This was measured via Truflation which is more now than CPI.
CPI is behind and could still show that we have a relatively high inflation even if real life data seems otherwise.
The market is still reacting to past data of December and their actions would have reduced measured inflation.
You didn't get my point at all. As I was saying, if this data is true then the next CPI numbers will be great. We will find out very soon. Once CPI comes out, and if it is according to the Truflation data, then the market will start responding very differently and we should see a rate cut or even an emergency rate cut soon.
The same reason you mentioned There are many exchanges that got hacked and scammed (FTX did affect me then)
The thing is, if many exchanges scammed or got hacked, then we should appreciate those with which these things didn't occur. We need exchanges, and the same issues happen with DEXes too so there is no escaping these problems.
Focus on Binance since I had some history with them some years ago that I'm still bitter about hence why I added bias.
I was asking for information about that.
APompliano stated that deflation is a bigger risk than inflation which imo depends on who
We can debate this in general and various aspects, but for the current system deflation is a big no. It would collapse countries all over the world, so it is more dangerous. Since even high inflation, even if it hurts a lot the average citizen, does not cause a complete collapse like a deflationary spiral would. Complete economic collapse will lead to massive job losses, famine, chaos.
They will do it in bulks, so, I don't think it will have an effect that much, as the cap is a trillion (and much more than that).
You have no idea what you are saying. A single entity is buying $1B of Bitcoin and you are dismissing it as meaningless. How entitled and ungrateful people have become.

They can't do that. The SAFU fund is supposed to be for reimbrusing users in case the platform gets hacked. What happens in the case that Bitcoin takes a heavy dip (hypothetically), and then a hack happens which steals so much money that the (devalued) SAFU fund cannot cover it? Then Binance will be toast.
Triggering a bigger crypto crash.
They are prioritizing short-term profits over long-term market stability.
Of course they can do that, what gives you any power to claim otherwise? It is a private business and if they wanted to turn that $1B into cash and throw it into a river, they can do that and it is their decision. Your counterargument fails for several reasons:
1) Most balances are in Bitcoin. They can reimburse directly Bitcoin balances from their Bitcoin reserve.
2) They can build a secondary SAFU fund after completing this. They have a lot of profit, nothing prevents them from doing this.
3) If Binance is hacked in orders of magnitude that are several billions or more, that means that the whole cold storage system is compromised and therefore the SAFU fund won't help at all. It is only meant to cover hot wallet losses or limited cold storage compromises.