From SIX accounts it has now increased to EIGHTEEN connected accounts.

[rangga28]

Great work in finding these additional accounts, and its nice that you used the most straight-forward proof of connection that there is. I tagged all of the non-banned accounts mentioned above, as well as most of the accounts listed by OP.

It will be interesting to see which managers decide to remove red tagged accounts from their campaigns. You would think that a red tag for "cheating campaigns" would be a disqualification but for some managers it is not.

Hi Nutildah,
I simply forgot to edit my wallet after copying someone's wallet when registering for a campaign. Is that considered a fatal error?

You or anyone here can check my account for anything, as I've never made any fatal errors while on this forum. So, I'd like to ask for your forgiveness for copying someone else's wallet and forgetting to edit it.

[TypoTonic]

I simply forgot to edit my wallet after copying someone's wallet when registering for a campaign. Is that considered a fatal error?

This isn't a valid excuse. Campaign managers provide an application format in the OP for applicants to copy.

Edit: After seeing nutildah's reply in another thread, I retract my previous statement. I failed to consider the genuine mistakes by lazy applicants.

sometimes it is indeed a case of someone copy/pasting an application and forgetting to update something. Each situation is contextually dependent, and its always better to compile more evidence than a single connection before proclaiming accounts are alts of each other.

I've never made any fatal errors while on this forum.

Ironically, you just did. Your post was from August 28, 2024, 04:40:53 AM
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/6447/64470810.html

While this post made by $anounimus$ containing the same address was made 7 minutes after on August 28, 2024, 04:47:28 AM, on a different campaign by the way, so it's basically impossible and there's no reason for you to copy it.
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/6447/64470822.html

I'd like to ask for your forgiveness for copying someone else's wallet and forgetting to edit it.

So how could you copy a post from the future? Are you perhaps a time traveler?

[nutildah]

So how could you copy a post from the future? Are you perhaps a time traveler?

Not to forget the shared merits

Hi Nutildah,
I simply forgot to edit my wallet after copying someone's wallet when registering for a campaign. Is that considered a fatal error?

You somehow found that address in a different thread. It was posted 13 days earlier, somewhere else, and copied it into an application for a new signature campaign, but got your name right? I don't believe you at all. But I can connect your accounts to wumbowo, Budening and a few other Indonesian accounts not mentioned so far via Ethereum transactions. I should probably take a closer look as I think there are a few stragglers.

You or anyone here can check my account for anything, as I've never made any fatal errors while on this forum. So, I'd like to ask for your forgiveness for copying someone else's wallet and forgetting to edit it.

You are remorselessly full of shit and the answer is no.

[Shishir99]

Great work in finding these additional accounts, and its nice that you used the most straight-forward proof of connection that there is. I tagged all of the non-banned accounts mentioned above, as well as most of the accounts listed by OP.

It will be interesting to see which managers decide to remove red tagged accounts from their campaigns. You would think that a red tag for "cheating campaigns" would be a disqualification but for some managers it is not.

Thanks!

The connections are so straight forward and I don't see any reason for the campaign manager not to remove the cheaters from the campaign. I am not sure about Stake though since they have history of accepting the negative tagged accounts in their campaign. These accounts should receive more negative feedbacks so the campaign manager pay some attention to the feedback page.

However, I would request OP to update the main post and list all those accounts. I think there are a total of 18 forum accounts. Please list them all on the main post with numbering so everyone can take a look. Thanks!

[JollyGood]

I think there will be other names added to the list soon. In your list I found at least two accounts that I had given tags to before you connected them to the farm. The rest is down to campaign managers, the correct course of action would be to remove them from existing campaigns and to blacklist them ensuring they will never join campaigns again.

• woez
• NewRanger
• Lamkuthang
• Freddie Boyer
• martinex
• Gayong88
• rokok local
• siniminomorocomunisakito
• Dorjoy Khan
• viananda2525
• jambul_kribo
• BitTraderCute
• Helpme_please
• $anounimus$
• rangga28
• rolings - Banned
• GigaBit
• PCindy - Banned

[woez]

I wonder why the forum hasn't taken a stand against this use of artificial intelligence as well as plagiarism? Such people should simply be permanently banned, of course if it is established beyond any doubt that they are using AI to generate their posts.

