Three heroes and a legend are cheaters.

[lovesmayfamilis]

This activity will not stop if managers want to pity lenders by allowing cheaters to stay in the campaign due to active loans. If they can not be removed immediately, their complete payment should be sent to the lenders address every week.

Everything is perfectly correct, and you're not alone in your thoughts. I'm 100% on your side. But how many of us are there? Those who have legitimate accounts, one or several, but don't use them for profit, will always be on the side of justice. However, it's highly utopian that in a good and righteous world, scammers wouldn't appear.
Don't feel sorry for those who give loans. That's their problem. Their problem is how they decide to trust the person they're lending to.
Above all, anyone reading this forum needs to take care of themselves, and that means a clean space, without repeating what they read on page 30.
Therefore, catching cheaters is like fighting windmills, as someone who saw the forum for its true purpose once put it. And yes, as long as certain concessions are allowed, everything will continue to be repeated, in one way or another.

[JollyGood]

None of these accounts have posted here since the thread was created on 24th November:

Lanatsa
dunfida
Mahanton
Koadharber

Considering they have a lot to do as they are still posting elsewhere in order to meet their campaign quotas, they cannot be bothered to post here to either admit or dispute the allegations. That speaks volumes about the individual accounts and the puppeteers behind them.

[Pandu Geddon]

None of these accounts have posted here since the thread was created on 24th November:

Lanatsa
dunfida
Mahanton
Koadharber

Considering they have a lot to do as they are still posting elsewhere in order to meet their campaign quotas, they cannot be bothered to post here to either admit or dispute the allegations. That speaks volumes about the individual accounts and the puppeteers behind them.

I suspect that there are indeed more accounts managed by the person behind those accounts. He would not have a problem when several accounts are tagged, removed from the campaign, and the accounts can disappear without repaying the loan.

There are old transactions that show a connection between those accounts with one of the Loan Defaulted accounts.
https://etherscan.io/address/0x2557520ce58ea7c72e91f9c12800ab38428c9501

ERC20 wallet address: 0xF70e8Fa5543545ea40A5529C05785d42aFD47637

https://ninjastic.space/post/54424009

ERC20 wallet address: 0x9c17C0bF5469C04de6e166a336589E031f1f2aeE

https://ninjastic.space/post/56294828

ERC20 wallet address: 0xE6d5A85867f682Aec2fde7AA3841d1f43C3B2e96

https://ninjastic.space/post/53987753

[FinneysTrueVision]

Here are a couple more accounts that belong to this farm.

Oilacris
Zadicar

Based on these accounts’ merit history I had suspected that they were also their alt accounts. Oilacris has not been active in almost a year, but yesterday Dunfida decided to send merit to two of his shitposts that were made 9 months ago. These posts were buried many pages deep into their thread, so it’s unlikely Dunfida found them by coincidence. This means he intentionally went to the Oilacris profile and sent merit to two random posts that appeared on the first page of their post history.

Here is another piece of evidence. Addresses associated with Oilacris and Dunfida have made many Bitcoin transfers around the same time.

Example 1 - On March 29, 2024 Dunfida sends funds to an OKX deposit address. At the same time Oilacris also sends funds to an OKX address.
https://mempool.space/tx/49c78b8e894a01f2f817fa97886375a58d4ddc000510589d971359394abac6e7
https://mempool.space/tx/4131af4a7cd00b2bfe1d642ffa3a3a722f1b673a68bfe6b71177d582197ee320



Example 2 - On April 17, 2024 we also see both their addresses sending funds to OKX with similar timing.
https://mempool.space/tx/e5e0f712506a7ed35487784e07d52ef47c00f8a9fdc394bf59a9aaa595b5ea05
https://mempool.space/tx/44d0a913aa2b7bd589f42d9efd9b03d5db07acf3ed9c6cde1c27ec13c1a8f2aa



Zadicar is an AI spammer who I have reported numerous times already. If you read the first report, I mention that he was previously banned for 5 years.
https://bitlist.co/post/66227733
https://bitlist.co/post/66510474

Evidence that this account is part of the same farm is in the Binance deposit address which he and Oilacris were sending funds to.

