Why you shouldn’t rely too much on AI in betting

[Awaklara]

AI usually thinks like the public. It follows stats, rankings, and odds. Same logic as most casual bettors. It doesn’t really watch games, it doesn’t see momentum or confidence.

Of course, AI provides answers based on available data statistics. What it gives is the most likely outcome, not an accurate prediction. AI will suggest the options favored by most people. I would not try to bet based on AI recommendations. You can look for information about preparations and the latest news regarding those who will compete against AI, but not about match results.

[iBaba]

AI responds based on the data it receives, so the results are guaranteed to be consistent. AI doesn't have confidence, like a feeling of trust. It speaks based on data to make predictions. However, in practice, it's different. Gambling involves unpredictable luck and chance in the game itself. Therefore, correct and incorrect predictions can't be punished because AI only responds based on the data it has.

And relying on AI isn't a good decision, in my opinion. It will create a very dangerous dependency on trust. In the long run, our expertise will accumulate in judging a match.

Maybe use AI to collate some vital information during the cause of my research for the data in the internet such as records of games played in the past, performance of the teams based on their ball possessions and collection of data like that which I can now use to guide my approach towards the gambling decisions I will be taking thereafter but not because it will help me to predict a gambling game.

No AI tool have shown such high level capability of predicting the future outcomes of any game being it a popular one or none popular one and even if they have tried to attempt to do so, you will be following such predictions at your own very risks and I don’t even think you have the right as a forward thinking person to blame the system because the system is not designed to predict games but helps you search for records in the internet and merely tries to make a sense of it through your prompts.

[iv4n]

AI usually thinks like the public. It follows stats, rankings, and odds. Same logic as most casual bettors. It doesn’t really watch games, it doesn’t see momentum or confidence.

Yes, we all know what AI is doing. And depending on the questions, the answer can look like "around ~65-73% probability" for something to happen or not. Gambling/casinos wouldn't exist if favorites always win and underdogs lose... that's why sportsbetting is so tricky, there are always some surprises waiting for us.

No screenshot, but the bet won.

Casino with no betting history?  

[TypoTonic]

I asked AI for a prediction and, as expected, it picked Cîrstea because of ranking and experience. But I didn’t agree.

It's just a tool after all, you asked for a prediction and it gave you one, but it could've been right or wrong just like any other. If Cîrstea had won, would you say that it's prediction was accurate?

I watched Eala’s previous game where she beat a Top 10 player, and she looked confident. So I trusted my own analysis and bet on Eala with high odds (around 5). No screenshot, but the bet won.

Why ask AI in the first place? It cannot tell you exactly what will happen in the future, so I would rather trust my own judgement when it comes to sports betting.

[Eternad]

This made me realize something.

AI usually thinks like the public. It follows stats, rankings, and odds. Same logic as most casual bettors. It doesn’t really watch games, it doesn’t see momentum or confidence.

Anyone else experienced this?

This is obvious result from an AI because it will based his predictions on the stats available which means the higher rated athletes will be the most favorable choice even for a normal bettor who will view the match without bias.

However, due to Eala popularity especially on PH people I believe many wants to bet on him with the underdog bet.

She is not always winning against top players, in fact she lose a lot against players with higher rank so a few upset result will not gonna change the overall view for her when against higher rank.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

AI usually thinks like the public. It follows stats, rankings, and odds. Same logic as most casual bettors. It doesn’t really watch games, it doesn’t see momentum or confidence.

That's why the bookies wins more than bettors do, because they would access the public's sentiments before they give put the game odds and when they see how the sentiment is changing, they will also adjust the odds so that the outcome will favour them. If someone doesn't do their own professional research, they can lose the bet, using AI can also result to lose because it does its prediction by already made article or views from other players.

[dwyane36]

Maybe use AI to collate some vital information during the cause of my research for the data in the internet such as records of games played in the past, performance of the teams based on their ball possessions and collection of data like that which I can now use to guide my approach towards the gambling decisions I will be taking thereafter but not because it will help me to predict a gambling game.

No AI tool have shown such high level capability of predicting the future outcomes of any game being it a popular one or none popular one and even if they have tried to attempt to do so, you will be following such predictions at your own very risks and I don’t even think you have the right as a forward thinking person to blame the system because the system is not designed to predict games but helps you search for records in the internet and merely tries to make a sense of it through your prompts.

