Privacy almost looking abnormal online.

[Antotena]

I am aware of what that means exactly but if we all in the cryptocurrency ecosystem choose to go by this construct it would be central authority desire erode away every form of privacy we may be receiving from some privacy available platforms. Both the centralized platforms with regulatory pass still do have their cons which serves as risk maybe not what we have with dealing with unregulated platforms but it's always wise to apply due diligence and always lurking on mostly with old standing ones.

Can we really get from centralized system where the government is ruling? Honestly, that will be very hard to overcome if we are been honest. You should know that gambling existed before crypto but crypto made gambling become accessible by many, most people that never experienced gambling through the regular casino become gambler because of crypto existence, this alone will make the government to want to regulate it with kyc because payment is involved.

I can't speak enough about online casino but physical casino are very known with money laundering, if this is bothering the government what do you think they will do since crypto payment seems to be too easy and fast. As long as the government exist, kyc will become normal unless the company chose not comply with regulations and a company that doesn't will definitely not be allow to operate. How many companies will actually agree to this? Of course none. They will prioritize their business more.

[Tungbulu]

Just a brain waving thought for us to reflect on.
For casinos that operates unregulated does that actually makes them illegal casinos (a bad casino to use).

Anything "unregulated" means it is has not been certified by the regulating authorities in charge of such industry. While it may not be bad but the caveat is that they carry a lot of risk for the people who use them - they can be taken advantaged of and therefore and the operators of such casinos can escape without punishment. It is almost like they have no moral code.

Yeah, that's true and some people don't understand that, even when they are being explained to, they still think its a bad idea or decision. If they knew what its going on online and how fraudsters are making sure they make money through deceiving others, people will get to understand that its better for they go for any casino that is being regulated because there is zero protection in it, that means they can lose their money at any time.

[Dunamisx]

For casinos that operates unregulated does that actually makes them illegal casinos (a bad casino to use).

We don't get to use a reliable gambling casino by their regulation, instead user's experience is more important here, then we may also consider their previous performance on past projects, when all these are meant, then we can go further use little amount of money,  for wagering, gambler's appreciates more use of casinos without KYC request.

[Ishicryptic]

Privacy is good but in some cases I think that it is safer to stay with regulations so that your rights will be protected and you wouldn't be easily scammed so as far as onling goes I will choose what I want to exercise my privacy and those that I don't mind filling KYC requirements. Example is when it comes to Bitcoin I like my privacy and freedom but for casinos I wouldn't mind doing KYC requirements to be on the safer side, with a regulated casino atleast they are mandated by law to treat gamblers with fairness. If you have an issue as a gambler with an unregulated casino in your country, your law enforcements cannot do anything to assist you but with a regulated casino you have a better chance that is if you're on your right.

[knuckey]

Casino gambling sites should have proper legal standing, which they can demonstrate to users before registration so we can trust them more when submitting KYC data. In this case, our data and privacy are at stake; we never know whether our data will be leaked or safe on a casino site whose legality is unknown. Unfortunately, gambling is sometimes so tempting that some people are unaware and don't care about their data.

[DrBeer]

Just a brain waving thought for us to reflect on.
For casinos that operates unregulated does that actually makes them illegal casinos (a bad casino to use). Isn't it just one of those socio-economic construct moulded by the centralized authority for usjto believe and generally accepting that once a casino isn't under a regulation through license then it's a red flag and a bad casino.

We can't deny that the primary reason for this formulation is to have every online casino users under KYC, making privacy look abnormal wherever it tries to relatively exist.

The government always has a "trump card up its sleeve"- if a casino doesn't operate according to our rules, isn't properly registered, or doesn't comply with the law, then... if your money is stolen there or you fall victim to any other type of fraud-we won't be able to help you! This casino is beyond our reach; the owners are anonymous, and so are the payments-who can we file a claim against, and who can we take to court or punish? ...
 

[barbara44]

Unregulated can also mean illegal but that is also in the eyes of the regulators of course. Illegal is another word for bad to use (they say) but it may still be risky for those who deal with it, in a way that they can track us and prepare some consequences for doing so.

Though I think there are literal risky unregulated casinos too. So this is why what they say that it is recommended to use a regulated one can make sense sometimes. Shady casinos obviously choose to not comply because they are shady at the first place. Regulation is tied with KYC may be because taxes can come after. After all, that still destroy our privacy indeed even if we are not also planning to do shady stuff like evading the taxes.

[bangjoe]

Casino gambling sites should have proper legal standing, which they can demonstrate to users before registration so we can trust them more when submitting KYC data. In this case, our data and privacy are at stake; we never know whether our data will be leaked or safe on a casino site whose legality is unknown. Unfortunately, gambling is sometimes so tempting that some people are unaware and don't care about their data.