Zadicar’s address 0xdd656f8E9d00d53BCd41259CcC53e976bCb6b71B sending funds to Binance address 0x3dc2E8f138610f3E1e16706502508bFE7c704615


Oilacris’ address 0x6501e173A74D0FEb0E8EEc9c09fFcb9A388741c8 sending funds to the same deposit address.

[JollyGood]

1. Lanatsa  Hero Member  Rollbit company signature
2. dunfida     Legendary  rainbet  company signature
3. Mahanton  Hero Member  Rollbit company signature
4. Koadharber  Hero Member jackpotter company signature

First of all, I'd like to point out that all four accounts have sufficient funds in their wallets, yet all four took out a loan from shasan. I was drawn to the way all four accounts trade merits. The exchange occurs exclusively between the four accounts; in some cases, other accounts are visible.

It has not escaped attention that two of the accounts were last active on 6th December 2025, it is highly unlikely that it is not a coincidence. There is some connection there. Also the other two have been active, one has been applying for campaigns and the other had been busy meeting campaign quota.

According to the feedback left by shasa, there have been loans give to the tune of at least $1090 to the above accounts. One remains a mystery because a loan is mentioned by deducting 50% of the signature campaign earnings but there is no reference link.

Here are a couple more accounts that belong to this farm.

Oilacris
Zadicar

The Zadicar account had a $2542 loan with shasan in 2025 and the Oilacris accoint had a $2858 with shasan in 2025 too. These are phenomenal amounts of money to be trusting accounts that basically most of us would never even consider lending $1 to let alone $5400 combined. There is nothing in their feedback by shasan that clarify whether the loans were repaid or not, maybe he can post here to clarify.

In total to the above six accounts, it seems shasan has given loans worth over $6490 though some might have been partially or fully repaid.

[FinneysTrueVision]

After those suspicious merit transfers from Dunfida, the Oilacris account became active again today trying to join signature campaigns. He has not been accepted into the Bitania campaign yet, but he is wearing their signature and avatar as if he had.

[TokenTikas]

the Oilacris account became active again today trying to join signature campaigns. He has not been accepted into the Bitania campaign yet, but he is wearing their signature and avatar as if he had.

Oilacris last made a post on June 27, 2025. For about 8–9 months, there was no activity but today he suddenly came back and applied for a signature campaign, even before getting accepted, he already wear signature and avatar. To be honest, that looks quite suspicious to me.

[Awaklara]

Oilacris last made a post on June 27, 2025. For about 8–9 months, there was no activity but today he suddenly came back and applied for a signature campaign, even before getting accepted, he already wear signature and avatar. To be honest, that looks quite suspicious to me.

What is suspicious is not that the account has already changed its signature and avatar before being accepted, because that is indeed the campaign rule. 
What is suspicious is an account that has been inactive for some time, suddenly knowing that a new campaign has been opened. It is certain that they have another account that is active in the campaign. 
Although there is another possibility that they were paying attention to update notifications from the Telegram channel. 

The account @Koadharber also has not been actively posting this month aside from applying for campaigns. Not actively posting does not necessarily mean the account is offline, but coincidentally also applies for the same campaign.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

Maybe Shasan should help us document the accounts that paid back the loans and those that did not. I want to tag all the accounts involved but i first need clarification from the lender. Did these default the loans or not?

1. Lanatsa
Last documented loan repayment - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5030169.msg66084611#msg66084611

Neutral feedback by lender. No update since then

shasan

2025-11-23

Reference

335$ active non-collateral loan, which should be repaid on or before 2025-12-23. You must have to send 160$ on or before 23rd December if you want to take extension.

2. dunfida
Last documented Loan repayment - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5030169.msg65651123#msg65651123

Neutral feedback by lender. No update since then and this guy is still on rainbet signature campaign.  

shasan

2025-08-03

Reference

390$ active non-collateral loan which should be repaid on or before 2025-09-02. 40% per month will be applied.

