Have they provided any other reason aside from not wanting to get audited by a public facility?
Any reason is enough. The community should have been stricter. After all, Tether came to the Cryptocurrency community. And when a company decides to lack transparency in the Cryptocurrency industry, it should end right there for them. Other wise, the community and the industry is prone to gigantic failures. See Cryptocurrency Exchanges using Know Your Customer to steal funds of their customers in the snap of a finger. See Terra. See all the other failures, it is like a plague.
Terra!! $40B wiped after building such a traffic-- making it look 'dependable', and that's what people call trust and reliability. Do they really think since tether has a huge market cap, and it's pegged to the USD, without any proper audit, liquidity in it reserves doesn't matter?
I don't defend Tether here and from your reply, it seems you misunderstood me. I only said that the collapses of Terra and FTX as well as pressure from community in cryptocurrency industry and perhaps regulators were big enough, so that Tether had to change themselves. I don't say their stablecoins are safe now but at least something was improved and looked more transparent, something better.
Here, all of us should work a lot more on splitting them in two strict categories. The worthy and the ones to completely ignore. A leg in our boat, a leg in theirs.. it sounds like something to ignore!
Reasons why I've never considered trying DCA. We've seen too many rug pulls in the past years already, so if one falls a victim due to the
ease, that's on them!