This is a blind spot that a gambler has and even the casino itself, no matter how safe the data stored will never know whether it will leak or not in the future, whether the casino is as big as any casino and has a very good reputation, there is always that potential because if this is not negligence it could be due to an attack that targets them so that their data can leak, which has legal legality can also be exposed to this, let alone those that don't, this can be a concern for gamblers to trust a casino where today KYC is a common obligation when wanting to gamble, so be careful in choosing and sorting out casinos for a place to find your fun, don't let it backfire badly in the future.

[Nwada001]

Privacy on the Internet is going away. I’ve seen some people call for licenses to use the Internet like you have to drive a car. Eventually they want to monitor everyone and everything to make sure you’re obeying the rules. Some people even think it is a good idea. They hate freedom of speech.

Those who think total control is a good idea have been sunk with the idea that the government sells to them that all this is being done for their own protection; the world is turning into the only place you can consider yourself not being watched by the government is when you are in your restroom built by yourself and not even in a public place. Aside from all the KYC bullshit, there are literally some cameras watching while they are supposed to be for other purposes.

[Itz-prisigold]

We don't get to use a reliable gambling casino by their regulation, instead user's experience is more important here, then we may also consider their previous performance on past projects, when all these are meant, then we can go further use little amount of money,  for wagering, gambler's appreciates more use of casinos without KYC request.

You're correct, it's more than a license bad on the home page of the casino. But no matter how organized your platform is, there's still this user experience that can be frustrating with long withdrawal times, crummy account restrictions, and never ending verification requests.

I also agree that a casino's reputation is slowly built based on its attitude towards the players, complaints, pay-out and past projects, and that history says a lot not marketing claims.

It's a great idea to begin playing with a small amount of money when trying out any casino for real. It enables users to see what they are investing more money into, what the games are, and understand the support and withdrawal policies before they do it.

KYC, many gamblers don't like to give away personal and sensitive information to a lot of online gambling sites, I believe they have a sense of privacy. That's not enough to raise their suspicions, however.

[bhadz]

Unregulated doesn't mean that they're already illegal. In the eyes of the law, they are illegal if they are unlicensed but if they are licensed and the government can't regulate them depending on their laws then that doesn't make them one. But let's say that they are unregulated and unlicensed, in the eyes of the law they are illegal but for the users they can't be if they are giving good service and there's plenty of interactions, withdrawals and intervention with how they have handled a lot of issues properly. Depending on the status of the casino, because not all that are licensed and regulated means that they're good and legal because there are those which are legal and regulated yet terrible casinos.

[Russlenat]

Unregulated doesn't mean that they're already illegal.

They are actually illegal because they are not guided by the law.

We may say it is alright to use them because they have a good reputation at first, but we have to remember that they are handling sensitive data, especially if they require KYC. And if they do not require KYC, then there is still one thing the government will look at, and that is the possibility of being used for money laundering.

We cannot really contest that much, because we are living in a world where financial regulators almost follow the same standards. There are rules that businesses need to follow. So either the users can be accused of using it for money laundering, or the casino itself can be questioned. In short, casinos without a license will not last long, because sooner or later, regulators will come after them.

[AmoreJaz]

Privacy on the Internet is going away. I’ve seen some people call for licenses to use the Internet like you have to drive a car. Eventually they want to monitor everyone and everything to make sure you’re obeying the rules. Some people even think it is a good idea. They hate freedom of speech.

Those who think total control is a good idea have been sunk with the idea that the government sells to them that all this is being done for their own protection; the world is turning into the only place you can consider yourself not being watched by the government is when you are in your restroom built by yourself and not even in a public place. Aside from all the KYC bullshit, there are literally some cameras watching while they are supposed to be for other purposes.

Now, it is up to you now how you maintain your privacy over the net. Just limit your exposure and the details you shared over social media. You can't discard the fact that a lot of sophisticated programs are all over the net. So as an individual who wants a lil bit of privacy, you are the one who is responsible to take care of your own business that you do online.

[bhadz]

Unregulated doesn't mean that they're already illegal.

They are actually illegal because they are not guided by the law.

We may say it is alright to use them because they have a good reputation at first, but we have to remember that they are handling sensitive data, especially if they require KYC. And if they do not require KYC, then there is still one thing the government will look at, and that is the possibility of being used for money laundering.

We cannot really contest that much, because we are living in a world where financial regulators almost follow the same standards. There are rules that businesses need to follow. So either the users can be accused of using it for money laundering, or the casino itself can be questioned. In short, casinos without a license will not last long, because sooner or later, regulators will come after them.