3. Mahanton
Last documented Loan repayment - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5030169.msg66063169#msg66063169

Neutral feedback by lender. No update since then

shasan

2025-11-19

Reference

309.6$ active non-collateral loan. Repayment should be made on or before 2025-12-17. New interest will be charged from 18th January 2026 (171$).

4. Koadharber
No documented loan request, no reference link, and no documented loan repayment.

Neutral feedback by lender. No update since then

shasan

2025-10-17

Active non-collateral loan. 50% of the signature payment must be made when the payment is made.

5. Oilacris
Last documented Loan repayment - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5030169.msg65484494#msg65484494

Neutral feedback by lender. No update since then

shasan

2025-06-16

Reference

2858$ active non-collateral loan which should be repaid on or before 2025-06-23.

6. Zadicar
No documented loan request, no reference link, and no documented loan repayment.

Neutral feedback by lender. No update since then

shasan

2025-04-08

2542$ active non-collateral loan which should be repaid on or before 2025-04-23.

[shasan]

All of those mentioned one the link is related to one another by anyway. And I have not lend zadicar and Koadharber but as a connection and a lot of due wit olicris I have added neutral tag to zadicar and Koadharber.
Lanatsa: Already been removed from campaign so not repaying
dunfida: sending 25$ weekly as the user receiving 50$ weekly (50% of the weekly income)
Mahanton: removed from campaign so stopped repaying
Koadharber: Not in a campiagn so not repaying
Oilacris: Not in a campiagn so not repaying
Zadicar: sending 30$ as the user receiving 60$ weekly (50% of the weekly income)


As they are not doing anything bad for the community and I have huge due I would request not to tag them. Thank you.

[lovesmayfamilis]

This may be off-topic, or I may have already asked this somewhere, but there's often a question. How can they lend huge sums to those whose weekly payments are small enough to pay off their debt on time?? Doesn't it look like an understanding that the account has a couple of other accounts that can pay faster or on time🤝? And why give a loan to someone who only repaid the debt a few days ago, and that's not all? This is a clear insurance policy against errors and the hope that these accounts will remain "alive" as long as there is a payment agreement.

As they are not doing anything bad for the community and I have huge due I would request not to tag them. Thank you.

Alternative accounts don't do anything bad to the community, not at all, yeah.🤔

[examplens]

This may be off-topic, or I may have already asked this somewhere, but there's often a question. How can they lend huge sums to those whose weekly payments are small enough to pay off their debt on time?? Doesn't it look like an understanding that the account has a couple of other accounts that can pay faster or on time🤝? And why give a loan to someone who only repaid the debt a few days ago, and that's not all? This is a clear insurance policy against errors and the hope that these accounts will remain "alive" as long as there is a payment agreement.

This has been noticeable for some time, but since it's not my money and not my business, I didn't even want to discuss it much.
Somehow, lending with him has been brought into the form of paying out earnings from signature campaigns, in advance.
Many of their debtors have debt for which they need months for repayment, even if they were to forward all the income from the campaign to the lender. Enough for one such campaign to end and things get more complicated.
At the same time, it is not that they are the most wanted posters on the forum, so they will easily find a new campaign. This is obviously happening with the accounts mentioned above.

Everything is reflected on the forum, because many tolerate (and I do it) other things and do not leave a red tag, so that they do not fall out of the campaign and leave the lander without money.
The question is, do spammers and account farmers use this method to protect accounts from red tags?

[lovesmayfamilis]

Everything is reflected on the forum, because many tolerate (and I do it) other things and do not leave a red tag, so that they do not fall out of the campaign and leave the lander without money.
The question is, do spammers and account farmers use this method to protect accounts from red tags?

Sure. If we see similar requests from the lender not to touch these accounts, then this is a kind of protection against negative tags (just in case). It's a kind of insurance that the taker pays the lender as a percentage, just like we all pay for insurance offline. But here it turns out that the obvious disadvantage of participating in the signature of companies is that if you participate honestly from one account, when paying out interest, the profit is generally a trifle. But having multiple accounts, you can sacrifice a certain amount, right?
As a result, the forum gets spammers who write bullshit in order to meet all the quotas on their accounts, and the lender receives interest. Everyone is happy. And yes, there's no harm at all.
A simple example is the amount of more than 1,100 dollars that needs to be paid in a month. Joyfully.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=3467805

Extended and the new repayment amount should be 1166$. Added 10%. If you need more extension then you will be charged 15% from next month and later it will increase the sooner repayment the best.

