Women Are Wired for Strong Masculine Leadership – Evolutionary Psychology

[Web3monk]

Fellow forum members,In the Bitcoin & crypto space we love talking about disruption, decentralized systems, game theory, incentives, and long-term thinking.But there is one area where most people still refuse to look at the data honestly: human mating & attraction dynamics.

After decades of research in evolutionary psychology (Buss, Miller, Gangestad, etc.), the evidence is overwhelming and consistent across cultures:Women are biologically drawn to three core male traits:High confidence / dominance 
Strong leadership / decisiveness 
Emotional stability / resource provision reliability

This is not social conditioning.
This is evolutionary wiring.For ~300,000 years of human history a woman’s survival (and her children’s survival) depended on choosing a mate who could:Protect her from threats (physical & social dominance) 
Provide resources & security during pregnancy & early childhood (confidence + status) 
Stay calm & consistent under stress (emotional stability)

Modern society tries very hard to override this with narratives of “total independence” and “equality at all costs”.But the wiring doesn’t disappear.
That’s why many high-achieving women in tech/crypto still feel a deep, unexplained pull toward calm, decisive, grounded men who lead without apology.It’s not “weakness”.
It’s biology saying: “This is the man who makes me feel safe enough to finally soften.”For women reading this:If you ever feel exhausted from carrying every decision, every plan, every emotional load alone…
That feeling is not “you need more money” or “you need a better job”.
It’s often your body signaling: “I need masculine leadership that lets me rest.”Repeat these 10 daily affirmations slowly (out loud, feel them in your body):I am safe in my softness. 
1.I attract calm, strong masculine energy. 
2.I receive without guilt. 
3.My surrender is my power. 
4.I am held by the right leadership. 
5.I release control and trust the flow. 
6.My presence is magnetic. 
7.I am worthy of being led higher. 
8.My femininity is celebrated, not judged. 
 Good girl… I am exactly where I belong.

Do this for 30 days and observe what changes in your energy, your interactions, even your trading decisions.

For those who want the deeper version (audio guidance, private lessons, community of like-minded women in crypto/tech) – join my private Telegram circle:
https://im.page/hisobedience101
No fluff.
No cult.
 Just practical polarity tools for high-stress environments like ours.Questions / objections / experiences – welcome below.
Let’s discuss like adults.Stay sovereign.
 
Morgan Rich -Facebook
@hisobedience101 (tiktok,facebook page and instagram.

[BADecker]

There isn't any evolution theory evolution. God made people the way they are.

However, chemists and researchers have found that adding certain chemicals to the diets of people, cause the men to become more feminine, and the women to become more masculine. They have added these chemicals through the foods we eat, in recent times.

Consider the low voices of Johnny Cash and John Wayne. That's the way most men were back before the present time. Or look at the female snipers in the Russian and German armies back in WW2. These women were not strong enough to participate in actual fighting. But they were great for sniping.

Things have changed. Through the addition of chemicals in our food, and through chemicals in injection, women are now strong enough to become Seals or Rangers in the military.

There is way more to all this than w generally think. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) plays a bigger part in all this. The 'F' in FDA stands for 'Food'. They control the crap that is in our everyday food that we buy at the store. In addition, pollution (chemtrails) plays a big part.

There is way more to all this than we generally think, or than researchers have taken into account.

[Web3monk]

Appreciate the thoughtful reply, and I respect your stance that God designed men and women exactly as they are without evolution needing to explain it.
Whether we attribute it to divine order, natural wiring, or both, the outcome is the same: men are built to lead, protect, provide, and remain steady under pressure; women are built to soften, follow, nurture, and thrive in the safety of that leadership.
The core point stands: most women feel deep, instinctive attraction to calm, confident, decisive masculine energy because that’s how they were created to respond. When that polarity is honored, relationships (and families) become stable and fulfilling.
When it’s disrupted, frustration, exhaustion, and disconnection follow.

Regarding chemicals, hormones, diet, pollution, and modern changes — yes, there’s evidence that endocrine disruptors (plastics, soy derivatives, certain pesticides, etc.) have measurable effects on testosterone/estrogen levels in populations over recent decades.
Voices are deeper in older recordings, body composition has shifted, and military roles have changed.
That’s observable.But even if external factors have softened men and hardened women in recent generations, the underlying design hasn’t been erased.
The craving for strong masculine leadership still exists in the hearts of most women — often buried under stress, independence narratives, or chemical interference, but still there.The solution isn’t to rage against the FDA or chemtrails (though awareness is good).
The solution is to consciously reclaim natural polarity in our own lives: men stepping back into firm leadership, women stepping back into softness and trust.That’s where real peace is found — not in fighting modern toxins alone, but in living out the order we were created for.
For those interested in practical steps (daily mindset shifts, affirmations, audio guidance on reclaiming feminine energy in a high-stress world like crypto/tech), I run a private Telegram circle focused exactly on this. https://im.page/hisobedience101
 No fluff. Just tools to restore what was always meant to be.
Curious to hear more experiences or counterpoints — keep it civil and evidence-based.
We’re all trying to figure out how to navigate this broken world while honoring what’s true.
Stay sovereign.
Morgan Rich
@hisobedience101

[BADecker]

All you are really saying is that all the government adjudications of additional genders, is just court blab. If people who are opposed to additional genders would simply not talk in court, within the court 'framework', they could beat any court gender thing if it doesn't include only men and women.

