BitcoinQ.cc. Bitcoin community driven quantum computer.

[bitcoinqtum]

Here is some public Quantum computing company as conference.
QUANTUM STOCKS - A Reality Check 6+ listed quantum companies. Only 2 are really investable.
 $IONQ - 64+ qubits, 99.9% fidelity, aggressive roadmap, defense contracts, huge collection of IP and talent
 $INFQ - 1,600+ qubits, neutral atoms scaling, sensing revenue, defense prime + $NVDA relationships
 $RGTI - 84 noisy qubits, not much revenue, no credible roadmap to scale
 $QBTS - An annealing company cosplaying as gate-based (8 qubits, lol)
 $QUBT - Show me the hardware. Any hardware
 $RAAQ (IQM SPAC announced yesterday) - Going public via SPAC at $1.8B. $RGTI but a couple of years behind. However with the current market sentiment, even $IONQ and $INFQ are going to be volatile from here. This is a long-term play - I'm confident there are some great developments coming in quantum in the next few months, but we'll have to continue to wait and see.

[hopenotlate]

Amongst all the bullshits surrounding this whole thread and the related website this is the one that made me laugh and made my day



 

I have a couple of suggestion, you could also add "if you want a generic answer include "GENERIC ANSWER" in the subject line"  or "DETAILED ANSWER" if you want a detailed one 

Seriously, guys please don't fall for this blatant and cheap scam attempt.

[bitcoinqtum]

No whitepaper
No roadmap
No team doxxing
No GitHub
No multisig escrow details
Inactive socials...........

100 to 500 BTC per year plus 2 M BTC service fee is nothing but a sure fund raise and vanish scheme.

This is not fund rise post.
It's project PR post. Just let community know what we are doing.

[aioc]

No whitepaper
No roadmap
No team doxxing
No GitHub
No multisig escrow details
Inactive socials...........

100 to 500 BTC per year plus 2 M BTC service fee is nothing but a sure fund raise and vanish scheme.

This is not fund rise post.
It's project PR post. Just let community know what we are doing.

Come again, that is not a fundraising post, but you are trying to raise funds for your project, and you have not answered the quoted post because you cannot and have no answer.

Can you please explain the screenshot I'm sharing if you're not doing a fund raising?

[MarryWithBTC]

No whitepaper
No roadmap
No team doxxing
No GitHub
No multisig escrow details
Inactive socials...........

100 to 500 BTC per year plus 2 M BTC service fee is nothing but a sure fund raise and vanish scheme.

Op is just wasting his time in extension to ours. How can a project with;

• No mechanism described
• No governance model
• No token utility
• No economic design
• No incentive structure

be taking seriously.

Another red flag is there statement about owning a token. He said “Doesn’t require a token but there are advantages”. This means that the token has no essential function or it is purely for fund raise.
A good crypto project either needs a token structurally or does not need a token at all.

[bitcoinqtum]

Google just posted: Quantum frontiers may be closer than they appear. google are setting a timeline for post-quantum cryptography migration to 2029.
https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/technology/safety-security/cryptography-migration-timeline/

[aioc]

Google just posted: Quantum frontiers may be closer than they appear. google are setting a timeline for post-quantum cryptography migration to 2029.
https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/technology/safety-security/cryptography-migration-timeline/

Thanks for giving us an update. Does this mean you are using this information to support your project? I don't think that's going to happen.

You are not addressing the concerns and questions about your project, so why would people support you?