Nof1 recently demonstrated that many AI models are unable to accurately predict future market movements. According to their leaderboard, most models traded at a loss. I think the situation would be similar if these AI models were used to place bets on sporting events. So for now, AI can only be called an auxiliary tool that may be useful for those who want to conduct a detailed analysis before placing bets on sporting events.

[robelneo]

AI usually thinks like the public. It follows stats, rankings, and odds. Same logic as most casual bettors. It doesn’t really watch games, it doesn’t see momentum or confidence.

There are many more instances where AI goes wrong in betting because it relies only on what's within its reach, leaving out factors like human interference and motivation.
The game always comes down to who wants it more, and when the underdog is more highly motivated and the favorite is undermining the underdog, the unexpected will surely happen, something that AI cannot grasp.

[Inwestour]

Last night, I bet on the match between Alexandra Eala and Sorana Cîrstea. Cîrstea was the favorite, Eala was the underdog. I asked AI for a prediction and, as expected, it picked Cîrstea because of ranking and experience.

But I didn’t agree.

I watched Eala’s previous game where she beat a Top 10 player, and she looked confident. So I trusted my own analysis and bet on Eala with high odds (around 5). No screenshot, but the bet won.

This made me realize something.

AI usually thinks like the public. It follows stats, rankings, and odds. Same logic as most casual bettors. It doesn’t really watch games, it doesn’t see momentum or confidence.

Anyone else experienced this?

Of course, he will always base his predictions on past statistics. I doubt he even takes into account the teams’ current form, possible injuries, or similar factors. And as for winning when you bet against the favorite, I think that’s quite rare as well. I’ve also tried betting against favorites when I felt it was justified, but in most cases those bets ended up losing for me.

[Dunamisx]

Depending on the use of AI in gambling could not help in wining, those that are concerned should know this already, not that we cant use AI for tips and other vital information, but relying on their result and outcome to bet may be a jeopardy on our own side, because we cant have the accurate result needed from doing such, instead, it is better that we learn on how we could do things all by our own and bring ideas together before betting.

[Questat]

No screenshot, but the bet won.

Casino with no betting history?  

There is a betting history for that, what I meant is I didn’t take a screenshot and share it here bur I actually won that bet.

Now it’s time for Alexandra Eala to play in the quarterfinals against Coco Gauff. I think I’m still rooting for her again. Obviously, AI and most people will say the world number 4 will win. But let’s see. Maybe it’s time to prove AI wrong once again. 

[Dunamisx]

Had it been that the use of AI has been productive to that extent, then probably most of us would have been fully dependent of using it for gambling, but things were not the way people thought they are with the use of AI, these bots can't serve us on every purpose, but I wouldn't blame some because that is how they have the idea of what AI is in a wrong approach, and despite all these they still have nothing to show as an opportunity for a consistent winning while using AI.

[aioc]

AI usually thinks like the public. It follows stats, rankings, and odds. Same logic as most casual bettors. It doesn’t really watch games, it doesn’t see momentum or confidence.

There are so many questions about whether AI can predict results; it can, but not as accurately as we can put money on it. We can use it as part of our options, but never in the final decision.
AI is a data and stat accumulator, but never something you can rely on for help in looking to make gambling a cash cow. So far, no one has cracked the code, and nobody will.

[Questat]

AI usually thinks like the public. It follows stats, rankings, and odds. Same logic as most casual bettors. It doesn’t really watch games, it doesn’t see momentum or confidence.

There are so many questions about whether AI can predict results; it can, but not as accurately as we can put money on it. We can use it as part of our options, but never in the final decision.
AI is a data and stat accumulator, but never something you can rely on for help in looking to make gambling a cash cow. So far, no one has cracked the code, and nobody will.

Prediction is different from just providing data. That’s how I look at it now. AI is good for giving stats and info, but the prediction part is still our job.

If AI could really give accurate picks all the time, betting would be too easy. I’d gladly pay $20 a month for that, and sportsbooks would go bankrupt. Line makers would lose their jobs too. That’s not how this works.

So it’s simple logic. We have to use AI as a tool, not as a shortcut. As bettors, we’re still expected to think and be clever, not just follow blindly.

[Zlantann]

This made me realize something.

