✅ b1exch.to - Instant Auto Exchange | NO KYC | Escrow 0.2 BTC

[vidabela]

It seemed like a good deal, until I completed my transaction and a few minutes later received an email from Bybit asking for more information about the deposit... extremely strange because I use Bybit constantly, I don't know, I think that ETH address is burned or something like that.... If any admin could contact me, that would be great....

I contacted B1's chat support and they were extremely helpful, thank you and good luck. Regarding Bybit, basically they ask for proof of the origin of the funds. In my case, I could prove the entire origin. If you can't, I suggest you don't do what I did; send the money to another wallet first and then send it to Bybit.

[Lakai01]

I missed out on remembering the part where they took back the '.io' domain.  Today I wrote the address by myself and since I typically find the link through Bitcoin Talk, I could not remember if it was '.io' or '.to' so I accidentally entered the old '.io' and I was redirected.  This is good, the two domains were close enough to be confusing.

Not only that, but various sites like Monerica and KYCNOT also listed the .io domain for a long time, and the domain change resulted in an additional entry there, even though it has since been corrected everywhere on those sites.

If someone searches for b1exch using a standard search engine, they’ll immediately see a notice in Chrome’s AI mode, for example, stating that the .io domain has been blocked—which could naturally raise questions for an inexperienced user. It will certainly take some time for such entries to be removed.

Ultimately, however, it is certainly a very positive step that b1exch now has access to the .io domain again.

[TokenTikas]

Apologies for the reduced forum presence - we've been focused on development and user support. We're here and monitoring everything.

I really like the fact that you’re focusing on development and supporting users. I was honestly expecting this kind of good news from you and I’m glad I got to know through this post. Making a way for users to talk directly to support is truly commendable because when issues come up during exchange, it will be easier to reach out straight away and get quick solutions without unnecessary delay.

But it’s also important for you to stay active in the forum because people will share different kinds of opinions there and through you, solutions can come out of it. Even though you’ve mentioned that you’re always keeping an eye on everything, your presence here is really needed to keep this ANN active and to allow proper, detailed discussions on all matters. I believe and hope we will continue to see you active here at all times.

[rat03gopoh]

I contacted B1's chat support and they were extremely helpful, thank you and good luck. Regarding Bybit, basically they ask for proof of the origin of the funds. In my case, I could prove the entire origin. If you can't, I suggest you don't do what I did; send the money to another wallet first and then send it to Bybit.

So, in conclusion, your funds from b1exch have now passed Bybit's inspection?
IIt's nothing serious, just asking for clarification and emphasizing that even up to the regulated entity's manual audit (my asumption), user funds will be fine if they are essentially clean. I know this isn't something anyone should feel safe about.

[TokenTikas]

So, in conclusion, your funds from b1exch have now passed Bybit's inspection?

b1ack has already confirmed that he is in contact with them and after he confirmed the matter, @vidabela also mentioned that after reaching out to support, he received assistance. Even though he didn’t clearly say anything specific about his funds on Bybit, from his comment it seems like he was able to resolve the issue successfully.

IIt's nothing serious, just asking for clarification and emphasizing that even up to the regulated entity's manual audit (my asumption), user funds will be fine if they are essentially clean. I know this isn't something anyone should feel safe about.

Exchanging through b1exch and moving funds to Bybit is actually smooth without any issue. There is no problem with the exchange itself but it seems Bybit was not aware of b1exch, which is why users faced a little difficulty. However, I believe the matter has now been fully discussed, so there shouldn’t be any problem going forward. Even if anything comes up, there is a support system in place and with b1ack staying here, once you reach out to him, the issue can be resolved quickly.

[internetional]

Exchanging through b1exch and moving funds to Bybit is actually smooth without any issue. There is no problem with the exchange itself but it seems Bybit was not aware of b1exch, which is why users faced a little difficulty. However, I believe the matter has now been fully discussed, so there shouldn’t be any problem going forward. Even if anything comes up, there is a support system in place and with b1ack staying here, once you reach out to him, the issue can be resolved quickly.

How is b1ack relevant here? It's unlikely he can actually help resolve issues with Bybit in situations like this. If I understand correctly, Bybit's concerns aren't related to b1exch. Bybit is interested in the original source of the user's funds (maybe the user sent an unusually large amount to Bybit?). So at best, b1ack can offer moral support, but vidabela still has to resolve any issues themself through communication with Bybit.