[Web3monk]

You're touching on an interesting legal angle, but I think you're missing the bigger picture this thread is actually about.The post isn't primarily arguing court cases, legal definitions of gender, or how to "win" in a judge's courtroom.
It's about observable human nature: men and women are designed (by God, evolution, or both — take your pick) with complementary polarity that creates attraction, stability, and long-term pair-bonding when honored.
The reason many high-achieving women in crypto/tech still feel exhausted, unfulfilled, or quietly craving strong masculine leadership isn't because of a court ruling.
It's because modern culture has spent decades telling both sexes to suppress their natural wiring in the name of "equality at all costs."When men are told to be softer, less decisive, and more "emotionally available" in a feminine way…
When women are told they must compete, lead, and never yield…
The result is widespread frustration, failed relationships, and a population that's increasingly disconnected from what actually makes deep, lasting bonds possible.
The government can invent as many gender categories as it wants on paper.
That doesn't change biology, attraction triggers, or the fact that most women (when honest with themselves) are still drawn to calm, confident, emotionally stable men who lead without apology.Court blab is just noise.
Human nature isn't negotiable in a courtroom.
If you're a man reading this and you want to reclaim that natural masculine frame (in life, relationships, and even in trading/business decisions), or if you're a woman tired of carrying the load alone and ready to explore how to invite real leadership back into your world — the tools are practical, not political.Private Telegram circle for those interested:
https://im.page/hisobedience101
 No agenda.
Just restoring what works.
Thoughts welcome — keep it on-topic and civil.
Morgan Rich
@hisobedience101

[BADecker]

But things aren't working as well as the world leaders want. They keep propagandizing us with women-strength movies, books, videos, news articles, and talk in general. But the women ultimately want to become mothers and have a family. Of course, there will always be a few who think that being more like men makes them stronger.

Legal multiple genders is simply another way of propagandizing.

[Web3monk]

You're hitting on something real here.The constant push for "women-strength" propaganda (movies, media, articles, "you don't need a man" narratives) is massive and deliberate.
It's everywhere — and it's been ramping up for decades.But as you said: most women, when the noise quiets down, still want to become mothers, build families, and feel protected by a strong, steady man.
That deep instinct doesn't vanish just because Hollywood, academia, or governments tell them it should.The propaganda works on the surface level — it creates confusion, guilt, and temporary rebellion against natural polarity.
But it doesn't rewrite biology or erase what hundreds of thousands of years of evolution (or divine design, depending on your view) wired into women.
The result?
A growing number of high-achieving women in tech/crypto feel:Exhausted from carrying masculine responsibilities alone
Quietly resentful of the "independence" they were sold
Deeply pulled toward calm, decisive, grounded masculine leadership (even if they won't admit it publicly yet)

The "few who think being more like men makes them stronger" exist, yes.
But they are the minority — and even many of them eventually feel the emptiness when the propaganda high wears off.Legal multiple genders, gender-neutral everything, forced equity quotas — all of it is just another layer of the same propaganda machine.
It tries to blur what is biologically and instinctively clear: men and women are complementary, not interchangeable.The ones who win long-term (in life, relationships, family, even mental health) are those who stop fighting their wiring and start honoring it:Men stepping back into unapologetic leadership
Women allowing themselves to soften, trust, and be led

That's where real peace, attraction, and stability come from — not from more propaganda or court rulings.For anyone here (men or women) tired of the noise and ready for practical steps to reclaim natural polarity in a high-stress world like crypto/tech:Private Telegram circle for deeper guidance (audio, lessons, community):
https://im.page/hisobedience101
No cult.
No fluff.
Just tools that work.Thoughts welcome — especially from those who've seen the propaganda crack in their own life or relationships.
Stay sovereign.
Morgan Rich
@hisobedience101
 (TikTok, Facebook, Instagram)

[philipma1957]

men human men had a bone in there boners.

yep like dogs still do
like walruses do.
like most mammals do.

Men were built with the bone in there boners to


 a) fuck better to breed
b) the bone surrounded the urethra to protect it from injury.
c) the urethra is where male ejaculate leaves.