AI usually thinks like the public. It follows stats, rankings, and odds. Same logic as most casual bettors. It doesn’t really watch games, it doesn’t see momentum or confidence.

Anyone else experienced this?

When people say that AI will replace humans in some areas, I don't agree with them. These tools will simply gather and analyse information that is available on the Internet to make predictions.

Relying on gambling AI tools without making any input might lead to losses. Gamblers would have to use their initiative to make some decisions. Artificial intelligence tools could assist in predicting games but humans need to make the necessary adjustments. Sports bettors should follow up on games because it will help in making the right predictions.

[pawanjain]

Last night, I bet on the match between Alexandra Eala and Sorana Cîrstea. Cîrstea was the favorite, Eala was the underdog. I asked AI for a prediction and, as expected, it picked Cîrstea because of ranking and experience.

But I didn’t agree.

I watched Eala’s previous game where she beat a Top 10 player, and she looked confident. So I trusted my own analysis and bet on Eala with high odds (around 5). No screenshot, but the bet won.

This made me realize something.

AI usually thinks like the public. It follows stats, rankings, and odds. Same logic as most casual bettors. It doesn’t really watch games, it doesn’t see momentum or confidence.

Anyone else experienced this?

May be that particular AI model didn't have enough data about the recent games.
May be it couldn't analyse Eala's recent performances otherwise it would have predicted the opposite.
AI gives us those responses which are more likely to happen based on statistics and probabilities.

It can be good for predictions but at the same it needs enough data around that subject.
But I also accept the fact that human instincts and gut feeling are no match to any AI models.
Trusting your gut feeling and instincts will make us win in many cases.

[Hewlet]

I watched Eala’s previous game where she beat a Top 10 player, and she looked confident. So I trusted my own analysis and bet on Eala with high odds (around 5). No screenshot, but the bet won.

In terms of this kind of prediction, i would not even say that you won because you did not follow the prediction you got from AI. if while asking AI to give you the possible outcome of the game you gave it enough information that will allow it work based on recent data, it might still make the same prediction you made. one thing we have to understand is that AI works to the degree we are able to make it work. most of the time, it is how good you are with your prompting that determines if you are going to get the best from your usage of an AI. In summary, gambling is a game of luck and neither your prediction or that of an AI can beat that aspect of gambling. wether you decide to do all the prediction on your own or will want to allow an AI help you, your fate is all in the hands of luck.

[CryptSafe]

It is never advisable to rely on AI for betting odds and prediction otherwise, you will regret your time and efforts. AI depends on statistics of past occurrences, data, and other public information about the team and their past performances to give you the possible results, but it can never tell you who would win the game. It worked based on how it was programmed to function and is not really accurate. But you can still use it to do analysis and draw your conclusion based on your experience. Total dependency on AI is never encouraged.

[hedgeh0g]

I watched Eala’s previous game where she beat a Top 10 player, and she looked confident. So I trusted my own analysis and bet on Eala with high odds (around 5). No screenshot, but the bet won.

In terms of this kind of prediction, i would not even say that you won because you did not follow the prediction you got from AI. if while asking AI to give you the possible outcome of the game you gave it enough information that will allow it work based on recent data, it might still make the same prediction you made. one thing we have to understand is that AI works to the degree we are able to make it work. most of the time, it is how good you are with your prompting that determines if you are going to get the best from your usage of an AI. In summary, gambling is a game of luck and neither your prediction or that of an AI can beat that aspect of gambling. wether you decide to do all the prediction on your own or will want to allow an AI help you, your fate is all in the hands of luck.

I think there are those who bet professionally and use AI perfectly to help themselves in analyzing upcoming bets. I'm not at all sure that AI in the hands of amateurs can help, probably even harm, because from not too correct queries, as well as not too correct answers and analysis of this information, everything will turn out to be too sophisticated so that it will simply work out how to apply it. Although amateurs can blindly apply this information and get terrible results, unaware that AI is only hindering them, not helping them.

[YOSHIE]

Anyone else experienced this?

Let's try to think logically, if Al can do everything in betting with 100% accuracy in predictions, analysis and so on, I'm sure many online casinos close every day and they can't afford to pay millions of dollars for their use.

But I have never seen those who bet and gamble using Al win every day and get rich in gambling, on the contrary, it is those who are predicted by Al who lose in the game, This means that even though Al is said to be great and so on, Al's gambling is still not the main way to win.