I'm working on a sort of inverse blockchain protocol and could use some feedback

Here's the full whitepaper, no clicking necessary. What we're trying to do is solve all of the issues preventing Crypto from being a usable currency, I think by flipping things around we can do that. Feedback is appreciated.

THE NOMOS PROTOCOL
A Cybernetic Social Contract for Economic Motion
Whitepaper v1.5 — January 2026
DISCLAIMER
Nomos Protocol is experimental open-source software provided "as is." It makes no representations or warranties of any kind regarding value, security, performance, or regulatory compliance in any jurisdiction. Participation involves significant technical, financial, and legal risk, including total loss of funds. The protocol is not money, a security, an investment contract, or legal tender. Users are solely responsible for determining compliance with all applicable laws. No promises of profit, utility, or adoption are made. Use at your own risk.

1. Executive Summary
Nomos Protocol is a decentralized economic system designed to solve three persistent failures of legacy monetary and blockchain systems:
Wealth stagnation caused by hoarding and passive capital
Computational centralization driven by economies of scale
Social exclusion from access to productive economic participation
Nomos introduces an Economy of Motion, where currency issuance is tied directly to verified human activity, infrastructure contribution, and transaction velocity. The protocol is self-correcting by design, combining algorithmic incentives with mandatory human mitigation at points of irreversible harm. Nomos is not a stablecoin, not a store-of-value maximizer, and not a replacement for sovereign currency.
For most participants, Nomos functions as a decentralized rewards layer on top of ordinary economic activity: users transact normally and receive protocol rewards for contributing to circulation, infrastructure, and verified human activity. Protocol complexity is intentionally confined to the system layer, while the user experience remains simple, voluntary, and non-punitive. Nomos does not impose fees, interest, forced participation, or irreversible automated penalties.

2. Core Economic Engine
2.1 The 3-Way Reward Split
Every verified transaction of value $v_{tx}$ mints a reward R, split equally:
Sender (1/3): Receives a rebate for initiating economic flow
Receiver (1/3): Receives value plus reward for utility creation
Node (1/3): Receives compensation for validation and infrastructure
A “verified transaction” is one validated by the node layer, compliant with protocol rules, and not invalidated by anti-manipulation review, it is publicly viewable and only available to wallets with a valid ZK-Liveness Proof.

1.X Zero-Knowledge Identity (The "No-Data" Standard) Nomos utilizes Recursive ZK-SNARKs to verify unique humanity without creating a central database. The protocol does not store, retain, or ever view user biometric data.
The Proof: The user's device generates a cryptographic "Liveness Proof" (a mathematical hash).
The Verify: The network verifies the hash, not the face.
The Privacy: Once the proof is generated, the biometric data is discarded. The protocol cannot comply with data seizures because it holds no data to seize.

This aligns incentives toward circulation rather than extraction.
2.2 Decimal Scarcity Algorithm
To preserve long-term value, rewards decay as the network grows.
Let:
X = total transaction volume (last 30 days)
Y = circulating supply
N = number of decimal digits in (X + Y)
r_s = 1 / 2^(N-2)
Scarcity increases logarithmically rather than abruptly.
2.3 Elastic Velocity Stimulus
Nomos targets a monthly circulation of the full token supply.
Target velocity: V_T = S
Actual velocity: V_A = X
Velocity coefficient:
C_V = V_T / max(V_A, ε)
Clamped between 0.5 and 2.0 to prevent runaway minting.
The $C_V$ mechanism is subject to systemic guardrails and a 24-hour volatility buffer to ensure stability, the specifications of which are detailed in the Nomos Technical Documentation.
2.4 Complete Minting Formula
$R = v_{tx} \times r_s \times C_V$
Rewards are split equally between sender, receiver, and validating node.
Node Autonomy
Nodes may allocate A% of their rewards to public goods (UBL, reliability pools, etc.).
Tax reduction:
T_r = min(4%, A/2)
Governance tax = 10% − T_r

UNITT (Unique Network-Initiated Transaction Token) is the protocol’s native reward token, created to keep economic activity moving rather than sitting idle. Unlike traditional currencies or fixed-supply cryptocurrencies, UNITT does not exist in advance and is never mined in bulk. It comes into existence only when a real, verified transaction occurs between reputable participants on the network. Each issuance is initially linked to a cryptographic Intent-Signature validated by the Sentinel, ensuring rewards arise from genuine human commerce rather than automated farming. The total supply is not centrally managed or pre-scheduled; it expands or contracts automatically through the Inverse Velocity Engine as economic activity rises or falls. Once released, UNITT is fully fungible, but the system is deliberately designed so value is earned by participating in circulation—initiating trade, providing utility, or maintaining infrastructure—rather than by hoarding or passive accumulation.

UNITT is not a speculative asset, store-of-value token, or gas abstraction; it exists solely to reward verified human economic activity and to keep value in motion within the Nomos Protocol.

2.5 Anti-Manipulation Layer: Resolution, Agency, and Temporal Control
(Replace existing 2.5 header + opening paragraphs)
When a transaction is flagged by the Nomos Sentinel (the protocol’s pattern-recognition layer), the system does not penalize the user or alter the underlying transaction. Instead, any associated mint rewards are placed into Protocol Escrow, while base transaction settlement remains final.
This escrow period is an intentional monetary and integrity control, serving three functions:
Dampening inflationary reflex loops by delaying speculative mint compounding

Neutralizing reward-farming incentives by removing immediate ROI

Ensuring no automated system imposes irreversible economic harm

Escrow applies only to newly minted rewards, never to user-owned balances or transfers.
Flagged users are always granted agency, review options, and due process.

