56 accounts connected to the same address

[FinneysTrueVision]

You have the right to expose Cheaters but you don't have the right to decide who stays in a campaign unless you want to be a campaign manager.
If the campaign manager disregards the tags, it means he doesn't find the tags worthy

I am allowed to express my opinion about people who engage in systematic abuse within the forum not being deserving to be paid for spamming generic shitposts from many different accounts. I am not telling any manager what they should do, because it is obvious that cheaters and spammers are going to be allowed to run rampant more often than not, regardless of what anybody thinks.

Just because they are both Nigerians means they are alts.

You are misrepresenting what I said. Troytech and Solodoski’s location was already mentioned as one piece of evidence indicating they might be the same person. Callido also being from the same place, is yet another detail in the long list of things these accounts have in common.

I mentioned other things in addition to where they are from. How likely is it that two graphic designers from Rivers, who are connected to accounts in the same Utopia abusing farm, and using the same unusual fee settings to transfer funds to the same exchange are different people?

One is still acquiring knowledge of graphic design while the other is already a graphic designer. Didn't you see the difference?

Only one of them mentioned their level of proficiency, you are making assumptions about the other. For being so adept at farming enough merits to achieve a rank that allows them to get decently paid, neither account, as far as I can tell, has shown much interest in art contests. Neither have made mention of graphic design aside from the newbie intro thread. There isn’t any reason to believe Solodoski has advanced beyond the level of beginner, same as Callido.

[lovesmayfamilis]

I have a question about account @Callido

Despite the red tags, Solodoski was allowed to remain in the Rollbit campaign, where Callido is currently enrolled also.

You have the right to expose Cheaters but you don't have the right to decide who stays in a campaign unless you want to be a campaign manager.
If the campaign manager disregards the tags, it means he doesn't find the tags worthy

Come on, are you serious? What do you think about the connection between these accounts, Callido in particular, and the fact that he previously had many newbie accounts? And how do you feel about the fact that these newbies were linked to the farm discovered by FinneysTrueVision? Do you still believe in coincidences?

Where did FinneysTrueVision write that the manager should kick these participants out of the company because they have negative tags? It's like you're pretending not to understand why they're still in the company and why all these scammers are taking out loans? If you're still having trouble understanding, here's an example of how to stay in the company despite being negatively tagged.

On the other hand, one can only guess how many accounts this farm has that violate the rules for participating in signature companies. There are also two sides: one side seemingly helps the cheaters by regularly giving them loans while simultaneously growing your own business, while the other side catches them, but either way, it's of little use. There is a solution: someone has to stop, but those who profit from it are unlikely to consider the rules.

[JollyGood]

I think it is safe to assume that when an account farm is exposed, it does not mean the account farmer has either given up or does not have other accounts that have remain unconnected for the time-being at least. The accounts are created with the intention of building up their rank in order to monetise them and sooner or later joining campaigns will become a priority with the aim of getting loans and exit-scamming.

If we do not take action, the account farmers will continue to create problems and will continue to ignore the rules.

On the other hand, one can only guess how many accounts this farm has that violate the rules for participating in signature companies. There are also two sides: one side seemingly helps the cheaters by regularly giving them loans while simultaneously growing your own business, while the other side catches them, but either way, it's of little use. There is a solution: someone has to stop, but those who profit from it are unlikely to consider the rules.