Im getting tired of this "dollar is done and usa going down" its not true

[DrBeer]

I will repeat once again—no one has any complaints about BRICS as an economic regional union! Everyone has the right to unite if it is beneficial to them! But any union must be built on equal rights, with common interests that do not contradict each other.
 In this case, I am talking about some “toxic” members of the union who want to use others, putting them at risk and using them to solve their own problems outside BRICS. In addition, these countries have extremely unstable economies and political problems, and in essence can be a “burden” for other member countries of the union.
  Relations with them can also lead to problems for other countries, for example in the form of secondary sanctions. The bottom line is this: we have created problems for ourselves, and now you can solve them at your own expense while we stand aside!

Those practice are normal on international relation, because when one country make relation with other country not base on pure morality but pushed by its national interest (economic stability, national defence and security). Through foreign policy and diplomacy, a country try bartered their weakness to be power. Sometimes they don't have perfect choice due to complexity of bargaining power, national interest and weakness. tHey can only choose from available option and relevan.

I think diplomacy is art of fill bargaining space. I assuming toxic country you discussed is Rusia, Iran, Venezuela. A country usually get this labelling when their national interest is in opposite with dominator of the system, when the conflict intense they got problematic labelling. If we explore, toxic country usually has sellable bargaining power such as energy, military, food supply chain and strategic geography position which bring curse suach as sanction, embargo, isolation. This tpxic country can not choose ally but some country still need them (bargaining space). It is common practice to exploit other weakness, other minus point is our plus point, enemy of my enemy is my ally. other weakness is leverage for others. intersection point  is result of diplomacy.

Trust me, each of BRICS member when decide to join truly understand the risk and has make long, carefully calculation between cost and benefit not just solidarity for world peace. Different with NATO, BRICS give dynamic diplomacy spacer rather than an ideology alliance, without defence obligation, without political homogenity, without deep integration.

You have made a very beautiful attempt to present a not-so-beautiful reality
One country is enough for me, Russia, which is essentially now an international terrorist, a violator of international norms and laws, and even simple human moral and ethical rules.  Using the same model, can we say that Hitler's Germany and Stalin's USSR, which in 1939 began the bloodiest massacre on earth, simply built their relationships, and everyone else, in fact the whole world, simply got in their way, which is why they attacked Europe and started World War II? 
You could also say that if a criminal attacks you and tries to take your life, he is right, he has interests and they do not coincide with yours. And he has also built a relationship with a fence and he owes him your belongings... Or is this a different situation?

The problem is that Russia is now trying to solve its problems, which it deservedly got, with someone else's hands and someone else's lives.
 And it is trying to implement this plan not because it will be beneficial to India, for example, but because Russia itself cannot end its criminal activities on its own. I am referring specifically to such “toxic” participants who, through manipulation and lies, playing on regional sentiments, are trying to drag others into very bad games.

[Alpha Marine]

The tariff war helped to hasten the dedollarization process. Most countries will not want to keep the currency of an unstable nation. The reason why some countries kept the dollars as a reserve was because of the trade partnership they have with the US. But the current administration is making these nations seek alternative trading partners, thereby reducing their reliance on the dollar.

This is something this administration fails to realise. It is making enemies of allies, while its enemies remain its enemies. I don't buy the "US is collapsing, and the dollar is dead" narrative, but the administration is heading towards that place.
They are like a ruler who rules with fear and power. They flex their muscle just to remind people that they're still strong. This is good, but when it becomes too extreme, you make an enemy out of everybody, and no matter how strong you are, in the long run, this becomes a wrong move.
Countries should be your allies because it's beneficial to them, not only because they're scared of crossing you.
It is things like this that slowly collapse an empire. It won't happen to the US, because it will be rectified after this administration or the one after that, but if it continues on this path, it might. Allies win wars. Publicly undermining your allies is not the way to go.

[DrBeer]

It seems that Venezuela's oil resources will soon come to the aid of the dollar, allowing the US to control more than 50% of all proven oil reserves. This is a very good asset for increasing interest in the dollar and compensating for some of the “reputational” losses that have occurred recently.
 It will also affect the revenues of other major players in the oil market, namely by reducing their revenues, especially those with high production costs.