2.5.3 Resolution Pathways (The Entity’s Choice)
(Replace table + surrounding text)
Upon flagging, the user is presented with a Resolution Choice Menu, including non-binding time-to-resolution estimates for each pathway, based on current queue depth and historical throughput.
Pathway
Eligibility
Mechanism
Economic Outcome
Reputation Impact
Voluntary Forfeiture
All users
User acknowledges synthetic or erroneous activity
Escrowed rewards routed to UBL Pool
Neutral — no strike
AI-Assisted Mitigation
First-time or rare offenders (≤2 flags/year)
Sentinel performs holistic historical analysis
Rewards released or reclaimed
Minor “Yellow Flag”; no suspension
Human / Jury Review
Mandatory for repeat offenders; optional otherwise
Case escalated to UBL Verification Pool or Nomos Jury
Consensus-based resolution
Potential full strike or temporary suspension

No pathway constitutes an admission of guilt. Escalation to human review is always permitted.

2.5.4 AI Mitigation Logic (Probabilistic Settlement)For AI-Assisted Mitigation, the Sentinel evaluates intent rather than structure alone, producing a probabilistic settlement outcome.
The AI analyzes an aggregated Intent-Signature, including:
Biometric Stability
Consistency of the wallet’s proof-of-agency over a rolling 180-day window.

Social Connectivity
Whether the transaction graph reflects natural economic clusters (e.g., recurring merchants, family, social peers) versus disposable or synthetic wallet networks.

Entropy Score
Statistical variance in timing, sequencing, and amounts, distinguishing human behavior from optimized automation.

Outcomes
Release: Escrowed rewards are returned

Reclaim: Rewards are routed to the protocol treasury

AI mitigation is explicitly non-punitive and cannot result in permanent exclusion.

2.8 Anti-Manipulation Layer (Operational Summary)

Automated detection mechanisms—including pair-cap thresholds (>10 transactions/day), reciprocal value flows within 45 days, and closed-loop transaction graphs—trigger reward escrow, not transaction reversal.
Flagged rewards are routed to independent, high-reputation third-party reviewers via anonymized “work-captcha” tasks (minimum 3–5 reviewers per case).
Outcomes
Valid: Rewards released

Invalid: Rewards reclaimed to treasury; proportional reputation penalties applied

Appeals escalate to the Nomos Jury under standard mitigation deposit rules.
Temporal escrow functions as both an anti-inflation control and an anti-fraud deterrent, preserving economic finality while maintaining system integrity.
2.9 Designated Transactions Rule

To qualify for mint rewards (R > 0), a transaction must include a designation

A smart contract call to a verified protocol contract, or
A public on-chain description (memo) stating purpose, or
A governance-approved category code (e.g., commerce, UBL task, governance action).
Undesignated transactions are treated as private (full ZK privacy option) and earn no mint reward (R = 0). This ensures rewards are tied to transparent, verifiable utility and further mitigates synthetic velocity and manipulation.

3. Infrastructure Layer — The Hydra Network
3.1 Tiered Scaling
Primary Nodes: Backbone validation, Lex registries
Edge Wallets: Opt-in devices providing compute/storage
3.2 ZK-Sharding & Reliability
Zero-knowledge sharded data storage
Randomized uptime challenges
Bonuses for success; strikes for failure
3 strikes → temporary removal + stake refund

4. Universal Basic Labor (UBL)
UBL provides a non-extractive on-ramp for low-resource participants.
Mechanism
Donors fund proof-of-human tasks
Participants complete verifiable work
Synthetic transaction mints rewards normally
Outcomes
Participants earn tokens + reputation
Nodes validate and earn
Donors receive rebate
UBL tasks are designed to be economically useful or integrity-preserving, not purely extractive or artificial.

5. Governance & Justice
5.1 Protocol Treasury
Funds:
Core development
UBL seeding
Reliability bonuses
Jury marketplace
5.2 Nomos Jury
High-reputation human jurors
Economic deposits deter spam
Verdict redistributes deposits
Truthful consensus rewarded
Justice restores trust rather than imposing punishment.
5.3 Adaptive Governance
Reputation-weighted voting with optional token stake
Quorum + majority + time-lock required
Governance may adjust parameters but not violate constitutional rights
Constitutional constraints are enforced at the contract layer and cannot be overridden by governance vote.

6. The Nomos Constitution
Nomos is governed by an immutable constitutional layer guaranteeing:
Voluntary participation
Right to exit
Property sovereignty
Mandatory human mitigation
Due process
Reputation integrity
Freedom from compelled labor (except where voluntarily elected for reward claiming)

No automated system may impose irreversible harm.

7. Closing Principle
Nomos is not designed to maximize speculation.
It is designed to:
keep value moving,
keep infrastructure distributed,
and keep humans in the loop where it matters.
Users are not required to understand Sentinel logic, mitigation pathways, or monetary tuning parameters to safely participate. For most users, Nomos operates as a simple principle: ordinary transactions generate rewards, subject only to delayed issuance when integrity review is required.
Any mechanism that violates these principles is invalid.

End of Whitepaper