So civilized world means no lions and tigers and bears
it also means men wear clothes to protect the johnson.

as evolution has already deboned man.

fact not bullshit.

men will continue to evolve if we remain civilized.

or if we go back to caveman time and jurrasic park really happens studly bonified men will be needed.

[Web3monk]

Solid point on the baculum (os penis) — you're right, most male mammals have one, including dogs, walruses, chimps, gorillas, etc.
It provides structural support, helps with prolonged intromission in competitive mating systems, and can protect the urethra during extended copulation.
Humans (and a few other primates) lost it entirely over evolutionary time.
The leading explanation from studies (e.g., Brindle & Opie 2016 in Proceedings of the Royal Society B) ties this directly to changes in mating strategy: our ancestors shifted toward more monogamous/pair-bonded systems (likely after splitting from chimps/bonobos ~2 mya), with shorter copulation durations (average human <2 minutes) and lower post-copulatory sperm competition.
In high-competition polygamous species, the bone helps males "guard" access longer to beat rivals to fertilization. Once pair-bonding became dominant — with females choosing reliable, protective providers over quick-and-many matings — the selective pressure for a rigid bone support vanished.
Erections became fully vascular (blood-pressure driven), and the baculum was phased out. It's an adaptation to our specific social/reproductive setup, not a "devolution" or weakness.
This actually reinforces the thread's core idea: human sexual dynamics evolved around complementary polarity — men as steady leaders/protectors/providers, women as nurturers who thrive in that security.
The loss of the baculum is part of the same evolutionary story: we traded raw mechanical competition for deeper pair bonds, emotional stability, and long-term family investment. That's why calm, decisive masculine leadership still triggers deep attraction in most women — it's wired into our species' successful reproductive strategy.Modern propaganda tries to override that wiring, but biology keeps reminding us.
For guys here grinding crypto volatility and life stress: reclaiming that grounded, unapologetic frame (leadership in decisions, relationships, trades) is the real edge. For women feeling the burnout from solo-carrying everything: tools to soften into trust and receive exist.
Private Telegram circle for practical polarity guidance in high-stakes worlds like ours (audio, mindset shifts, community — no fluff):
https://im.page/hisobedience101
Curious for more thoughts or experiences on how evolutionary tweaks like this play out today.
Keep it civil.
Stay sovereign.
Morgan Rich
@hisobedience101
 (TikTok, Facebook, Instagram)

[Dechris_08]

What this really highlights is incentives under stress.

In markets, we don’t outsource decision-making to feelings, we build systems.

Relationships aren’t that different:
leadership, trust, and stability emerge from consistent action over time, not from affirmations or labels.

[Web3monk]

Appreciate the thoughtful pushback — you're right that incentives matter hugely, just like in markets.
We build systems around reliable signals, consistent action, and aligned rewards to avoid emotional FOMO or panic sells.
Relationships operate on similar game theory: trust and stability compound over time through repeated, verifiable behavior, not just words or labels.Where we align: Affirmations alone aren't a magic system — they're a daily recalibration tool to quiet cultural noise and reconnect with wiring that's already there. The real "incentives" emerge when polarity is lived out: a man consistently showing calm decisiveness, emotional rock-steadiness, and resource reliability creates safety for a woman to soften, trust, and invest emotionally/sexually without fear of loss.
That reciprocity — leadership met with receptivity — is the compounding reward that stabilizes the bond long-term.Evolutionary psychology (e.g., Buss's landmark 1989 cross-cultural study across 37 cultures, involving 10,000+ people) backs this with hard data: women universally prioritize traits like ambition, good earning potential, social status, dependability, emotional stability, and leadership in long-term mates.
These aren't social constructs — they're consistent preferences tied to ancestral survival needs (protection, provision during vulnerable periods like pregnancy/child-rearing). Men who reliably deliver on those incentives trigger deep attraction and pair-bonding; when suppressed by "equality at all costs" narratives, the system breaks — burnout, resentment, disconnection.In crypto terms:  Suppressing masculine frame = like trading with no stop-loss — you lose edge under volatility. 
Forcing women into constant masculine mode = over-leveraging one side of the portfolio — high short-term gains, but eventual blow-up from exhaustion.

The solution scales: men lead with consistent action (decisiveness in life/trades/relationships), women respond by softening into trust. That's where incentives realign for mutual upside — stronger bonds, lower stress, sharper performance across the board.For those grinding the space and ready to test this in real life (practical mindset shifts, audio tools for frame-building or feminine receptivity, community of like-minded):
Private Telegram circle:
https://im.page/hisobedience101
No fluff.
Just systems that work under pressure.
Curious for your take — how do you see incentives playing out in your own relationships or the crypto grind? Or counter-data welcome.
 Let's keep building the discussion.
Stay sovereign.
Morgan Rich
@hisobedience101
 (TikTok, Facebook, Instagram)