[Hanadawa]

It seems that Venezuela's oil resources will soon come to the aid of the dollar, allowing the US to control more than 50% of all proven oil reserves. This is a very good asset for increasing interest in the dollar and compensating for some of the “reputational” losses that have occurred recently.
 It will also affect the revenues of other major players in the oil market, namely by reducing their revenues, especially those with high production costs.

The current actions of the US government will make their dollar currency increasingly dominant, and I believe it will almost never collapse. Yes, calls for dedollarization have grown stronger in recent years. Some countries realize that holding dollars will bind them to US regulations and their assets could be frozen at any time, as happened with Russia. But now the US is taking aggressive steps, making people think that dedollarization is almost impossible. Countries like China are starting to hold gold as their foreign exchange reserves. But how many other countries are capable of doing what China is doing? The current US government's actions are very risky. They are trying to take over Greenland not for its mineral potential, but as a strategic location to monitor the Russian and Chinese militaries and further isolate those two countries so they cannot challenge US hegemony. But if successful, the US will truly dominate the world by 2030.

[DrBeer]

It seems that Venezuela's oil resources will soon come to the aid of the dollar, allowing the US to control more than 50% of all proven oil reserves. This is a very good asset for increasing interest in the dollar and compensating for some of the “reputational” losses that have occurred recently.
 It will also affect the revenues of other major players in the oil market, namely by reducing their revenues, especially those with high production costs.

The current actions of the US government will make their dollar currency increasingly dominant, and I believe it will almost never collapse. Yes, calls for dedollarization have grown stronger in recent years. Some countries realize that holding dollars will bind them to US regulations and their assets could be frozen at any time, as happened with Russia. But now the US is taking aggressive steps, making people think that dedollarization is almost impossible. Countries like China are starting to hold gold as their foreign exchange reserves. But how many other countries are capable of doing what China is doing? The current US government's actions are very risky. They are trying to take over Greenland not for its mineral potential, but as a strategic location to monitor the Russian and Chinese militaries and further isolate those two countries so they cannot challenge US hegemony. But if successful, the US will truly dominate the world by 2030.

What I agree with is that the dollar, as a centralized global reserve currency, has a slight drawback, which is the possibility of funds being frozen. But let's also be honest and admit that no one freezes funds just like that; there has to be a good reason.
 For example, terrorism, violation of laws and conventions, waging aggressive war, etc. Russia has paid for this, and deservedly so, and rightly so. What is China afraid of? It probably has its own “skeletons in the closet” that are not yet known, and China has taken steps to preempt the risks. I also believe that China's behavior is largely related to its desire to become the second pole of the world. This means that it is necessary to abandon dependence on the first pole of the world in the form of the US and its dollar. For other countries, the dollar does not pose any threat.

[abhiseshakana]

What I agree with is that the dollar, as a centralized global reserve currency, has a slight drawback, which is the possibility of funds being frozen. But let's also be honest and admit that no one freezes funds just like that; there has to be a good reason.
 For example, terrorism, violation of laws and conventions, waging aggressive war, etc. Russia has paid for this, and deservedly so, and rightly so. What is China afraid of? It probably has its own “skeletons in the closet” that are not yet known, and China has taken steps to preempt the risks. I also believe that China's behavior is largely related to its desire to become the second pole of the world. This means that it is necessary to abandon dependence on the first pole of the world in the form of the US and its dollar. For other countries, the dollar does not pose any threat.

I think dedolarization is long term geopolitical strategy for China, Rusia and some country as solution for economic vulnerability of high dependence on single currency. Especially with US bad habit, which use financial saction as political tools not as international law enforcement penalthy. Decrease its dependence on USD is strategic measure more than fear of skeleton closet because financial system can be weapon. For country which its national interest collide with US's, dependence will reduce their bargaining power on foreign policy, in this case USD will be power instrument i/o currency. Sovereignity in modern world mean ability to make policy without external pressure, and it can only achieve if a country has wide policy space. I think those is the most acceptable reason for China action for stacking gold, building its payment settlement and socialization of local currency use for international trade payment. Simple example, many country promote/ campaigned food self suffeciency, energy resilience, etc.

How we draw universal separated line for correct and wrong in the international game's rule book if we re not the game creator. As a matter of fact, Iran false, Rusia false, Venezuela false, but different action and response for US's ally crime.