I think there's something very funny here. Someone named AakZaki also sent a merit to arufox even though his account had been tagged/marked for posting using AI, and had been blacked out previously. What's more, the investigation seems to have been halted.



hhhm...

.... If that's okay with you, woez, I can say that he can assume the OP received a notification from me, as you wish.

I respect you for your professionalism, even though you're a woman. What's funny is that a man who concealed the identity of the reporter was too cowardly to share his information with me.

However, I would request OP to update the main post and list all those accounts. I think there are a total of 18 forum accounts. Please list them all on the main post with numbering so everyone can take a look. Thanks!

My question is, the person who came specifically to report to the forum clearly identified the problem openly, but was also blackballed by DT, while the hero or informant who reported me was hidden by AakZaki. There seems to be a similar sentiment. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5566807.msg66105558#msg66105558 Did you notice anything unusual?

They were meeting their weekly quota by using AI to write their posts. It is obvious from first glance, but to be certain I checked with AI detectors, and sure enough their posts are 100% AI.

It's best to check all arufox posts that AakZaki gives merit to arufox to see if they use AI or super AI, and whether their posts in such threads are worthy of merit, considered high-quality, and fulfilling the requirements, contributing to the forum through their writing. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5253221.msg66010426#msg66010426.

[Awaklara]

I think there's something very funny here. Someone named AakZaki also sent a merit to arufox even though his account had been tagged/marked for posting using AI, and had been blacked out previously. What's more, the investigation seems to have been halted.

I saw the tags on that account. But the question is, did AakZaki give Merit to posts that were proven to be made with AI? 
I saw that rank-up help thread, most of the Merit was distributed to application posts, not to the original posts made by the applicants. I assume that the Merit distributed was only a form of appreciation for the member’s activity on the local board and recognition for having created an application. 
I might be wrong about this, but your concern about it doesn’t prove anything.

[FinneysTrueVision]

It's best to check all arufox posts that AakZaki gives merit to arufox to see if they use AI or super AI, and whether their posts in such threads are worthy of merit, considered high-quality, and fulfilling the requirements, contributing to the forum through their writing. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5253221.msg66010426#msg66010426.

Whataboutism and trying to get revenge won’t help you at all. A single merit transfer doesn’t mean anything. It’s not a consistent pattern, like what you were trying to do with your alts. The only issue that is of any concern is your 18 accounts for which you have not given any explanation. As far as I'm concerned, this is an open and shut case, so there is nothing more to discuss except for which other accounts were also part of this farm.

[woez]

I saw the tags on that account. But the question is, did AakZaki give Merit to posts that were proven to be made with AI? 
I saw that rank-up help thread, most of the Merit was distributed to application posts, not to the original posts made by the applicants. I assume that the Merit distributed was only a form of appreciation for the member’s activity on the local board and recognition for having created an application. 
I might be wrong about this, but your concern about it doesn’t prove anything.

That's your version, my friend. Now, see if simply drawing and drawing an arrow means that person A sent merit to person B, and person B sent it to person C. Meanwhile, you said, "I assume the distribution of merit is simply a token of appreciation for the members' activities in the local council and acknowledgment of their application."

Those accused also have their own right to send their merit wherever they like and send it however they like, as you, unAakZaki, assumed in your defense. You are also free to send merit to whomever you like. Therefore, it's fair to say that AakZaki is someone who easily believes what others say (The heroes he has protected until now to raise his own name) and is too hasty in making decisions without confirmation.

To others, he might be great, but not to me. It's only a matter of time before more red flags fall on his account  in the near future because he's too eager to judge people. When the campaign manager kicked him out of the campaign, he realized that everything he had done was meaningless.

[Awaklara]

Therefore, it's fair to say that AakZaki is someone who easily believes what others say (The heroes he has protected until now to raise his own name) and is too hasty in making decisions without confirmation.

Even though he got information about your account and other accounts from someone else, by attaching the evidence provided by the OP, it already proves that he has confirmed the accuracy of the information he received. What confirmation are you referring to? 
Your current attitude already sufficiently confirms that the accusation against you is indeed true. Look, what you did was not just a Merit transaction.