Lets stop on boxing as an example. Why do you think Olympic boxers are better or worse than professional boxers (lets skip amateur boxing) ? I find it incorrect to compare professional athletes and those who train exactly to perform during Olympics. Professional boxer - an athlete who fight ranked boxing matches under specified promotion and his opponents often determined by contracts. Olympic boxer - an athlete who during 4 years participated in numerous world championships and gained medals, to get score points, to be selected to represent country.
Why do we need to "skip" amateur boxing?
That was the reason why you had no professional boxers at the Olympics in the first place till 2016!
Nobody "trained" for the Olympics because they like that more than turning profesional well, if we exclude Cuba for obvious reasons!
And all discussions can be broken by one example. Olexander UsykOlympic gold medal + all heavyweight belts owner
Wow....that is your argument? Who could have thought of it!
Michael Schumacher, first kart champion then 7 times Formula 1 champion, so kart drivers are the same as F1 drivers!
You realize how stupid this is?
I was only trying to tell that training to be professional boxing and training to be Olympic boxer are two different preparation programs, strategies and gameplans

Also I understood that Daniel91 told that professional boxers as athletes are better than Olympic, when I see them as two different athletes. Also he told that Olympic athletes are not the best in category, but then how can Usyk be best as a boxer and best as professional boxer. I can easily break that saying myself by saying that Olympic gold medal athletes, lets say in wrestling, in mix martial arts, against other elite wrestlers are not 100% winner

P.S. that is off-topic, but are karting championship differs much from F1 ? No pit stops, kart is less powerful. But isnt race principles are similar?