[stompix]

Sure. If we see similar requests from the lender not to touch these accounts, then this is a kind of protection against negative tags (just in case).

Which is pure bull!
So every spammer now has insurance because he owes money to someone who got greedy and lent a piece of shit spammer money?

I'm curious about both things here:
- How do you lend $1655 to this guy
- How do you keep this guy in a signature campaign?

What Union barikin did to Girona was so surprising, the result was really a shock to me. Because Union Berlin is not in a good performance compare to what Gurin performance looks like, I expected Girona to win the match even they will not score many goals, but ended up giving union Berlin the opportunity. I believe after this match it’s another motivation for union Berlin in their coming match, this will boost their confidence in winning the match.

I am open to every explanation that doesn't include alternative realities and time travel

[Satofan44]

Everything is reflected on the forum, because many tolerate (and I do it) other things and do not leave a red tag, so that they do not fall out of the campaign and leave the lander without money.
The question is, do spammers and account farmers use this method to protect accounts from red tags?

Sure. If we see similar requests from the lender not to touch these accounts, then this is a kind of protection against negative tags (just in case).

Some even take out loans one after another, further proving that this is already happening -- as is the case here, but I keep encountering this more and more randomly. What I often see after I look into the profile of a completely useless and parasitic shitposter is that I find him to have a loan with shasan. No responsible person would ever need to take several "no collateral" loans like this.

I'm curious about both things here:
- How do you lend $1655 to this guy
- How do you keep this guy in a signature campaign?

Amazing, right?

So every spammer now has insurance because he owes money to someone who got greedy and lent a piece of shit spammer money?

Not a single DT member seems to want to do anything about shasan or similar users (or actually anything that generates money among friends), so there's nothing to be done by non DT members. I wonder how many farmers are actually doing this, someone should run an analysis on all granted loans and the state of accounts afterwards. The sensible thing would be to voluntarily stop this, but since the prevalent culture here is that greed is good mixed in with some keep-the-status-quo-at-all-cost it is unlikely that something will happen.

[shasan]

How can they lend huge sums to those whose weekly payments are small enough to pay off their debt on time?? And why give a loan to someone who only repaid the debt a few days ago, and that's not all? This is a clear insurance policy against errors and the hope that these accounts will remain "alive" as long as there is a payment agreement.

The amount based on several factors mostly how they repay their loan, whats their weekly earnings and most important their reputation on the forum. I have lended a forum user 20k+ loan even I have not tagged that user and the user has not posted anything on the forum and that user has almost repaid the loan only 2 more months need to repay fully.

And why give a loan to someone who only repaid the debt a few days ago, and that's not all? This is a clear insurance policy against errors and the hope that these accounts will remain "alive" as long as there is a payment agreement.

You are coreect and I agree with you and almost everyone should be agreed with you but there is something difficult for me to guess they are doing this for scamming or not. Cause if anyone repay a loan from me and then retake the loan again then the interest will be regular interest. But if anyone take loans but not full repaid then the interest rate increase with the time being. In this case those who are perfect borrower manage the funds anyway for few days 1/2 and after retaking the loan they settle that. If that is not the case then that will turn into scam.

- How do you lend $1655 to this guy

This user has not repaid on time that's why the amount is high. It is for the added interest. If the amount repaid on time weekly base then there would have no due till now.

[Free Market Capitalist]

- How do you lend $1655 to this guy

This user has not repaid on time that's why the amount is high. It is for the added interest. If the amount repaid on time weekly base then there would have no due till now.

So, a default about to happen.

Am I missing something here?

You left a neutral tag today stating:

1615$ active non-collateral loan, which should be repaid on or before 2026-04-04. Weekly repayment.

You don't have to be a fortune-teller to know what will happen in less than a week.