally, and I've exposed this issue since early last year (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5253221.msg63622765#msg63622765). And if you're willing to examine how they're getting merits from one account to another, you might find more anomalies than just the connection between their transactions. One account that's been making me suspicious about merits is FunshareNesialMLMPenipu. If you have the time to investigate, there might be better results for all of them.

I will continue to do this especially in Local Indonesia, because last night I was almost four hours in front of the computer to validate the truth of the thread I made, so I decided to take a break first.

The evidence is strong enough and I guess there are more accounts involved.
I checked their post history. They are all active in Indonesian local board and also have the same posting style.

(...)

You're right, I actually created a thread in the Indonesian Local here, strongly opposing the practice of "account farming" and "Merit Abuse". But it seems like no one really took my thread seriously, which is why I'm proving it here.

Alt accounts are proven.
(...)
however, I think the community will expect more evidence to support your negative feedback.

Don't worry sir, I will continue to investigate fraudulent accounts even in all campaigns, especially those carried out by local Indonesian members.

You can check the participation of those accounts in the VAVE campaign.


I have already discussed this in the findings of lovesmayfamilis. There is evidence of transactions connecting many accounts that woke up around the same time and engaged in Merit abuse. You can check the transactions here, there might be a few more accounts joining your campaign.

Thank you for the new findings. I will add them to the OP as suggested by God of Thunder.

[jg_btc]

Your subject of this thread is misleading as Epicbet and Epicbet Bounty are two different campaigns.

Code:

 ~ 2 of them are in Epicbet

[YOSHIE]

4 Hero Members and 1 Sr. Member are connected and 2 of them are in Epicbet

Don't forget one more Alt, put it into 6 connected Alts.

There is one more Alt left behind, although not in the same campaign currently, but they used to be.

Connected accounts:

1. cakravothy

@cakravothy is connected to @PokerBetting & @JariKriting.
All three can be proven based on repeated ETH and BTC/transaction pages more than several times.

Proof of connected ETH Transaction:

Bitcointalk Username: cakravothy
BSC Wallet Address:   0xe7b6E6Fbc725A9E147bfaD502FF619F18a8Fc40D

https://archive.vn/wip/J20Wq

https://bscscan.com/tx/0xb912d8deb4a631e52238f725f5f03703a0cd7bfcc44c316d9772afa0cf04eb1a
0xe7b6E6Fbc725A9E147bfaD502FF619F18a8Fc40D
To
0xae394c3ab2906F299Eac2359A4DA303368FB0337

Bitcointalk Username:  PokerBetting
BSC Wallet Address: 0xae394c3ab2906F299Eac2359A4DA303368FB0337

https://archive.vn/wip/JKhR4


Proof of connected BTC Transaction:

Post btc address 1KiTbsPhPc1egnoPdupeCyLaxQp6U42iMU

https://bitcoin.atomicwallet.io/tx/0001c1364d1805125c1640d70acfdebe45f921a256fdb87024be5ad3235a8f68
1KiTbsPhPc1egnoPdupeCyLaxQp6U42iMU
To
1JbVmGxXY31gWJbkadBWV1LBZ6oPTJHjWb

https://bitcoin.atomicwallet.io/tx/cafce1825999b3e655a60813d5db87ebb28648a787e16a2a4f62f3ba487a116f
1Pg7nCMFFM1LQdJnPgbjM3wxo9GewmdPoA
To
1JbVmGxXY31gWJbkadBWV1LBZ6oPTJHjWb

Bitcointalk username: cakravothy
Btc address: 1Pg7nCMFFM1LQdJnPgbjM3wxo9GewmdPoA

@JariKriting & @cakravothy collect BTC to the same exchange, namely: 1JbVmGxXY31gWJbkadBWV1LBZ6oPTJHjWb

[dkbit98]

Thank you AakZaki for doing the good investigation again.
Connection is clear enough for me, and I think all this accounts are controlled by one guy located in Indonesia.
We can see more higher ranked members cheating in same signature campaigns, and they deserve to get negative feedback.