[TokenTikas]

How is b1ack relevant here? It's unlikely he can actually help resolve issues with Bybit in situations like this. If I understand correctly, Bybit's concerns aren't related to b1exch. Bybit is interested in the original source of the user's funds (maybe the user sent an unusually large amount to Bybit?). So at best, b1ack can offer moral support, but vidabela still has to resolve any issues themself through communication with Bybit.

Yes, understand the point you are making and I also see it that way. Since b1ack has given a positive statement about the matter, that's why we are hopeful for something good. You mentioned that at best b1ack can give moral support but what i'm trying to say is that even moral support alone can be enough sometimes. When Bybit receives moral support from b1ack’s actions, they will likely look at the issue in a more positive way. However, it is also true that if users are facing problems, they still need to reach out themselves and resolve their issues directly.

For now, we are just waiting for the next update from vidabela, because if they share further updates, it will help us understand the situation better and know whether the problem has truly been resolved or not.

[Peanutswar]

Always use your own personal wallet to receive exchanged coins from us. If you must use a CEX to receive:
- Tell the exchange the coins are from b1eXch
- Share the swap ID with them
- Explain it's from a legitimate no-KYC exchange

This helps them understand the source and may prevent SOF inquiries.

It's always preferable to use our own non-custodial wallet for receiving funds from any swap or clients. Then the user could explain these are their own funds from their wallet; they could even sign the message if necessary. I have suffered previously with Binance due to receiving funds into a Binance address, and my client sent funds from a mixer. However, later it was solved, and they released my funds. So I agree with you; we need to explain to Bybit about the funds; it's not a very hard task. But for the future, everyone should use their own address first to receive funds.

I used to have this kind of experiene in a local currency here in my country where they are identifing each of the transactions if its where it came from (the platform), what address did use to received the money before transfering to their platform so they can log if it's safe or not. And it seems this is the same with the recommendation of b1exch. But after that kind of hassle every time they seek where it came from I made a direct transfer to my own wallet than using a CEX address for a direct deposit.

[SamReomo]

But after that kind of hassle every time they seek where it came from I made a direct transfer to my own wallet than using a CEX address for a direct deposit.

That's the best approach and with such an approach no centralized exchange will ask anything about the source of funds, but one should also check the safe AML of the coins as well before sending those to a centralized exchange's deposit address for safety.

[The Cryptovator]

I contacted B1's chat support and they were extremely helpful, thank you and good luck. Regarding Bybit, basically they ask for proof of the origin of the funds. In my case, I could prove the entire origin. If you can't, I suggest you don't do what I did; send the money to another wallet first and then send it to Bybit.

Yep, simply, it does mean the source of funds, in other words, the source of income. b1exch isn't a mixer, so there shouldn't be an issue if the funds came from the b1exch since it has served swap services. Was your problem solved from the Bybit ends? And have they explained why the transaction has been raised as a flag? I have been using Bybit and made a lot of bigger transactions; they haven't asked me any questions yet. But I often use my non-custodial wallet to deal with the Bybit. Because I learnt a lesson from Binance, and it was an almost costly lesson.

Remember, you always need to use a non-custodial wallet for dealing with your funds. When you send funds to another platform from your own wallet, then you can explain it's your own funds. If necessary, even you can sign a message from your address to prove ownership of the address. I hope you learnt a lesson, and other users must take a lesson from it.

[Lakai01]

[...]
Remember, you always need to use a non-custodial wallet for dealing with your funds. When you send funds to another platform from your own wallet, then you can explain it's your own funds. If necessary, even you can sign a message from your address to prove ownership of the address. I hope you learnt a lesson, and other users must take a lesson from it.

In my opinion, that’s the biggest problem here. Some exchanges actually require a signature from the deposit address used as proof before the coins are released. This is simply not possible with an address for which you do not possess the key.

To make matters worse, b1eXch, as a non-KYC exchange, may be classified as potentially unsafe and rejected despite proof of ownership of the coins. In such cases, even b1eXch support cannot help, and the deposit is blocked.

You can simply save yourself all the hassle and stress by using a private wallet.