That is correct, even if we like these unregulated ones but there's a clear violation of law from them and as a business that has users from specific countries where they want to protect the data of their people and also the activities done on them, we can't really saw much in it. We know it because it's happening in our country and both in crypto exchanges and as well as online crypto casinos are being regulated and those unlicensed ones can't operate here. But it is us, as users, are the ones continue to access these platforms because there are ways to do it. And with that, we only lean to the user-experience and that's why we're choosing them.

[Sonia_123]

Just a brain waving thought for us to reflect on.
For casinos that operates unregulated does that actually makes them illegal casinos (a bad casino to use). Isn't it just one of those socio-economic construct moulded by the centralized authority for usjto believe and generally accepting that once a casino isn't under a regulation through license then it's a red flag and a bad casino.

We can't deny that the primary reason for this formulation is to have every online casino users under KYC, making privacy look abnormal wherever it tries to relatively exist.

If a casino is not regulated then it is better not to use such casino to be on a safe side Incase of any situation how do you get yourself and game secured, those casinos cannot be trusted as it can easily be used by scammers and fraudsters, any gambler that falls into them are bound to be risking themselves since no guaranty of privacy, no KYC involvement which exposes you to danger.

[jossiel]

Casino gambling sites should have proper legal standing, which they can demonstrate to users before registration so we can trust them more when submitting KYC data. In this case, our data and privacy are at stake; we never know whether our data will be leaked or safe on a casino site whose legality is unknown.

Most of them shows the TOS and legal matters before we click on agree but I guess that many of us don't really read that.

As for signing up with a service or a platform, we are subject to their rules and that includes the kyc verification and all other additional stuff that they might ask us with.

Unfortunately, gambling is sometimes so tempting that some people are unaware and don't care about their data.

You said it right and that's because all we want is a good casino that we want to stay with and we'll adhere to their rules.

[Accardo]

Those who think total control is a good idea have been sunk with the idea that the government sells to them that all this is being done for their own protection; the world is turning into the only place you can consider yourself not being watched by the government is when you are in your restroom built by yourself and not even in a public place. Aside from all the KYC bullshit, there are literally some cameras watching while they are supposed to be for other purposes.

Phones have recorders and cameras in it, these two things work for both the Government and the advertisers, multiple times have I noticed that after conversing with a friend about a certain service, I start to see a related ad on that same service pop up on major sites I visit. It never happened ones or twice, the relationship tallied a lot that I had to notice it, sooner, people would begin to go for phones with no internet connections, there are more ok for usage, and protects privacy.

[yhiaali3]

Yes, I agree with you that governments are the ones who cultivate these concepts. For me, if bad casinos mean casinos without KYC, then that would be my favorite. I don't care whether a casino is licensed or not as much as I care whether it requires KYC.

Personally, I prefer to register at an unlicensed casino without KYC over a licensed casino that requires KYC. For me, privacy is more important than licensing and more important than the rest of the features.

[ultrloa]

Yes, I agree with you that governments are the ones who cultivate these concepts. For me, if bad casinos mean casinos without KYC, then that would be my favorite. I don't care whether a casino is licensed or not as much as I care whether it requires KYC.

Personally, I prefer to register at an unlicensed casino without KYC over a licensed casino that requires KYC. For me, privacy is more important than licensing and more important than the rest of the features.

They are not always right and usually they always call the casino as bad or illegal if they didn't have license on their jurisdictions. But if people are familiar with the reputation of the casino especially if they operate here for long time without giving any issue to their gamblers, we can say that those statement release by government is a lie and they have hidden agenda on their negative statements.

Personally if I know the casino is really a reputable one and they have solid reputation also great feedback from the community here. I provably continue to gamble in their casino and will ignore those recommendations also warnings release by the government.

[Localhostspeed]

Now, it is up to you now how you maintain your privacy over the net. Just limit your exposure and the details you shared over social media. You can't discard the fact that a lot of sophisticated programs are all over the net. So as an individual who wants a lil bit of privacy, you are the one who is responsible to take care of your own business that you do online.

If the government make it mandatory for casinos to request for kyc, I don't see it as a big deal. In every difficult situation there are alternatives, we have many non kyc casino that have been on operation for many years, use them and avoid the ones that request for kyc and other information. I don't think kyc is non negotiable in the eyes of the government, just like the centralized exchanges people still use them even though we have the decentralized ones.

People will always make choices whether it's will affect them or not. Msot people that gamble don't even care much about their privacy, they just use what they want and go with their life. Even a kyc casino sometimes can be shady, just because you are kyc and verified doesn't mean you can't be banned. Some people have lose their won bet for false allegations and the casino got away with it despite the fact that they verify the authentication of users.